619:
I have. Have you? Because it seams something personal you and Corvus cornix have against my 6 articles up for vote this week. You two seem to back to the articles continuesly to put more and more comments in.. I don't see that in any of your other AfD articles that you two are involved in do you guys
291:
First off that is a lie.. I only nominated those articles by you that I felt merited deletion. And once this blows over I will re-nominated them or I will have someone else nominate them. Some of those articles had no independent sources. One was about a small town in France that nothing notable ever
272:
Seeing how no one has explained to me why a IP address that is created just to vote on these six articles is not fishy.. I mearly asked what was a definition as to what would be considered fishy? But you are right he and others are not dense, just commenting on a subject matter without reading what I
314:
Ah, yes, how could I have been mistaken? You nominated every article I ever created except for one. Just get over it and move on, all right? Like I said before, I didn't nominate every article you ever created, just those genealogical articles which make no claims of notability. And please note that
324:
I was not meaning to dupe anyone. If you bothered to read the articles and my reasoning for nominating them you would see that they merited discussion for deletian. But since you all assumed that I can not see further then my own AfD that it would cloud my judgement as to poorly written and sourced
705:
I think in the interest in full disclosure, myself and other involved editors would appreciate if
Callelinea could either confirm or deny that they are or are related to any of the articles in question. While it is not required, I think it would be in the interest of good faith and intellectual
715:
Daniel if someone as yourself had asked that question at the begining of this process I would of been happy to answer that question.. But during this process I have felt that there has been a lack of good faith and intellectual integrity in the part of a few of the editors. So I will decline to
581:
Has anyone else noticed that the author of this article is the same age (47) as the subject of the article ... plus the article seems to have been written by a genealogist and lo and behold this article is about a genealogist? Amazingly both were born in Cuba and live in Miami, I make again the
147:, I'm baised I created the article. He is mentioned in the book about the AIDS activist Pedro Zamora. Is a well-known geneologist in the Miami area. Very influnicial conections in Florida politics. Is notable and well-known for his work in immigration matters and in geneology.
664:
I take the AfD of any of the articles I created personally. It take away my time to work on new articles or of improving articles. I create articles that usally have something to do with Cuba, Cubans, and Cuban-Americans, something which I know lots about.
334:
Your articles are not at issue here. Mine are.. Yours will get their judgement in the future.. And I only put 5 of your seven articles up for deletion.. The other 2 were fine. You proved notability and they had sources.. But your other five are lacking.
250:
You see nothing fishy about the only reason he gives is not notable, nor do you aee anything fishy that his IP address was created and only used to comment on these six articles for delitions? what would make you think it would be fishy? can you be that
223:
per nom. Generally
Congressional staffers are not inherently notable, and the article does not assert that his involvement in genealogy is anything more than a hobby. (By the way, the anonymous user is entitled to participate in these AfDs under
292:
occured in it.. I do not think they are notable and If brought to discussion I believe it will be proven that they are not notable.. Yes I was blocked, but I feel it was unfairly done. And have told the person that blocked me my reasons for it.
517:
On re-reading this article in the context of the others in the series, I have nasty feeling we have here the author of the series. It is clear that a genealogist is writing these articles about his family ... I bet it is
504:
articles, and del
Portillo was indeed mention in one of the main reference sources I relied on for info. He is a public figure (albeit not a household name), and I believe noteworthy enough to have an article.
273:
have written. Not to worry.. I will be placing all my articles for AfD and then I will not have to go through this process any more. I do feel it being motivated by some reasons that are not being spoken.
230:
Unregistered or new users are welcome to contribute to the discussion, but their recommendations may be discounted, especially if they seem to be made in bad faith (for example, if they misrepresent their
644:
If this really is
Callelinea, I'm not surprised he has taken this personally. Having said that, if it's true, it's unacceptable and downright unethical not to have disclosed that, let alone violating the
315:
the AfD discussions are almost universally supporting my contention. And that ship has sailed, it has already been established by overwhelming consensus that every place in the world is notable.
348:
by nominating all of my articles again, you'll be blocked by another admin. I have nothing further to say on this subject. Keep up the disruptive behavior and you'll just cut your own throat.
496:- While most of the six articles by this author that were AfD nominated should be deleted, I believe the subject of this one is noteworthy enough to keep. I worked extensively on the
282:
It is worth noting that
Callelinea nominated every single article I have created, for deletion. The AfDs were speedy closed and Callelinea was blocked for one hour for disruption.
582:
suggestion that the author and the subject are closely related, good friends or even one and the same person; perhaps this time he will tell us what the facts are? Beware
115:
48:. To Callelinea- Bring the article to deletion review after you find references in your trip to Cuba (but even then, the subject might not have sufficient notability).
397:
So even if everything in the article is true, even though it is sourced with books and articles, the subject is not notable? sorry now I am sure its a witch-hunt.
683:
597:, and how many times will you mention the same thing over.. you already previously stated that. As far as I know the article is up on its merit or lack of them.
173:
Comment: interesting that the only contribution 74.242.184.198 has done is to vote on my six articles up for AfD.. Like I have stated something fishy is going on
88:
83:
380:, nothing demonstrating notability in either genealogy or politics. Accomplishment is not notability, and notability of relatives is not commutative. --
92:
75:
17:
159:, I see a well-sourced geneology, but no notability, in fact some sources don't even show what part of the article they pertain to.
607:
583:
433:
629:
Do you not think that writing articles about yourself, your father and your grandfather creates just a tiny conflict of interest?
741:
36:
720:
710:
693:
669:
653:
633:
624:
614:
601:
589:
573:
561:
549:
535:
526:
509:
488:
476:
464:
452:
440:
418:
401:
388:
352:
339:
329:
319:
309:
296:
286:
277:
267:
255:
241:
209:
179:
163:
151:
139:
126:
57:
237:
appears to be providing legitimate reasons for deletion, I don't see anything "fishy" about their participation.) --
79:
740:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
519:
71:
63:
707:
136:
234:
160:
557:- notability not established; subject may be interesting and a good person but that is not sufficient.
716:
answer your question and allow these articles to be deleted based on what you "editors" feel is fair.
122:
Non-notable former
Congressional aide and current genealogist related to marginally notable people.
238:
646:
532:
415:
385:
349:
316:
283:
264:
206:
123:
345:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
546:
506:
411:
260:
225:
188:
717:
690:
666:
621:
598:
449:
398:
336:
326:
293:
274:
252:
176:
148:
650:
485:
473:
53:
407:
558:
461:
381:
202:
630:
611:
586:
523:
501:
437:
306:
195:
109:
570:
497:
50:
734:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
620:
put so much effort to get rid of an article.. am i mistaken?
436:
series based on personal genealogy rather than notability.
187:
There is a template provided for pointing out apparent
105:
101:
97:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
344:Whatever. I'm sure when you decide to re-violate
744:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
448:, does not meet guidelines for notability ++
682:: This debate has been included in the
569:. I'm not convinced he's that notable.
135:No evidence of notability provided. --
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
608:Knowledge (XXG):Conflict of interest
584:Knowledge (XXG):Conflict of interest
522:who has written the whole series.
24:
484:- Agree per nomination reasons.--
432:, this appears to be part of a
684:list of Cuba-related deletions
1:
531:That is my opinion, as well.
474:-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider)
301:Which, I have told you, are
761:
737:Please do not modify it.
721:19:09, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
711:18:54, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
694:14:50, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
670:18:47, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
654:16:24, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
634:21:43, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
625:21:35, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
615:21:28, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
602:21:25, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
590:21:19, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
574:10:59, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
562:03:45, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
550:02:12, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
536:18:55, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
527:16:59, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
510:16:22, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
489:16:02, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
477:14:33, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
465:14:06, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
453:14:00, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
441:13:43, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
419:16:46, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
402:13:06, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
389:10:01, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
353:04:44, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
340:04:08, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
330:02:10, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
320:22:41, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
310:22:46, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
297:20:42, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
287:18:54, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
278:16:54, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
268:16:44, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
256:13:04, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
242:06:42, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
210:10:12, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
180:04:48, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
164:04:48, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
152:03:33, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
140:23:43, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
127:23:36, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
58:04:07, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
472:- Agree with Rklawton.
189:single-purpose accounts
520:Alonso R. del Portillo
72:Alonso R. del Portillo
64:Alonso R. del Portillo
406:Have you even read
235:User:74.242.184.198
228:, which provides,
708:Daniel J. Leivick
696:
687:
137:Daniel J. Leivick
752:
739:
688:
678:
305:duping anybody.
200:
194:
113:
95:
34:
760:
759:
755:
754:
753:
751:
750:
749:
748:
742:deletion review
735:
460:- non-notable.
198:
192:
86:
70:
67:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
758:
756:
747:
746:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
724:
723:
698:
697:
675:
674:
673:
672:
659:
658:
657:
656:
642:
641:
640:
639:
638:
637:
636:
606:Have you read
576:
564:
552:
545:- non-notable
540:
539:
538:
512:
491:
479:
467:
455:
443:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
392:
391:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
362:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
312:
245:
244:
239:Metropolitan90
217:
216:
215:
214:
213:
212:
167:
166:
161:74.242.184.198
154:
142:
120:
119:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
757:
745:
743:
738:
732:
731:
722:
719:
714:
713:
712:
709:
706:integrity. --
704:
703:
702:
701:
700:
699:
695:
692:
685:
681:
677:
676:
671:
668:
663:
662:
661:
660:
655:
652:
648:
643:
635:
632:
628:
627:
626:
623:
618:
617:
616:
613:
609:
605:
604:
603:
600:
596:
593:
592:
591:
588:
585:
580:
577:
575:
572:
568:
565:
563:
560:
556:
553:
551:
548:
544:
541:
537:
534:
533:Corvus cornix
530:
529:
528:
525:
521:
516:
513:
511:
508:
503:
499:
495:
492:
490:
487:
483:
480:
478:
475:
471:
468:
466:
463:
459:
456:
454:
451:
447:
444:
442:
439:
435:
431:
428:
427:
420:
417:
416:Corvus cornix
413:
409:
405:
404:
403:
400:
396:
395:
394:
393:
390:
387:
383:
379:
376:
375:
354:
351:
350:Corvus cornix
347:
343:
342:
341:
338:
333:
332:
331:
328:
323:
322:
321:
318:
317:Corvus cornix
313:
311:
308:
304:
300:
299:
298:
295:
290:
289:
288:
285:
284:Corvus cornix
281:
280:
279:
276:
271:
270:
269:
266:
265:Corvus cornix
262:
259:
258:
257:
254:
249:
248:
247:
246:
243:
240:
236:
232:
227:
222:
219:
218:
211:
208:
204:
197:
190:
186:
183:
182:
181:
178:
174:
171:
170:
169:
168:
165:
162:
158:
155:
153:
150:
146:
143:
141:
138:
134:
131:
130:
129:
128:
125:
124:Corvus cornix
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
56:
55:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
736:
733:
679:
594:
578:
566:
554:
542:
514:
502:Pedro Zamora
493:
481:
469:
457:
445:
429:
377:
302:
229:
220:
184:
172:
156:
144:
132:
121:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
507:Nightscream
498:Judd Winick
718:Callelinea
691:Callelinea
667:Callelinea
651:Dali-Llama
622:Callelinea
599:Callelinea
486:Dali-Llama
450:Arx Fortis
399:Callelinea
337:Callelinea
327:Callelinea
294:Callelinea
275:Callelinea
253:Callelinea
177:Callelinea
149:Callelinea
325:articles.
231:reasons).
649:rules.--
559:MKoltnow
462:Rklawton
382:Dhartung
346:WP:POINT
203:Dhartung
116:View log
631:Abtract
612:Abtract
595:Comment
587:Abtract
579:Comment
547:docboat
524:Abtract
515:Comment
438:Abtract
307:Circeus
185:Comment
89:protect
84:history
647:vanity
571:Kripto
567:delete
555:Delete
543:delete
482:Delete
470:Delete
458:Delete
446:delete
434:vanity
430:delete
412:WP:BIO
378:Delete
261:WP:NPA
251:dense?
233:Since
226:WP:AFD
221:Delete
157:Delete
133:Delete
93:delete
46:delete
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
680:Note
500:and
494:Keep
410:and
408:WP:N
386:Talk
207:Talk
201:. --
145:Keep
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
689:--
303:not
196:spa
114:– (
686:.
414:?
384:|
263:.
205:|
199:}}
193:{{
191:,
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
54:13
51:Sr
610:?
175:.
118:)
112:)
74:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.