209:
is also a concern (educational courses or degrees are not eligible for an article on
Knowledge (XXG) just because the university or educational institution is notable, the course/degree itself has to be notable and covered by reliable and independent sources). Article consists of 2 references, both
414:
Consensus has been that it takes very strong evidence to justify a separate article on an individual program in a university. What's basically the standard is world-wide fame.This isn't even a doctoral program, and is therefore nowhere at all near that level. It should get a mention but a mention
166:
94:
89:
98:
81:
160:
305:
Agreed that it reads like an ad. However, it seems to be part of a
University program. I see above that this does not make it notable...what does? It can be given a neutral tone if there is sufficient notability.
126:
415:
only in the article on the university but nothing further, so there isn't really anything to merge. and it isn't a useful redirect, nobody would look for it independently of the university.
447:
426:
404:
388:
363:
334:
315:
294:
271:
248:
225:
181:
63:
148:
256:
233:
279:
121:
142:
138:
85:
188:
77:
69:
379:. It does need a serious rewrite. If no one steps up on that front, a redirect to Chalmers University of Technology would be a logical solution.
154:
202:
17:
376:
325:. Reads like a university prospectus. No evidence that the program itself is notable and deserving of a self-standing article. --
466:
40:
198:
206:
462:
359:
36:
58:
174:
344:
384:
311:
212:
290:
267:
244:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
461:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
443:
400:
375:
on the basis of its association with the and the notability of the parent organizatin, the
355:
435:
218:
53:
330:
422:
380:
307:
286:
263:
240:
115:
439:
396:
395:
Notability of parent is not a valid argument as notability is not inherited.
347:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
326:
417:
78:
Applied
Information Technology in Chalmers University of Technology
70:
Applied
Information Technology in Chalmers University of Technology
455:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
197:
Article looks like an advertisement, which is a violaton of
111:
107:
103:
173:
354:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
187:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
469:). No further edits should be made to this page.
257:list of Education-related deletion discussions
234:list of Computing-related deletion discussions
8:
280:list of Schools-related deletion discussions
278:Note: This debate has been included in the
255:Note: This debate has been included in the
232:Note: This debate has been included in the
210:are from the university's official website.
277:
254:
231:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
377:Chalmers University of Technology
1:
486:
316:22:59, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
295:17:30, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
272:17:30, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
249:17:30, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
226:09:23, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
458:Please do not modify it.
64:15:09, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
448:18:54, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
427:01:30, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
405:18:58, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
389:22:39, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
364:01:12, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
335:04:37, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
203:neutral point of view
434:as fatally failing
48:The result was
366:
297:
283:
274:
260:
251:
237:
199:WP:NOTADVERTISING
477:
460:
353:
349:
284:
261:
238:
224:
221:
215:
192:
191:
177:
129:
119:
101:
61:
56:
34:
485:
484:
480:
479:
478:
476:
475:
474:
473:
467:deletion review
456:
342:
219:
213:
211:
134:
125:
92:
76:
73:
59:
54:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
483:
481:
472:
471:
451:
450:
429:
408:
407:
392:
391:
369:
368:
367:
351:
350:
339:
338:
337:
319:
318:
299:
298:
275:
252:
195:
194:
131:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
482:
470:
468:
464:
459:
453:
452:
449:
445:
441:
437:
433:
430:
428:
424:
420:
419:
413:
412:Strong Delete
410:
409:
406:
402:
398:
394:
393:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
371:
370:
365:
361:
357:
352:
348:
346:
341:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
321:
320:
317:
313:
309:
304:
301:
300:
296:
292:
288:
281:
276:
273:
269:
265:
258:
253:
250:
246:
242:
235:
230:
229:
228:
227:
222:
216:
208:
204:
200:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
457:
454:
431:
416:
411:
372:
343:
322:
302:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
49:
47:
31:
28:
356:Ron Ritzman
161:free images
55:‑Scottywong
207:Notability
60:| gossip _
463:talk page
201:. Not in
37:talk page
465:or in a
381:Stormbay
345:Relisted
308:Stormbay
122:View log
39:or in a
303:Comment
287:Frankie
264:Frankie
241:Frankie
167:WP refs
155:scholar
95:protect
90:history
440:Ipsign
436:WP:GNG
432:Delete
397:Ipsign
323:Delete
139:Google
99:delete
50:delete
423:talk
214:jfd34
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
116:views
108:watch
104:links
16:<
444:talk
401:talk
385:talk
373:Keep
360:talk
331:talk
327:DAJF
312:talk
291:talk
268:talk
245:talk
220:talk
175:FENS
149:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
418:DGG
189:TWL
124:•
120:– (
446:)
438:.
425:)
403:)
387:)
362:)
333:)
314:)
293:)
285:—
282:.
270:)
262:—
259:.
247:)
239:—
236:.
205:.
169:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
52:.
442:(
421:(
399:(
383:(
358:(
329:(
310:(
289:(
266:(
243:(
223:)
217:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
118:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.