356:
has avant-punk as a derivative of art-punk. It can't be both the same thing as art-punk and also a derivative of it. The opening definition is also completely unsourced. The real problem here is that art-punk will always mean different things to different people, and there are a real lack of sources to base an article on, so anything more than a brief article pointing people to these different (source-based) areas is going to be problematic. If we could find sources identifying several similar bands consistently as 'art-punk' it may be a different matter. Some of the bands listed are not really any sort of punk rock, e.g. Bloc Party, The
Futureheads, which doesn't help.--
199:. First of all, the previous AfD resulted in keep, so what is the basis for your claim that this has been deleted previously and come back? I see no evidence that it was speedied. Second, what is your actual reason for wanting it deleted? Certainly, it is not a well-written or sourced article, but that is a reason for careful editing, and the placement of cleanup tags, but it is not a valid reason for deletion. Your statement that the term "is rarely used by critics" would seem to indicate that it
333:. Both pages are definitely redundant. What is the problem with the first sentence of the article, by the way? "Art punk is punk rock of an experimental bent, or related to art school or the art world" - isn't that an accurate description? I don't see why art punk can't be kept as an umbrella page for various subgenres, on analogy with
228:
Apparently I voted in the last AfD... and my stance hasn't changed. Reading the opening sentence of the article annoyed the hell out of me, but despite the completely incorrect and badly sourced content, I see no reason to delete the article, Art Punk is real and I found a huge number of mentions it
372:
If nothing else gets decided, it makes no sense for both avant-punk and art punk to be maintained as separate articles. Along these lines, Crass and The Ex are both coming from anarcho-punk backgrounds; it's totally arbitrary to say "Crass is an art punk band, whereas the Ex is an avant-punk band".
355:
The problem with the first sentence is the "(also known as avant-punk)" part which you omitted above, since (i) art-punk has been used to decribe bands such as Crass, while the avant-punk article is about completely different bands, e.g. Sonic Youth, The Ex, Dog Faced
Hermans, and (ii) the infobox
142:
The page has been deleted in the past and it has somehow come back, it is also incongruent to the history of Post-punk and Post-hardcore as Art-punk is considered the same thing, it is a term that is rarely used by critics to describe these kinds of music but IT IS NOT A VALID GENRE. Therefore my
309:
has it's own (sourced) article, and is distinct from art-punk, so the opening statement is immediately suspect. The list of 'styles of art punk' and artists here just looks (with a few exceptions) like OR/POV and is lacking sources. Perhaps the best approach would be to find artists that have
229:
with a simple search. It needs serious work, and at least until alot more content is brought in, I'd support a Merge, though I wouldn't know where, as the Art Music article isn't well structured for taking it, and it'd be semantically wrong to just stick it in the art rock article. -
256:. Yes it might be used by critics but not to refer it as a stand alone genre but to refer to genres like Post-hardcore, Post-punk, Industrial and etc. If you want sources of my claims I will give them to you whenever it is requested.
609:
it. As the article's refs for the Ex show (and as Aryder779 mentions above), both terms are used to describe the same genre/style. I think Art Punk is the better known of the two and Google appears to agree with me.
434:) - no real consistency to suggest this is a genre rather than an inconsistently-used term. Whether avant-garde punk and arty punk are really the same thing is a matter for the merge discussion mentioned above.--
75:
554:
It's more like a redundancy; all punk music is art. But that's not really the issue: the point is that it's a term that is used by the media, albeit broadly and without a strict definition.
135:
406:
here, even if only a redirect (so not really a suitable case for AfD, perhaps, particularly as there is already an active merge proposal on the avant-punk article).
507:
70:
310:
articles linking here with sources for 'art punk' (on the assumption that there's more than just Crass), mention them here and stubbify this article.--
534:
Not well-defined as a genre by reliable sources, and typically used as journalistic shorthand to describe punk bands with "arty" tendencies.
301:(sourced in the Crass article), and I believe it's possible to have a reasonable article here. The article as it stands, however, is full of
17:
402:
1. Google has 215,000 hits for 'art punk', so it's a commonly used term and there are lots of articles linking here, so we need
637:
163:
693:
668:
649:
620:
591:
563:
543:
525:
494:
469:
443:
382:
365:
346:
319:
285:
268:
238:
220:
187:
54:
489:
212:
102:
97:
708:
203:
used by some critics, undercutting your argument that it is not a valid genre. All in all, not a valid nomination. ---
36:
106:
89:
611:
276:
This is exactly the position of the article as it stands - "art punk" is a broad designator for many subgenres.
707:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
49:
205:
175:
151:
539:
520:
432:
234:
147:
or a redirection to Art rock. Please put references that DO REFER art punk as a valid genre, thanks.
418:
643:
559:
461:
378:
342:
281:
260:
155:
248:. Do we have to keep inventing genres here in Knowledge (XXG)? I was previously involved with the
689:
465:
264:
159:
48:. or at least no consensus to delete. Decision whether to merge or not does not require an AfD.
395:. I've done a little digging based on the first 10 pages of Google hits, and here's some facts:
183:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
664:
535:
514:
484:
439:
361:
315:
425:
230:
302:
631:
587:
555:
374:
338:
277:
685:
428:
93:
179:
123:
575:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
478:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
660:
435:
357:
311:
659:
Another punk genre that I know of. The article should be expanded, though. --
603:
334:
306:
582:
414:
409:
2. The following bands have reliable sources describing them as art-punk:
548:
454:
253:
249:
85:
60:
677:
421:
410:
298:
701:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
684:
are. (Can someone explain it to me?) But as I was saying, keep.
297:. 'Art-punk' has been used by critics to describe bands such as
681:
130:
119:
115:
111:
676:. I know of art punk, even though I don't know what
580:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
483:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
711:). No further edits should be made to this page.
630:It seems notable enough to stand as an article.
76:Articles for deletion/Art punk (2nd nomination)
8:
508:list of Music-related deletion discussions
252:article deletion and it has come back as
506:: This debate has been included in the
68:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
67:
24:
526:17:32, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
495:01:56, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
470:01:26, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
444:18:01, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
383:19:52, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
366:17:30, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
347:15:20, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
320:07:30, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
286:15:20, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
269:23:47, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
239:23:07, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
221:19:03, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
188:11:17, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
71:Articles for deletion/Art punk
1:
694:21:16, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
669:16:28, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
650:13:16, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
621:11:14, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
592:08:30, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
564:13:45, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
544:02:44, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
55:20:19, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
728:
373:The terms are synonymous.
704:Please do not modify it.
174:This AfD nomination was
32:Please do not modify it.
166:) 2008/09/21 19:03:32
66:AfDs for this article:
331:merge with avant-punk
178:. It is listed now.
413:(see the article),
207:RepublicanJacobite
44:The result was
594:
528:
511:
497:
168:
154:comment added by
719:
706:
646:
640:
634:
579:
577:
523:
517:
512:
502:
487:
482:
480:
219:
215:
208:
167:
148:
133:
127:
109:
52:
34:
727:
726:
722:
721:
720:
718:
717:
716:
715:
709:deletion review
702:
644:
638:
632:
602:- And redirect
573:
521:
515:
492:
485:
476:
218:
213:
206:
204:
149:
129:
100:
84:
81:
64:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
725:
723:
714:
713:
697:
696:
671:
653:
652:
624:
623:
596:
595:
578:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
552:
529:
499:
498:
490:
481:
473:
459:
458:
449:
448:
447:
446:
407:
397:
396:
389:
388:
387:
386:
385:
369:
368:
350:
349:
323:
322:
305:and nonsense.
291:
290:
289:
288:
258:
257:
242:
241:
223:
214:The'FortyFive'
210:
193:
192:
191:
190:
140:
139:
80:
79:
78:
73:
65:
63:
58:
51:TravellingCari
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
724:
712:
710:
705:
699:
698:
695:
691:
687:
683:
679:
675:
672:
670:
666:
662:
658:
655:
654:
651:
647:
641:
635:
629:
626:
625:
622:
619:
618:
617:
616:
608:
605:
601:
598:
597:
593:
589:
585:
584:
576:
572:
571:
565:
561:
557:
553:
550:
547:
546:
545:
541:
537:
533:
530:
527:
524:
518:
509:
505:
501:
500:
496:
493:
488:
479:
475:
474:
472:
471:
467:
463:
457:
456:
451:
450:
445:
441:
437:
433:
430:
426:
423:
419:
416:
412:
408:
405:
401:
400:
399:
398:
394:
391:
390:
384:
380:
376:
371:
370:
367:
363:
359:
354:
353:
352:
351:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
325:
324:
321:
317:
313:
308:
304:
300:
296:
293:
292:
287:
283:
279:
275:
274:
273:
272:
271:
270:
266:
262:
255:
251:
247:
244:
243:
240:
236:
232:
227:
224:
222:
217:
216:
209:
202:
198:
195:
194:
189:
185:
181:
177:
173:
172:
171:
170:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
146:
145:Strong Delete
137:
132:
125:
121:
117:
113:
108:
104:
99:
95:
91:
87:
83:
82:
77:
74:
72:
69:
62:
59:
57:
56:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
703:
700:
673:
656:
627:
614:
613:
612:
606:
599:
581:
574:
531:
503:
477:
460:
453:Redirect to
452:
403:
392:
330:
326:
294:
259:
245:
225:
211:
200:
196:
150:— Preceding
144:
141:
45:
43:
31:
28:
536:WesleyDodds
516:Fabrictramp
604:Avant-punk
522:talk to me
335:punk metal
307:Avant-punk
231:Jimmi Hugh
176:incomplete
143:vote is a
674:Weak keep
633:rootology
556:Aryder779
415:The Rakes
404:something
375:Aryder779
339:Aryder779
278:Aryder779
686:Tezkag72
549:Oxymoron
462:The-15th
455:Art rock
261:The-15th
254:Art punk
250:Art-punk
164:contribs
156:The-15th
152:unsigned
136:View log
86:Art punk
61:Art punk
393:Comment
295:Comment
246:Comment
197:Comment
180:DumbBOT
103:protect
98:history
678:2 Tone
661:Banime
532:Delete
486:treelo
436:Michig
429:The Ex
422:No Age
358:Michig
312:Michig
131:delete
107:delete
491:radda
411:Crass
329:, or
303:WP:OR
299:Crass
134:) – (
124:views
116:watch
112:links
16:<
690:talk
680:and
665:talk
657:Keep
628:Keep
600:Keep
588:talk
583:Cirt
560:talk
540:talk
504:Note
466:talk
440:talk
379:talk
362:talk
343:talk
327:Keep
316:talk
282:talk
265:talk
235:talk
226:Keep
184:talk
160:talk
120:logs
94:talk
90:edit
46:keep
682:Oi!
615:SIS
513:--
510:.
427:),
420:),
692:)
667:)
648:)
642:)(
607:to
590:)
562:)
542:)
519:|
468:)
442:)
381:)
364:)
345:)
337:.
318:)
284:)
267:)
237:)
201:is
186:)
162:•
122:|
118:|
114:|
110:|
105:|
101:|
96:|
92:|
688:(
663:(
645:T
639:C
636:(
586:(
558:(
551:?
538:(
464:(
438:(
431:(
424:(
417:(
377:(
360:(
341:(
314:(
280:(
263:(
233:(
182:(
158:(
138:)
128:(
126:)
88:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.