356:
prestigious yes but "Highly
Prestigious"? NO. The person is or has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g. a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a Fellow of a major scholarly society for which that is a highly selective honor (e.g. the IEEE) - NO. The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions. - NO. The person holds or has held a named chair appointment or "Distinguished Professor" appointment at a major institution of higher education and research. - NO. The person has held a major highest-level elected or appointed academic post at a major academic institution or major academic society. - NO. The person has made substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity. - NO. The person is or has been an editor-in-chief of a major well-established journal in their subject area. - NO. The person is in a field of literature (e.g writer or poet) or the fine arts (e.g. musician, composer, artist), and meets the standards for notability in that art, such as WP:CREATIVE or WP:MUSIC. - NO.
490:
355:
The person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources. - NO. The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level. - An undergraduate math competition,
899:
level far outdistancing other types of recognition at the undergrad level, for which most people outside the world of mathematics have no appreciation. Moreso, Rubin is one of only a handful of people (seven, actually) to have ever attained 4-time-fellow status. Separately, his "Choosability in
256:
In simple english: 1. Winning a Math competition 4 times does not make someone notable on it's own.... 2. Filing a patent does not make someone notable. 3. Having failed to achieve a seat on the assembly does not make someone notable. 4. Being smart does not make someone notable.
667:
208:
323:
827:
108:
103:
98:
93:
88:
83:
923:- As known and regardless subject,the primary criteria for determining notability of any article must be the existence of references. Here, they do exist! Rirunmot 17:53, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
260:
And since the 80's there has be no activity whatsoever, achievements are notable and in this case I just don't see enough to make it a worthy entry. Clearly a smart guy but not a notable one...
253:
Apologies for raising this a 4th time but I and it appears other just don't see this as notable page for
Knowledge (XXG), much more notable pages have been deleted as far as I can see.
163:
735:
888:
202:
168:
830:. I think he went through the previous nominations and left (biased) comments for anyone who has ever argued this article should be deleted, which clearly violates
78:
892:
558:- Per Jujutacular and GB fan. Also, it's interesting how a new member with no previous contributions appears to know so much about the guidelines.
847:
Ah, that explains it. It did look somewhat familiar, but since 2008 I have learned more about WP and have also become more inclusionist... :-) --
465:"Significant coverage in reliable sources" is the primary criteria for determining notability of any article, regardless of the subject. See the
454:
286:
17:
690:
282:
573:
Appreciate the feedback, but Rubin being a "Mathematician" should have notability requirements fall under the
Academic category .
754:
694:
589:
506:
450:
372:
136:
131:
914:
879:
856:
842:
817:
793:
747:
728:
710:
679:
661:
643:
619:
593:
567:
550:
523:
477:
437:
415:
376:
337:
313:
269:
248:
140:
61:
901:
400 citations alone (GS) – an enormous number for a mathematics paper and arguably enough on its own per the impact clause of
939:
223:
123:
635:, therefore all the arguments made by the nominator are irrelevant. I also strongly suspect sock- or meat-puppetry here.
190:
957:
36:
393:
If an academic/professor meets none of these conditions, they may still be notable, if they meet the conditions of
345:
Jujutacular, I didn't know that press coverage was one of the criteria for academic notability, is this correct?
808:, because this obviously meets GNG (even if WP:PROF is more doubtful). No idea why Euro-Voice canvassed me... --
956:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
57:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
184:
927:
577:
400:
394:
360:
718:- clearly meets GNG. Seems to be ulterior motive to nomination; would suggest someone check the drawers. –
180:
743:
563:
510:
278:
265:
244:
910:
657:
585:
500:
446:
433:
368:
831:
230:
758:
216:
53:
935:
698:
298:
127:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
902:
604:
388:
852:
813:
787:
778:
770:
762:
739:
559:
544:
471:
331:
307:
274:
261:
240:
649:
632:
534:
466:
302:
906:
774:
766:
653:
581:
496:
442:
429:
364:
196:
49:
973:
804:
And a good thing that is, otherwise I would not have seen this and would not have voted
489:
875:
726:
677:
652:"Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention" I see very very little coverage.
521:
608:
931:
706:
836:
637:
613:
409:
119:
67:
157:
848:
809:
782:
539:
301:. If other 'more notable' pages have been deleted, it also doesn't matter, per
871:
719:
670:
514:
405:
significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject
702:
905:#1. Nom already blocked, AfD a waste of time for this one, etc. Thanks,
297:. It doesn't matter that the last major activity was in the 80s, as
828:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Arthur Rubin (2nd nomination)
950:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
611:, a fact stated explicitly in the academic notability criteria.
887:. This is basically the same nonsense that was floated in the
666:
An article in the LA Times specifically regarding the subject
305:. Rubin has received adequate press coverage, therefore keep.
324:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
974:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Notability_(academics)
153:
149:
145:
215:
738:, got my double barrel ready for some duck hunting.
891:, so I'll give the same argument I gave there. The
229:
109:
Articles for deletion/Arthur Rubin (7th nomination)
104:
Articles for deletion/Arthur Rubin (6th nomination)
99:
Articles for deletion/Arthur Rubin (5th nomination)
94:
Articles for deletion/Arthur Rubin (4th nomination)
89:
Articles for deletion/Arthur Rubin (3rd nomination)
84:
Articles for deletion/Arthur Rubin (2nd nomination)
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
960:). No further edits should be made to this page.
391:, the page you're quoting these criteria from:
537:, significant coverage in reliable sources.
8:
318:
322:: This debate has been included in the
966:
603:The fact that someone doesn't pass the
76:
693:. Only confirmation so far by another
689:. Like, obvious. Pointy nomination by
350:The academic criteria are as follows:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
428:, sorry forgot to give my verdict..
648:Hut, specifically how does it pass
74:
79:Articles for deletion/Arthur Rubin
24:
900:graphs" paper seems to have : -->
607:doesn't mean they don't pass the
488:
826:You wanted it deleted in 2008:
1:
467:general notability guidelines
870:- Obvious troll is obvious.
605:academic notability criteria
397:or other notability criteria
915:17:24, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
880:16:25, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
857:16:35, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
843:14:49, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
818:14:37, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
794:14:24, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
748:13:31, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
729:13:28, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
711:13:23, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
680:13:29, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
669:is not a trivial mention. –
662:13:19, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
644:12:38, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
620:12:41, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
609:general notability criteria
594:12:36, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
568:12:28, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
551:12:24, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
524:16:02, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
478:12:26, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
438:12:22, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
416:12:38, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
399:. The primary criterion of
377:12:17, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
338:11:58, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
314:11:58, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
299:notability is not temporary
270:11:02, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
249:10:34, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
62:18:48, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
992:
895:carries a prestige at the
401:Knowledge (XXG):Notability
953:Please do not modify it.
239:No notable achievements
32:Please do not modify it.
73:AfDs for this article:
455:few or no other edits
287:few or no other edits
457:outside this topic.
289:outside this topic.
736:Already opened them
44:The result was
944:
930:comment added by
597:
580:comment added by
458:
380:
363:comment added by
340:
327:
290:
983:
976:
971:
955:
943:
924:
790:
785:
724:
675:
596:
574:
547:
542:
519:
492:
474:
440:
379:
357:
334:
328:
310:
272:
234:
233:
219:
171:
161:
143:
34:
991:
990:
986:
985:
984:
982:
981:
980:
979:
972:
968:
964:
958:deletion review
951:
925:
889:Reid Barton AfD
788:
783:
720:
697:. Quack quack?
671:
575:
545:
540:
515:
472:
358:
332:
308:
176:
167:
134:
118:
115:
113:
71:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
989:
987:
978:
977:
965:
963:
962:
946:
945:
918:
882:
864:
863:
862:
861:
860:
859:
821:
820:
801:
800:
799:
798:
797:
796:
757:is canvassing
732:
731:
713:
684:
683:
682:
664:
625:
624:
623:
622:
571:
570:
553:
528:
527:
526:
513:of this AFD. –
483:
482:
481:
480:
421:
420:
419:
418:
342:
341:
316:
237:
236:
173:
169:AfD statistics
114:
112:
111:
106:
101:
96:
91:
86:
81:
75:
72:
70:
65:
54:Colonel Warden
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
988:
975:
970:
967:
961:
959:
954:
948:
947:
941:
937:
933:
929:
922:
919:
916:
912:
908:
904:
898:
894:
890:
886:
883:
881:
877:
873:
869:
866:
865:
858:
854:
850:
846:
845:
844:
841:
840:
839:
833:
829:
825:
824:
823:
822:
819:
815:
811:
807:
803:
802:
795:
792:
791:
786:
780:
776:
772:
768:
764:
760:
756:
753:
752:
751:
750:
749:
745:
741:
737:
734:
733:
730:
727:
725:
723:
717:
714:
712:
708:
704:
700:
696:
692:
688:
685:
681:
678:
676:
674:
668:
665:
663:
659:
655:
651:
647:
646:
645:
642:
641:
640:
634:
630:
627:
626:
621:
618:
617:
616:
610:
606:
602:
601:
600:
599:
598:
595:
591:
587:
583:
579:
569:
565:
561:
557:
554:
552:
549:
548:
543:
536:
532:
529:
525:
522:
520:
518:
512:
511:the nominator
508:
505:
502:
498:
495:
491:
487:
486:
485:
484:
479:
476:
475:
468:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
456:
452:
448:
444:
439:
435:
431:
427:
417:
414:
413:
412:
406:
402:
398:
396:
395:WP:Notability
390:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
352:
351:
347:
346:
339:
336:
335:
325:
321:
317:
315:
312:
311:
304:
300:
296:
293:
292:
291:
288:
284:
280:
276:
271:
267:
263:
258:
254:
251:
250:
246:
242:
232:
228:
225:
222:
218:
214:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
182:
179:
178:Find sources:
174:
170:
165:
159:
155:
151:
147:
142:
138:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
116:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
80:
77:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
969:
952:
949:
920:
896:
884:
867:
837:
835:
805:
781:
721:
715:
686:
672:
638:
636:
628:
614:
612:
572:
555:
538:
530:
516:
503:
493:
470:
425:
423:
422:
410:
408:
404:
392:
354:
353:
349:
348:
344:
343:
330:
319:
306:
294:
259:
255:
252:
238:
226:
220:
212:
205:
199:
193:
187:
177:
120:Arthur Rubin
68:Arthur Rubin
45:
43:
31:
28:
926:—Preceding
868:Speedy Keep
806:speedy keep
740:Ian.thomson
716:Speedy keep
576:—Preceding
560:Ian.thomson
473:Jujutacular
453:) has made
359:—Preceding
333:Jujutacular
309:Jujutacular
285:) has made
275:B-Objective
262:B-Objective
241:B-Objective
203:free images
46:Speedy Keep
907:Agricola44
832:WP:CANVASS
755:Euro-Voice
695:attack SPA
691:attack SPA
654:Euro-Voice
582:Euro-Voice
509:) is also
497:Euro-Voice
443:Euro-Voice
430:Euro-Voice
365:Euro-Voice
885:Snow Keep
759:SkipSmith
940:contribs
932:Rirunmot
928:unsigned
897:national
590:contribs
578:unsigned
533:- meets
507:contribs
451:contribs
373:contribs
361:unsigned
283:contribs
164:View log
903:WP:PROF
838:Hut 8.5
639:Hut 8.5
631:passes
615:Hut 8.5
411:Hut 8.5
389:WP:PROF
209:WP refs
197:scholar
137:protect
132:history
893:Putnam
849:Crusio
810:Crusio
789:fan ~~
779:Vufors
771:Crusio
763:Bwithh
650:WP:GNG
633:WP:GNG
546:fan ~~
535:WP:GNG
426:Delete
303:WP:WAX
181:Google
141:delete
784:~~ GB
775:BWH76
767:Nsk92
699:DNFTT
541:~~ GB
494:Note:
387:From
224:JSTOR
185:books
158:views
150:watch
146:links
50:WP:SK
16:<
936:talk
921:Keep
911:talk
876:talk
872:Tarc
853:talk
814:talk
777:and
744:talk
722:xeno
707:talk
687:Keep
673:xeno
658:talk
629:Keep
586:talk
564:talk
556:Keep
531:Keep
517:xeno
501:talk
447:talk
434:talk
369:talk
320:Note
295:Keep
279:talk
266:talk
245:talk
217:FENS
191:news
154:logs
128:talk
124:edit
58:talk
52:#2.
48:per
703:Abd
403:is
329:--
231:TWL
166:•
162:– (
942:)
938:•
913:)
878:)
855:)
834:.
816:)
773:,
769:,
765:,
761:,
746:)
709:)
701:--
660:)
592:)
588:•
566:)
469:.
449:•
441:—
436:)
407:.
375:)
371:•
326:.
281:•
273:—
268:)
247:)
211:)
156:|
152:|
148:|
144:|
139:|
135:|
130:|
126:|
60:)
934:(
917:.
909:(
874:(
851:(
812:(
742:(
705:(
656:(
584:(
562:(
504:·
499:(
445:(
432:(
424:*
367:(
277:(
264:(
243:(
235:)
227:·
221:·
213:·
206:·
200:·
194:·
188:·
183:(
175:(
172:)
160:)
122:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.