228:
government changed the law in a way that made many organisations (UNSW included) have to reorganise their corporate structure (and the 2006 discussion was right in the middle of that, hence the keep with the weird name), but that doesn't magically eliminate their notability. You seem to have a bee in your bonnet about student organisations today, but you've bizarrely gone and nominated two of the most (really obviously) well-covered campus organisations in the southern hemisphere. It took me about five minutes to track down plenty of sources, but I'm disinclined to have to go through libraries (yes, we're talking book-detail coverage, not passing-mention-in-newspaper) unless the nominator were to, say, accept a three-day ban as compensation for wasting editors' time. (For context, this editor nominated the Monash
University student union, an organisation with a UC Berkeley-like history that is ridiculously well reported on in all manner of sources, for speedy deletion, which shows the level of diligence that went on beforehand.)
265:
what do I get out of this besides limiting their damage? That's the kind of effort that would mean I would have to drop what I'm currently working on and run to stop someone else vandalising the place, and that's not the kind of situation where I feel very enthusiastic about spending a week in a library fleshing these articles out.
264:
You're talking organisations with long, well-documented public histories and where the best stuff, especially if people are going to be querulous about it, is probably in books (certainly the less recent, more overview-like material). And when someone is willy-nilly nominating notable organisations:
227:
Notability does not decrease over time, and "history and significant membership" is an absolute whopper of an understatement. This is a major and very notable student organisation dating back decades (with significant, high-level mainstream media coverage dating back decades). In 2006, the federal
242:
I note that this editor didn't see to fit to actually add those references to the article, or list them here and explain their relevance. "Notability does not decrease over time" may be true, but it is also true that in the discussion from 2006 no one actually had any real arguments, let alone
168:
198:
This group may have some history and significant membership in the past (well, it was free), but I do not see any in-depth discussion of this outfit to make it notable by our standards, either GNG or CORP. Newspaper
206:
327:
274:
237:
162:
307:
287:
244:
121:
243:
evidence. The Drover's Wife has plenty of passion and plenty of insults, but I wish they had a desire to actually improve these articles. They could look, for instance, at
344:
128:
249:
I appreciate their as-yet unproven diligence, but have to kindly decline their offer of a "three-day ban" (I'm not quite sure what that is, anyway).
258:
94:
89:
209:, ended in "keep" despite a complete lack of discussion of sources, and voters seemed to think that existence automatically meant notability.
98:
81:
17:
183:
150:
247:
and start pruning these lists of student clubs--but perhaps they want
Knowledge (XXG) to function as websites for these clubs.
409:
366:
270:
233:
462:
40:
144:
439:
140:
443:
424:
400:
381:
356:
336:
319:
299:
218:
63:
266:
229:
190:
85:
435:
458:
420:
377:
332:
315:
295:
36:
352:
176:
156:
77:
69:
58:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
457:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
54:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
311:
291:
254:
214:
396:
348:
434:
Notable organisation that will have ongoing social and historical currency in Sydney
391:
Appears notable, and has encyclopedic value. Unclear why nominator wishes to delete.
115:
250:
210:
392:
205:
The article was nominated in 2006, under its old name; that discussion,
451:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
412:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
369:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
207:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/ACN 121 239 674 Limited
111:
107:
103:
245:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject
Schools/Article guidelines
175:
203:
are one thing but don't make an organization notable.
418:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
375:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
189:
328:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
465:). No further edits should be made to this page.
308:list of Education-related deletion discussions
288:list of Australia-related deletion discussions
8:
345:list of Schools-related deletion discussions
343:Note: This debate has been included in the
326:Note: This debate has been included in the
306:Note: This debate has been included in the
286:Note: This debate has been included in the
342:
325:
305:
285:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
401:20:43, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
382:04:42, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
357:14:34, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
337:06:12, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
320:03:44, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
300:03:44, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
275:02:14, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
259:01:52, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
238:22:00, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
219:21:40, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
482:
444:13:21, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
425:05:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
64:07:02, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
454:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
55:(non-admin closure)
78:Arc @ UNSW Limited
70:Arc @ UNSW Limited
427:
384:
359:
339:
322:
302:
267:The Drover's Wife
230:The Drover's Wife
57:
473:
456:
423:
417:
415:
413:
380:
374:
372:
370:
335:
194:
193:
179:
131:
119:
101:
61:
53:
34:
481:
480:
476:
475:
474:
472:
471:
470:
469:
463:deletion review
452:
436:Australian Matt
428:
419:
408:
406:
385:
376:
365:
363:
331:
136:
127:
92:
76:
73:
59:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
479:
477:
468:
467:
447:
446:
416:
405:
404:
403:
373:
362:
361:
360:
340:
323:
303:
282:
281:
280:
279:
278:
277:
197:
196:
133:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
478:
466:
464:
460:
455:
449:
448:
445:
441:
437:
433:
430:
429:
426:
422:
421:North America
414:
411:
402:
398:
394:
390:
387:
386:
383:
379:
378:North America
371:
368:
358:
354:
350:
346:
341:
338:
334:
333:North America
329:
324:
321:
317:
313:
309:
304:
301:
297:
293:
289:
284:
283:
276:
272:
268:
263:
262:
261:
260:
256:
252:
246:
241:
240:
239:
235:
231:
226:
223:
222:
221:
220:
216:
212:
208:
202:
192:
188:
185:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
138:Find sources:
134:
130:
126:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
453:
450:
431:
407:
388:
364:
248:
224:
204:
200:
186:
180:
172:
165:
159:
153:
147:
137:
124:
49:
47:
31:
28:
312:Yngvadottir
292:Yngvadottir
163:free images
349:Necrothesp
459:talk page
37:talk page
461:or in a
410:Relisted
367:Relisted
201:mentions
122:View log
39:or in a
169:WP refs
157:scholar
95:protect
90:history
251:Drmies
211:Drmies
141:Google
99:delete
432:Keep.
393:Aeonx
225:Keep.
184:JSTOR
145:books
129:Stats
116:views
108:watch
104:links
16:<
440:talk
397:talk
389:Keep
353:talk
316:talk
296:talk
271:talk
255:talk
234:talk
215:talk
177:FENS
151:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
60:sst✈
50:keep
191:TWL
120:– (
52:.
442:)
399:)
355:)
347:.
330:.
318:)
310:.
298:)
290:.
273:)
257:)
236:)
217:)
171:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
438:(
395:(
351:(
314:(
294:(
269:(
253:(
232:(
213:(
195:)
187:·
181:·
173:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
143:(
135:(
132:)
125:·
118:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.