436:
than your interest in this content but your vehemance in defending your delete position speaks for itself. If I have time I'll look to variations on her name to find possible sourcing but no, it's not my job to fix the article. Thank you however for your keen interest in discussing the merits of my opinion.
435:
You are mistaken. The closer should add weight to !votes per our guidelines and nothing states I have to prove anything to express my opinions. With such logic the burden would be on you to prove that no sources exist which is illogical and certainly untrue. I feel you're motivated by other issues
550:. This is a small (only 6 churches), fringe (formerly associated with the Klan) denomination and my opinion is that most of the coverage is because the media likes to report on the strange, but my gut feeling isn't relevant here, the fact that coverage is there is relevant.
467:
I am assuming good faith, but, the motivation appears to be to retaliate against me for voting against Drawn in the bilateral articles. He is following my edits and bringing multiples articles to AFD that I have worked on or created.
251:
a bit too small to pull me into the "keep" camp, but I would be perfectly happy with a keep and would ask the closing admin not to count my vote as being on the "delete" side--if this makes sense. :)
233:. I don't see how notability here is achieved by way of a rather passing mention and a couple of obituaries. A list of important church members in the main article would be enough, in my opinion.
533:
Yes the article is brief as is, but like the lesser sovereigns of a notable dynasty, Arlene is noteworthy. There is more to tell about her. Sourcing more is difficult, but we'll find more.
270:
Multiple obituaries about the subject are just a few of the reliable and verifiable sources included in the article that establish her independent notability separate and apart from the
247:
After reading Uncle G's comment (below) and a brief chat with
Alansohn I am more cognizant of the relevance of obituaries. I do feel that 273 words is a bit too brief and the
493:
121:
421:
If you have sources to determine notablity, please provide them, or your !vote should be disregarded. Others have been unable to find them so please share!
88:
83:
473:
328:
is 273 words long, and is directly about this specific person, not a tangential mention in the context of some other subject as you claim it to be.
311:
183:
155:
92:
75:
521:
also establishes the significance/importance of the subject. I also trust the judgment of the creator and primary author of this article.
469:
307:
179:
151:
370:
208:
itself, to show that you have put deletion policy into action, which means looking for sources yourself. Where did you look?
201:
17:
321:
288:
Trivial mentions in obituaries and even one's own obituary are not sufficient to establish notability. Do you have any
197:
613:
593:
576:
559:
542:
525:
508:
477:
452:
430:
416:
378:
337:
315:
301:
283:
260:
242:
217:
187:
173:
159:
141:
57:
79:
164:
The burden is on those saying "Keep" to provide sources. Please provide them or your !vote should be disregarded.
630:
205:
36:
629:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
538:
609:
589:
504:
555:
397:
391:
362:
350:
271:
230:
71:
63:
53:
572:
426:
297:
169:
137:
534:
437:
401:
279:
605:
585:
500:
333:
213:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
551:
256:
238:
49:
568:
422:
366:
293:
165:
133:
320:
Obituaries are rarely, by their very natures, autobiographies. As such, they count as
358:
292:
to support notability and verifiability or should your !vote be disregarded as well?
275:
129:
522:
329:
289:
209:
132:. Only has a couple of extremely trivial mentions in media, mostly in obituaries.
109:
354:
252:
234:
202:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion#Before nominating an article for deletion
623:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
604:
What makes you think that you want to see her any more clearly?
386:. Somewhat boring but notable and source-able to standards.
584:
Seems notable to me. Can't they get a better photograph?
150:
meets every criteria for verifiability and notability. --
116:
105:
101:
97:
517:
The obituaries are enough sourcing. The bit from the
306:
Please, again, AGF and don't threaten commentators. --
494:list of Christianity-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
633:). No further edits should be made to this page.
519:Handbook of Denominations in the United States
178:Please AGF and don't threaten commentators. --
8:
488:
492:: This debate has been included in the
361:, but could and should be mentioned in
198:Knowledge:Guide to deletion#Nomination
567:. There are RS to show notability.
7:
192:Actually, the burden is equally on
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
470:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )
308:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )
180:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )
152:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )
1:
650:
614:22:35, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
594:16:04, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
577:14:21, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
206:Knowledge:Deletion policy
58:00:33, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
626:Please do not modify it.
560:13:53, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
543:17:18, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
526:13:27, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
509:11:53, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
478:19:48, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
453:05:28, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
431:04:48, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
417:04:33, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
379:04:14, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
338:05:02, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
316:03:03, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
302:03:00, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
284:02:57, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
261:19:31, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
243:02:15, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
218:05:02, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
188:03:03, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
174:03:00, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
160:02:10, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
142:02:04, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
398:Donald Justin Wolfram
392:Orland Albert Wolfram
363:Pillar of Fire Church
351:Pillar of Fire Church
272:Pillar of Fire Church
231:Pillar of Fire Church
72:Arlene White Lawrence
64:Arlene White Lawrence
326:Rocky Mountain News
322:independent sources
249:Rocky Mountain News
388:See also noms for:
324:. The one in the
511:
497:
374:
44:The result was
641:
628:
498:
449:
443:
413:
407:
372:
357:. Subject fails
290:reliable sources
119:
113:
95:
34:
649:
648:
644:
643:
642:
640:
639:
638:
637:
631:deletion review
624:
447:
441:
411:
405:
377:
115:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
647:
645:
636:
635:
620:
619:
618:
617:
616:
597:
596:
579:
562:
545:
528:
512:
485:
484:
483:
482:
481:
480:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
395:
389:
387:
381:
369:
347:Merge/redirect
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
318:
265:
264:
263:
227:Merge/redirect
224:
223:
222:
221:
220:
190:
126:
125:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
646:
634:
632:
627:
621:
615:
611:
607:
603:
602:
601:
600:
599:
598:
595:
591:
587:
583:
580:
578:
574:
570:
566:
563:
561:
557:
553:
549:
546:
544:
540:
536:
535:Buz lightning
532:
529:
527:
524:
520:
516:
513:
510:
506:
502:
495:
491:
487:
486:
479:
475:
471:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
454:
451:
450:
444:
434:
433:
432:
428:
424:
420:
419:
418:
415:
414:
408:
399:
393:
385:
382:
380:
376:
375:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
345:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
317:
313:
309:
305:
304:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
286:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
245:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
225:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
189:
185:
181:
177:
176:
175:
171:
167:
163:
162:
161:
157:
153:
149:
146:
145:
144:
143:
139:
135:
131:
123:
118:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
625:
622:
606:Bigdaddy1981
586:Mrs. Wolpoff
581:
564:
547:
530:
518:
514:
501:TexasAndroid
489:
445:
439:
409:
403:
383:
371:
346:
325:
267:
248:
226:
193:
147:
127:
45:
43:
31:
28:
552:Niteshift36
50:Pastor Theo
569:Springnuts
423:Drawn Some
367:Yilloslime
294:Drawn Some
166:Drawn Some
134:Drawn Some
548:Weak keep
276:Alansohn
122:View log
523:GRBerry
330:Uncle G
210:Uncle G
89:protect
84:history
359:WP:BIO
355:Drmies
253:Drmies
235:Drmies
204:, and
196:, per
130:WP:BIO
128:Fails
117:delete
93:delete
120:) – (
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
610:talk
590:talk
582:Keep
573:talk
565:Keep
556:talk
539:talk
531:Keep
515:Keep
505:talk
490:Note
474:talk
440:Banj
427:talk
404:Banj
384:Keep
353:per
334:talk
312:talk
298:talk
280:talk
268:Keep
257:talk
239:talk
214:talk
184:talk
170:talk
156:talk
148:Keep
138:talk
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
46:Keep
499:--
438:--
402:--
394:and
349:to
229:to
194:you
612:)
592:)
575:)
558:)
541:)
507:)
496:.
476:)
468:--
448:oi
429:)
412:oi
400:.
396:*
390:*
365:.
336:)
314:)
300:)
282:)
274:.
259:)
241:)
216:)
200:,
186:)
172:)
158:)
140:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
48:.
608:(
588:(
571:(
554:(
537:(
503:(
472:(
446:b
442:e
425:(
410:b
406:e
373:C
332:(
310:(
296:(
278:(
255:(
237:(
212:(
182:(
168:(
154:(
136:(
124:)
114:(
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.