828:(Tulsa World, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 23 January 2005) Then, ATM records are discovered making and IT TURNS OUT that this was a drug-related murder for the theft a quite small amount of money. Horrible, horrible horrible - but not a hate crime. No Muslims involved. Article could be expanded and improved. It should not be whitewashed as User:Dan Murphy attempted to do yesterday by removing sources and material about the brief but widespread press coverage of the possibility tat this was a hate crime. I have only dipped a toe into the massive caches of stories in news archives because there are only so many hours available. But I am persuaded that this should be kept, and The REASON why it should be kept is that there was massive coverage of this both as a possible hate rime, and as a possible thing that could be used to incite hatred of Muslims, and, because case had become notorious, there was ongoing coverage over the years.
1109:
here, add some of the sources I find if the sourcing looks weak. Sometimes I'm sufficiently captivated by some aspect of the article to go in and really improve it, really try to sort the issues out. other times I just point out that sources and notability exist and move on. More or less leaving the article itself to someone who is familiar with the topic, or interested in it. This case posed special issues because of the tendency of editors not only to delete what was obviously a notable incident, but of the article as it was to make it look like it really was a hate crime, while recent editors have tired to edit out the accusations/early indications that it might have been a hate crime - This, frankly, puzzles me because it seems useful to keep refutation of false accusations of hate crimes on
Knowledge (XXG). If I ever had heard of Spencer before today, I must have found him was entirely forgettable.
1047:.) That is not an accident. The article was started with a political agenda (ongoing effort to make Islam/Muslims look as bad as possible on Knowledge (XXG)) and it continues. This "Gregory" fellow is obviously at Knowledge (XXG) with an unpleasant agenda. It is sadly not surprising that it's being tolerated to this extent. (Adding: Fer chrissake; the original version of the article was 75% about "rumors" that had already been demonstrated to be
824:, UPI Latin America Service, 18 Januray) Prosecutors make unhelpful statements about how it looks like a targeted crime, not a robbery. National and International media coverage as a possible hate crime. At some point it emerges that victims throats were slit and rumors of "Islamist-style beheading" type hate-crime start. Substantial national press coverage of anti-Islam hate-mongering angle with headlines like:
820:
Jersey just as they did back in Egypt; Rumors and fear in Muslim community that
Muslims will be blamed as a group for murder by unknown assailant; Muslims show up at funeral to demonstrate empathy and solidarity with murdered family; Christians shout and shove (throw punches?) to drive Muslims away form funeral; Press coverage increases within region in wake of incident at funeral.(Headlinse like
877:. I feel bad about still asking it to be deleted, but it still is a random crime. There was a brief flurry of rumours about hate crime with random speculation (who knew that "slitting throats" is similar to "Muslim-style beheading"? words fail me). Still, nobody has given any evidence of lasting impact. A flurry of uninformed speculation in proximity to the murder does not pass
797:, the crime being an excuse to talk about Muslims as terrorists. If the article is to stay, those who back it should roll up their sleeves, wikify it, and create distinct sections, separating the actual facts of the case, with the huge load of circumstantial paranoia surrounding the case. As it stands the title should be changed to reflect the content, along the lines of
748:. A handful of the many in-depth explorations of this event and its impact are blue-linked in my comment below. My efforts to improve this article, by bringing sources expolring it's use as propaganda (both accusations of Muslim-on-Christian hate crime, and accusations that incident was used to fuel fear/hatred of Muslims) have been removed from page.
345:: this murder got extensive, intensive coverage at the time, and in the follow-op of the trial. Rumors can make an criminal matter into a matter of national concern, and when they do, the proper thing for Knowledge (XXG) to do is to KEEP. Article needs improvement, I added a bit of copy and a few good sources.
1412:
trivial coverage. Existence is not notability; just because somebody mentions something doesn't make it noteworthy. My television remote is not notable simply because it mentions a well-known TV manufacturer's name on it. This is, in historical context, just another crime and which, frankly, still
1408:- per Serialjoepsycho. Reading the article, it boils down to this: "Family killed in robbery, incorrect assumptions were made as to motivation which caused an isolated issue, story over." There is nothing actually in the article indicating a timeline of "lasting effect." Passing mentions in books
1299:
based arguments that stand up to two minutes scrutiny. This was a storm in the teacup, was debunked, and everyone has since forgot about it. The editor who created it had nothing good in their intention, and has been since blocked for their various sins. Knowledge (XXG) space is practically infinite
1108:
Honestly? I hardly glanced at the original article before I googled to see what sources were out there. it's not worth spending much time on an AFD if it's obvious that there are not sources, or that - as in this case - there are many. So after a quick glance, I search for sources. I do, as I did
819:
Article has been tidied up, sourcing expanded. In addition to being a ghastly murder, this is s complex incident. Sequence is, roughly: Ghastly murder; no obvious suspects or apparent motive; Rumors and panic in urban community of Coptic
Christians that Muslims are starting to murder Christians in
340:
that the killing was a hate crime committed by
Muslims against Coptic Christians made it a national news story. It is useful to have this article here, so that anyone hearing the echo of those old rumors can quickly discover that a garden-variety, low-life, thug was the murderer. But the rationale
515:
If you think vanity publishing (paying someone to publish your book) counts, I don't know what to say. Secondly, the other mentions are simply passing mentions of this being a hate crime in 2005 (which turns out not to be true). Even if this were true, does every hate crime have a
Knowledge (XXG)
480:
My point precisely. (Several: More than two but not many). At least three books describe it as a "hate crime". But reasers of those books who look it up on
Knowledge (XXG) will get the facts. Remember that google book searches are not comprehensive. More like being shown the tip of whatever
1134:
Multiple reliable sources have today been removed, by a pair of extremely tendentious editors. User:Dan Murphy in particular appears to think that
Knowledge (XXG) is some sort of video game that he can "win" by selectively deleting questions about his editing from his talk page, and by deleting
959:
On the contrary, the incident is not a poster child for anything. The NYT article is an in-passing photo in a regional story on NJ crime statistics. It has no mention of any hate crime angle, as expected. All of the other links are in
January 2005, in close proximity to the crime, when there was
570:, 9781610699471. the 3rd (2015) edition lists this as a hate crime. It is no longer regarded as such by the police. I thing it's a good thing for readers to be able to check facts like that against a brief article in Knowledge (XXG), because reference books can be out of date or in error.
714:
725:
711:
450:
by a vanity publisher. The other is just a reference book, which lists purported hate crime incidents, originally published in 2005, with a brief, passing mention. The other one is also a brief mention by a book in 2005 (not sure what that is about, I couldn't figure it out).
903:
I am back at this discussion, however, mostly to point out that User:KingsIndian is inaccurate when he dismiss news coverage of this incident as, "a brief flurry of rumours about hate crime with random speculation". In fact, coverage in major newspapers was extensive and in
792:
173 words of the article's 689, about 25% deal with the crime and conviction. The article, it follows, is not about the murder at all, but about the innuendoes and suspicions re
Muslims at the time, who had nothing to do with it. That is technically therefore a
367:? What lasting impact does this crime have? There are hundreds, if not thousands of murders and robberies each day. That some people jumped to conclusions regarding the hate crime aspects at the time says what exactly? And what do you mean that it is not
910:
Washington Post
Investigators are looking into the possibility that Hossam Armanious, 47, his wife, Amal Garas, 37, and their daughters, Sylvia, 15, and Monica, 8, were slain by a Muslim angered over postings that the father wrote in an Internet chat
766:(Speaking of WP:BLUDGEON, I was wondering when you would come along to offer a reply.) WP:NOTTEMPORARY states: "As such, brief bursts of news coverage may not be sufficient signs of notability, while sustained coverage would be, as described by
173:
603:
Notable incident supported by ample reliable and verifiable sources about the case. The fact that it was widely believed / purported to be a hate crime or terrorism only adds to the enduring notability of the case.
706:, one of the exceptions to WP:GNG. Initial thoughts that was a hate crime were dispelled over the course of the investigation, and it actually did not receive much coverage outside of the NY metro area (i.e. fails
1327:
It was discussed in major national and international newspapers. It was discussed in major media for at least a decade (many sources have been removed form the article during this debate). More to the point,
1336:
does not apply because, as the articles I linked to above show, coverage was not limited to articles "published during or immediately after an event," it included substantive followup and "analysis or
1332:
Reads: "Notability is not temporary; once a topic has been the subject of "significant coverage" in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage." and
52:. The "keep" opinions added since the relist merely assert notability, which is not in doubt, but fail to discuss the additional inclusion requirement that events must have lasting significance (
56:). Discounting these opinions, we arrive at consensus that this is (until now) merely newspaper-type coverage of current events. Can be recreated if new sources indicate lasting significance.
927:
CBS News "Authorities insist a theory that a Muslim angry over Internet postings was responsible for the slaying of an Egyptian Christian family is just one of several under investigation"
335:
1247:. I don't see you editing at AFD very often, but I see BabbaQ here all the time, on a range ot topics, sometimes voting keep and sometimes voting delete. Please try to remember that
702:. It is not uncommon for there to be news reports of a murder, then follow-up about the trial, conviction, sentencing, and appeals. This is routine coverage of a crime and it fails
167:
126:
422:
291:
1086:
I don't believe that you fail to see that the original version of this article resting almost entirely on Spencer's false propaganda has something to do with this article.
311:
273:
99:
94:
1066:. I can see why Dan_Murphy does not like him. I fail to see what this has to do with news coverage of the Araminous murders. with notability. Or with me.
710:). A search of GBooks is not persuasive. One author listed it (tantamount to trivial coverage) as a hate crime in his 2005 book prior to the facts coming out
133:
103:
249:
I do not see any coatracking, just reports in reliable sources of rumours that were apparently rampant at the time. Coverage was extensive, have your read
1295:
article. Much of the objectionable content has been removed. But that does not mean that the article should exist. Nobody has even pretended to give any
86:
991:
As I stated, It is used as the poster child in that article, presumably because it was the 2005 murder readers would remember. (and also a child).
447:
224:
that robbery, not religion was the motive. The event by itself had no lasting impact. The page was one of many created by a now-blocked user
559:
In fact, quite of number of books describe the incident as a hate crime. Published in Dutch and English, by real publishers, these include
1383:
It's a routine news story. An event with no lasting significance. There's nothing really here other depth of coverage. While it may meet
371:? Why is more than half the article discussing the religious angle, with comments from various religious figures, and Daniel Pipes etc.?
188:
155:
918:
17:
1307:
967:
888:
655:
523:
458:
378:
235:
873:), right down to the title (the original was a trashy sensationalist one due to Daniel Pipes): in no small part by the efforts of
929:
I found scores of such stories in archive searches. And an impressive number of stories revisiting this a decade and more later.
905:
842:
In choosing which of the many sources to read and a handful to add to article, I gave preference to ones freely available online.
919:
Philadelphia Inquirer The attack on a Coptic family rekindled feelings of hostility and mistrust between Muslims and Christians.
1413:
seems to be coatracking religion by making a huge deal about it in the lede, when in fact it didn't matter in the slightest.
1371:
1043:
There were 36 murders in Jersey City in 2005. There is only one article on Knowledge (XXG) about any of those murders. (See:
922:
914:
567:
1291:: Just to clarify my position here. I would not have nominated the article as it currently exists, since it is no longer a
149:
1422:
1400:
1375:
1346:
1310:
1283:
1260:
1238:
1212:
1193:
1176:
1144:
1118:
1095:
1075:
1030:
1000:
970:
938:
891:
851:
837:
810:
779:
757:
736:
676:
658:
632:
613:
579:
526:
490:
461:
433:
409:
381:
354:
323:
303:
283:
262:
238:
68:
1153:
770:." This event never passed WP:LASTING, WP:PERSISTENCE, WP:GEOSCOPE, or WP:INDEPTH so WP:NOTTEMPORARY is not relevant. -
1441:
1391:
which is also a notability guideline that points out in the case of an event depth of coverage is not enough in itself.
1248:
40:
1366:
meets notability guidelines given the non-trivial coverage from multiple reliable third party publications. Regards,
145:
90:
1396:
1367:
338:
195:
1329:
745:
221:
82:
74:
1333:
1296:
699:
1063:
1051:
at the time of creation, and leans heavily on the serial fabricator/propagandist Robert Spencer. So it goes.
280:
1437:
1342:
1304:
1256:
1140:
1114:
1071:
1026:
996:
964:
934:
885:
847:
833:
753:
672:
652:
575:
520:
486:
455:
429:
405:
375:
350:
258:
232:
36:
1292:
794:
707:
664:
368:
217:
161:
909:
900:
Long afterwards, this murder was the poster child/selected photo in analysis of New Jersey crime wave.
1392:
1279:
1275:
1091:
1056:
643:
624:
717:
703:
695:
621:
There are ample sources to show this has lasting significance and was not just a small news event. ~
364:
209:
53:
1234:
806:
181:
767:
250:
775:
732:
609:
334:
This was a criminal murder/theft; committed by drug dealers. However, the response and coverage
1388:
878:
691:
205:
1418:
1044:
564:
319:
299:
277:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1436:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1300:
so I don't mind if it stays, but it is a singularly useless article, which nobody will read.
1021:
But note that KingsIndian fails to address my actual argument - extent and depth of coverage.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1338:
1301:
1252:
1208:
1136:
1110:
1067:
1022:
992:
961:
930:
926:
882:
843:
829:
749:
721:
668:
649:
648:
Can you elaborate on what lasting significance this event has, and which sources show this?
571:
517:
482:
452:
425:
401:
396:"lasting impact" is not a requisite, but, rather, an indication of notability. Please read
372:
346:
254:
229:
1384:
397:
342:
1087:
1052:
901:
874:
1244:
1230:
1184:
1167:
802:
59:
771:
728:
605:
1414:
315:
295:
120:
1204:
960:
random speculation. I am still waiting for any demonstration of lasting impact.
225:
563:
3rd Edition, Contemporary World Issues, Donald Altschiller, ABC-CLIO, 2015,
446:
What "several books"? I found only three. One of them is a self-published
822:
Musulmanes y cristianos protagonizan riña en funeral en New Jersey
1430:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1229:
vote on every occasion, with no evidence of a reasoned opinion.
906:
New York Times "A Bloody Crime in New Jersey Divides Egyptians"
861:: It is true that the article has been improved dramatically (
1156:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
799:
Armanious family massacre: the Facts and Ethnic Suspicions
1045:
Knowledge (XXG)'s category on 2005 murders in Jersey City
923:
New York Times Mourners Link Religious Feud to 4 Slayings
915:
New York Times Mourners Link Religious Feud to 4 Slayings
713:
and didn't even bother to update it for his 2015 version.
516:
page? This is precisely why lasting impact is important.
1225:
for this kind of article? All I recall is a predictable
220:
for the larger issue of the Coptics and Muslims. It was
1221:
BabbaQ. Just out of curiosity: have you ever not voted
870:
866:
862:
424:. This crime was notable, it just wasn't a hate crime.
213:
116:
112:
108:
1274:
not a stub, sourced, i dont see any reason to delete.
1203:- notable event, plenty of reliable sources. WP:GNG.--
421:
that the hate crime rumours live on in several books,
180:
1181:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
194:
667:, here you repeat a question I responded to above.
826:Killings rekindle flames of anti-Islam sentiment.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1444:). No further edits should be made to this page.
292:list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions
1135:sources from this article while it is at AFD.
8:
310:Note: This debate has been included in the
290:Note: This debate has been included in the
272:Note: This debate has been included in the
312:list of Events-related deletion discussions
1164:To evaluate changes since the nomination.
309:
289:
274:list of Crime-related deletion discussions
271:
363:What on Earth does this have to do with
337:at the time were extraordinary. Rumors
724:mentioned, the other is self-published.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
690:. Fails the various guidelines of
561:Hate Crimes: A Reference Handbook,
24:
720:coverage, I might reconsider. As
1387:by that alone, it does not meet
1062:Curiosity piqued, I looked up
1:
865:), from when I nominated it (
1423:15:44, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
1401:01:22, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
1376:22:42, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
1347:23:54, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
1311:21:07, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
1284:04:29, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
1261:21:15, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
1239:11:46, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
1213:11:42, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
1194:18:39, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
1177:18:39, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
1145:00:24, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
1119:18:16, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
1096:17:50, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
1076:16:08, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
1031:15:49, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
1001:15:49, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
971:15:29, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
939:15:06, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
892:13:38, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
852:13:11, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
838:12:50, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
780:21:44, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
758:21:34, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
580:16:48, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
69:10:12, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
811:16:12, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
737:16:07, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
677:13:55, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
659:23:59, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
633:22:59, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
614:02:40, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
527:16:06, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
491:14:39, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
481:iceberg you're looking for.
462:03:08, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
434:01:58, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
410:15:13, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
382:02:47, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
355:01:48, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
324:01:36, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
304:01:36, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
284:01:09, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
263:02:00, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
239:00:48, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
1461:
83:Armanious family massacre
75:Armanious family massacre
1433:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
1064:Robert Spencer (author)
768:notability of events
1249:WP:NOTBATTLEGROUND
1162:Relisting comment:
871:diff with original
1393:-Serialjoepsycho-
1196:
1192:
1175:
326:
306:
286:
67:
1452:
1435:
1191:
1189:
1182:
1180:
1174:
1172:
1165:
1159:
1157:
647:
627:
199:
198:
184:
136:
124:
106:
66:
64:
57:
34:
1460:
1459:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1442:deletion review
1431:
1330:WP:NOTTEMPORARY
1243:Inappropriate,
1197:
1185:
1183:
1168:
1166:
1152:
1150:
746:WP:NOTTEMPORARY
644:Editorofthewiki
641:
625:
341:for keeping is
212:. The article (
141:
132:
97:
81:
78:
60:
58:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1458:
1456:
1447:
1446:
1426:
1425:
1403:
1378:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1334:WP:PERSISTENCE
1314:
1313:
1297:WP:PERSISTENCE
1286:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1245:User:Nishidani
1216:
1215:
1179:
1160:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1099:
1098:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
982:
981:
980:
979:
978:
977:
976:
975:
974:
973:
948:
947:
946:
945:
944:
943:
942:
941:
856:
855:
854:
787:
786:
785:
784:
783:
782:
761:
760:
740:
739:
700:WP:PERSISTENCE
684:
683:
682:
681:
680:
679:
636:
635:
616:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
589:
588:
587:
586:
585:
584:
583:
582:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
529:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
493:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
439:
438:
437:
436:
416:
415:
414:
413:
412:
387:
386:
385:
384:
358:
357:
328:
327:
307:
287:
268:
267:
266:
265:
202:
201:
138:
77:
72:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1457:
1445:
1443:
1439:
1434:
1428:
1427:
1424:
1420:
1416:
1411:
1407:
1404:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1390:
1386:
1382:
1379:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1362:
1361:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1335:
1331:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1312:
1309:
1306:
1303:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1287:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1270:
1269:
1262:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1199:
1198:
1195:
1190:
1188:
1178:
1173:
1171:
1163:
1158:
1155:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1133:
1130:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1060:
1058:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1002:
998:
994:
990:
989:
988:
987:
986:
985:
984:
983:
972:
969:
966:
963:
958:
957:
956:
955:
954:
953:
952:
951:
950:
949:
940:
936:
932:
928:
924:
920:
916:
912:
907:
902:
899:
898:
897:
896:
895:
894:
893:
890:
887:
884:
880:
876:
872:
868:
864:
860:
857:
853:
849:
845:
841:
840:
839:
835:
831:
827:
823:
818:
815:
814:
813:
812:
808:
804:
800:
796:
791:
781:
777:
773:
769:
765:
764:
763:
762:
759:
755:
751:
747:
744:
743:
742:
741:
738:
734:
730:
726:
723:
719:
716:If there was
715:
712:
709:
705:
701:
697:
693:
689:
686:
685:
678:
674:
670:
666:
663:KingsIndian,
662:
661:
660:
657:
654:
651:
645:
640:
639:
638:
637:
634:
630:
629:
628:
620:
617:
615:
611:
607:
602:
599:
581:
577:
573:
569:
566:
562:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
546:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
528:
525:
522:
519:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
504:
503:
492:
488:
484:
479:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
463:
460:
457:
454:
449:
445:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
435:
431:
427:
423:
420:
417:
411:
407:
403:
399:
395:
394:
393:
392:
391:
390:
389:
388:
383:
380:
377:
374:
370:
366:
362:
361:
360:
359:
356:
352:
348:
344:
339:
336:
333:
330:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
308:
305:
301:
297:
293:
288:
285:
282:
279:
275:
270:
269:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
245:
244:
243:
242:
241:
240:
237:
234:
231:
227:
223:
219:
216:) is largely
215:
211:
207:
197:
193:
190:
187:
183:
179:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
147:
144:
143:Find sources:
139:
135:
131:
128:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:
76:
73:
71:
70:
65:
63:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1432:
1429:
1409:
1405:
1380:
1363:
1337:discussion."
1288:
1271:
1226:
1222:
1200:
1186:
1169:
1161:
1151:
1131:
1048:
858:
825:
821:
816:
798:
789:
788:
694:, including
687:
623:
622:
618:
600:
560:
418:
331:
278:Everymorning
246:
203:
191:
185:
177:
170:
164:
158:
152:
142:
129:
61:
49:
47:
31:
28:
1368:Yamaguchi先生
1339:E.M.Gregory
1302:Kingsindian
1293:WP:COATRACK
1253:E.M.Gregory
1137:E.M.Gregory
1111:E.M.Gregory
1068:E.M.Gregory
1023:E.M.Gregory
993:E.M.Gregory
962:Kingsindian
931:E.M.Gregory
883:Kingsindian
844:E.M.Gregory
830:E.M.Gregory
795:WP:COATRACK
750:E.M.Gregory
722:Kingsindian
708:WP:GEOSCOPE
669:E.M.Gregory
665:WP:BLUDGEON
650:Kingsindian
572:E.M.Gregory
518:Kingsindian
483:E.M.Gregory
453:Kingsindian
426:E.M.Gregory
402:E.M.Gregory
373:Kingsindian
369:WP:COATRACK
347:E.M.Gregory
255:E.M.Gregory
230:Kingsindian
218:WP:COATRACK
168:free images
1276:Donottroll
1187:Sandstein
1170:Sandstein
1088:Dan Murphy
1053:Dan Murphy
875:Dan Murphy
718:WP:INDEPTH
704:WP:NOTNEWS
696:WP:LASTING
568:1610699475
365:WP:NOTNEWS
222:determined
210:WP:NOTNEWS
62:Sandstein
54:WP:NOTNEWS
1438:talk page
1231:Nishidani
867:permalink
863:permalink
803:Nishidani
419:Note also
316:• Gene93k
296:• Gene93k
251:WP:BEFORE
214:permalink
37:talk page
1440:or in a
1389:WP:EVENT
1154:Relisted
879:WP:EVENT
772:Location
729:Location
692:WP:EVENT
606:Alansohn
206:WP:EVENT
127:View log
39:or in a
1415:MSJapan
1289:Comment
859:Comment
790:Comment
174:WP refs
162:scholar
100:protect
95:history
1406:Delete
1385:WP:GNG
1381:Delete
1205:BabbaQ
904:depth.
688:Delete
398:WP:GNG
343:WP:GNG
281:(talk)
204:Clear
146:Google
104:delete
50:delete
1132:Note'
1049:false
226:CltFn
189:JSTOR
150:books
134:Stats
121:views
113:watch
109:links
16:<
1419:talk
1397:talk
1372:talk
1364:Keep
1343:talk
1280:talk
1272:Keep
1257:talk
1235:talk
1227:Keep
1223:Keep
1209:talk
1201:Keep
1141:talk
1115:talk
1092:talk
1072:talk
1057:talk
1027:talk
997:talk
935:talk
911:room
848:talk
834:talk
817:Note
807:talk
776:talk
754:talk
733:talk
698:and
673:talk
626:EDDY
619:Keep
610:talk
601:Keep
576:talk
565:ISBN
487:talk
448:book
430:talk
406:talk
351:talk
332:Keep
320:talk
300:talk
259:talk
247:Note
208:and
182:FENS
156:news
117:logs
91:talk
87:edit
1410:are
196:TWL
125:– (
1421:)
1399:)
1374:)
1345:)
1282:)
1259:)
1237:)
1211:)
1143:)
1117:)
1094:)
1074:)
1059:)
1029:)
999:)
937:)
925:,
921:,
917:,
913:,
908:,
881:.
869:,
850:)
836:)
809:)
778:)
756:)
735:)
727:-
675:)
631:~
612:)
578:)
489:)
432:)
408:)
353:)
322:)
314:.
302:)
294:.
276:.
261:)
228:.
176:)
119:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
1417:(
1395:(
1370:(
1341:(
1308:♚
1305:♝
1278:(
1255:(
1251:.
1233:(
1207:(
1139:(
1113:(
1090:(
1070:(
1055:(
1025:(
995:(
968:♚
965:♝
933:(
889:♚
886:♝
846:(
832:(
805:(
801:.
774:(
752:(
731:(
671:(
656:♚
653:♝
646::
642:@
608:(
574:(
524:♚
521:♝
485:(
459:♚
456:♝
428:(
404:(
400:.
379:♚
376:♝
349:(
318:(
298:(
257:(
253:.
236:♚
233:♝
200:)
192:·
186:·
178:·
171:·
165:·
159:·
153:·
148:(
140:(
137:)
130:·
123:)
85:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.