751:
subject made notable by the event, the majority of people and media looking or reporting for this event will know it as the bad calls by Arnold Hunter (rather than the Europa League incident), and that it's worth having an article about him because he was made notable by this particular event. That being said, I think there's still verifiable and possibly notable information about the person beyond this particular incident; seeing the sources that some people have mentioned proves at least some level of significance beyond that event. I feel like we're seeing a lot of consensus that this person is notable enough for inclusion, though obviously nom disagrees still.
566:"Subjects notable only for one event" does surely not apply since he has been a FIFA referee for a five-year period. Participants in international football matches are regularly kept at AfD discussions, and the referee is on the field with the 22+ players (including playing substitutes). Vandalism does not preclude notability. The nominator challenging every !vote they disagree with is rather poor form, as well.
672:- the first two results, one of which is mentioned above are coverage of him in general, the first few pages show quite few international media outlets reporting specifically about this referee, not just about recent performances but also in general about his appointments to games at the highest level of club football.
492:
far before the event, so he's been discussed for other events besides this. And it's not particularly relevant that it didn't have an impact on the outcome - there's still significant coverage, regardless of whether it's "justified" in your view. On an unrelated, I recommend you strike out the third
719:
states that blogs are largely unacceptable. Regardless, 99% of the sources that have been brought up here are simply match-ups listing all the officials. That isn't much proof of significance. That's information that needs to be announced because the teams themselves need to know that. No sources
750:
By the way, my opinion is that the incident itself is clearly notable - there's been a lot of commentary in the media about that. So I think it'd be worth a standalone article somewhere. The question is - what's notable? Is it the event, or the person? In this case, I think Arnold Hunter is the
700:
OK, so, the Irish FA source is absolutely fine given the wealth of top level third party sourcing available in addition, so no issue there, it is perfectly useable to derive encyclopedic content. Secondly, you can't just say blog = unreliable, you need to provide evidence to support your claim,
289:
make it that your arguments don't make a valid rationale to keep the article. In fact, you state "keep all or delete all" in your reasoning which means it is not simply a keep !vote. If you want to add those other articles to the nomination, be my guest. Having checked them, I cannot find any
331:
There is no discussion whatsoever. This is just a list of referees appointed for all the matches. Such list are published ahead of every single match in the entire world. That doesn't many that every referee merits a wikipedia article.
207:
Unremarkable person. Notability hasn't been demonstrated with sources and no claim of significance in the article. Moreover edit history shows that page seems to be only used for attempts to defame the person, which is a serious
310:
In case you hadn't noticed, I'm in favor of keeping this kind of articles. Besides, Arnold Hunter is not an unremarkable person. His appointment was even discussed before the
Olympiacos vs Anderlecht game took place.
176:
460:. Just how important is this match even in the history of the sport? What's more is that his "errors" didn't even have an impact on the outcome of the game since Anderlecht won and qualified for the next round
669:
129:
366:
720:
have so far been provide that actually discuss his performances outside of that one Europa League match last thursday, which is currently given undue weight in the article.
170:
369:
433:
602:– Is refereeing at the highest level, BLP1E not relevant here as the sources above are discussing one event that indicates notability not the only event.
136:
686:
I'm not sure what results you're seeing, but I see a profile by his employer (not an independent source) and a blog (not a reliable source).
511:
Giving two links to the exact same source doesn't create multiple sources. And the Irish FA doesn't quite constitute independent coverage.
394:
All from one country dealing with just one match he led. While you think that is enough, according to our notability guidelines it isn't.
363:
17:
102:
97:
539:
312:
650:
418:
because there are multiple independent reliable sources (sources from the same country are almost always considered independent).
106:
89:
191:
158:
855:
816:– After looking closely at the article and the comments above, it is my opinion that this international referee passes
619:- it would be helpful if there were some articles showing that he has received significant coverage sufficient to meet
373:
40:
641:
Just wanted to add on that there's another source (that I don't think was mentioned yet in this AfD) about the first
727:
518:
471:
401:
339:
297:
219:
590:
437:
286:
152:
414:
Can you cite the relevant notability guideline for referees? I actually couldn't find that, so I'm going off
489:
485:
237:
282:
836:
808:
787:
784:
760:
745:
731:
710:
695:
681:
662:
632:
611:
594:
577:
551:
522:
502:
475:
447:
427:
405:
385:
343:
322:
301:
273:
223:
148:
71:
253:
851:
547:
36:
562:– comments in this discussion have shown multiple independent sources covering this individual's work.
493:
sentence in your nomination since it's fairly clear that that has no bearing in a deletion discussion.
232:
A whole bunch of other UEFA/FIFA referees do have their own article, even though only as a stub, e.g.
804:
706:
677:
607:
586:
198:
571:
184:
257:
642:
443:
318:
269:
93:
649:
is significant (I know nothing about sports, but the article makes it sound notable). Here's a
781:
756:
741:
658:
498:
423:
381:
241:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
850:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
54:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
830:
543:
261:
817:
796:
716:
620:
415:
209:
164:
800:
702:
673:
603:
585:– per above comments, especially Cloudz679's argument. Article should be improved though.
249:
563:
457:
432:
As per request, a
Northern Irish source, Irish source and a French source, respectively.
724:
691:
628:
568:
515:
468:
398:
372:. By the way, we shouldn't be basing deletion off of what people use the page for, see
336:
294:
216:
59:
623:. Are there any feature articles in reliable sources that deal with him as a person?
439:
314:
265:
85:
77:
435:
360:
752:
737:
654:
494:
419:
377:
245:
233:
123:
822:
456:
Again, all just about one of many matches he officiated during his career. See
359:—reliable independent sources online, just looking up "Arnold Hunter" reveals
721:
687:
624:
512:
465:
395:
333:
291:
213:
264:, and so on, and so on... Or all should be kept, or all should be deleted.
736:
Did you see the source I listed above by the
Impartial Reporter?
844:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
780:- per sourcing above; article needs improving, not deleting.
290:
evidence that justifies them having a dedicated article.
119:
115:
111:
183:
542:'s list of association football-related deletions.
197:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
858:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
538:Note: This discussion has been included in
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
795:International referee, and passes
24:
645:match that he refereed, which I
1:
612:15:54, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
595:01:41, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
578:01:05, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
552:23:37, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
523:15:53, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
503:03:46, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
476:23:16, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
448:21:37, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
428:19:58, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
406:19:26, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
386:18:36, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
344:23:18, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
323:21:51, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
302:16:19, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
274:14:20, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
224:23:45, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
484:There's also some coverage
875:
670:Let me google that for you
837:21:36, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
809:21:16, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
788:18:17, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
761:21:21, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
746:19:29, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
732:17:48, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
711:09:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
696:08:56, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
682:08:49, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
663:15:46, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
633:08:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
72:19:45, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
847:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
238:Carlos del Cerro Grande
540:WikiProject Football
254:Vadims Direktorenko
55:(non-admin closure)
374:WP:LIKELYVIOLATION
554:
242:Yuriy Mozharovsky
57:
866:
849:
587:Inter&anthro
576:
574:
537:
262:Denis Scherbakov
202:
201:
187:
139:
127:
109:
69:
64:
53:
34:
874:
873:
869:
868:
867:
865:
864:
863:
862:
856:deletion review
845:
572:
567:
287:WP:ALLORNOTHING
250:Tsvetan Krastev
144:
135:
100:
84:
81:
65:
60:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
872:
870:
861:
860:
840:
839:
811:
790:
774:
773:
772:
771:
770:
769:
768:
767:
766:
765:
764:
763:
748:
715:Actually, no.
666:
665:
636:
635:
614:
597:
580:
556:
555:
535:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
506:
505:
479:
478:
451:
450:
430:
409:
408:
389:
388:
353:
352:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
346:
326:
325:
305:
304:
277:
276:
205:
204:
141:
80:
75:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
871:
859:
857:
853:
848:
842:
841:
838:
835:
834:
833:
829:
828:
825:
819:
815:
812:
810:
806:
802:
798:
794:
791:
789:
786:
783:
779:
776:
775:
762:
758:
754:
749:
747:
743:
739:
735:
734:
733:
729:
726:
723:
718:
714:
713:
712:
708:
704:
699:
698:
697:
693:
689:
685:
684:
683:
679:
675:
671:
668:
667:
664:
660:
656:
652:
648:
644:
643:Europa League
640:
639:
638:
637:
634:
630:
626:
622:
618:
615:
613:
609:
605:
601:
598:
596:
592:
588:
584:
581:
579:
575:
570:
565:
561:
558:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
536:
524:
520:
517:
514:
510:
509:
508:
507:
504:
500:
496:
491:
487:
483:
482:
481:
480:
477:
473:
470:
467:
463:
459:
455:
454:
453:
452:
449:
445:
441:
438:
436:
434:
431:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
412:
411:
410:
407:
403:
400:
397:
393:
392:
391:
390:
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
368:
365:
362:
358:
355:
354:
345:
341:
338:
335:
330:
329:
328:
327:
324:
320:
316:
313:
309:
308:
307:
306:
303:
299:
296:
293:
288:
284:
283:WP:OTHERSTUFF
281:
280:
279:
278:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
258:Radek Příhoda
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
228:
227:
226:
225:
221:
218:
215:
211:
200:
196:
193:
190:
186:
182:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
150:
147:
146:Find sources:
142:
138:
134:
131:
125:
121:
117:
113:
108:
104:
99:
95:
91:
87:
86:Arnold Hunter
83:
82:
79:
78:Arnold Hunter
76:
74:
73:
70:
68:
63:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
846:
843:
831:
826:
823:
821:
813:
792:
777:
646:
616:
599:
582:
559:
461:
356:
246:Marius Avram
234:Jakob Kehlet
229:
206:
194:
188:
180:
173:
167:
161:
155:
145:
132:
66:
61:
49:
47:
31:
28:
544:Sir Sputnik
464:decisions.
357:Strong Keep
171:free images
801:Joseph2302
703:Fenix down
674:Fenix down
604:Fenix down
852:talk page
50:Snow Keep
37:talk page
854:or in a
701:please.
440:Karma-AH
315:Karma-AH
266:Karma-AH
130:View log
39:or in a
785:Snowman
753:Appable
738:Appable
655:Appable
617:Comment
495:Appable
462:despite
420:Appable
378:Appable
370:sources
212:issue.
177:WP refs
165:scholar
103:protect
98:history
832:(talk)
818:WP:GNG
797:WP:GNG
717:WP:SPS
621:WP:GNG
416:WP:GNG
149:Google
107:delete
782:Giant
647:think
564:WP:1E
458:WP:1E
192:JSTOR
153:books
137:Stats
124:views
116:watch
112:links
62:Davey
16:<
814:Keep
805:talk
793:Keep
778:Keep
757:talk
742:talk
707:talk
692:talk
688:Hack
678:talk
659:talk
651:link
629:talk
625:Hack
608:talk
600:Keep
591:talk
583:Keep
560:Keep
548:talk
499:talk
490:here
488:and
486:here
444:talk
424:talk
382:talk
319:talk
285:and
270:talk
230:Keep
185:FENS
159:news
120:logs
94:talk
90:edit
67:2010
827:237
824:Qed
573:679
364:lot
210:BLP
199:TWL
128:– (
52:.
820:.
807:)
799:.
759:)
744:)
730:1
709:)
694:)
680:)
661:)
653:.
631:)
610:)
593:)
550:)
521:1
501:)
474:1
446:)
426:)
404:1
384:)
376:.
367:of
342:1
321:)
300:1
272:)
260:,
256:,
252:,
248:,
244:,
236:,
222:1
179:)
122:|
118:|
114:|
110:|
105:|
101:|
96:|
92:|
803:(
755:(
740:(
728:x
725:v
722:T
705:(
690:(
676:(
657:(
627:(
606:(
589:(
569:C
546:(
519:x
516:v
513:T
497:(
472:x
469:v
466:T
442:(
422:(
402:x
399:v
396:T
380:(
361:a
340:x
337:v
334:T
317:(
298:x
295:v
292:T
268:(
240:,
220:x
217:v
214:T
203:)
195:·
189:·
181:·
174:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
151:(
143:(
140:)
133:·
126:)
88:(
58:–
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.