489:"Try and is nonstandard for try to. I will try to (not try and) be better about writing to you." -Diana Hacker, A Pocket Manual of Style, 39. "Takes the infinitive: 'try to mend it,' not 'try and mend it.'...try to is precise, and when you are writing formal prose...write try to." -William Strunk, Jr. and E.B. White, The Elements of Style, Fourth Edition (New York: Allyn & Bacon, 2000), 62. --
589:. "The Astronomicon is a psychic beacon that directs travel through the daemon-filled 'Warp', allowing faster-than-light travel." Put this in the WH40K article or the Imperium article or wherever and delete this. No GFDL concern because, well, I skimmed this and learned nothing, and there's no sourced info to merge anyway. The hope of sourced info for this is vanishingly slim. -
475:
and a factual description of the problem, thus, no further comment was needed other than a "support" comment, and as someone pointed out, my comments are actually *allowed* under the WP:PERNOM page that Le Grand Roi des
Citrouilles pointed to - there was no need for him to try and diminish my comment by adding "Please see WP:PERNOM" to almost every page I commented on.
474:
As others have pointed out, the odds of this (or any of the AfD's I posted to recently, not all of which were
Warhammer related) being sourced properly or legitimately are slim. I've been following the discussions, and cast my votes *when I was ready*. I found the nomination language to be concise
404:
Possible, perhaps, but unlikely as from experience it's usually the per noms that never return to discussions to take into account whether or not the article has improved, sources have been added, etc. Assuming good faith does not stretch to the point of being naive.
314:
If the rationale provided in the nomination includes a comprehensive argument, specific policy references and/or a compelling presentation of evidence in favour of deletion, a simple endorsement of the nominator's argument may be sufficient, typically indicated by "per
757:
as the practical solution for all of them. Preserve the history, in case anyone does actually find sources. Experience shows that doing so for these articles is possible, but slow and difficult, and so far few people here have the determination and patience.
445:
Keep per
Knowledge (XXG):Five pillars (notability to a real-world audience, unoriginal research, consistent with a “specialized encyclopedia” concerning verifiable fictional topics with importance in the real world) and What Knowledge (XXG)
440:
Keep per
Knowledge (XXG):Five pillars (notability to a real-world audience, unoriginal research, consistent with a “specialized encyclopedia” concerning verifiable fictional topics with importance in the real world) and What Knowledge (XXG)
435:
Keep per
Knowledge (XXG):Five pillars (notability to a real-world audience, unoriginal research, consistent with a “specialized encyclopedia” concerning verifiable fictional topics with importance in the real world) and What Knowledge (XXG)
430:
Keep per
Knowledge (XXG):Five pillars (notability to a real-world audience, unoriginal research, consistent with a “specialized encyclopedia” concerning verifiable fictional topics with importance in the real world) and What Knowledge (XXG)
425:
Keep per
Knowledge (XXG):Five pillars (notability to a real-world audience, unoriginal research, consistent with a “specialized encyclopedia” concerning verifiable fictional topics with importance in the real world) and What Knowledge (XXG)
420:
Keep per
Knowledge (XXG):Five pillars (notability to a real-world audience, unoriginal research, consistent with a “specialized encyclopedia” concerning verifiable fictional topics with importance in the real world) and What Knowledge (XXG)
385:
possible to read four articles, check for sources, and read all the posts in four AFDs in 15 hours, then reply to all four in under a minute. You should have brought this up on the editor's talk page first to determine what happened.
185:
505:
The big difference is I also make additional comments throughout the discussions and usually do something to the articles as well. Plus, you can do the same thing with practically all of the deletes here.
356:
Three "per noms" in under a minute at 05:19 and FOUR "per noms" in under a minute at 05:20. Can you read four articles, check for sources, and read all the posts in four AfDs in under a minute? --
215:
and not even significant within the gameplay. You could play 40k for a dozen years and never know about this topic. Not covered in reliable sources independent from the game manufacturers.
565:
255:(notability to a real-world audience, unoriginal research, consistent with a “specialized encyclopedia” concerning verifiable fictional topics with importance in the real world) and
155:
124:
165:
150:
180:
232:. Plot summary and in-universe detail without real-world content. Lack of coverage in reliable sources independent of the subjects indicates the topic is non-notable.
160:
135:
by relying on primary sources. Written in a completely "in universe" style and contains content that is not even relevant to the game as it is played. -- JediLofty
170:
195:. Notability is not established through significant coverage in independent third-party sources. Wholly in-universe repetition of plot information.
175:
720:
669:
604:
464:
17:
733:
686:
640:
509:
492:
408:
359:
297:
262:
256:
91:
86:
95:
78:
787:
36:
252:
786:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
716:
665:
600:
460:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
351:
05:17, 20 August 2008 (hist) (diff) Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Alien
Hunters (Warhammer 40,000) ‎
480:
281:
238:
769:
739:
725:
692:
674:
646:
625:
609:
580:
555:
515:
498:
484:
469:
414:
399:
376:
365:
303:
285:
268:
243:
224:
203:
200:
141:
60:
634:
82:
393:
330:
05:20, 20 August 2008 (hist) (diff) Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Languages of the
Imperium ‎
706:
655:
590:
450:
372:
137:
309:
291:
74:
66:
547:
333:
05:20, 20 August 2008 (hist) (diff) Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/High Lords of Terra ‎
575:
476:
277:
233:
220:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
212:
345:
05:19, 20 August 2008 (hist) (diff) Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Adeptus Custodes ‎
327:
05:20, 20 August 2008 (hist) (diff) Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Schola Progenium ‎
196:
702:
698:
651:
630:
542:
541:
sources independent of the topic. As it stands, article is entirely plot summary and fails
342:
05:19, 20 August 2008 (hist) (diff) Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Adeptus Arbites ‎
321:
622:
388:
538:
348:
05:18, 20 August 2008 (hist) (diff) Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Age of Strife ‎
336:
05:20, 20 August 2008 (hist) (diff) Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Daemonhunters ‎
132:
370:
That's a fair comment. I'd not looked at the user's other contributions. -- JediLofty
339:
05:19, 20 August 2008 (hist) (diff) Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Astronomican ‎
51:
765:
572:
216:
112:
618:
760:
381:
You're right, Le Grand, what you describe is not possible. However, it
654:
is, however, a perfectly valid one. Are you being willfully myopic? -
186:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Alien Hunters (Warhammer 40,000)
537:- no adequate assertion of notability via significant coverage in
780:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
131:
No real world references or assertion of notability. Fails
156:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/High Lords of Terra
444:
439:
434:
429:
424:
419:
119:
108:
104:
100:
166:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Adeptus Custodes
151:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Schola Progenium
566:
list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions
181:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Marneus Calgar
161:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Age of Strife
617:- non-notable cruft with no independent sources --
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
790:). No further edits should be made to this page.
171:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Immaterium
697:So you disagree, which has nothing to do with
8:
176:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Squig
637:are both invalid reasons for deletion. --
564:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
197:Chris Cunningham (not at work)
1:
735:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
688:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
642:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
511:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
494:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
410:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
361:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
299:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
264:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
253:Knowledge (XXG):Five pillars
770:16:51, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
740:00:58, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
732:Happy editing! Sincerely,
726:00:00, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
693:17:56, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
685:Happy editing! Sincerely,
675:17:52, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
647:17:12, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
639:Happy editing! Sincerely,
626:15:31, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
610:11:42, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
581:10:39, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
556:10:27, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
516:17:16, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
508:Happy editing! Sincerely,
499:17:16, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
491:Happy editing! Sincerely,
485:14:48, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
470:11:42, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
415:16:40, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
407:Happy editing! Sincerely,
400:16:44, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
377:18:59, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
366:18:56, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
358:Happy editing! Sincerely,
304:18:42, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
296:Happy editing! Sincerely,
286:05:19, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
269:01:16, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
261:Happy editing! Sincerely,
244:20:41, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
225:17:21, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
204:14:39, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
142:14:25, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
61:17:00, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
807:
449:Hey, I'm just sayin'... -
783:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
679:I'm not persuaded that
257:What Knowledge (XXG) is
652:No independent sources
320:My concern stems from
239:robe and wizard hat
683:sources exist. --
44:The result was
724:
673:
608:
583:
569:
468:
242:
59:
798:
785:
738:
736:
714:
712:
691:
689:
663:
661:
645:
643:
598:
596:
578:
570:
560:
554:
552:
514:
512:
497:
495:
458:
456:
413:
411:
396:
391:
364:
362:
302:
300:
294:. Thanks and --
267:
265:
236:
122:
116:
98:
58:
56:
49:
34:
806:
805:
801:
800:
799:
797:
796:
795:
794:
788:deletion review
781:
734:
731:
708:
701:. Don't misuse
687:
684:
657:
641:
638:
592:
576:
548:
546:
510:
507:
493:
490:
452:
409:
406:
394:
389:
375:
360:
357:
298:
295:
263:
260:
213:plot repetition
140:
118:
89:
73:
70:
52:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
804:
802:
793:
792:
775:
773:
772:
752:
751:
750:
749:
748:
747:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
730:No one is. --
612:
584:
558:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
503:
502:
501:
448:
443:
438:
433:
428:
423:
379:
371:
354:
353:
352:
349:
346:
343:
340:
337:
334:
331:
328:
271:
246:
227:
206:
189:
188:
183:
178:
173:
168:
163:
158:
153:
136:
129:
128:
69:
64:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
803:
791:
789:
784:
778:
777:
776:
771:
767:
763:
762:
756:
753:
741:
737:
729:
728:
727:
722:
718:
713:
711:
704:
700:
696:
695:
694:
690:
682:
678:
677:
676:
671:
667:
662:
660:
653:
650:
649:
648:
644:
636:
632:
629:
628:
627:
624:
620:
616:
613:
611:
606:
602:
597:
595:
588:
585:
582:
579:
574:
567:
563:
559:
557:
553:
551:
550:sephiroth bcr
544:
540:
536:
533:
517:
513:
504:
500:
496:
488:
487:
486:
482:
478:
473:
472:
471:
466:
462:
457:
455:
447:
442:
437:
432:
427:
422:
418:
417:
416:
412:
403:
402:
401:
398:
397:
392:
384:
380:
378:
374:
369:
368:
367:
363:
355:
350:
347:
344:
341:
338:
335:
332:
329:
326:
325:
323:
319:
318:
316:
311:
307:
306:
305:
301:
293:
289:
288:
287:
283:
279:
275:
272:
270:
266:
258:
254:
250:
247:
245:
240:
235:
231:
228:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
207:
205:
202:
198:
194:
191:
190:
187:
184:
182:
179:
177:
174:
172:
169:
167:
164:
162:
159:
157:
154:
152:
149:
148:
147:
144:
143:
139:
134:
126:
121:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
57:
55:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
782:
779:
774:
759:
754:
709:
680:
658:
614:
593:
586:
561:
549:
534:
477:MikeWazowski
453:
387:
382:
313:
290:Please note
278:MikeWazowski
273:
248:
234:Doctorfluffy
229:
208:
192:
145:
130:
75:Astronomican
67:Astronomican
53:
45:
43:
31:
28:
635:WP:ITSCRUFT
543:WP:NOT#PLOT
211:Primarily
146:See also:
54:Sandstein
707:A Man In
656:A Man In
591:A Man In
451:A Man In
310:WP:PERNOM
292:WP:PERNOM
276:per nom.
755:redirect
721:past ops
717:conspire
670:past ops
666:conspire
605:past ops
601:conspire
539:reliable
465:past ops
461:conspire
125:View log
573:the wub
324:, i.e.
217:Protonk
92:protect
87:history
703:WP:ATA
699:WP:ATA
631:WP:JNN
615:Delete
587:Delete
535:Delete
274:Delete
230:Delete
209:Delete
193:Delete
120:delete
96:delete
46:delete
710:Bl♟ck
659:Bl♟ck
594:Bl♟ck
454:Bl♟ck
395:shtak
390:Pagra
315:nom."
308:From
259:. --
133:WP:RS
123:) – (
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
766:talk
705:. -
633:and
577:"?!"
562:Note
481:talk
373:Talk
322:this
282:talk
251:per
249:Keep
221:talk
201:talk
138:Talk
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
761:DGG
623:rex
571:--
568:.
446:is.
441:is.
436:is.
431:is.
426:is.
421:is.
312:: "
768:)
719:|
681:no
668:|
603:|
545:.
506:--
483:)
463:|
405:--
383:is
317:"
284:)
223:)
199:-
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
48:.
764:(
723:)
715:(
672:)
664:(
621:-
619:T
607:)
599:(
479:(
467:)
459:(
280:(
241:)
237:(
219:(
127:)
117:(
115:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.