245:
Explanation – I hadn't read the pornographic actor criteria, but have now. I agree: (a) no major awards won or nominated for, (b) hasn't made a ground breaking contribution, and (c) hasn't featured much in mainstream media. When I added the profile, I thought that inclusion in the adult film
312:
124:
477:
155:
288:
152:
185:
17:
91:
86:
95:
78:
508:
36:
507:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
459:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
362:
266:
223:
358:
320:
181:
492:
467:
442:
422:
395:
366:
349:
324:
300:
278:
255:
235:
214:
189:
167:
144:
60:
452:
296:
210:
163:
140:
227:
391:
383:
334:
274:
198:
132:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
316:
231:
177:
433:
413:
339:
251:
176:. Suitable for a comprehensive adult database, but not notable enough for Knowledge. --
82:
51:
488:
292:
206:
159:
136:
450:
per the source raised by Epbr123, she now satisfies PORNBIO, amongst other things.
387:
284:
270:
112:
405:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
379:
202:
375:
246:
databases and IMDB was enough, however according the these criteria it isn't.
247:
74:
66:
484:
382:, and her Bubba the Love Sponge appearances may be enough to satisfy
501:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
119:
108:
104:
100:
430:Note: Relisted on account of Epbr123's new source.
410:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
313:list of Living people-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
511:). No further edits should be made to this page.
265:Three WP:PORNBIO nominations in a row? remember
357:No independent reliable sources = not notable.
8:
333:, article fails to establish notability per
478:list of Japan-related deletion discussions
476:: This debate has been included in the
291:. I think you'll find my name there. :)
226:'s show; wouldn't that make her notable?
151:Note: This debate has been added to the
311:: This debate has been included in the
7:
283:Ahem... take a look at the list of
24:
289:Knowledge:WikiProject Pornography
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
378:is probably enough to satisfy
131:No evidence of notability per
1:
493:01:40, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
468:20:46, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
443:17:49, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
423:17:49, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
396:17:15, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
367:23:56, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
350:00:44, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
325:00:02, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
301:15:56, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
279:15:29, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
256:15:25, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
236:15:23, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
215:15:01, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
190:14:47, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
168:14:40, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
145:14:39, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
61:14:33, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
528:
197:- No evidence of passing
504:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
153:WikiProject Pornography
222:. She's a regular on
224:Bubba the Love Sponge
44:The result was
495:
481:
441:
425:
421:
348:
327:
156:list of deletions
59:
519:
506:
482:
472:
466:
462:
455:
440:
438:
431:
420:
418:
411:
409:
407:
346:
345:
338:
307:
287:participants in
170:
122:
116:
98:
58:
56:
49:
34:
527:
526:
522:
521:
520:
518:
517:
516:
515:
509:deletion review
502:
465:
460:
453:
451:
434:
432:
414:
412:
403:
343:Esradekan Gibb
341:
340:
150:
118:
89:
73:
70:
52:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
525:
523:
514:
513:
497:
496:
470:
457:
454:coccyx bloccyx
445:
427:
426:
408:
400:
399:
398:
369:
352:
328:
305:
304:
303:
267:WP:NOTCENSORED
259:
258:
241:
239:
238:
217:
192:
171:
129:
128:
69:
64:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
524:
512:
510:
505:
499:
498:
494:
490:
486:
479:
475:
471:
469:
464:
463:
456:
449:
446:
444:
439:
437:
429:
428:
424:
419:
417:
406:
402:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
374:Her coverage
373:
370:
368:
364:
360:
356:
353:
351:
347:
344:
336:
332:
329:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
281:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
261:
260:
257:
253:
249:
244:
243:
242:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
218:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
193:
191:
187:
183:
179:
175:
172:
169:
165:
161:
157:
154:
149:
148:
147:
146:
142:
138:
134:
126:
121:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
57:
55:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
503:
500:
473:
458:
447:
435:
415:
404:
386:criteria 3.
371:
354:
342:
330:
308:
262:
240:
219:
194:
173:
130:
53:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
436:Sandstein
416:Sandstein
384:WP:PORNBIO
359:DescĂclope
335:WP:PORNBIO
317:Erwin85Bot
199:WP:PORNBIO
178:Amwestover
133:WP:PORNBIO
54:Sandstein
75:Asa Akira
67:Asa Akira
461:(toccyx)
293:Tabercil
207:Tatarian
160:Tabercil
137:Tabercil
125:View log
388:Epbr123
271:Ipatrol
263:Comment
186:contrib
92:protect
87:history
355:Delete
331:Delete
285:active
195:Delete
174:Delete
120:delete
96:delete
228:SPNic
123:) – (
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
489:talk
474:Note
448:Keep
392:talk
380:WP:N
376:here
372:Keep
363:talk
321:talk
315:. --
309:Note
297:talk
275:talk
252:talk
248:P3L3
232:talk
220:Keep
211:talk
203:WP:N
182:talk
164:talk
141:talk
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
485:Fg2
480:.
201:or
491:)
394:)
365:)
337:.
323:)
299:)
277:)
269:--
254:)
234:)
213:)
205:.
188:)
166:)
158:.
143:)
135:.
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
48:.
487:(
483:—
390:(
361:(
319:(
295:(
273:(
250:(
230:(
209:(
184:|
180:(
162:(
139:(
127:)
117:(
115:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.