205:. This article, however, makes no use of these sources and I'm not sure there's much here worth saving; if a proper article on this company were created at a later date, I would not object, but what's there now clearly has to go. (for full disclosure, I denied a speedy deletion request on this company, and recommended that an AFD discussion be started instead). --
129:
Unreferenced, not-notable, and appears to be almost attempting to give notoriety to an otherwise unknown group. WP has articles for major viruses, trojans, and rogues, but doesn't need articles for every rogue software group who would be happy to solidify their rep with other wannabe virus writers
198:
and the company actually looks like it (at least at one time) legit; their main product appeared to be a software package that allowed employers or parents to monitor and control their employees and children's internet usage while at work. MSNBC did a bit on them:
148:- Not-notable; seems to be advertising and posturisation for otherwise unimportant. From the internet, it appears that this group offer performance-enhancing software that actually acts as malware. Not the sort of thing Knowledge supports.
122:
166:
194:
but for different reasons than noted. This page looks like the corporate equivalent of a BLP violation or an attack page. I did a
17:
216:
195:
89:
84:
93:
76:
236:
54:
36:
235:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
175:
135:
50:
221:
183:
154:
139:
80:
58:
131:
210:
72:
64:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
203:
149:
206:
110:
200:
229:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
117:
106:
102:
98:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
239:). No further edits should be made to this page.
167:list of Internet-related deletion discussions
8:
161:
165:: This debate has been included in the
202:as did the Raleigh News and Observer:
7:
130:through a WP article of their own.
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
256:
222:16:54, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
184:12:27, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
155:11:16, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
140:04:28, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
59:06:14, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
232:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
196:google news search
44:The result was
219:
213:
186:
170:
247:
234:
217:
211:
178:
171:
120:
114:
96:
34:
255:
254:
250:
249:
248:
246:
245:
244:
243:
237:deletion review
230:
176:
116:
87:
71:
68:
51:LinguistAtLarge
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
253:
251:
242:
241:
225:
224:
188:
187:
158:
157:
127:
126:
67:
62:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
252:
240:
238:
233:
227:
226:
223:
220:
214:
208:
204:
201:
197:
193:
190:
189:
185:
182:
181:
179:
168:
164:
160:
159:
156:
153:
152:
147:
144:
143:
142:
141:
137:
133:
124:
119:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
56:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
231:
228:
191:
174:
173:
162:
150:
145:
128:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
73:Ascentive
65:Ascentive
218:contribs
207:Jayron32
151:Greggers
123:View log
132:JCutter
90:protect
85:history
192:Delete
146:Delete
118:delete
94:delete
46:delete
121:) – (
111:views
103:watch
99:links
16:<
212:talk
163:Note
136:talk
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
55:Talk
172:--
48:. —
169:.
138:)
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
53:•
215:.
209:.
180:'
177:I
134:(
125:)
115:(
113:)
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.