Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Ashley Juggs (2nd nomination) - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

264:
video appearances, multiple magazine appearances... This is not "my neighbor's kid" we're talking about. It would be to Knowledge (XXG)'s advantage to have the best biography available on subjects just like this. The "Notability" requirements are abused when they are used to delete articles on a minor celebrities, rather than to keep out vanity pages.
233:: "A person is notable if he or she has been the subject of secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject." Three such sources are given in the article. And further, "Entertainers... Notability can be determined by: Multiple features in credible magazines and newspapers" Her 263:
has been around since 1992, and it's not a 'credible magazine' in the porn, and particularly big-bust genre? It's often pointed out that the Notability requirements are there to keep out vanity pages, and articles on "my neighbor's kid." Well, this article has multiple sourcing, and shows multiple
246:
The Danni.com profile is not 'independent of the subject' as Ashley Juggs models for that website. The Rotten Tomatoes filmography is as invalid as an IMDb filmography as a criteria for notability. I doubt that
314:
so we're going to change rules and renominate.... ahh yes the old "I'll keep listing shit on AFD til I get my way" argument. Validly kept last time... nothing of significance has changed.
110: 121:. Survived last deletion nomination because there was a pornographic movie named after her. This is no longer a criteria for notability. 17: 277:
magazine. She should only be kept if it can be shown she is one of the top models in the big-bust genre. I think you've made your
83: 78: 337: 328: 298: 285: 268: 255: 241: 221: 195: 178: 166: 125: 87: 52: 273:
Appearing in a porn mag a couple of times doesn't establish notability. Probably around a thousand models have appeared in
70: 354: 36: 353:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
294:. People are bound to disagree with you at times; there's no reason to assume they do it in bad faith. -- 175: 74: 217: 206: 184: 136: 118: 66: 58: 49: 291: 278: 322: 295: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
164: 146: 230: 188: 210: 265: 238: 154: 334: 315: 282: 252: 192: 122: 104: 234: 159: 141: 174:
She appears to be a model, not an actress. Does WP:PORNBIO apply?
281:
that all porn stars should be included regardless of notability.
347:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
100: 96: 92: 290:
Disagreeing with you is hardly the same as making a
39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 333:Yes, something has changed. Read the first line. 205:per comment above, no sign of notability even if 357:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 251:magazine counts as a 'credible magazine'. 187:doesn't apply, she still doesn't pass 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 1: 237:lists two such features. -- 374: 338:10:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 329:04:10, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 299:00:11, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 286:23:43, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 269:22:12, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 256:18:50, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 242:18:35, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 222:09:16, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 196:02:46, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 179:22:59, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 167:14:28, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 148:22:43, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 126:22:09, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 117:Model no longer satisfies 53:00:30, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 350:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 48:, let's keep it. - 214: 209:doesn't apply. -- 365: 352: 327: 320: 212: 162: 144: 108: 90: 34: 373: 372: 368: 367: 366: 364: 363: 362: 361: 355:deletion review 348: 325: 316: 158: 140: 81: 65: 62: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 371: 369: 360: 359: 343: 342: 341: 340: 309: 308: 307: 306: 305: 304: 303: 302: 301: 224: 200: 199: 198: 169: 115: 114: 61: 56: 50:Richard Cavell 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 370: 358: 356: 351: 345: 344: 339: 336: 332: 331: 330: 324: 321: 319: 313: 310: 300: 297: 293: 289: 288: 287: 284: 280: 276: 272: 271: 270: 267: 262: 259: 258: 257: 254: 250: 245: 244: 243: 240: 236: 232: 228: 225: 223: 219: 215: 208: 204: 201: 197: 194: 190: 186: 182: 181: 180: 177: 173: 170: 168: 165: 161: 156: 152: 149: 147: 143: 138: 134: 130: 129: 128: 127: 124: 120: 112: 106: 102: 98: 94: 89: 85: 80: 76: 72: 68: 64: 63: 60: 57: 55: 54: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 349: 346: 317: 311: 296:Black Falcon 274: 260: 248: 226: 202: 176:209.78.98.27 171: 150: 132: 131: 116: 67:Ashley Juggs 59:Ashley Juggs 46:No consensus 45: 43: 31: 28: 235:IMDB entry 213:ヴィルヴェルヴィント 211:Wirbelwind 207:WP:PORNBIO 185:WP:PORNBIO 137:WP:PORNBIO 119:WP:PORNBIO 266:Dekkappai 239:Dekkappai 155:Dekkappai 292:WP:POINT 111:View log 335:Epbr123 318:ALKIVAR 283:Epbr123 253:Epbr123 229:Passes 193:Epbr123 172:Comment 123:Epbr123 84:protect 79:history 231:WP:BIO 203:Delete 189:WP:BIO 160:Dismas 142:Dismas 135:Fails 133:Delete 88:delete 279:point 275:Score 261:Score 249:Score 105:views 97:watch 93:links 16:< 312:Keep 227:Keep 218:talk 153:per 151:Keep 101:logs 75:talk 71:edit 183:If 157:. 139:. 109:– ( 220:) 191:. 103:| 99:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 77:| 73:| 326:☢ 323:™ 216:( 163:| 145:| 113:) 107:) 69:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Richard Cavell
00:30, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Ashley Juggs
Ashley Juggs
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
WP:PORNBIO
Epbr123
22:09, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
WP:PORNBIO
Dismas

Dekkappai
Dismas

14:28, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
209.78.98.27
22:59, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
WP:PORNBIO
WP:BIO

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.