476:--As I read it, it doesn't require multiple, significant roles. If that's what it's supposed to mean, it should say it. It says "Has had significant roles or been featured multiple times in notable films, television, stage performances, and other productions." From what IMDB says, she's certainly been featured multiple times in notable film and television shows. Full stop. Granted 'The IMDb should only be used as a tertiary source for "hard data" on released films. However, if the IMDb is found to contradict another source that meets WP:V (preferably a primary or secondary one), then that source should be considered to trump the IMDb.' So, if anything contradicts her IMDB credits, they should be considred unreliable. I'm not seeing any assertion so far that those credits are inflated or erroneous, however. 2) In the absence of an impeachment of the IMDB record, her career to date is larger than what's in the article, satisfying
951:
That makes sense, but the assertion was that they weren't reliable, not that they didn't establish notability. I would expect a movie's official website to be a reliable source for the content of the movie (actors, etc.), but insufficient to estabish notability. The assertion that the official site
910:
Please elaborate on why the official movie sites (references, not external links) are neither sufficiently secondary or reliable. I genuinely do not understand why you don't believe the criteria to have been met. If film credits, primary sources, can be cited, why can the official movie sites not be
488:
doesn't apply, since she already has plenty documented appearances; this just further reinforces my opinion that notability, while not temporary, can only increase with respect to this young actress. That is, I give her more benefit of the doubt as a living and working entertainer who has a
791:
I think the fly is just avoiding the fact that there is no such criterion. In fact, number one explicitly states, "No-one other than the nominator recommends that the page be deleted." However, someone else already argued for deletion.
769:
I happen to know the nominator very well and I'm very sure he won't get insulted. In addition, if it truly fits under one of the criteria, incivility should not stand in the way of the correct application of
Knowledge's policies.
372:
was a 2007 film, and has no
Knowledge article so I believe that isn't a notable film, sorry about that. So she sort of has one or two notable films (and one in unnotable film), so it does not meet the WP:ENTERTAINER..
517:
which specifically comment on
Sanchez' acting ability. I'd encourage those advocating deletion to review the article and the additional sources, which I or anyone can add to the article as desired.
368:, critics say she was "the heart and soul" which seems she had a significant role, and she did conclude the racism in the film. Her biography on TV.com (reliable, I don't know) states that
830:. Without significant independent sourcing, we cannot have the article, and I cannot see that such exists. Perhaps it will someday, we could always write the article then.
199:
but that claim would require the verification from some sort of reliable source. But appearing in one film and having one semi-important role in another doesn't satisfy
119:
1017:
1020:
in the past month is not difficult to source. An actress who plays a major role in one of the biggest movies of the year is, in my opinion, inherently notable.
232:
Not only one film, but many films, and in many television shows. Also, future film that has been completed and already has an official site doesn't violate
863:
Added two official movie sites, one of which confirms IMDB on her other contributions, like Crash. Anyone desire more sourcing, or is this enough to meet
843:
I've added a general reference for her biography. There are many news articles and biography pages that we may reference to expand the article. --
489:
demonstrated potential for future contributions, than I do for a dead entertainer whose contributions cannot possibly expand in the future.
1002:- Being part of the main cast of Happenings (which indeed sucks, but is one of the big movies this year) is enough to make her notable. --
572:
260:
Did she have significant/important roles in multiple films or has she just appeared in multiple films? All I'm seeing is the latter. --
86:
81:
90:
511:
896:
777:
738:
450:
342:
267:
214:
137:
1028:
827:
364:
but I guess not. She was one of the four main character in the film getting me to believe that she co-starred. As for the film
73:
17:
755:
There's a very good criteria that can be specified. But specifying it could be construed as uncivil towards the nominator. --
561:
A "featured" role is one that could conceivably be nominated for a
Supporting Actor award. None of these roles satisfy. —
911:
cited? There's nothing particularly negative or controversial about asserting that she appeared in such-and-such a movie.
335:, there's no Knowledge article on the film and her role in the film or the film's notability has yet to be established. --
413:
She's got plenty of appearances for her age, indicating an ongoing career and large potential for expansion. I can't see
853:
383:
307:
246:
185:
1021:
1050:
656:
322:
36:
1049:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
643:
567:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
933:. And given that she is being mentioned in moview reviews and in fact is being singled out for bad acting in
1035:
1008:
994:
961:
946:
920:
905:
876:
858:
836:
801:
786:
764:
747:
718:
704:
690:
672:
647:
624:
602:
577:
551:
526:
498:
458:
426:
388:
350:
312:
275:
251:
222:
190:
145:
55:
981:- her acting career has named roles of sufficient signifigance that they appear in moview reviews such as
562:
728:
660:
612:
590:
473:
436:
414:
200:
196:
172:
127:
611:
Further, a "featured" performance must be different than a "significant role" else the two clauses in
901:
797:
782:
760:
743:
714:
700:
686:
668:
547:
455:
347:
272:
219:
142:
982:
639:
477:
77:
52:
937:, there certainly appears to be abundant independent reliable sources to establish notability. --
957:
916:
872:
831:
620:
598:
522:
494:
481:
422:
321:
Please forgive my slight incivility, but you're exaggerating her roles. She did not "co-star" in
485:
469:
440:
233:
204:
163:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
659:
must realize that this article should exist, for she plays a key role throughout the movie.
891:
849:
793:
772:
756:
733:
710:
696:
682:
664:
543:
445:
379:
337:
331:
303:
262:
242:
209:
181:
132:
435:"indicating an ongoing career and large potential for expansion" not only fails to meet
990:
942:
69:
61:
49:
514:
1003:
953:
912:
882:
868:
823:
616:
594:
518:
490:
418:
157:
663:
has serious flaws if it somehow excludes her from having an article on wikipedia. --
930:
886:
864:
326:
155:
She has a large fan base, with multiple fan sites. She has appeared co-starring in
107:
926:
844:
374:
298:
237:
176:
934:
986:
938:
508:
297:. Isn't that three films that she has a significant or important role in? --
655:
Any editor who has been to the movies lately and seen M. Night
Shyamalan's
472:--either of the other two are sufficient on their own: 1) She doesn't fail
681:
What a really crappy movie that was, by the way...just a side note. --
695:
Such a subjective statement is completely irrelevant to this Afd. --
484:, and 3) in a longer term, there is FURTHER potential for growth--
1043:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
480:
simply by documenting the IMDB-referenced appearances, see also
130:
notability standard. Did not have multiple significant roles.
929:, the notability needs to be through independent third-party
293:. She will have a one of the leading, and important roles in
468:
I made three assertions, only the last of which is remotely
325:, she had role. Neither did she have a significant role in
289:
as a significant role, and having an important role in
114:
103:
99:
95:
542:
Multiple appearances on notable television shows. --
507:In addition to what I've added to the article, try
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1053:). No further edits should be made to this page.
731:criteria do you suggest applies to this afd?--
8:
285:I stated earlier that she has co-starred in
411:Assuming the IMDB entries aren't falsified,
709:See where I wrote, "just a side note"? --
952:wasn't reliable threw me a curve ball.
881:The movie sites are neither secondary (
589:: "featured role" does not appear in
203:. Future film roles are violative of
7:
126:Child actress that doesn't meet the
615:are simply saying the same thing.
1016:Any article whose subject has had
828:WP:SOMEOTHERSUBNOTABILITYGUIDELINE
167:. She will have a leading role in
161:, and having an important role in
24:
195:A large fan base might satisfy
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
417:intending this to be deleted.
1:
360:I thought she did co-star in
593:. See my quotation above.
171:. I believe that meets the
1070:
1036:03:08, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
1009:06:54, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
995:19:13, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
962:19:35, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
947:19:17, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
921:22:45, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
906:21:34, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
877:20:47, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
859:16:17, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
837:14:33, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
802:02:36, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
787:00:42, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
765:00:41, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
748:23:59, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
719:02:34, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
705:00:39, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
691:23:52, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
673:23:48, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
648:21:58, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
625:22:25, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
603:22:23, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
578:21:16, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
552:19:28, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
527:23:38, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
499:19:10, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
459:18:49, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
427:18:14, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
389:17:25, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
351:17:12, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
329:, she had a role. As for
323:The Happening (2008 film)
313:16:59, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
276:16:56, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
252:16:47, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
223:16:35, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
191:16:17, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
146:15:36, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
56:12:48, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
1046:Please do not modify it.
439:it is also violative of
236:(it can be verified). --
32:Please do not modify it.
653:Strong and Speedy Keep
729:Knowledge:Speedy keep
1018:482 Google News hits
44:The result was -
925:Generally, to meet
638:Evidently notable.
820:It does not matter
1033:
983:this one from CNN
857:
835:
727:Which one of the
387:
311:
250:
189:
1061:
1048:
1032:
1029:
1026:
1006:
931:reliable sources
899:
894:
885:) nor reliable (
847:
834:
780:
775:
741:
736:
575:
570:
565:
453:
448:
377:
345:
340:
301:
270:
265:
240:
217:
212:
179:
140:
135:
117:
111:
93:
34:
1069:
1068:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1051:deletion review
1044:
1030:
1022:
1004:
897:
892:
778:
773:
739:
734:
573:
568:
563:
451:
446:
370:Universal Signs
343:
338:
332:Universal Signs
295:Universal Signs
268:
263:
215:
210:
169:Universal Signs
138:
133:
113:
84:
68:
65:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1067:
1065:
1056:
1055:
1039:
1038:
1011:
997:
975:
974:
973:
972:
971:
970:
969:
968:
967:
966:
965:
964:
840:
839:
822:if she passes
813:
812:
811:
810:
809:
808:
807:
806:
805:
804:
725:
724:
723:
722:
721:
676:
675:
661:WP:ENTERTAINER
650:
640:Colonel Warden
632:
631:
630:
629:
628:
627:
613:WP:ENTERTAINER
606:
605:
591:WP:ENTERTAINER
581:
580:
555:
554:
536:
535:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
529:
502:
501:
474:WP:ENTERTAINER
463:
462:
437:WP:ENTERTAINER
430:
429:
415:WP:ENTERTAINER
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
392:
391:
355:
354:
316:
315:
280:
279:
255:
254:
227:
226:
201:WP:ENTERTAINER
197:WP:ENTERTAINER
173:WP:ENTERTAINER
128:WP:ENTERTAINER
124:
123:
70:Ashlyn Sanchez
64:
62:Ashlyn Sanchez
59:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1066:
1054:
1052:
1047:
1041:
1040:
1037:
1034:
1027:
1025:
1019:
1015:
1012:
1010:
1007:
1001:
998:
996:
992:
988:
984:
980:
977:
976:
963:
959:
955:
950:
949:
948:
944:
940:
936:
932:
928:
924:
923:
922:
918:
914:
909:
908:
907:
904:
903:
900:
895:
888:
884:
880:
879:
878:
874:
870:
866:
862:
861:
860:
855:
851:
846:
842:
841:
838:
833:
832:Seraphimblade
829:
825:
821:
818:
815:
814:
803:
799:
795:
790:
789:
788:
785:
784:
781:
776:
768:
767:
766:
762:
758:
754:
751:
750:
749:
746:
745:
742:
737:
730:
726:
720:
716:
712:
708:
707:
706:
702:
698:
694:
693:
692:
688:
684:
680:
679:
678:
677:
674:
670:
666:
662:
658:
657:The Happening
654:
651:
649:
645:
641:
637:
634:
633:
626:
622:
618:
614:
610:
609:
608:
607:
604:
600:
596:
592:
588:
585:
584:
583:
582:
579:
576:
571:
566:
560:
557:
556:
553:
549:
545:
541:
538:
537:
528:
524:
520:
516:
513:
510:
506:
505:
504:
503:
500:
496:
492:
487:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
466:
465:
464:
461:
460:
457:
454:
449:
442:
438:
434:
433:
432:
431:
428:
424:
420:
416:
412:
409:
406:
405:
390:
385:
381:
376:
371:
367:
363:
362:The Happening
359:
358:
357:
356:
353:
352:
349:
346:
341:
334:
333:
328:
324:
320:
319:
318:
317:
314:
309:
305:
300:
296:
292:
288:
287:The Happening
284:
283:
282:
281:
278:
277:
274:
271:
266:
259:
258:
257:
256:
253:
248:
244:
239:
235:
231:
230:
229:
228:
225:
224:
221:
218:
213:
206:
202:
198:
194:
193:
192:
187:
183:
178:
174:
170:
166:
165:
160:
159:
158:The Happening
154:
151:
150:
149:
148:
147:
144:
141:
136:
129:
121:
116:
109:
105:
101:
97:
92:
88:
83:
79:
75:
71:
67:
66:
63:
60:
58:
57:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1045:
1042:
1023:
1013:
999:
978:
902:(yada, yada)
890:
819:
816:
783:(yada, yada)
771:
752:
744:(yada, yada)
732:
652:
635:
586:
558:
539:
478:WP:POTENTIAL
456:(yada, yada)
444:
410:
407:
369:
365:
361:
348:(yada, yada)
336:
330:
327:Crash (film)
294:
290:
286:
273:(yada, yada)
261:
220:(yada, yada)
208:
175:standard. --
168:
162:
156:
152:
143:(yada, yada)
131:
125:
45:
43:
31:
28:
1014:Strong Keep
935:this review
482:WP:DEMOLISH
408:Strong Keep
927:notability
794:Ave Caesar
757:Firefly322
711:Ave Caesar
697:Firefly322
683:Ave Caesar
665:Firefly322
544:Ave Caesar
486:WP:CRYSTAL
470:WP:CRYSTAL
441:WP:CRYSTAL
234:WP:CRYSTAL
205:WP:CRYSTAL
1024:faithless
50:Peripitus
1005:lucasbfr
954:Jclemens
913:Jclemens
869:Jclemens
617:Jclemens
595:Jclemens
519:Jclemens
491:Jclemens
419:Jclemens
120:View log
753:Comment
587:Comment
515:reviews
87:protect
82:history
898:crewer
883:WP:BIO
824:WP:BIO
817:Delete
779:crewer
740:crewer
559:Delete
452:crewer
344:crewer
269:crewer
216:crewer
139:crewer
115:delete
91:delete
53:(Talk)
985:. --
889:). --
887:WP:RS
865:WP:RS
845:staka
569:Maker
564:Music
512:three
509:these
375:staka
366:Crash
299:staka
291:Crash
238:staka
177:staka
164:Crash
118:) – (
108:views
100:watch
96:links
16:<
1000:Keep
991:talk
987:Whpq
979:Keep
958:talk
943:talk
939:Whpq
917:talk
893:brew
873:talk
798:talk
774:brew
761:talk
735:brew
715:talk
701:talk
687:talk
669:talk
644:talk
636:Keep
621:talk
599:talk
574:5376
548:talk
540:Keep
523:talk
495:talk
447:brew
443:. --
423:talk
339:brew
264:brew
211:brew
207:. --
153:Keep
134:brew
104:logs
78:talk
74:edit
46:Keep
826:or
1031:()
993:)
960:)
945:)
919:)
875:)
867:?
800:)
792:--
770:--
763:)
717:)
703:)
689:)
671:)
646:)
623:)
601:)
550:)
525:)
497:)
425:)
373:--
106:|
102:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
80:|
76:|
48:-
989:(
956:(
941:(
915:(
871:(
856:)
854:C
852:・
850:T
848:(
796:(
759:(
713:(
699:(
685:(
667:(
642:(
619:(
597:(
546:(
521:(
493:(
421:(
386:)
384:C
382:・
380:T
378:(
310:)
308:C
306:・
304:T
302:(
249:)
247:C
245:・
243:T
241:(
188:)
186:C
184:・
182:T
180:(
122:)
112:(
110:)
72:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.