175:. I am the editor who added the references. AtTask has been covered by several third parties, however I had trouble finding all of them online. In addition, the two that JzG says are "evidently based on press releases" aren't press releases, and weren't issued by the company itself, so I don't see how they should be excluded per the source criteria in
196:
has committed is landing on JzG's watchlist as spam. I'd be happy to rewrite some of the copy to make it less like an advertisement, but I want it to be clear that this is a notable corporation per
110:
188:(which has no more reliable sources than AtTask, but has been left alone because substantial effort has been put in to making it a legitimate article), and others like
267:
159:. However, the fact that independent third-party sources exist means it may have a claim to notability, although this isn't clear at the moment.
125:
twice, external sources are one review and two evidently based on press releases. No data on turnover, not a public company, not fortune 500.
271:
261:
17:
184:
Also, this article existed for quite a long time before JzG deleted it. Compared to several other related articles, such as
310:
36:
83:
78:
87:
309:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
255:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
275:
160:
70:
49:
293:
279:
243:
227:
204:
189:
163:
142:
52:
224:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
197:
176:
172:
156:
126:
122:
118:
287:
Note: I combined two "keeps" above into one, since they were from the same anonymous user
185:
137:
131:
258:
221:
104:
219:
74:
290:
252:
236:
215:
201:
240:
155:, but the external sources don't seem sufficient to prove notability per
260:. AtTask is project management software. There is a legitimate wiki for
193:
66:
58:
239:
seems to have made an adequate argument for keeping the article. --
192:
which have no notability assertion, the only crime that it seems
303:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
48:- no challenge by deletion advocates to the sources offered. --
264:. AtTask is a well-known participant in this industry.
171:, as this company does fit the notability criteria per
100:
96:
92:
251:and expand. Another few references for notability.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
313:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
214:and expand. The multiple sources added by
223:) sufficiently demonstrate notability. --
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
294:17:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
280:14:03, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
244:22:42, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
228:19:41, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
205:19:01, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
164:18:43, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
143:16:27, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
53:03:20, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
117:Spammy article created by a
262:Project Management Software
330:
306:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
151:- it isn't advertising
121:, alreadyu speedied as
119:single-purpose account
270:comment was added by
161:Walton monarchist89
288:
283:
141:
321:
308:
286:
265:
135:
108:
90:
34:
329:
328:
324:
323:
322:
320:
319:
318:
317:
311:deletion review
304:
266:—The preceding
81:
65:
62:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
327:
325:
316:
315:
299:
298:
297:
296:
272:61.193.186.130
246:
230:
208:
207:
181:
180:
166:
115:
114:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
326:
314:
312:
307:
301:
300:
295:
292:
285:
284:
281:
277:
273:
269:
263:
259:
256:
253:
250:
247:
245:
242:
238:
234:
231:
229:
226:
222:
220:
217:
213:
210:
209:
206:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
186:24SevenOffice
183:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
165:
162:
158:
154:
150:
147:
146:
145:
144:
139:
134:
133:
129:a directory.
128:
124:
120:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
305:
302:
248:
232:
225:Black Falcon
211:
168:
152:
148:
130:
116:
50:Sam Blanning
45:
43:
31:
28:
218:and these (
149:Weak Delete
190:AceProject
123:WP:CSD#G11
268:unsigned
111:View log
198:WP:CORP
177:WP:CORP
173:WP:CORP
157:WP:CORP
84:protect
79:history
194:AtTask
153:per se
127:WP:NOT
88:delete
67:AtTask
59:AtTask
291:Vms37
237:Vms37
216:Vms37
202:Vms37
200:. --
138:Help!
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
276:talk
257:and
254:and
249:Keep
241:JJay
233:Keep
212:Keep
169:Keep
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
46:keep
289:--
132:Guy
109:– (
278:)
235:.
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
282:.
274:(
179:.
140:)
136:(
113:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.