260:: fairly clear case here. The organization in question has numerous reliable sources that can be located easily through google news, google scholar, or google books. In addition to that, there is at least one reliable source already incorporated in the article. Notability is easy to establish. Fact checking statements in the article should be easy for editors in the future. Looks like it has potential to be a good article in the long run.
288:
325:
327:
310:
331:
Perhaps I should have included a lot of this research in the nomination statement, but I did much of this a week ago. I'm open to evaluating better sources that I've not seen, but those found in the article don't meet the notability guidelines, hence the AfD. —
323:
As for "google news, google scholar, or google books" citations, everything I've evaluated looks like a press release or a cross-hit with mony of the other similarly-named organizations. If one narrows the search to try to hit only this
149:
143:
211:
313:, a subscription-required PR site of unknown credibility. In fact, given that the external links (those that aren't broken) all lead to press releases, the article fails
234:
110:
83:
78:
87:
70:
278:
I obviously disagree that notability is "clear". I spent a fair amount of effort trying to find any mention of this organization in the
164:
131:
17:
125:
421:
397:
372:
341:
269:
249:
226:
203:
52:
121:
436:
74:
36:
435:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
171:
300:
299:
that the citation itself is critically inaccurate. I also don't think that the other two cited sources, from
66:
58:
280:
186:
405:
The article and this discussion do not contain verifiable references to the sort of coverage required by
393:
368:
337:
199:
384:
It is quite clear that a proper interrogation of bald google searches reveals insufficient coverage in
137:
157:
265:
245:
222:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
389:
364:
353:
333:
195:
412:
406:
314:
261:
181:
287:. That the reference is only 1 page in the paper, and that the title cited is found
304:
241:
218:
191:
49:
104:
307:
356:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
303:(an apparent press release hosted on a website that may not meet
429:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
285:
100:
96:
92:
156:
363:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
212:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
190:citation and the other cited sources do not seem
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
439:). No further edits should be made to this page.
329:, there is considerably less apparent coverage.
235:list of Websites-related deletion discussions
170:
8:
233:Note: This debate has been included in the
210:Note: This debate has been included in the
291:suggests strongly that if the organization
295:mentioned at all it is only trivially so,
232:
209:
7:
24:
289:only in Knowledge and its mirrors
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
284:and urge you to try the same
180:Organization of questionable
456:
270:19:29, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
250:20:40, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
227:20:40, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
204:11:04, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
432:Please do not modify it.
422:06:07, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
398:01:23, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
373:01:08, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
342:14:44, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
53:08:49, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
281:San Francisco Examiner
187:San Francisco Examiner
184:. I cannot verify the
67:Autism Support Network
59:Autism Support Network
311:bulldogreporter.com
301:disabled-world.com
44:The result was
420:
375:
252:
238:
229:
215:
447:
434:
419:
417:
410:
362:
358:
239:
216:
175:
174:
160:
108:
90:
34:
455:
454:
450:
449:
448:
446:
445:
444:
443:
437:deletion review
430:
413:
411:
351:
194:-appropriate —
117:
81:
65:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
453:
451:
442:
441:
425:
424:
400:
378:
377:
376:
360:
359:
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
330:
322:
317:for a lack of
273:
272:
254:
253:
230:
178:
177:
114:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
452:
440:
438:
433:
427:
426:
423:
418:
416:
408:
404:
401:
399:
395:
391:
387:
383:
380:
379:
374:
370:
366:
361:
357:
355:
350:
349:
343:
340:
339:
335:
328:
326:
320:
316:
312:
308:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
283:
282:
277:
276:
275:
274:
271:
267:
263:
259:
256:
255:
251:
247:
243:
236:
231:
228:
224:
220:
213:
208:
207:
206:
205:
202:
201:
197:
193:
189:
188:
183:
173:
169:
166:
163:
159:
155:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
130:
127:
123:
120:
119:Find sources:
115:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
431:
428:
414:
402:
385:
381:
352:
336:
324:organization
318:
296:
292:
279:
257:
198:
185:
179:
167:
161:
153:
146:
140:
134:
128:
118:
45:
43:
31:
28:
390:Mkativerata
388:sources. --
365:Ron Ritzman
319:independent
144:free images
415:Sandstein
262:i kan reed
182:notability
321:coverage.
242:• Gene93k
219:• Gene93k
386:reliable
354:Relisted
111:View log
403:Delete.
150:WP refs
138:scholar
84:protect
79:history
50:Spartaz
407:WP:GNG
382:Delete
338:tizzle
315:WP:ORG
200:tizzle
122:Google
88:delete
46:delete
334:Scien
305:WP:RS
196:Scien
192:WP:RS
165:JSTOR
126:books
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
394:talk
369:talk
309:and
266:talk
258:Keep
246:talk
223:talk
158:FENS
132:news
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
172:TWL
109:– (
409:.
396:)
371:)
297:or
293:is
268:)
248:)
240:—
237:.
225:)
217:—
214:.
152:)
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
48:.
392:(
367:(
264:(
244:(
221:(
176:)
168:·
162:·
154:·
147:·
141:·
135:·
129:·
124:(
116:(
113:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.