129:, but the redirect was reverted eight days later by the page's creator, who has since added to the page. The page links to several other pages about Burger King sandwiches (most created by the same user who created this one), but those all at least seem to have some additional content besides just describing the sandwich itself, so I'm only nominating this one. There are no references indicating this is more notable than any other fast food sandwich.
217:
6. As I said, I believe the article was orphaned when I found it, meaning there were no links to it at all; none of the articles currently linking to it seem to have been linking to it at the time, so I'm puzzled how my redirect created "loops." Even if it were a bad redirect, though, I don't see how
168:
corporation and expand beyond the US oriented content. In creating an article about a product sold in country besides the US helps to create more neutral articles about said multinational corporations. By nominating this particular product you are going against the reason for its creation in the
124:
Non-notable. It's a sandwich. To be more precise, it's a line of sandwiches apparently offered in Burger Kings in New
Zealand. The article is a list of the different sandwiches and their ingredients. About a month ago (when the page had been dormant for several months), I redirected the page to
203:
1. The article had been dormant for months and I believe I found it on the
Orphaned Articles list, leading me to think that it was not of particular interest to anyone, and it seemed to me a clear redirect. If the redirect was inappropriate, I knew it could be easily reverted, as you
175:
It takes time to compile information on subjects like this since it is a product sold outside the US. As I am located in the US, it is more difficult to obtain information regarding "foreign" advertising campaigns, history, nutrition information etc. Hence it still being labeled a
156:
You should have created a merge discussion or talked about the creation of the redirect on the discussion page before going ahead and removing the article. This is the proper way to go about removing articles you believe to be substandard or inappropriate for
Knowledge
210:
3. This project was not mentioned on the page or its Talk page, and I don't see why non-notable articles should be immune to deletion or redirect simply because they're part of a project to create articles regardless of their
218:
that's relevant to this discussion. I redirected it, you reverted it. If editors voted to redirect it, I'm sure any problems with the redirect would be immediately corrected.
117:
235:
If it's just a stub, then it should have been expanded, rather than hanging around for months. I don't understand why a particular local sandwich is notable.
164:
articles being US centric in their content, as I expanded the article I tried to include global and regional menu variations to reflect BK being a
90:
85:
179:
The article is still just a stub. As more information becomes available it will have all the data that is found in the other articles.
94:
17:
207:
2. I didn't nominate the article because it's foreign, I nominated it because it doesn't assert notability and doesn't seem notable.
77:
172:
There is an ongoing
Knowledge (XXG) project to create articles about fast food products, this is in line with that project.
256:
311:
36:
310:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
296:
275:
247:
228:
192:
146:
133:
59:
55:
81:
50:
290:
272:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
264:
222:
73:
65:
260:
214:
4 and 5. A stub that doesn't prove the notability of its topic is eligible for deletion.
225:
130:
285:
268:
165:
189:
111:
161:
143:
126:
244:
283:
per
Dhartung. I see no valid notability argument for a separate article.--
304:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
107:
103:
99:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
314:). No further edits should be made to this page.
182:The redirect you created caused several loops.
8:
263:-compliant name and seems to have some
243:into one of the other BK articles. --
223:Knowledge (XXG) is not a crystal ball.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
185:These sandwiches may be take global
24:
259:(which has been moved to a non-
160:There was criticism about the
1:
257:List of Burger King products
331:
152:Some reasons for keeping:
307:Please do not modify it.
297:22:42, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
276:06:11, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
248:21:08, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
229:13:55, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
193:19:37, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
147:18:24, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
134:16:46, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
60:05:44, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
127:Burger King#Products
281:Merge and redirect
253:Merge and redirect
46:redirect and merge
265:article ownership
322:
309:
295:
115:
97:
34:
330:
329:
325:
324:
323:
321:
320:
319:
318:
312:deletion review
305:
284:
88:
74:BK Crown Jewels
72:
69:
66:BK Crown Jewels
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
328:
326:
317:
316:
300:
299:
278:
250:
232:
231:
219:
215:
212:
208:
205:
201:
187:
186:
183:
180:
177:
173:
170:
158:
150:
149:
122:
121:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
327:
315:
313:
308:
302:
301:
298:
294:
292:
287:
282:
279:
277:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
251:
249:
246:
242:
238:
234:
233:
230:
227:
224:
220:
216:
213:
209:
206:
202:
200:
197:
196:
195:
194:
191:
184:
181:
178:
174:
171:
167:
166:multinational
163:
159:
155:
154:
153:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:
136:
135:
132:
128:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
306:
303:
288:
280:
252:
240:
236:
198:
188:
169:first place.
151:
139:
123:
56:bananabucket
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
267:issues). --
211:notability.
162:Burger King
142:! Please!
226:Propaniac
176:{{stub}}.
131:Propaniac
286:Kubigula
269:Dhartung
199:Response
118:View log
51:Blnguyen
190:Jerem43
91:protect
86:history
237:Delete
157:(XXG).
144:Mangoe
140:DELETE
95:delete
261:WP:NC
245:Haemo
241:Merge
112:views
104:watch
100:links
16:<
291:talk
273:Talk
204:did.
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
255:to
239:or
221:7.
116:– (
271:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
58:)
48:.
293:)
289:(
120:)
114:)
76:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.