465:. Many academics start labs and centers, and many more publish in peer-reviewed journals. However, output is different from reception. There is no evidence of influence in his discipline: no influential piece of scholarship, no transformative idea or theory. For an associate professor to have not even one citation is rather surprising. There are graduate students who have made a bigger impact.--
713:: I have relisted this as the reference found above was a couple of days ago, and others who suggested deleting the article have not had time to discuss this. If they all change to "keep", I am happy to close this as a "keep", otherwise further discussion for a week might show a clear consensus one way or the other
285:
But then we're not necessarily dealing with scholarly citations of his work. If we merely do a search on his name, and it shows up as part of a conference abstract or in the acknowledgements in a book, that's not a scholarly citation. Doing a Google search on scholarly works authored by the subject
411:
most of new original research is published in journals and conference proceedings whereas in humanities book publications tend to play a larger role. The meaning of "substantial number of publications" and "high citation rates" is to be interpreted in line with the interpretations used by major
434:
this fellow, his work, his 'ideas', and his influence.. Knowledge does not expect a scholar to get the coverage as might a politician, athlete, or film star, and being cited is only a small portion of what editors are allowed to consider when determining notability.
580:
has chosen to quote him in detail about the
Promised Land Symposium. Things which do not usually happen to a non-notable professor, as apparently, and even if not cited by scholars, his expertise in his particular field is being sought out.
149:
427:
Many scientists, researchers, philosophers and other scholars (collectively referred to as "academics" for convenience) are notably influential in the world of ideas without their biographies being the subject of secondary
537:
would be more applicable, but Google News archive appears broken. I can input a specific known article date and source and it comes up empty. Sure wish Google would get the stick out of their corporate butt.
310:
201:
602:
419:
251:
143:
561:
110:
619:: okay, the participation as a judge at Cannes does change things. He still doesn't appear to have had any scholarly impact. He's notable; just not for scholarly reasons.--
342:
college professor, and one who is making an impact within his field. We have him as 'Director of the
Audiovisual Media Lab for the studies of Cultures and Societies' at
83:
78:
87:
286:
tells us not only how many scholarly pieces he has published, but also which pieces have been cited by whom. It does not appear that anyone has cited his work.--
70:
164:
131:
506:. I thought, given the lack of citations to his scholarly articles, and the description of him as a filmmaker in his article, that maybe
733:
694:
447:
193:
184:
are satisfied. According to Google
Scholar, he hasn't been cited by anyone. There's simply no evidence of scholarly importance here.
642:
has shown me as notable enough for
Knowledge, but not neccessarily for scholarly impact. Article will need cleanup and refocus.
347:
785:
764:
739:
700:
654:
628:
611:
593:
550:
523:
497:
474:
325:
295:
280:
263:
242:
216:
125:
52:
17:
121:
378:
171:
399:
74:
800:
651:
590:
565:
547:
444:
277:
239:
36:
578:
799:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
519:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
66:
58:
391:
137:
228:
727:
688:
555:
The "breaking" of my ability to use News
Archives was due to my using IE7. Now udated to IE8, I find that
606:
227:??? My own look at the Google Scholar link above finds three pages of hits of this Academic being cited,
644:
624:
583:
540:
493:
470:
437:
343:
291:
270:
259:
232:
212:
189:
515:
406:
157:
781:
507:
181:
716:
677:
514:
to look for notability. But I can't find any there either. Zero hits on Google news archive. —
321:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
574:
461:
was a textbook, not a monograph. It has since been discontinued and isn't even listed on the
750:
664:
639:
534:
356:
620:
489:
466:
287:
255:
208:
185:
511:
462:
777:
422:
761:
317:
49:
403:
104:
431:
753:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
667:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
354:) New Initiative Scholarship, and whose publications appear in the journals
346:
whose prizes and scholarships include the 2003 Van Horne Prize and the 2005
416:
publications in especially prestigious and selective academic journals,
569:
793:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
557:
351:
311:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
202:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
366:
100:
96:
92:
776:
Dr
Blofeld's reference lifts it over the threshold. --
384:
156:
760:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
674:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
803:). No further edits should be made to this page.
412:research institutions in the awarding of tenure.
268:Yes, remove the word "author" from your search.
564:reports him chosen as one of the jurors at the
414:" And it also guides that we might consider "
170:
8:
386:(Germany, BASS 80, 2006), and the editor of
309:Note: This debate has been included in the
200:Note: This debate has been included in the
254:shows 10 publications and zero citations.--
308:
199:
430:", we DO have secondary sources that can
388:Introduction to Media Studies: A Reader
180:I don't see how any of the criteria in
7:
338:Seems that he is more than just an
348:Canadian Foundation for Innovation
24:
510:might be a better criterion than
418:" which this man appears to have.
370:Canadian Journal of Communication
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
488:. Much published, zero cited.
398:dans les mondes fraconphones,
53:13:49, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
1:
786:08:02, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
765:05:08, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
740:04:36, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
701:04:34, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
655:01:26, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
459:Introduction to Media Studies
379:American Journal of Semiotics
629:21:59, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
612:16:18, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
594:07:20, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
551:08:44, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
524:00:30, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
498:23:18, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
475:02:02, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
448:19:03, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
382:, and who is the author of
326:18:22, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
296:01:11, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
281:22:42, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
264:20:28, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
243:19:54, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
230:but I do not speak French.
217:19:43, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
194:15:38, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
820:
400:University of Ottawa Press
566:Pan African Film Festival
796:Please do not modify it.
250:: Are you sure? Because
32:Please do not modify it.
392:Oxford University Press
67:Boulou Ebanda de B'béri
59:Boulou Ebanda de B'béri
396:Les "Cultural Studies"
344:University of Ottawa
575:Chatham Daily News
57:
44:The result was
767:
742:
703:
328:
314:
219:
205:
811:
798:
759:
755:
736:
730:
722:
719:
709:
697:
691:
683:
680:
673:
669:
647:
640:User:Dr. Blofeld
609:
586:
543:
533:I do agree that
440:
421:And even though
357:Cultural Studies
315:
273:
235:
206:
175:
174:
160:
108:
90:
34:
819:
818:
814:
813:
812:
810:
809:
808:
807:
801:deletion review
794:
748:
734:
728:
720:
717:
695:
689:
681:
678:
662:
645:
607:
584:
541:
438:
409:cautions that "
271:
233:
117:
81:
65:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
817:
815:
806:
805:
789:
788:
770:
769:
768:
757:
756:
745:
744:
743:
706:
705:
704:
671:
670:
659:
658:
657:
633:
632:
631:
596:
553:
526:
516:David Eppstein
501:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
330:
329:
305:
304:
303:
302:
301:
300:
299:
298:
221:
220:
178:
177:
114:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
816:
804:
802:
797:
791:
790:
787:
783:
779:
775:
772:
771:
766:
763:
758:
754:
752:
747:
746:
741:
737:
731:
725:
724:
723:
712:
708:
707:
702:
698:
692:
686:
685:
684:
672:
668:
666:
661:
660:
656:
653:
652:
649:
648:
641:
637:
634:
630:
626:
622:
618:
615:
614:
613:
610:
604:
600:
597:
595:
592:
591:
588:
587:
579:
577:
576:
571:
567:
563:
560:
559:
554:
552:
549:
548:
545:
544:
536:
532:
531:
527:
525:
521:
517:
513:
509:
505:
502:
499:
495:
491:
487:
484:
483:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
446:
445:
442:
441:
433:
429:
424:
420:
417:
413:
408:
404:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
380:
375:
374:Critical Arts
371:
367:
363:
359:
358:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
336:
327:
323:
319:
312:
307:
306:
297:
293:
289:
284:
283:
282:
279:
278:
275:
274:
267:
266:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
246:
245:
244:
241:
240:
237:
236:
229:
226:
223:
222:
218:
214:
210:
203:
198:
197:
196:
195:
191:
187:
183:
173:
169:
166:
163:
159:
155:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
130:
127:
123:
120:
119:Find sources:
115:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
795:
792:
773:
749:
715:
714:
710:
676:
675:
663:
650:
643:
635:
616:
598:
589:
582:
573:
556:
546:
539:
529:
528:
503:
485:
458:
443:
436:
426:
415:
410:
407:WP:ACADEMICS
395:
394:, 2007) and
387:
383:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
355:
339:
334:
332:
331:
276:
269:
247:
238:
231:
224:
179:
167:
161:
153:
146:
140:
134:
128:
118:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
608:Dr. Blofeld
508:WP:CREATIVE
463:OUP website
252:this search
182:WP:ACADEMIC
144:free images
621:BlueonGray
599:Weak keep'
490:Xxanthippe
467:BlueonGray
390:(Toronto,
288:BlueonGray
256:BlueonGray
209:Tom Morris
186:BlueonGray
638:I agree.
601:based on
535:WP:AUTHOR
318:• Gene93k
778:Pgallert
751:Relisted
735:contribs
696:contribs
665:Relisted
646:Schmidt,
585:Schmidt,
562:{French)
542:Schmidt,
439:Schmidt,
425:states "
272:Schmidt,
248:Question
234:Schmidt,
111:View log
762:Spartaz
718:Phantom
679:Phantom
617:Neutral
530:Neutral
512:WP:PROF
428:sources
402:(2010).
362:CiNéMAS
340:average
225:Comment
150:WP refs
138:scholar
84:protect
79:history
50:Spartaz
572:. The
570:Cannes
504:Delete
486:Delete
432:verify
423:WP:BIO
122:Google
88:delete
721:Steve
682:Steve
165:JSTOR
126:books
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
782:talk
774:Keep
729:talk
711:Note
690:talk
636:Keep
625:talk
603:this
558:Nice
520:talk
494:talk
471:talk
457:His
335:Keep
322:talk
292:talk
260:talk
213:talk
190:talk
158:FENS
132:news
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
605:.♦
568:at
352:CFI
172:TWL
109:– (
784:)
738:\
699:\
627:)
522:)
496:)
473:)
405:.
376:,
372:,
368:,
364:,
360:,
324:)
316:—
313:.
294:)
262:)
215:)
204:.
192:)
152:)
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
48:.
780:(
732:|
726:/
693:|
687:/
623:(
518:(
500:.
492:(
469:(
350:(
333:*
320:(
290:(
258:(
211:(
207:—
188:(
176:)
168:·
162:·
154:·
147:·
141:·
135:·
129:·
124:(
116:(
113:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.