501:). It got split into a separate article, because it meant some additional information could be added, and it could sensibly be presented in a sortable fashion. The article requires some work - in particular it needs a better lead so it can function as a standalone article, and generally add context for the casual reader.
710:
When I said "This list is an enumeration..." I was explaining to
Postdlf what the list is about, as he seemed confused on the subject matter. That wasn't my argument for deletion. My argument is that encyclopedias do not list out items in this degree of detail. Just as there is no listing of every
711:
room in the Empire State
Building, although the building itself is notable, we should not list every stop on a giant organ. If any particular sets of stops are notable, they can be described in the main organ's article, but the level of factual detail is too much for an encyclopedia article.
475:
Certainly this information is very technical and of interest to a limited audience, but so are many topics on
Knowledge (XXG). The list of stops is highly relevant to the article about the instrument, but in this case too large to include in the article itself, I believe.
282:
operates, I have no idea what this list is even presenting so I can't really evaluate it. Can you explain, and then be a bit more specific about why this information is trivial or encyclopedic and why or why not the summary table in the parent article is sufficient?
507:
is an enumeration of each of the senators from a small state - it's true, but I fail to see why it's a reason for deletion. Further, this isn't just "a very large organ" - it's the largest pipe organ ever built. That makes the information non-trivial.
166:
453:
I wish there were a use for this information that would make it worth retaining but the fantastic amount of microscopic detail here makes it hard to justify keeping this as an article or merging it elsewhere. The level of detail in the
578:
Firstly, it's not original research. It lacked references, but that's a separate issue... I've added some). Secondly, that list of categories for lists doesn't cover everything allowed - hence why it says "Types of list articles
679:
Are for notability... You agree that's its notable as a whole, although the items on the list aren't (and no-one's claiming they are). So you seem to be arguing that something notable shouldn't have its own article.
493:"The fantastic amount of microscopic detail" can't seriously be a reason to delete something. If we applied that logic, then we wouldn't have any articles with details! Much of this information used to be in
740:
This article is pretty notable. It doesn't seem to bother me whether if you guys decide to keep or delete it. I would not have a problem with either option. Ashbeckjonathan 02:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
587:- the links on the page are to cities, not articles on the stations, so it's not an index list). Thirdly, it doesn't detail "every single pipe". It lists key information about every *set* of pipes.
160:
92:
87:
615:
do feel this article fails to satisfy; and (2) are you certain these failures cannot be fixed? (If they can be fixed, I'm sure we all agree we should fix things rather than delete the article).
96:
301:
To whom is your above message directed? The author of the list article? He's not an active editor (hasn't made an edit in almost a month) so I don't expect him to even notice this AfD. –
79:
503:
To
Themfromspace: You say "This list is an enumeration of each of the sets of pipes on a very large organ". Any list is an enumeration, by definition! Your comment is like saying that
126:
639:
I really don't think this article can be "fixed". If that were the case, I wouldn't have nominated it for an AfD. The problem is that the content itself is not notable. In
218:
119:
647:
from the list and write an article about it. As a whole, yes, the stops are notable, but that content should be reserved for the organ's main article. If you look at
258:
238:
83:
321:(NB: Even if I'm not active, a notice on my user space is surely only polite. I only found out because a template used on the page was listed for deletion.
181:
640:
504:
148:
75:
67:
423:. The information presented is purely trivial. To Postdlf: This list is an enumeration of each of the sets of pipes on a very large organ. See
729:
699:
664:
634:
606:
573:
527:
485:
467:
445:
403:
361:
340:
314:
296:
270:
250:
230:
210:
61:
643:, each senator on the list is notable themselves and has his/her own article. Looking at this article, you can't pick out any individual
142:
723:
439:
138:
17:
583:" not "Types of allowed list articles are" (emphasis mine). There are other lists that don't fit in any of these categories (e.g.
382:
encyclopedic. As
Themfromspace noted below, it's trivial because it's merely an indiscriminate collection of information, as per
694:
629:
601:
522:
335:
188:
494:
455:
279:
673:
you feel this article fails is that it doesn't fit in those categories? If so, then I would repeat that those categories are
756:
40:
584:
154:
659:
568:
398:
309:
205:
718:
434:
544:
for every single one of the organ pipes. Second, the article does not seem to satisfy the requirements at
57:
752:
36:
652:
561:
391:
302:
198:
174:
713:
463:
429:
420:
383:
651:, you'll see that this list does not fit in the category of any of the eight types of lists. –
356:
291:
266:
246:
226:
53:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
751:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
553:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
481:
688:
623:
595:
516:
329:
541:
537:
557:
459:
350:
285:
262:
242:
222:
113:
477:
681:
644:
616:
588:
509:
424:
322:
556:
and details on every single pipe in the world's largest organ simply are not
670:
648:
612:
549:
545:
677:
exhaustive. Plenty of lists exist that do not fit in those categories.
745:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
278:
Other than this apparently having something to do with how the
197:
Article content is entirely too trivial and unencyclopedic. –
611:
Bother... forgot to add: (1) what specific requirements at
554:
Knowledge (XXG) is not a list of indiscriminate information
390:
sufficient enough; no need to have this article as well. –
498:
109:
105:
101:
173:
187:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
759:). No further edits should be made to this page.
548:. The list does not fit into any categories at
386:. I think the summary table in parent article
219:list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions
8:
458:article seems appropriate and encyclopedic.
257:Note: This debate has been included in the
237:Note: This debate has been included in the
217:Note: This debate has been included in the
536:First, the entire article seems to be 100%
259:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
256:
239:list of Music-related deletion discussions
236:
216:
641:List of United States Senators from Maine
505:List of United States Senators from Maine
76:Boardwalk Hall Auditorium Organ stoplist
68:Boardwalk Hall Auditorium Organ stoplist
540:. I don't know where you could find
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
669:So, to be clear, the only part of
24:
495:Boardwalk Hall Auditorium Organ
456:Boardwalk Hall Auditorium Organ
280:Boardwalk Hall Auditorium Organ
1:
585:Railway stations in Armenia
776:
730:16:48, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
700:16:36, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
665:01:43, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
62:19:50, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
748:Please do not modify it.
635:19:08, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
607:19:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
574:03:42, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
528:00:59, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
486:19:30, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
468:19:23, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
446:21:54, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
404:22:18, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
362:21:05, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
341:00:59, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
315:20:49, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
297:19:53, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
271:18:26, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
251:18:26, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
231:18:26, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
211:17:02, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
348:To you, the nominator.
649:MOS:LIST#List articles
550:MOS:LIST#List articles
378:I said the list is
48:The result was
698:
685:
663:
633:
620:
605:
592:
572:
538:original research
526:
513:
402:
339:
326:
313:
273:
253:
233:
209:
767:
750:
726:
721:
716:
692:
683:
657:
655:
627:
618:
599:
590:
566:
564:
542:reliable sources
520:
511:
499:this old version
442:
437:
432:
396:
394:
333:
324:
307:
305:
203:
201:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
775:
774:
770:
769:
768:
766:
765:
764:
763:
757:deletion review
746:
724:
719:
714:
653:
562:
440:
435:
430:
392:
303:
199:
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
773:
771:
762:
761:
735:
734:
733:
732:
708:
707:
706:
705:
704:
703:
702:
678:
654:Dream out loud
609:
563:Dream out loud
531:
530:
502:
488:
470:
448:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
393:Dream out loud
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
346:
345:
344:
304:Dream out loud
275:
274:
254:
234:
200:Dream out loud
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
772:
760:
758:
754:
749:
743:
742:
741:
739:
731:
728:
727:
722:
717:
709:
701:
696:
690:
686:
676:
672:
668:
667:
666:
661:
656:
650:
646:
642:
638:
637:
636:
631:
625:
621:
614:
610:
608:
603:
597:
593:
586:
582:
577:
576:
575:
570:
565:
559:
555:
551:
547:
543:
539:
535:
534:
533:
532:
529:
524:
518:
514:
506:
500:
496:
492:
489:
487:
483:
479:
474:
471:
469:
465:
461:
457:
452:
449:
447:
444:
443:
438:
433:
426:
422:
418:
415:
414:
405:
400:
395:
389:
385:
381:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
363:
359:
358:
353:
352:
347:
342:
337:
331:
327:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
311:
306:
300:
299:
298:
294:
293:
288:
287:
281:
277:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
255:
252:
248:
244:
240:
235:
232:
228:
224:
220:
215:
214:
213:
212:
207:
202:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
747:
744:
737:
736:
712:
674:
580:
490:
472:
450:
428:
416:
387:
379:
355:
349:
290:
284:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
54:SarahStierch
49:
47:
31:
28:
161:free images
645:organ stop
552:. Third,
425:Organ stop
753:talk page
263:• Gene93k
243:• Gene93k
223:• Gene93k
37:talk page
755:or in a
671:MOS:LIST
613:MOS:LIST
546:MOS:LIST
497:(as per
460:Alansohn
421:WP:IINFO
384:WP:IINFO
120:View log
39:or in a
581:include
558:notable
351:postdlf
286:postdlf
167:WPÂ refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
695:review
630:review
602:review
523:review
478:Danmuz
451:Delete
417:Delete
336:review
139:Google
97:delete
725:Space
441:Space
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
738:Keep
720:From
715:Them
689:talk
660:talk
624:talk
596:talk
569:talk
517:talk
491:Keep
482:talk
473:Keep
464:talk
436:From
431:Them
419:per
399:talk
357:talk
330:talk
310:talk
292:talk
267:talk
247:talk
227:talk
206:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
50:keep
682:Tom
675:not
617:Tom
589:Tom
560:. –
510:Tom
323:Tom
189:TWL
118:– (
691:)
684:pw
626:)
619:pw
598:)
591:pw
519:)
512:pw
484:)
476:--
466:)
427:.
388:is
380:un
360:)
332:)
325:pw
295:)
269:)
261:.
249:)
241:.
229:)
221:.
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:.
697:)
693:(
687:(
662:)
658:(
632:)
628:(
622:(
604:)
600:(
594:(
571:)
567:(
525:)
521:(
515:(
480:(
462:(
401:)
397:(
354:(
343:)
338:)
334:(
328:(
312:)
308:(
289:(
265:(
245:(
225:(
208:)
204:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.