462:. Few mentions in passing - not much of a political career. Granted, he was more of an aide/advisor, but those are simply not things that make one notable, not without in-depth coverage and that I don't see. However, it is worth pointing out that his full name was "Robert A. Crittenden", and the current informal "Bob" name may be obscuring some results. Bob is the name that we can see he is cited in the media on the few occasions he was asked for comment; Robert A. Crittenden / RA Crittenden is the name he used for his scientific works. Still, Google Scholar suggests his impact is low - he has been a co-author on a number of papers, but their citations are mid-20s at best, most of them got very few cites. As such, he does not seem to pass
511:
that has over 300 listed citations on Google scholar. She is not notable for her condominium role, but she might be notable as an academic. I began editing the article to reflect this fact, but there is a need for more work to be done. The article has been tagged since August 2015 as needing better
207:
piece of legislation than the one he worked on. It's not entirely impossible that
Crittenden might have a stronger claim of notability and better sourceability than the creator actually attempted to show (it was created by Ottawahitech, a user who has been permanently editblocked for persistently
512:
sourcing, so tagging articles in this matter is not working. These sub-standard article that focus on non-notable issues in possibly notable people's lives are a reason
Ottawahitech was banned. At least 4 articles he created are in process of being prod deleted right now.
466:. I couldn't find any information on significant awards, or any recognition of him as a significant scholar/etc. I am afraid I have to agree with the nominator here.: this is not an encyclopedic person per sources we have so far. --
304:, tentatively. Editor Ottawahitech should not have been banned; they identified many notable topics and there is nothing wrong with starting stub articles. I added a bit to the article and see other sources available. --
165:
216:) -- so I'm willing to withdraw this if somebody with better access than I've got to US media coverage circa 1993 can put in the work to salvage it, but what's here isn't enough.
377:) are a fairly big deal, but there's not much yet in Knowledge (XXG) about the program. Crittenden was one of those, and had other fellowships/awards not yet in the article. --
250:
199:
of a political aide, whose only stated claim of notability is that he wrote the first draft (but not the finished product) of a single piece of legislation. And he isn't the
118:
284:
267:
159:
341:
notability or sourcing need to be shown to justify an article. There's nothing inherently wrong with creating stubs, true, but even a short stub still has to actually
233:
329:
Ottawahitech did not correctly identify many notable topics; their habit was to create an article about absolutely anything and anyone who could be verified by
125:
91:
86:
17:
95:
486:
background aides only pass notability if we have reliable source coverage of them of a level to, and we lack that for
Crittenden.
78:
374:
180:
147:
507:
and was ready to nominate it for deletion. However I did some background research and realized she has written books like
388:
315:
437:
408:
561:
40:
370:
503:
With the above mentions of
Ottawahitech I began to look into some of his contributions. I came across the article on
346:
538:
517:
491:
141:
530:
542:
521:
495:
478:
452:
428:
393:
362:
320:
293:
276:
259:
242:
225:
137:
60:
82:
557:
448:
424:
289:
272:
255:
238:
36:
504:
187:
534:
513:
487:
345:
a credible claim of notability in the first place. And so far, the only new sources you've added are
74:
66:
173:
196:
472:
383:
358:
310:
221:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
556:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
463:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
153:
350:
54:
468:
378:
354:
305:
217:
212:, rather than actually putting in enough work to demonstrate that the topics were
112:
203:
of the article's only source, either, but merely gives brief soundbite about a
419:
Of note is that the article was expanded after being nominated for deletion.
337:, without regard to Knowledge (XXG)'s established standards of how
208:
doing the bare minimum needed to show that their choice of topics
550:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
440:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
411:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
108:
104:
100:
172:
446:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
422:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
186:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
564:). No further edits should be made to this page.
251:list of Washington-related deletion discussions
285:list of Politics-related deletion discussions
268:list of Medicine-related deletion discussions
8:
283:Note: This debate has been included in the
266:Note: This debate has been included in the
249:Note: This debate has been included in the
232:Note: This debate has been included in the
234:list of People-related deletion discussions
282:
265:
248:
231:
369:By the way I have the impression that
529:Someone might want to have a look at
469:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
373:(now a redirect to a new section in
24:
509:The Effect of Children on Parents
375:Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
1:
333:newspaper article as merely
371:Robert Wood Johnson Fellows
581:
543:04:41, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
522:04:18, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
496:03:49, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
479:03:39, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
453:03:04, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
429:00:31, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
61:18:50, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
553:Please do not modify it.
533:, I doubt he is notable.
394:18:11, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
363:14:58, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
321:14:47, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
294:14:44, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
277:14:44, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
260:14:43, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
243:14:43, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
226:14:31, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
531:Dave Brown (columnist)
353:coverage in media.
417:Relisting comment:
535:John Pack Lambert
514:John Pack Lambert
505:Anne-Marie Ambert
488:John Pack Lambert
455:
431:
296:
279:
262:
245:
572:
555:
475:
451:
445:
443:
441:
427:
421:
414:
412:
391:
386:
381:
318:
313:
308:
292:
275:
258:
241:
191:
190:
176:
128:
116:
98:
59:
57:
34:
580:
579:
575:
574:
573:
571:
570:
569:
568:
562:deletion review
551:
477:
473:
456:
447:
436:
434:
432:
423:
407:
405:
389:
384:
379:
351:reliable source
316:
311:
306:
288:
271:
254:
237:
133:
124:
89:
73:
70:
55:
53:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
578:
576:
567:
566:
546:
545:
524:
498:
481:
467:
444:
433:
420:
415:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
324:
323:
298:
297:
280:
263:
246:
194:
193:
130:
75:Bob Crittenden
69:
67:Bob Crittenden
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
577:
565:
563:
559:
554:
548:
547:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
525:
523:
519:
515:
510:
506:
502:
499:
497:
493:
489:
485:
482:
480:
476:
470:
465:
461:
458:
457:
454:
450:
449:North America
442:
439:
430:
426:
425:North America
418:
413:
410:
395:
392:
387:
382:
376:
372:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
327:
326:
325:
322:
319:
314:
309:
303:
300:
299:
295:
291:
290:North America
286:
281:
278:
274:
273:North America
269:
264:
261:
257:
256:North America
252:
247:
244:
240:
239:North America
235:
230:
229:
228:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
206:
202:
198:
189:
185:
182:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
139:
136:
135:Find sources:
131:
127:
123:
120:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
552:
549:
526:
508:
500:
483:
459:
435:
416:
406:
342:
338:
334:
330:
301:
213:
209:
204:
200:
195:
183:
177:
169:
162:
156:
150:
144:
134:
121:
49:
47:
31:
28:
160:free images
474:reply here
349:ones, not
558:talk page
205:different
37:talk page
560:or in a
438:Relisted
409:Relisted
335:existing
197:WP:BLP1E
119:View log
39:or in a
527:Comment
501:Comment
464:WP:PROF
355:Bearcat
347:primary
343:contain
218:Bearcat
214:notable
210:existed
201:subject
166:WP refs
154:scholar
92:protect
87:history
484:Delete
460:Delete
138:Google
96:delete
50:delete
181:JSTOR
142:books
126:Stats
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
539:talk
518:talk
492:talk
359:talk
339:much
302:Keep
222:talk
174:FENS
148:news
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
56:czar
385:ncr
331:one
312:ncr
188:TWL
117:– (
52:.
541:)
520:)
494:)
390:am
380:do
361:)
317:am
307:do
287:.
270:.
253:.
236:.
224:)
168:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
537:(
516:(
490:(
471:|
357:(
220:(
192:)
184:·
178:·
170:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
140:(
132:(
129:)
122:·
115:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.