355:
mention of these, but not including
Bonsall, as well as passing mentions in coverage of Bonsall sightings). I'm not sure that it's worth mentioning in that article, but as there's a possibility that it could be used, or at least discussed, in development of that article, I suggest moving it to a talk
200:
explicitly warn against using News-of-the-Weird or slow news day reporting to establish notability of an event of dubious provenance. This seems to me to be exactly the case with this stub. There is not likely to be any further development of sources which would satisfy
437:
seems dubious. The BBC was careful to avoid confirming even the factually verifiable details, like whether the videotape was really sold or whether NASA said they saw a similar craft; it uses "has reportedly" and "are said to have" to artfully disavow the claims.
306:- I don't think there is enough reliably sourced content available to justify an independent article. The only reliable source seems to be the BBC article linked in the external links section. The content should be summarized and added to
481:- UFO Flap articles tend to be poorly sourced and of limited encyclopedic value. This is a perfect example of what is wrong with the category. I'd support merging into a list of British UFO flaps, or plain deletion.
508:
The sources are just an echo chamber of space-filling commentary, and there is nothing encyclopedic which can be said about "events" like this. It is possible to create a good article about fake photographs, see
166:
266:
119:
226:
246:
160:
442:, by contrast, confirmed the payment, the NASA story, and not just that a UFO was filmed over a field, but that "a flying saucer hovered above her home". (A later
408:
suggest that the incident has attracted ongoing attention in reliable sources, lending credence its perceived importance. It also seems to transcend
126:
458:
is dead, and contains only a minor one-sentence description of the event. The author of the aboutderbyshire.co.uk also wrote a similar piece for
396:, which as nominator points out could be dismissed as "slow news day" stories spanning eight months. However, less-detailed accounts in
348:
330:
307:
497:
352:
17:
513:, but someone claiming they filmed a UFO with no possible verification and no secondary-source analysis does not make an article.
454:
article seems well written but equivalent to a personal blog (i.e. one author, no apparent editor/organization, self-published),
92:
87:
96:
181:
148:
79:
541:
40:
443:
417:
214:
210:
142:
485:
493:
451:
412:
status by having a lasting impact, spawning ongoing reports ("known internationally as a UFO hotspot") in
537:
459:
361:
138:
36:
522:
471:
409:
365:
342:
317:
298:
278:
258:
238:
218:
206:
61:
397:
83:
338:
373:. There were multiple sources of independent reliable source coverage of the event in 2000-2001, in
197:
413:
188:
174:
518:
510:
75:
67:
55:
202:
489:
405:
274:
254:
234:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
536:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
450:
identified the film buyer as Fox TV). Of the 3 sources cited in the
Knowledge (XXG) article,
420:/walks & "International Bonsall UFO Society" meetings at the Barley Maw pub mentioned in
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
357:
467:
334:
329:. Insufficient in depth coverage for its own article. Best to merge any usable content to
294:
154:
393:
514:
314:
270:
250:
230:
113:
425:
421:
380:
463:
386:
290:
455:
374:
326:
311:
198:
Our guidelines for writing articles about these kinds of subjects
530:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
351:, as it apparently followed other UFO sightings in Derbyshire (
289:. Nothing notable here, just old news, and never much news.
462:, but that seems to be a tourism site than a news site.
109:
105:
101:
173:
428:, and other tourism-drawing UFO nonsense in the area.
187:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
544:). No further edits should be made to this page.
267:list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions
8:
265:Note: This debate has been included in the
245:Note: This debate has been included in the
227:list of England-related deletion discussions
225:Note: This debate has been included in the
247:list of Events-related deletion discussions
264:
244:
224:
203:our independent sourcing requirements
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
390:(apparently - mentioned, not linked)
349:UFO sightings in the United Kingdom
331:UFO sightings in the United Kingdom
308:UFO sightings in the United Kingdom
24:
347:Maybe it could be mentioned in
205:and this remains essentially a
1:
561:
523:10:12, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
472:01:27, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
452:the aboutderbyshire.co.uk
366:21:42, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
343:21:10, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
318:16:55, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
299:15:36, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
279:00:23, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
259:00:23, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
239:00:23, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
219:00:13, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
62:06:14, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
533:Please do not modify it.
460:peakdistrictonline.co.uk
32:Please do not modify it.
500:) 08:33, 13 June 2014
433:The reliability of
511:Cottingley Fairies
394:other news sources
48:The result was
502:
488:comment added by
356:or user subpage.
281:
261:
241:
552:
535:
501:
482:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
60:
58:
34:
560:
559:
555:
554:
553:
551:
550:
549:
548:
542:deletion review
531:
483:
353:Derby Telegraph
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
56:
53:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
558:
556:
547:
546:
526:
525:
503:
475:
474:
456:this UKTV link
446:Matlock Mirror
430:
429:
426:this 2013 book
422:this 2005 book
414:this 2008 book
406:this 2013 book
368:
345:
320:
301:
283:
282:
262:
242:
209:problem here.
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
557:
545:
543:
539:
534:
528:
527:
524:
520:
516:
512:
507:
504:
499:
495:
491:
487:
480:
477:
476:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
449:
447:
441:
436:
432:
431:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
401:
395:
391:
389:
388:Straits Times
384:
383:
378:
377:
372:
369:
367:
363:
359:
354:
350:
346:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
321:
319:
316:
313:
309:
305:
302:
300:
296:
292:
288:
285:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
263:
260:
256:
252:
248:
243:
240:
236:
232:
228:
223:
222:
221:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
199:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
57:FreeRangeFrog
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
532:
529:
505:
490:Salimfadhley
484:— Preceding
478:
445:
439:
434:
400:Sciences 360
399:
387:
381:
375:
370:
322:
303:
286:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
49:
47:
31:
28:
410:WP:ONEEVENT
358:Peter James
207:WP:ONEEVENT
161:free images
76:Bonsall UFO
68:Bonsall UFO
440:The Mirror
435:The Mirror
398:this 2008
382:The Mirror
335:LuckyLouie
538:talk page
418:UFO tours
371:Weak keep
271:• Gene93k
251:• Gene93k
231:• Gene93k
37:talk page
540:or in a
515:Johnuniq
498:contribs
486:unsigned
376:BBC News
120:View log
39:or in a
448:article
402:article
323:Delete
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
506:Delete
479:delete
392:, and
304:Delete
287:Delete
139:Google
97:delete
50:delete
464:Agyle
444:2002
291:Szzuk
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
519:talk
494:talk
468:talk
424:and
404:and
362:talk
339:talk
333:. -
325:per
295:talk
275:talk
255:talk
235:talk
215:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
327:MrX
310:.-
211:jps
189:TWL
118:– (
521:)
496:•
470:)
416:,
385:,
379:,
364:)
341:)
312:Mr
297:)
277:)
269:.
257:)
249:.
237:)
229:.
217:)
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
52:.
517:(
492:(
466:(
360:(
337:(
315:X
293:(
273:(
253:(
233:(
213:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
54:§
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.