204:
What I meant was, the article clearly reads as nonsense - e.g. "During the attack Char directed
Baraskytiv to follow him to the base in Jaburo during Char and Amuro Ray's fight Char ordered for Baraskytiv's help..." is utterly unintelligible to the average reader. It's not the concept that it's
140:
An article about a seemingly minor character from the Gundam series - as far as I can tell, he only appeared in one episode and was easily dispatched. No references or assertion of importance are given. This article would be far more appropriate for a specialist Wikia site rather than
Knowledge
219:
That reads like a run-on sentence to me, not nonsense: "During the attack, Char directed
Baraskytiv to follow him to the base in Jaburo. During Char and Amuro Ray's fight, Char ordered for Baraskytiv's help..." (that's just punctuation fixes, BTW)
352:. May as well, the content of this article is already mentioned in the Zock's article, more or less. ...hell, I think the Zock's article says MORE already, because it at least qualifies Boraskyniv as being fat.
390:
284:- almost laughably unnotable. We typically handle characters such as him in episode summaries; they don't even receive mention in character lists, much less get their own article. —
254:
133:
295:
231:
205:
insignificant that makes it nonsense, it's the fact that it's simply a bunch of Gundam jargon packed into an incoherent paragraph.
17:
100:
95:
104:
87:
445:
164:
36:
444:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
290:
226:
430:
405:
380:
361:
340:
319:
300:
273:
236:
214:
199:
183:
154:
69:
188:
it what way does it resemble nonsense--it may not be significant, but how does that make it nonsense?
91:
401:
357:
315:
426:
376:
349:
336:
328:
210:
179:
49:
83:
75:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
285:
266:
221:
147:
65:
61:
397:
353:
311:
415:
371:
332:
206:
195:
175:
172:
121:
261:
168:
142:
369:
Incidental character that is simply ordered around before being killed off. --
54:
190:
438:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
310:
Not even enough notability to merge into a character list.
391:
list of
Fictional characters-related deletion discussions
128:
117:
113:
109:
255:
list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
448:). No further edits should be made to this page.
163:per nom. Unsalvageable; almost qualifies for
8:
389:: This debate has been included in the
253:: This debate has been included in the
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
167:in my opinion. No evidence of
1:
431:22:19, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
406:22:10, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
381:23:43, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
362:23:36, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
341:19:03, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
320:23:31, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
301:20:13, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
274:14:33, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
237:22:52, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
215:22:15, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
200:16:25, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
184:13:44, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
155:12:13, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
70:01:51, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
465:
441:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
173:external references.
423:
44:The result was
416:
408:
394:
276:
270:
258:
151:
68:
456:
443:
422:
419:
395:
385:
298:
293:
288:
271:
268:
264:
259:
249:
234:
229:
224:
152:
149:
145:
131:
125:
107:
60:
57:
34:
464:
463:
459:
458:
457:
455:
454:
453:
452:
446:deletion review
439:
420:
417:
296:
291:
286:
267:
262:
232:
227:
222:
165:patent nonsense
148:
143:
127:
98:
82:
79:
55:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
462:
460:
451:
450:
434:
433:
414:per Jtarinor.
409:
383:
364:
343:
322:
304:
303:
278:
277:
246:
245:
244:
243:
242:
241:
240:
239:
138:
137:
78:
73:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
461:
449:
447:
442:
436:
435:
432:
428:
424:
413:
410:
407:
403:
399:
392:
388:
384:
382:
378:
374:
373:
368:
365:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
344:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
323:
321:
317:
313:
309:
306:
305:
302:
299:
294:
289:
283:
280:
279:
275:
272:
265:
256:
252:
248:
247:
238:
235:
230:
225:
218:
217:
216:
212:
208:
203:
202:
201:
197:
193:
192:
187:
186:
185:
181:
177:
174:
170:
166:
162:
159:
158:
157:
156:
153:
146:
135:
130:
123:
119:
115:
111:
106:
102:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:
77:
74:
72:
71:
67:
63:
59:
58:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
440:
437:
411:
386:
370:
366:
345:
324:
307:
281:
250:
189:
160:
139:
53:
45:
43:
31:
28:
350:MSM-10 Zock
329:MSM-10 Zock
50:MSM-10 Zock
169:notability
84:Boraskyniv
76:Boraskyniv
62:delusional
398:Raven1977
354:MalikCarr
312:Edward321
412:Redirect
346:Redirect
333:Jtrainor
325:Redirect
207:Luinfana
176:Luinfana
141:itself.
134:View log
66:kangaroo
46:Redirect
269:(rawr!)
150:(rawr!)
101:protect
96:history
367:Delete
308:Delete
282:Delete
263:Bettia
161:Delete
144:Bettia
129:delete
105:delete
372:Farix
171:, no
132:) – (
122:views
114:watch
110:links
56:Jerry
16:<
427:talk
421:4314
418:Ryan
402:talk
387:Note
377:Talk
358:talk
337:talk
316:talk
297:1000
287:Dino
251:Note
233:1000
223:Dino
211:talk
196:talk
180:talk
118:logs
92:talk
88:edit
396:--
393:.
348:to
327:to
292:guy
257:.
228:guy
191:DGG
48:to
429:)
404:)
379:)
360:)
339:)
331:.
318:)
213:)
198:)
182:)
120:|
116:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
64:¤
52:.
425:(
400:(
375:(
356:(
335:(
314:(
260:—
220:—
209:(
194:(
178:(
136:)
126:(
124:)
86:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.