Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Border history of Romania (second nomination) - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

358:- The captions in the article, while they surely could be expanded, made it reasonably clear that the various states in the region were not all called Romania. "Romania" and "Romanian" are one of those ambiguous terms that can mean both a citizen of a state of Romania, and a speaker of a Balkan Romance language. We don't present the history of some other countries like that because no one has written those articles yet. A category would be a poor substitute for this page; shifting borders would be harder to track. (FWIW, countries with less complicated histories can present similar data differently; look at 343:: As said above in various ways, one of the problems is that a state called Romania has only existed since the 19th century, not the 1st century BC. What exactly was going on during those two millennia is not straightforward enough to be able to be conveyed by just a series of maps. (Otherwise, why don't we present the histories of all countries like that?) 310:
In the middle ages, the East-Roman Empire was called Romania, thus, the title is not hisorically correct. If the title was eg. Historical states on the terriory of present-day Romania, there would be no problem with it. But if these maps were included in Category:Maps of the history of Romania, there
133:
Apart from being practically useless (the images can be used later even if the article gets deleted now), this article also runs a mild risk of becoming a POV fork at some time, since it allows presenting historical states without providing enough context on what they do or do not have in common with
371:
Indirectly, it does have somewhat to do with ethnic politics – most ethnic groups over here are trying to prove in various ways that "they were first" in the neighbourhood where they currently are and even its surroundings. In this sense, the situation is not analogous to the US, where a consensus
125:
article. This standpoint is now more or less proven by the facts that (1) there have been 4 edits to this article since the previous AfD, none of which was in any way substantial, and (2) the only reference to this article (from the article space) remains a single link in the "See also" section of
323:. Very simply, this article contains information that is more easily presented visually than in text. This is another example. I did not check each map, but it seems to me there are few if any fair use images there; that is not a reason not to have a gallery of these maps. Perhaps a 266:
per KissL, Grandmasterka, and DaGizza. To which I will add: not only is that article a POV fork of no relevant use, but it is also not about what its title says it is about (the borders of Dacia and medieval Transylvania are certainly not the borders "of Romania", and wikipedia catalogs
120:
resulted in no consensus more than half a year ago. Many users voted "keep" in the hope that the article would shortly be improved. I still believe this is not possible, since whatever encyclopedic content could be included in this article belongs rather to the
397:, its just maps and maps. Well, my opinion on this article being kept has changed. Since nothing has been done since June 2006, this article does not deserve to be kept. As for the maps, they can be in a category and I don't see why its useful. 493:. WP articles are not galleries. Nor should they be. The function of pictures is to illustrate articles and not to be articles by themselves. While deleting the articles, keep images of course and use them in proper articles with 199:. As I said before, these pictures would be better served in the history of Romania article itself, if anywhere. That article is better than it was the first time around, but could still use more pictures. 117: 409:
Notable for Romanian history. It needs clean-up, but that's not a good enough reason to delete it. It also needs more text, but maps are a very good way to refer information. --
109: 250:
I believe all objections are about the un-wikiness of the article, not about its current state. When something is absurd, you don't make it better by expanding it.
372:
exists on historiography (unless I'm badly mistaken). However, if we were talking about an article titled "Border history of the US" containing just the maps in
82: 77: 86: 663:. Even if additional text were to be added, giving the images narrative support, the material would still be better placed in individual articles such as 533:- on the one hand, this is not the border history "of Romania", but rather goes back much farther. On the other hand, given the existence of articles like 421:- Border History is not a good way to organise this; it'd make more sense split up, the maps put into the main article or into articles about each period. 538: 69: 674: 651: 631: 619: 585: 569: 549: 523: 501: 479: 457: 443: 425: 413: 401: 383: 366: 350: 335: 315: 300: 281: 254: 241: 227: 215: 191: 174: 148: 51: 373: 359: 210: 581:, the definition of national boundaries is a very significant topic, especially for a country that has evolved so much as this one. -- 453:- Knowledge (XXG) is not a mere collection of images, and I have seen no indication that the "article" in question will be otherwise. 17: 659:. The maps are good content, but there is no reason for them to be collected under this single heading. The topic is covered in 578: 558: 542: 602: 73: 328: 598: 534: 497:
series being the most natural candidate. A commons entry is also a solution to have all these maps handy in one place. --
689: 36: 516: 274: 65: 57: 688:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
237:
notable topic, needs expanding (but how many articles in need of expansion are there and are never deleted?).
223:
as unencyclopaedic at present. However, I will change my vote if the cleanup is carried out satisfactorily.
671: 205: 640: 376:
with some captions, my opinion would still be that it is not (and has no hope of becoming) encyclopedic.
545:, the article does have potential, provided either a change in title or a shift in focus to post-1859. 134:
modern states, unlike other articles containing sufficient amounts of prose (such as the well-written
628: 439:
is not a rational for deletion, I see none other presented. Is this nomination a joke or something?
594: 582: 668: 660: 648: 565:
all details, is better to have a separate article and in the main article to have a link to it.--
562: 494: 200: 135: 127: 122: 48: 612: 171: 161: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
476: 490: 184:
I've posted a short message to the talk pages of all users who took part in the first AfD.
158: 546: 380: 347: 297: 188: 145: 410: 639:
This article is merely a collection of maps that already appear in the satisfactory
608: 566: 520: 398: 268: 165: 103: 472: 454: 363: 332: 238: 224: 627:, just delete as per Piotrus' arguments. This is too lousy to be salvageable. 498: 440: 422: 377: 362:. If this has something to do with Balkan ethnic politics, please say so. - 344: 294: 271: 185: 142: 312: 278: 251: 157:
Per nom and the arguments for deletion given in the first nomination.
647:
as suggested above. Certainly the article should not remain here.
664: 682:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
327:
to something more precisely descriptive of the contents, like
99: 95: 91: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 692:). No further edits should be made to this page. 597:. If it had more text, it could be similar to 277:imaginary realms, not individual fantasies). 8: 557:and maybe change the name of the article in 311:would be no need for this article at all -- 539:Territorial evolution of the United States 667:(which indeed has one of these images). 605:, but currently it is just a gallery.-- 609:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 374:Image:USA Territorial Growth small.gif 360:Image:USA Territorial Growth small.gif 329:Gallery of historical maps of Romania 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 517:commons:Border history of Romania 293:this is not Wikimedia commons. - 579:Territorial evolution of Romania 559:Territorial evolution of Romania 543:Territorial evolution of Canada 603:Territorial changes of Germany 591:Transwikify (merge and delete) 1: 599:Territorial changes of Poland 535:Territorial changes of Poland 511:per nom. I copy this page to 118:first nomination for deletion 561:. We can not include in the 709: 652:20:18, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 632:09:46, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 620:21:11, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 586:20:23, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 570:01:21, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 550:01:03, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 524:20:33, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 502:18:47, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 480:16:08, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 458:15:18, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 444:14:51, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 426:14:44, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 414:13:59, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 402:13:00, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 384:16:45, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 367:15:47, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 351:15:33, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 336:12:02, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 316:10:55, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 301:10:32, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 282:10:22, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 255:10:24, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 242:10:08, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 228:09:47, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 216:09:33, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 192:09:12, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 175:09:08, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 149:15:50, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 675:17:35, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 66:Border history of Romania 58:Border history of Romania 52:22:39, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 685:Please do not modify it. 643:series. Alternatively, 595:commons:Atlas of Romania 32:Please do not modify it. 331:, might be in order. - 159:Knowledge (XXG) is Not 641:History of Roumania 661:History of Romania 563:History of Romania 495:History of Romania 136:History of Romania 128:History of Romania 123:History of Romania 162:Wikimedia Commons 700: 687: 617: 615: 213: 208: 203: 107: 89: 34: 708: 707: 703: 702: 701: 699: 698: 697: 696: 690:deletion review 683: 629:Pavel Vozenilek 618: 613: 607: 469:Move to Commons 437:Needs a cleanup 364:Smerdis of Tlön 333:Smerdis of Tlön 211: 206: 201: 80: 64: 61: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 706: 704: 695: 694: 678: 677: 654: 634: 622: 606: 588: 577:and rename as 572: 552: 527: 526: 505: 504: 483: 482: 461: 460: 447: 446: 429: 428: 416: 404: 392: 391: 390: 389: 388: 387: 386: 318: 304: 303: 284: 260: 259: 258: 257: 245: 244: 231: 230: 218: 194: 178: 177: 114: 113: 60: 55: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 705: 693: 691: 686: 680: 679: 676: 673: 670: 669:Mike Christie 666: 662: 658: 655: 653: 650: 649:Peterkingiron 646: 642: 638: 635: 633: 630: 626: 623: 621: 616: 610: 604: 600: 596: 592: 589: 587: 584: 580: 576: 573: 571: 568: 564: 560: 556: 553: 551: 548: 544: 540: 536: 532: 529: 528: 525: 522: 518: 514: 510: 507: 506: 503: 500: 496: 492: 488: 485: 484: 481: 478: 474: 470: 466: 463: 462: 459: 456: 452: 449: 448: 445: 442: 438: 434: 431: 430: 427: 424: 420: 417: 415: 412: 408: 405: 403: 400: 396: 393: 385: 382: 379: 375: 370: 369: 368: 365: 361: 357: 354: 353: 352: 349: 346: 342: 339: 338: 337: 334: 330: 326: 322: 319: 317: 314: 309: 306: 305: 302: 299: 296: 295:Francis Tyers 292: 288: 285: 283: 280: 276: 273: 270: 265: 262: 261: 256: 253: 249: 248: 247: 246: 243: 240: 236: 233: 232: 229: 226: 222: 219: 217: 214: 209: 204: 198: 195: 193: 190: 187: 183: 180: 179: 176: 173: 172: 169: 168: 163: 160: 156: 153: 152: 151: 150: 147: 144: 141: 137: 131: 129: 124: 119: 111: 105: 101: 97: 93: 88: 84: 79: 75: 71: 67: 63: 62: 59: 56: 54: 53: 50: 49:Alex Bakharev 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 684: 681: 656: 644: 636: 624: 590: 574: 554: 530: 512: 508: 486: 468: 464: 450: 436: 432: 418: 406: 394: 355: 340: 324: 320: 307: 290: 286: 263: 234: 220: 196: 181: 170: 166: 154: 139: 132: 115: 45: 43: 31: 28: 645:Transwikify 547:Biruitorul 138:series). 130:article. 583:FateClub 411:Roamataa 110:View log 567:MariusM 531:Neutral 521:Yakudza 513:Commoms 399:Terence 356:Comment 341:Comment 275:popular 182:Comment 140:Delete. 83:protect 78:history 672:(talk) 657:Delete 637:Delete 625:Delete 515:. See 509:delete 491:WP:NOT 487:delete 473:Jmabel 455:Olessi 451:Delete 419:Delete 395:Delete 308:Delete 287:Delete 264:Delete 239:Dpotop 225:Vizjim 221:Delete 207:master 197:Delete 155:Delete 87:delete 46:Delete 665:Dacia 614:talk 499:Irpen 441:WilyD 423:fel64 291:Merge 202:Grand 167:Gizza 104:views 96:watch 92:links 16:< 575:Keep 555:Keep 541:and 519:. -- 489:per 477:Talk 471:. - 465:Keep 433:Keep 407:Keep 381:issL 348:issL 325:move 321:Keep 313:KIDB 279:Dahn 272:more 252:Dahn 235:Keep 189:issL 146:issL 126:the 100:logs 74:talk 70:edit 601:or 593:to 467:or 289:or 269:the 108:– ( 537:, 475:| 435:- 212:ka 164:. 116:A 102:| 98:| 94:| 90:| 85:| 81:| 76:| 72:| 611:| 378:K 345:K 298:· 186:K 143:K 112:) 106:) 68:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Alex Bakharev
22:39, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Border history of Romania
Border history of Romania
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
first nomination for deletion
History of Romania
History of Romania
History of Romania
K
issL
15:50, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Knowledge (XXG) is Not
Wikimedia Commons
Gizza

09:08, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
K
issL

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.