Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/BaDoinkVR - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

201:. They give the rationale: "The article is appears to be written by employee (SPA using a code name 'labia') and hyperlinks with an "external link" to the adult website. The 'adult' company is one of millions. Many attend conventions and many receive "pornography awards." Knowledge (XXG) does not have an 'adult filter' that would prevent access to children. Bing, Yahoo, and Google have SafeSearch to screen children, however, this is circumvented when a child goes to Knowledge (XXG) and gains access to adult content. Children routinely use Knowledge (XXG) to do essays or homework. That is of concern to parents who are motivate to donate and support Knowledge (XXG) financially, because they believe they are donating to educate our children." 706:
These "sources" are the same kind obtained when a PR firm is hired. (The articles promote the business, sell the products, and quote the business owner on how wonderful the newest innovation is.) The page also hyperlinks to an adult-subscription site (for profit). Seems the intent of this Knowledge
866:
We would like to clarify that we don't seek to censor adult content. Even with "adult" content, the sources typically add credibility to an article that is encyclopedic. With this page, the sources are publicity/press releases and the endorsements are coming from the employees. With suggestive
684:- but K.e.coffman above has identified an issue with sourcing. None of the references provided meet the criteria for establishing notability and all rely on extensive quotes/interviews from the company and their officers. Article Content is not intellectually independent, fails 429:
Could you please revisit what you wrote, in light that the requester will read this discussion. I am sure that they not be very pleased to read your comment at all. I understand how you may have seen this, thought 'WTF?' and then made this comment in haste. Please reconsider --
553: 555: 635:, passing mentions and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Just typical tech startup promo 'cruft. Knowledge (XXG) is not censored, but neither is it a collection of articles on nn companies. 166: 578:
Thanks for that, I asked in case I'd missed something. I don't agree GNG has been met - none of those references pass the criteria for establishing notability. The books are mere mentions-in-passing.
327: 119: 615: 272: 242: 227: 529: 347: 287: 925:
I looked at the sources, and they're mostly quotes from the CEO of the company, mentions in a general discussion of virtuality reality porn etc, or random awards. Fails
656:
applies. Furthermore, parents can purchase parental control software that is available from many vendors to limit children's access to internet content. See the article
867:
photos, this seems more promotional, rather than "informational." We hope the editors who vote can take a closer look at the references (these speak for themselves).
160: 257: 481:- Redacted above per the ping below - Sources look fine and there's plenty more online, Not sure about the whole NOTCENSORED thing however this still meets GNG. – 305: 198: 542: 540: 379:. The alleged COI issues are surmountable. Should Knowledge (XXG) purge notable but not famous porn articles because children also use the site? 814:
got pinged back into this so I reviewed the sources; this has substantial third-party magazine articles written about the company which pass
126: 302: 733: 17: 729: 536: 950: 902: 544: 435: 205: 92: 87: 766: 532: 181: 96: 983: 40: 513:, which sources in particular look fine? None that I have seen could be described as such, have you seen some online? 148: 818:. They are promotional in a sense, but they're also independent from the source and appear to be more than just PR. 79: 847:
and the content is promo 'cruft. Might as well delete now, instead of kicking the can down the road, so to speak.
534: 790: 681: 653: 603: 376: 823: 798: 142: 844: 725: 712: 624: 979: 884: 852: 750: 668: 640: 611: 57: 36: 138: 546: 964: 937: 916: 856: 827: 802: 779: 754: 721: 716: 708: 698: 672: 644: 584: 573: 519: 494: 473: 449: 417: 388: 359: 339: 317: 294: 279: 264: 249: 234: 219: 61: 933: 291: 276: 261: 246: 231: 174: 685: 876: 819: 794: 188: 926: 840: 689: 628: 789:
I have not reviewed the sources to check to see if it passes notability, but it clearly passes
384: 355: 335: 313: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
978:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
946: 745:
I've unstruck the !vote; SPAs are allowed to vote and the comment is already marked as such.
632: 372: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
888: 872: 848: 746: 636: 607: 53: 815: 538: 431: 929: 892: 657: 561: 508: 482: 461: 424: 405: 154: 83: 204:
Yes the OTRS customer did allow me to link to the ticket and publish the rationale :)
880: 693: 579: 514: 896: 776: 380: 351: 331: 309: 113: 662: 839:-- the nomination may have been flawed, but the subject clearly does not meet 949:
is a very good point when taking the non-press release sources into account.
75: 67: 560:
All of which IMHO establishes notability and certainly meets GNG. –
631:& significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is blogs, 972:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
460:
Whoops I'd forgot all about this so have redacted all, Cheers, –
52:
defaulting to keep and w/o prejudice to a future renomination.
793:
which is what I think this AfD is about. I'd vote soft keep.
769:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
680:
I disagree with the reasoning provided for the nomination -
328:
list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions
109: 105: 101: 173: 707:(XXG) page is to sell and promote various products. 775:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 187: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 986:). No further edits should be made to this page. 346:Note: This discussion has been included in the 326:Note: This discussion has been included in the 286:Note: This discussion has been included in the 271:Note: This discussion has been included in the 256:Note: This discussion has been included in the 241:Note: This discussion has been included in the 226:Note: This discussion has been included in the 273:list of California-related deletion discussions 243:list of Technology-related deletion discussions 228:list of Companies-related deletion discussions 864:The requester has added a clarification that 375:and the main deletion rationale goes against 348:list of Websites-related deletion discussions 288:list of New York-related deletion discussions 8: 945:Not meant to have a dog in this debate, but 658:"The Best Parental Control Software of 2018" 652:– Relative to the nomination for deletion, 400: 345: 325: 285: 270: 258:list of Spain-related deletion discussions 255: 240: 225: 301:Note: This debate has been added to the 865: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 371:as the subject appears to satisfy 24: 604:Knowledge (XXG) is not censored 602:Passes the notability bar, and 1: 965:12:18, 27 February 2018 (UTC) 938:09:19, 27 February 2018 (UTC) 917:17:53, 26 February 2018 (UTC) 857:01:00, 26 February 2018 (UTC) 828:20:55, 26 February 2018 (UTC) 803:07:25, 23 February 2018 (UTC) 780:06:26, 23 February 2018 (UTC) 755:01:00, 26 February 2018 (UTC) 717:01:35, 20 February 2018 (UTC) 699:14:57, 19 February 2018 (UTC) 673:15:10, 17 February 2018 (UTC) 645:07:13, 17 February 2018 (UTC) 616:21:43, 16 February 2018 (UTC) 585:11:41, 27 February 2018 (UTC) 574:19:08, 26 February 2018 (UTC) 520:18:47, 26 February 2018 (UTC) 495:18:19, 26 February 2018 (UTC) 474:18:19, 26 February 2018 (UTC) 450:14:04, 16 February 2018 (UTC) 418:13:35, 16 February 2018 (UTC) 389:12:26, 16 February 2018 (UTC) 360:12:16, 16 February 2018 (UTC) 340:12:16, 16 February 2018 (UTC) 318:12:16, 16 February 2018 (UTC) 295:23:58, 15 February 2018 (UTC) 280:23:58, 15 February 2018 (UTC) 265:23:58, 15 February 2018 (UTC) 250:23:58, 15 February 2018 (UTC) 235:23:58, 15 February 2018 (UTC) 220:22:54, 15 February 2018 (UTC) 1003: 62:02:19, 4 March 2018 (UTC) 975:Please do not modify it. 197:Doing this on behalf of 32:Please do not modify it. 303:WikiProject Pornography 199:ticket:2018013110005508 734:few or no other edits 736:outside this topic. 531:(Promo piece tho), 919: 782: 757: 737: 362: 342: 306:list of deletions 297: 282: 267: 252: 237: 994: 977: 962: 957: 914: 909: 900: 885:Northamerica1000 869: 774: 772: 770: 744: 719: 671: 571: 566: 512: 492: 487: 471: 466: 447: 442: 428: 415: 410: 403: 402: 320: 217: 212: 192: 191: 177: 129: 117: 99: 34: 1002: 1001: 997: 996: 995: 993: 992: 991: 990: 984:deletion review 973: 958: 951: 910: 903: 870: 783: 765: 763: 667: 567: 562: 506: 488: 483: 467: 462: 443: 436: 432:The Golden Rule 422: 411: 406: 399: 300: 213: 206: 134: 125: 90: 74: 71: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1000: 998: 989: 988: 968: 967: 940: 920: 859: 833: 832: 831: 830: 806: 805: 791:WP:NOTCENSORED 773: 762: 761: 760: 759: 758: 739: 738: 701: 682:WP:NOTCENSORED 675: 666:for starters. 654:WP:NOTCENSORED 647: 618: 596: 595: 594: 593: 592: 591: 590: 589: 588: 587: 558: 550: 549: 548: 523: 522: 498: 497: 455: 454: 453: 452: 391: 377:WP:NOTCENSORED 364: 363: 343: 322: 321: 298: 283: 268: 253: 238: 195: 194: 131: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 999: 987: 985: 981: 976: 970: 969: 966: 963: 961: 956: 955: 948: 944: 941: 939: 935: 931: 928: 924: 921: 918: 915: 913: 908: 907: 898: 894: 890: 886: 882: 878: 877:SportingFlyer 874: 868: 863: 860: 858: 854: 850: 846: 842: 838: 835: 834: 829: 825: 821: 820:SportingFlyer 817: 813: 810: 809: 808: 807: 804: 800: 796: 795:SportingFlyer 792: 788: 785: 784: 781: 778: 771: 768: 756: 752: 748: 743: 742: 741: 740: 735: 731: 727: 723: 718: 714: 710: 705: 702: 700: 697: 696: 691: 687: 683: 679: 676: 674: 670: 669:North America 665: 664: 659: 655: 651: 648: 646: 642: 638: 634: 630: 626: 622: 619: 617: 613: 609: 605: 601: 598: 597: 586: 583: 582: 577: 576: 575: 572: 570: 565: 559: 556: 554: 551: 547: 545: 543: 541: 539: 537: 535: 533: 530: 527: 526: 525: 524: 521: 518: 517: 510: 505: 502: 501: 500: 499: 496: 493: 491: 486: 480: 477: 476: 475: 472: 470: 465: 459: 458: 457: 456: 451: 448: 446: 441: 440: 433: 426: 421: 420: 419: 416: 414: 409: 397: 396: 392: 390: 386: 382: 378: 374: 370: 366: 365: 361: 357: 353: 349: 344: 341: 337: 333: 329: 324: 323: 319: 315: 311: 307: 304: 299: 296: 293: 289: 284: 281: 278: 274: 269: 266: 263: 259: 254: 251: 248: 244: 239: 236: 233: 229: 224: 223: 222: 221: 218: 216: 211: 210: 202: 200: 190: 186: 183: 180: 176: 172: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 140: 137: 136:Find sources: 132: 128: 124: 121: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 974: 971: 959: 953: 952: 942: 922: 911: 905: 904: 861: 845:WP:CORPDEPTH 836: 811: 786: 764: 703: 694: 677: 661: 649: 625:WP:CORPDEPTH 620: 599: 580: 568: 563: 515: 503: 489: 484: 478: 468: 463: 444: 438: 437: 412: 407: 394: 393: 368: 367:Inclined to 214: 208: 207: 203: 196: 184: 178: 170: 163: 157: 151: 145: 135: 122: 50:no consensus 49: 47: 31: 28: 873:K.e.coffman 849:K.e.coffman 747:K.e.coffman 732:) has made 663:PC Magazine 637:K.e.coffman 479:Speedy Keep 395:Speedy Keep 161:free images 54:Ad Orientem 889:XOR'easter 608:XOR'easter 434:. Thanks. 401:(Redacted) 980:talk page 934:pingó mió 930:Galobtter 901:pinging. 893:Davey2010 722:LuvToEdit 709:LuvToEdit 686:WP:ORGIND 623:-- Fails 509:Davey2010 425:Davey2010 381:• Gene93k 352:• Gene93k 332:• Gene93k 310:• Gene93k 76:BaDoinkVR 68:BaDoinkVR 37:talk page 982:or in a 927:WP:NCORP 881:HighKing 841:WP:NCORP 767:Relisted 730:contribs 695:HighKing 690:WP:NCORP 629:WP:NCORP 581:HighKing 516:HighKing 292:MT Train 277:MT Train 262:MT Train 247:MT Train 232:MT Train 120:View log 39:or in a 947:WP:SPIP 943:Comment 897:Gene93k 895:, and 862:Comment 837:Comment 787:Comment 777:Spartaz 633:WP:SPIP 552:Books: 504:Comment 373:WP:CORP 167:WP refs 155:scholar 93:protect 88:history 923:Delete 816:WP:GNG 704:Delete 678:Delete 621:Delete 528:News: 139:Google 97:delete 660:from 564:Davey 485:Davey 464:Davey 408:Davey 182:JSTOR 143:books 127:Stats 114:views 106:watch 102:links 16:< 960:dave 912:dave 853:talk 824:talk 812:Keep 799:talk 751:talk 726:talk 713:talk 688:and 650:Keep 641:talk 612:talk 600:Keep 569:2010 490:2010 469:2010 445:dave 413:2010 385:talk 369:keep 356:talk 336:talk 314:talk 215:dave 175:FENS 149:news 110:logs 84:talk 80:edit 58:talk 189:TWL 118:– ( 936:) 891:, 887:, 883:, 879:, 875:, 855:) 843:/ 826:) 801:) 753:) 728:• 720:— 715:) 692:. 643:) 627:/ 614:) 606:. 398:- 387:) 358:) 350:. 338:) 330:. 316:) 308:. 290:. 275:. 260:. 245:. 230:. 169:) 112:| 108:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 60:) 954:! 932:( 906:! 899:: 871:@ 851:( 822:( 797:( 749:( 724:( 711:( 639:( 610:( 557:, 511:: 507:@ 439:! 427:: 423:@ 404:– 383:( 354:( 334:( 312:( 209:! 193:) 185:· 179:· 171:· 164:· 158:· 152:· 146:· 141:( 133:( 130:) 123:· 116:) 78:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Ad Orientem
talk
02:19, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
BaDoinkVR
BaDoinkVR
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
ticket:2018013110005508
!dave

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.