Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Baker abdel munem - Knowledge

Source 📝

339:. The state of the article is quite poor, but that alone is not a reason to delete. I have cleaned up the most obvious problems, so that it is no longer spam or advertisement. With a little more work, any COI issues can also be resolved. (What the hell does "cruft" have to do with this?) His education and diplomatic appointments suggest to me that he is probably notable. A "speedy deletion" in light of that seems, no offense, less than serious. The article has multiple external links which kind of establish notability. An article on an international diplomat hardly falls under 297:
Ph.D.(Engineering),Ph.D.(Economics),Ph.D.(Political Science) Palestine Ambassador to Canada This is certainly worth a discussion. An article about a notable subject written incompetently and sounding like PR justifies only editing; it only justifies deletion if an articles cannot be reasonably made
252:
is an essay (read opinion piece), not a policy, procedure, or guideline. Nobody else had commented on the AfD and AFAIC the nominator had successfully made the case for deletion. Nothing more needed to be said to build consensus on the issue. This is not withstanding the fact that someone left off
371:
Agreed. Politician, diplomat and author. This would need a serious working over by somebody with knowledge of the subject/experience in writing political bios but I think it passes the standards. It is unfair, in my opinion, to class this as spam simply because it doesn't conform to
298:
out of it. And certainly not a speedy. The very idea that an ambassador from one nation to another would be incontestably un-notable, and that it would be totally uncontroversial, does not make sense to me.
58: 118: 314: 343:(meant for speedy deletions mostly) and the only real reason offered for deletion, "Knowledge is not a resume service", has already been mostly corrected. -- 53: 91: 86: 95: 205:
If you're going to list it for speedy deletion, at least include the article number that applies. For example, in this case you would put
253:
the CSD point they thought applied to the article in question (which last time I checked isn't something which deserves comments which
78: 17: 418: 36: 417:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
403: 387: 363: 347: 330: 304: 289: 263: 240: 193: 154: 139: 60: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
261: 227: 180: 152: 82: 286: 74: 66: 356: 400: 322: 282: 258: 214: 167: 149: 209:. Also, this not a vote. You need a reason for delete because this is a discussion. Please see 344: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
355:. While I detest autobiographies and vanity spam on wikipedia, the subject does seem to meet 249: 210: 377: 373: 360: 254: 340: 163: 128: 125: 278: 206: 132: 396: 112: 136: 376:
norms. Even it it was spam it could still be turned into something good.
300: 411:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
166:. This article exists solely to promote the subject. -- 108: 104: 100: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 421:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 313:: This debate has been included in the 7: 315:list of Palestine-related deletions 24: 133:Knowledge is not a resume service 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 281:and blatant demonstration of 438: 404:09:51, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 388:02:06, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 364:23:40, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 348:06:05, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 331:08:59, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 305:04:36, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 290:14:22, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 264:14:18, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 241:14:12, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 194:14:12, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 155:13:39, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 140:13:31, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 61:14:06, 17 April 2007 (UTC) 255:fail to keep a civil tone 414:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 129:vanispamcruftisement 55:Nearly Headless Nick 48:, now that we have 381: 135:. Contested prod. 379: 333: 318: 75:Baker abdel munem 67:Baker abdel munem 429: 416: 385: 382: 329: 327: 319: 309: 238: 237: 234: 231: 225: 224: 221: 218: 191: 190: 187: 184: 178: 177: 174: 171: 126:Autobiographical 116: 98: 56: 50:reliable sources 34: 437: 436: 432: 431: 430: 428: 427: 426: 425: 419:deletion review 412: 383: 378: 323: 321: 235: 232: 229: 228: 222: 219: 216: 215: 188: 185: 182: 181: 175: 172: 169: 168: 89: 73: 70: 54: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 435: 433: 424: 423: 407: 406: 390: 366: 350: 334: 307: 292: 271: 270: 269: 268: 267: 266: 244: 243: 197: 196: 157: 123: 122: 69: 64: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 434: 422: 420: 415: 409: 408: 405: 402: 398: 394: 391: 389: 386: 375: 370: 367: 365: 362: 358: 357:WP:NOTABILITY 354: 351: 349: 346: 342: 338: 335: 332: 328: 326: 316: 312: 308: 306: 303: 302: 296: 293: 291: 288: 284: 280: 276: 273: 272: 265: 262: 260: 259:Thewinchester 256: 251: 248: 247: 246: 245: 242: 239: 226: 212: 208: 204: 201: 200: 199: 198: 195: 192: 179: 165: 161: 158: 156: 153: 151: 150:Thewinchester 147: 146:Speedy delete 144: 143: 142: 141: 138: 134: 130: 127: 120: 114: 110: 106: 102: 97: 93: 88: 84: 80: 76: 72: 71: 68: 65: 63: 62: 59: 57: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 413: 410: 392: 368: 352: 345:Black Falcon 336: 324: 310: 299: 294: 287:Orderinchaos 283:Geogre's Law 274: 202: 159: 145: 124: 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 325:⇒ bsnowball 401:Sefringle 295:weak keep 250:WP:PERNOM 211:WP:PERNOM 148:per nom. 374:WP:WPBIO 361:Kathy A. 119:View log 341:WP:VSCA 203:Comment 92:protect 87:history 393:Delete 380:ŞůṜīΣĻ 279:WP:BIO 275:Delete 257:). -- 160:Delete 96:delete 397:WP:RS 137:MER-C 113:views 105:watch 101:links 16:< 395:per 384:¹98¹ 369:Keep 353:Keep 337:Keep 320:-- 311:Note 277:per 213:. -- 207:this 164:spam 109:logs 83:talk 79:edit 52:. — 46:keep 359:.-- 317:. 301:DGG 233:dir 186:dir 162:as 117:– ( 399:-- 285:. 236:on 230:An 220:ru 217:Cy 189:on 183:An 173:ru 170:Cy 131:. 111:| 107:| 103:| 99:| 94:| 90:| 85:| 81:| 223:s 176:s 121:) 115:) 77:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Nearly Headless Nick

14:06, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Baker abdel munem
Baker abdel munem
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Autobiographical
vanispamcruftisement
Knowledge is not a resume service
MER-C
13:31, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Thewinchester

13:39, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
spam
Cyrus
Andiron
14:12, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
this

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.