214:
due to the inherent weakness of the nomination. Your job, as nominator, is to thoroughly research the notability if the topic, and if you conclude after due diligence that it is non-notable, bring it to AfD. You need to assert that it is non-notable, rather than equivocating. Otherwise, work on
431:
This is a valid procedural nomination - a user on the talk page already argued the article should be deleted but never actually nominated it. I agree with that person's argument and nominated for him. The reasons for deletion are already summarized on the talk page so there is no reason I need to
232:
Maybe you should have read the talk page first. Google searches (including -wikipedia) give results that are mostly wiki mirrors, and a handful of discussion board posts. A web page about the project indicates it has been inactive for over a year. All this is mentioned on the talk page. You're
257:
I am not judging you but rather evaluating your nomination. If you conclude that an article should be deleted, then I request that you say so unambiguously. Perhaps I misinterpreted, but I read your nomination as indecisive. Please correct me if I am wrong.
456:
After further thought, reading the talk page and searching through Google, I have decided to change my recommendation, as I can't conclude that the software is notable. I did not intend to be disruptive when expressing my wish for a clear nomination.
336:
I was not arguing that the discussion is "disqualified" but rather asking that the nominator state his/her conclusions about the notability of the topic, based on the results of their investigation. That's all.
156:
117:
187:
There is quite a bit of discussion on the article talk page as to whether this article has the notability for a page here, so I've bringing this to the wider Wiki community.
306:
272:
Procedural nominations are done all the time, and even if the nomination is somehow a procedural error, it does not disqualify the AfD discussion from going forward.
150:
383:
RoninBK, please refer me to a description (policy or guideline) of exactly what a "procedural nomination" is, and what is intended to accomplish. Thank you.
482:. I feel bad – wonder if I could do better if I could read Bangla and Hindi – but unless some other sources appear, don't see another option. (I think
363:
Off-topic question about "Procedural nomination." Let's keep this discussion about the article itself, not about how the nomination occured
17:
90:
85:
94:
410:
285:
171:
138:
77:
514:
36:
273:
487:
317:
513:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
490:
can continue to mention its existence, but it sure would be nice to have a reference in a secondary source.) --
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
132:
443:
244:
198:
128:
499:
475:
466:
448:
415:
392:
346:
321:
290:
249:
224:
203:
59:
81:
313:
462:
388:
342:
263:
220:
178:
164:
433:
234:
188:
73:
65:
398:
407:
282:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
483:
144:
458:
384:
338:
259:
216:
55:
479:
495:
403:
278:
111:
50:
491:
478:) The problem is that I can't locate anything on the topic that meets
507:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
397:
I'd be happy to debate policy with you in a venue that is not
107:
103:
99:
163:
401:
As it stands, this request is horribly off-topic. --
177:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
517:). No further edits should be made to this page.
307:list of Software-related deletion discussions
8:
233:supposed to be judging the article, not me.
399:disruptive to the ongoing AfD process here.
368:The following discussion has been closed.
359:
301:
305:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
60:17:03, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
500:05:26, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
467:01:20, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
449:22:22, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
416:22:10, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
393:21:40, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
347:21:32, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
322:06:32, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
291:19:51, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
250:05:52, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
225:05:10, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
204:04:07, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
534:
488:Hindawi Programming System
510:Please do not modify it.
432:state it a second time.
371:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
215:improving the article.
474:, I'm sad to say. (
44:The result was
441:
425:
424:
324:
310:
274:WP:NOTBUREAUCRACY
242:
196:
525:
512:
446:
439:
438:
414:
373:
360:
311:
289:
247:
240:
239:
201:
194:
193:
182:
181:
167:
115:
97:
34:
533:
532:
528:
527:
526:
524:
523:
522:
521:
515:deletion review
508:
484:Indic computing
444:
434:
413:
402:
369:
314:Jclemens-public
288:
277:
245:
235:
199:
189:
124:
88:
72:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
531:
529:
520:
519:
503:
502:
469:
451:
423:
422:
421:
420:
419:
418:
406:
375:
374:
365:
364:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
351:
350:
349:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
281:
185:
184:
121:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
530:
518:
516:
511:
505:
504:
501:
497:
493:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
470:
468:
464:
460:
455:
452:
450:
447:
442:
437:
430:
427:
426:
417:
412:
409:
405:
400:
396:
395:
394:
390:
386:
382:
379:
378:
377:
376:
372:
367:
366:
362:
361:
348:
344:
340:
335:
332:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
326:
325:
323:
319:
315:
308:
304:
300:
292:
287:
284:
280:
275:
271:
268:
267:
265:
261:
256:
253:
252:
251:
248:
243:
238:
231:
228:
227:
226:
222:
218:
213:
212:
208:
207:
206:
205:
202:
197:
192:
180:
176:
173:
170:
166:
162:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
130:
127:
126:Find sources:
122:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
509:
506:
471:
453:
435:
428:
380:
370:
333:
302:
269:
254:
236:
229:
210:
209:
190:
186:
174:
168:
160:
153:
147:
141:
135:
125:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
151:free images
74:BangaBhasha
66:BangaBhasha
476:It exists!
445:Talk to me
246:Talk to me
200:Talk to me
459:Cullen328
436:D O N D E
385:Cullen328
339:Cullen328
260:Cullen328
237:D O N D E
217:Cullen328
191:D O N D E
440:groovily
241:groovily
195:groovily
118:View log
429:Comment
404:RoninBK
381:Request
334:Comment
279:RoninBK
270:Comment
255:Comment
230:Comment
157:WP refs
145:scholar
91:protect
86:history
472:Delete
454:Delete
129:Google
95:delete
46:delete
172:JSTOR
133:books
112:views
104:watch
100:links
48:. --
16:<
496:talk
486:and
480:WP:V
463:talk
389:talk
343:talk
318:talk
303:Note
264:talk
221:talk
211:Keep
165:FENS
139:news
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
56:talk
51:Cirt
492:Pnm
312:--
179:TWL
116:– (
498:)
465:)
391:)
345:)
320:)
309:.
276:--
266:)
223:)
159:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
58:)
494:(
461:(
411:C
408:T
387:(
341:(
316:(
286:C
283:T
262:(
219:(
183:)
175:·
169:·
161:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
136:·
131:(
123:(
120:)
114:)
76:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.