31:
261:
the shopping mall, so it cannot be considered a public transport more than the
Disneyland Monorail is. That said, the Disneyland Monorail is notable because it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. The subject of this article is not.
257:, an elevated train system, or discussions on future non-existent projects. The nine Google News results are from the Los Angeles Times and concern a different, unrelated subject. I don't know what the "multiple sources" Arsenikk mentioned refers to. The amusement park is
253:; The news in the mentioned link is the only reference I could find about the incident, which has the incident rather than the monorail itself as the primary subject. Almost all search results referring to a Bangkok monorail are misnomers of the
207:, news search finds 218 hits for bangkok and monorail; also finds 9 hits for "Fashion Island" and monorail. Also, I believe the nominator is incorrect in his assumptions, since multiple sources claim that the monorail goes
152:
177:, as stated in my comment below. So far, no reliable sources confirming its notability have been established. The article itself seems to be based on this very short mention at
40:
278:- Notable ride. Just needs expanding and altering to avoid implying it is a public transport operating system. I'd suggest mergin it into the shopping mall article
231:. No real reason for deletion given in the nomination, and as noted by Arsenikk, the reason is probably incorrect as well. Even if it was an amusement park ride,
159:
The monorail in question is not an actual transport system, but an amusement park ride. See "Bangkok amusement monorail fire. (6/26/02)" at
119:
114:
123:
17:
343:
106:
190:
181:, which I have trouble accepting as a reliable source (not least because it seemingly fails to recognise that Fashion Island
185:
the shopping mall in question and location of the mostly-indoor amusement park rather than an actual island). Also, per
325:
65:
46:
324:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
64:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
308:
290:
266:
244:
221:
197:
167:
88:
279:
211:
a shopping mall and the amusement part (as also stated in the above article), making it public transport.
110:
82:
239:
232:
305:
218:
58:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
235:
would be in the same situation. Coverage of the monorail is already provided in the article.
102:
94:
186:
189:, the incident itself may not merit inclusion in Knowledge (XXG), save perhaps mention in
79:
236:
160:
250:
174:
337:
300:
263:
213:
194:
164:
254:
140:
178:
298:
as far as I can see, there is no article on the shopping mall. Or is there?
249:
Sorry for not having been clearer. The subject of the article fails
318:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
25:
147:
136:
132:
128:
173:
To clarify the reason for deletion, the subject fails
161:
http://www.monorails.org/tmspages/archive071402.html
68:). No further edits should be made to this page.
328:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
179:http://www.subways.net/thailand/bangkok.htm
276:Keep or redirect info to the shopping mall
45:For an explanation of the process, see
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
41:deletion review on 2008 October 17
24:
29:
47:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
191:Incidents at independent parks
1:
309:11:41, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
291:11:28, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
267:11:23, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
245:10:43, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
222:10:31, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
198:07:48, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
168:09:29, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
89:18:09, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
360:
344:Pages at deletion review
321:Please do not modify it.
61:Please do not modify it.
233:Disneyland Monorail
303:
216:
73:The result was
301:
242:
214:
53:
52:
39:was subject to a
351:
323:
307:
288:
287:
240:
220:
150:
144:
126:
103:Bangkok Monorail
95:Bangkok Monorail
85:
63:
33:
32:
26:
359:
358:
354:
353:
352:
350:
349:
348:
334:
333:
332:
326:deletion review
319:
299:
281:
280:
212:
146:
117:
101:
98:
83:
66:deletion review
59:
37:This discussion
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
357:
355:
347:
346:
336:
335:
331:
330:
314:
313:
312:
311:
272:
271:
270:
269:
225:
224:
201:
200:
157:
156:
97:
92:
71:
70:
54:
51:
50:
44:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
356:
345:
342:
341:
339:
329:
327:
322:
316:
315:
310:
306:
304:
297:
294:
293:
292:
289:
286:
285:
277:
274:
273:
268:
265:
260:
256:
252:
248:
247:
246:
243:
238:
234:
230:
227:
226:
223:
219:
217:
210:
206:
203:
202:
199:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
176:
172:
171:
170:
169:
166:
162:
154:
149:
142:
138:
134:
130:
125:
121:
116:
112:
108:
104:
100:
99:
96:
93:
91:
90:
87:
86:
81:
76:
69:
67:
62:
56:
55:
48:
42:
38:
35:
28:
27:
19:
320:
317:
295:
284:The Bald One
283:
282:
275:
258:
255:BTS Skytrain
228:
208:
204:
182:
158:
78:
74:
72:
60:
57:
36:
187:WP:NOT#NEWS
237:Sjakkalle
338:Category
302:Arsenikk
264:Paul_012
241:(Check!)
215:Arsenikk
195:Paul_012
165:Paul_012
153:View log
296:Comment
209:between
120:protect
115:history
148:delete
124:delete
151:) – (
141:views
133:watch
129:links
16:<
251:WP:N
229:Keep
205:Keep
193:. --
175:WP:N
137:logs
111:talk
107:edit
75:keep
340::
262:--
259:in
183:is
163:.
139:|
135:|
131:|
127:|
122:|
118:|
113:|
109:|
80:ff
77:.
43:.
155:)
145:(
143:)
105:(
84:m
49:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.