377:— due diligence is not being done when these tools are being used in this way. "Shoot them all and let the saps at AfD sort them out," is apparently the line of thinking. While I am personally sympathetic to the idea of a very high bar for so-called "Porn Bios," this blasting of 100 articles at the rate of 1 per minute, judging from the time logs, is not conducive to the spirit or practice of AfD. It is putting
382:
sororities. The net result of these efforts was a lot of lost time by article creators and AfD participants and a lot of lost information from those articles annihilated as part of these campaigns. Meanwhile, the backlog of crap at New Pages festers. Something needs to be done about this problem. Mine is not a unique view — see
381:
ahead of the established article deletion process and is disrespectful both to the work of article creators and those of us who volunteer our time at AfD. We have seen similar automated mass annihilation efforts recently against modern
Trotskyist political organizations and against fraternities and
200:
is not an award: It's a strategic commercial decision made by
Playboy Corporation about how to better commercialize it products. Regardless of how much some Wikipedians love Playmates, we should write articles about them only when they were covered by independent third part sources. Also, texts
314:
The accomplishments of
Barbara Moore meet the requirements of WP:BASIC and surpass the requirements of WP:ANYBIO. Nominators assertion that "Playmate of the Month" is not an award is false, and his "strategic commercial decision" analysis is irrevelant.
158:
445:
You nominated this mass of articles with checkoing for notability. You nominated people who weren't even playmates as not notable because they were just playmates. If we were a Greek democracy, watch out for the
485:
Yet still more difficult than the effort it took you to nominate them all. I've only ever read
Playboy for the articles and even I know the basic distinction of whether there is a staple in the model.--
347:
373:- The use of automated tools for mass deletions should not be allowed against large blocks of articles which have already been patrolled at New Pages. It is, simply put, a violation of
152:
225:. I think there's just enough coverage out there to justify an independent article, but it's a very close call and a redirect absent article improvement is certainly justifiable.
464:
Non-playmates? I called playmate any models that stripped for playboy, and used a playboy list article as my guideline. It comes out that some of them are actually "'cyber girl'
119:
189:
287:
267:
92:
87:
96:
79:
427:
so far, no keep vote provided any evidence of notability. Just plain declarations. If we were a democracy, this AfD would be easy to close. --
264:
173:
140:
17:
230:
49:
134:
378:
513:
36:
130:
494:
480:
459:
436:
417:
400:
362:
336:
324:
302:
279:
255:
234:
216:
61:
242:- mainstream media seems to like to cover her due to her playmate status. No exception to "playmatehood" in GNG or
226:
83:
386:
at ANI. We need to keep them all as a matter of principle and ban the future use of automated tools in this way.
180:
468:
playboy's net mate" and other even more obscure classifications. These one are the most non-notable of them all.
512:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
251:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
471:
But of course, pointing unrated mistakes by is easier that actually discussing the merits of this article. --
75:
67:
389:
This argument will be copied-and-pasted in the debate sections for all automated AfDs of this campaign.
146:
247:
166:
374:
243:
396:
358:
320:
298:
275:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
383:
206:
472:
428:
330:
210:
57:
329:
Do you have any arguments to bring to this discussion, or just declarations of truth? --
384:
Knowledge (XXG):ANI#Massive_number_of_Playboy-related_AFD_nominations_by_a_single_user
487:
452:
410:
392:
354:
316:
294:
271:
113:
53:
447:
506:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
348:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
109:
105:
101:
165:
205:are not the kind non-trivial coverage asked by the
179:
190:Being a Playboy playmate does not make you notable
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
516:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
346:Note: This debate has been included in the
286:Note: This debate has been included in the
288:list of People-related deletion discussions
345:
285:
263:Note: This debate has been added to the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
207:general notability guideline
533:
363:21:08, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
337:09:27, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
325:00:44, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
303:22:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
280:22:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
256:22:48, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
235:15:26, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
217:03:18, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
509:Please do not modify it.
201:solely related to their
32:Please do not modify it.
495:02:04, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
481:22:28, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
460:21:55, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
450:with your name on it.--
437:20:42, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
418:19:25, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
408:, enough to meet GNG.--
401:13:42, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
265:WikiProject Pornography
62:02:30, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
227:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
194:Playmate of the Month
76:Barbara Moore (model)
68:Barbara Moore (model)
198:Playmate of the Year
379:WP:I DON'T LIKE IT
44:The result was
493:
477:
458:
433:
416:
391:
365:
351:
334:
305:
291:
268:list of deletions
214:
50:non-admin closure
524:
511:
492:
478:
475:
457:
434:
431:
415:
387:
352:
332:
292:
282:
212:
184:
183:
169:
117:
99:
34:
532:
531:
527:
526:
525:
523:
522:
521:
520:
514:deletion review
507:
473:
429:
371:Procedural Keep
262:
192:. Being chosen
126:
90:
74:
71:
60:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
530:
528:
519:
518:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
497:
469:
440:
439:
421:
420:
403:
367:
366:
342:
341:
340:
339:
307:
306:
283:
259:
258:
248:Morbidthoughts
237:
187:
186:
123:
70:
65:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
529:
517:
515:
510:
504:
496:
490:
489:
484:
483:
482:
479:
470:
467:
463:
462:
461:
455:
454:
449:
444:
443:
442:
441:
438:
435:
426:
423:
422:
419:
413:
412:
407:
404:
402:
398:
394:
390:
385:
380:
376:
372:
369:
368:
364:
360:
356:
349:
344:
343:
338:
335:
328:
327:
326:
322:
318:
317:Glenn Francis
313:
309:
308:
304:
300:
296:
289:
284:
281:
277:
273:
269:
266:
261:
260:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
238:
236:
232:
228:
224:
221:
220:
219:
218:
215:
208:
204:
199:
195:
191:
182:
178:
175:
172:
168:
164:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
132:
129:
128:Find sources:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
508:
505:
486:
465:
451:
424:
409:
405:
388:
370:
311:
239:
222:
203:playmatehood
202:
197:
193:
188:
176:
170:
162:
155:
149:
143:
137:
127:
45:
43:
31:
28:
153:free images
375:WP:BEFORE
355:• Gene93k
295:• Gene93k
272:• Gene93k
223:Weak keep
488:Milowent
453:Milowent
448:Ostracon
411:Milowent
244:WP:BASIC
120:View log
474:Damiens
430:Damiens
393:Carrite
331:Damiens
211:Damiens
159:WP refs
147:scholar
93:protect
88:history
131:Google
97:delete
174:JSTOR
135:books
114:views
106:watch
102:links
54:Logan
16:<
466:", "
425:NOTE
406:Keep
397:talk
359:talk
321:talk
312:KEEP
299:talk
276:talk
252:talk
240:Keep
231:talk
167:FENS
141:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:Talk
46:keep
476:.rf
432:.rf
353:--
333:.rf
213:.rf
196:or
181:TWL
118:– (
48:. (
491:•
456:•
414:•
399:)
361:)
350:.
323:)
301:)
290:.
278:)
270:.
254:)
246:.
233:)
209:.
161:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
52:)
395:(
357:(
319:(
310:'
297:(
293:—
274:(
250:(
229:(
185:)
177:·
171:·
163:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
138:·
133:(
125:(
122:)
116:)
78:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.