Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Bart Tanski (2nd nomination) - Knowledge

Source 📝

52:. There is a 5-3 majority for deletion, although the last delete vote comes from a new account and simply makes an assertion of non-notability. Still, the delete side does provide a persuasive argument when they point out that the news coverage of high school sports is fairly routine. On the other hand, I accept that the Ohio Mr. Football award can arguably elevate a player to higher than average notability for a football player, and the keep arguments pointing out (admittedly brief) coverage in media beyond the very local sources have some merit too. I am therefore calling this no consensus. 292:
not required to be available online, and they are not required to be in English. Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability. - Again, Cleveland Plain Dealer and Toledo Blade, among others, count as sources. Plus, the above articles are from four different Ohio news papers, not just his 'hometown' paper.
527:
not apply to a person being receiving accolades for a sustained period of productivity or accomplishment. We should not, and need not, stretch the boundaries of BLP1E to conclude that Tanski is not notable. As noted above, coverage is limited to his playing of "high school" football, and the applicable criterion imposes a higher-than-normal standard of substantial and
475:"If that person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual. Biographies in these cases can give undue weight to the event and conflict with neutral point of view. In such cases, it is usually better to merge the information and redirect the person's name to the event article. 498:
is not regularly covered by the media, and he is already included in the list of Ohio's Mr. Football award recipients. There is no relevant information to merge to the list. And having been recognized as Mr. Football clearly does not rise to the level of historical significance of the example cited.
342:
The News Herald covers the northeastern portion of the Greater Cleveland area, where Tanski is from. The supplied 2012 article is a personal routine interview and does not help establish notability. And, despite the title (High school football: Life changed for Bart Tanski after winning Mr. Football)
291:
3. "Sources", for notability purposes, should be secondary sources, as those provide the most objective evidence of notability. The number and nature of reliable sources needed varies depending on the depth of coverage and quality of the sources. Multiple sources are generally expected. Sources are
526:
is a basis for deleting in this case. That guideline should be invoked to protect otherwise private, living persons where they gain brief notoriety due to their involvement in a single news event such as an isolated involvement in a scandal, escapade, crime, disaster, protest, stunt, etc. It does
497:
Applying the WP:BLP1E analysis, the subject was covered in the Ohio media solely for having been recognized as "Mr. Football." There is no reliable, independent source coverage beyond that. All other sources are either blogs or team websites. The subject is clearly a "low-profile" individual and
259:
1. "Significant coverage" that means that sources address the subject directly in detail, so no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material. - Upon winning Mr. Football, a number of
431:
who did not have a significant college career and never played in a professional game. Any marginal notability of the subject is based solely on his having received Ohio's Mr. Football award as a 17-year-old in 2007. That's all there is; everything else is filler. This appears to be exactly the
200:
While the award (Mr. Football Award)is a notable award, Bart Tanski is not. The article states he went to Mentor, won the award, and walked onto Bowling Green. This does not goes beyond WP:ROUTINE coverage in that his notability is restricted to local coverage and sports specific publications, and
377:
Searching brings up nothing else about Tanski other than the already supplied local and somewhat non-local articles stating he won the award. He broke no records or made any significant achievements outside his 2007 high school award. He seems like a fairly typical college student who was a good,
295:
4. "Independent of the subject" excludes works produced by those affiliated with the subject or its creator. For example, self-publicity, advertising, self-published material by the subject, the subject's website, autobiographies, and press releases are not considered independent. Yet again,
279:
2. "Reliable" means sources need editorial integrity to allow verifiable evaluation of notability, per the reliable source guideline. Sources may encompass published works in all forms and media, and in any language. Availability of secondary sources covering the subject is a good test for
257:. WP:GNG states that if a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list. WP:GNG gives further guidance and it is shown Tanski meets these. 369:
really shouldn't be used as an alternative to determine notablility, (Tanski's only claim to notability is an award he won for being a good High School athlete ...that is why we have high school guidelines to determine notability in
346:
The 2010 Cleveland.com/Plain Dealer article, while certainly a greater reaching paper, is rather short, and again, only rehashes what was known in 2007; he won the award, lost at states, and walked on to Bowling Green.
197:"igh school and pre-high school athletes are notable only if they have received, as individuals, substantial and prolonged coverage that is (1) independent of the subject and (2) clearly goes beyond WP:ROUTINE coverage 350:
The Medina Gazette is, again, a local north eastern Ohio community publication. The 2007 article provided has strange formatting errors, and a username for an author. Clicking the username "northcoastNOW" leads
339:
above, are still local stories wrote at the time of and about Tanksi winning the Mr. Football Award, nothing more, nothing less. The two sole articles written after the fact are rehashes of when he DID win the
166: 488:"It is not the case that the event is significant and the individual's role within it is substantial and well-documented—as in the case of John Hinckley, Jr., who shot President Ronald Reagan in 1981." 451:"Being in the news does not in itself mean that someone should be the subject of a Knowledge article. We should generally avoid having an article on a person when each of three conditions is met: 343:
the article seems to focus on a then current Mentor student who was in the running for the award, with Tanski supplementing the story with personal anecdotes and rehashing his 2007 experience.
384: 355:. After some research into the supplied email address in the article, I am led to believe this is a blog/commentary post from a freelance blogger rather than a journalistic article. 404: 217: 119: 531:
coverage for a high school football player to be deemed notable. I do not see sufficient coverage to satisfy the heightened standard for high school football players.
160: 358:
The Toledo Blade article is not local to Tanski, (though it's still Ohio), but only covers a single fact; that he is a high school athlete that won the award.
126: 550:
I see a good deal of coverage for this individual in the news, ranging from local and regional articles to USA Today. There should be no question he passes
303:
Based on the above, there is a presumption of notability and I think that further analysis (e.g., that he won Mr. Football in Ohio) establish notability. -
378:
though not exceptionally good, high school football player and does not establish significant notability to warrant his own article. -Dorbella
374:) but regardless, his coverage still does not seem significant, nor does the number of sources seem enough given the depth of coverage. 327:
Though the initial argument is weak, I must side with deletion. It would not appear Tanski meets the guideline requirements of either
201:
hardly qualifies as "substantial and prolonged coverage" as it was only around reported around the time period he won the award. -
273: 92: 87: 17: 599: 582: 563: 540: 512: 416: 396: 312: 234: 61: 96: 230: 181: 148: 79: 265: 261: 618: 40: 142: 559: 281: 268:) as well as more current articles that directly discuss his achievement in a historical contents (e.g., 614: 508: 138: 36: 590:. I have found nothing to determine notability! Artical would need expanding to qualify for inclusion. 269: 503:
After properly analyzing this article under the WP:BLP1E criteria, the result is a clear "delete."
202: 188: 174: 56: 296:
Cleveland Plain Dealer and Toledo Blade are independent of the subject (as opposed to data on the
595: 578: 433: 308: 213: 555: 412: 392: 226: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
613:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
504: 371: 362: 328: 250: 83: 536: 523: 441: 437: 154: 53: 591: 574: 551: 366: 336: 332: 304: 254: 408: 388: 285: 221: 113: 352: 260:
articles were written about Tanski of which he was directly addressed (e.g., see
75: 67: 532: 427:. Some perspective here is important: we are discussing the notability of a 462:"If reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event. 361:
The coverage of Tanski has neither been "substantial and prolonged" to meet
280:
notability. - The above articles are from noted newspapers such as the
432:
sort of case that the one-event rules were designed to address per
335:. Much of the (little) coverage of Tanski, such as those given by 607:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
297: 276:). It is established that significant coverage is met. 109: 105: 101: 385:
list of American football-related deletion discussions
173: 212:
This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (
218:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 January 4 405:list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 621:). No further edits should be made to this page. 187: 8: 522:. I disagree with the assertion above that 403:Note: This debate has been included in the 383:Note: This debate has been included in the 402: 382: 249:The first question, regardless of the 7: 444:. In relevant part, WP:BLP1E states 253:guidelines, is if the article meets 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 216:). I have transcluded it to 600:20:51, 10 January 2013 (UTC) 288:and such they are reliable. 62:11:21, 12 January 2013 (UTC) 583:17:43, 7 January 2013 (UTC) 564:02:26, 7 January 2013 (UTC) 541:15:25, 6 January 2013 (UTC) 513:00:38, 6 January 2013 (UTC) 429:high school football player 417:23:21, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 397:23:21, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 313:18:17, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 235:17:57, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 638: 610:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 282:Cleveland Plain Dealer 573:Per Ron and Paul. - 210:Automated comment: 48:The result was 419: 399: 237: 59: 629: 612: 224: 208: 192: 191: 177: 129: 117: 99: 57: 34: 637: 636: 632: 631: 630: 628: 627: 626: 625: 619:deletion review 608: 222: 134: 125: 90: 74: 71: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 635: 633: 624: 623: 603: 602: 585: 567: 566: 544: 543: 516: 515: 500: 499: 494: 493: 492: 491: 490: 489: 481: 480: 479: 478: 477: 476: 468: 467: 466: 465: 464: 463: 455: 454: 453: 452: 446: 445: 421: 420: 400: 380: 321: 320: 319: 318: 317: 316: 239: 238: 203:TheRunningDude 195: 194: 131: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 634: 622: 620: 616: 611: 605: 604: 601: 597: 593: 589: 586: 584: 580: 576: 572: 569: 568: 565: 561: 557: 556:Paul McDonald 553: 549: 546: 545: 542: 538: 534: 530: 525: 521: 518: 517: 514: 510: 506: 502: 501: 496: 495: 487: 486: 485: 484: 483: 482: 474: 473: 472: 471: 470: 469: 461: 460: 459: 458: 457: 456: 450: 449: 448: 447: 443: 439: 435: 430: 426: 423: 422: 418: 414: 410: 406: 401: 398: 394: 390: 386: 381: 379: 375: 373: 368: 364: 359: 356: 354: 348: 344: 338: 334: 330: 326: 323: 322: 315: 314: 310: 306: 301: 299: 293: 289: 287: 283: 277: 275: 271: 267: 263: 256: 252: 248: 245: 244: 243: 242: 241: 240: 236: 232: 228: 225: 219: 215: 211: 207: 206: 205: 204: 198: 190: 186: 183: 180: 176: 172: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 140: 137: 136:Find sources: 132: 128: 124: 121: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72: 69: 66: 64: 63: 60: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 609: 606: 587: 570: 547: 528: 519: 428: 424: 376: 360: 357: 349: 345: 341: 324: 302: 294: 290: 286:Toledo Blade 278: 258: 246: 209: 199: 196: 184: 178: 170: 163: 157: 151: 145: 135: 122: 50:no consensus 49: 47: 31: 28: 505:Dirtlawyer1 434:WP:ONEEVENT 161:free images 76:Bart Tanski 68:Bart Tanski 365:. Perhaps 300:website). 615:talk page 529:sustained 409:• Gene93k 389:• Gene93k 372:WP:NSPORT 363:WP:NSPORT 329:WP:NSPORT 251:WP:NSPORT 54:Sjakkalle 37:talk page 617:or in a 592:Deangunn 575:Ret.Prof 524:WP:BLP1E 442:WP:BLP1E 438:WP:BIO1E 337:RonSigPi 305:RonSigPi 120:View log 58:(Check!) 39:or in a 223:Snotbot 167:WP refs 155:scholar 93:protect 88:history 588:Delete 552:WP:GNG 520:Delete 425:Delete 367:WP:GNG 340:award. 333:WP:GNG 325:Delete 255:WP:GNG 214:step 3 139:Google 97:delete 571:Keep: 533:Cbl62 182:JSTOR 143:books 127:Stats 114:views 106:watch 102:links 16:< 596:talk 579:talk 560:talk 548:Keep 537:talk 509:talk 440:and 413:talk 393:talk 353:here 309:talk 298:BGSU 284:and 274:here 272:and 270:here 266:here 264:and 262:here 247:Keep 175:FENS 149:news 110:logs 84:talk 80:edit 554:.-- 331:or 233:» 220:. 189:TWL 118:– ( 598:) 581:) 562:) 539:) 511:) 436:, 415:) 407:. 395:) 387:. 311:) 229:• 169:) 112:| 108:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 594:( 577:( 558:( 535:( 507:( 411:( 391:( 307:( 231:c 227:t 193:) 185:· 179:· 171:· 164:· 158:· 152:· 146:· 141:( 133:( 130:) 123:· 116:) 78:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Sjakkalle
(Check!)
11:21, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Bart Tanski
Bart Tanski
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
TheRunningDude
step 3

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.