619:, and its entry is extremely short. The entry also consists entirely of plot summary except for half a sentance saying that this anime is a rip-off of another anime. While The Anime Encyclopedia gives some anime longer coverage that I would consider significant, in this case the entry seems to fall well short of what would be considered significant coverage. While the anime encylopedia doesn't cover every anime ever made, it attempts to cover a very large percentage of them. For entries such as this one that have no real content beyond a plot summary and a little production information, I don't think they meet the threshold of significant coverage required to show notability.
413:
192:
453:), and other things that are clearly not significant coverage from reliable sources. Even the reliable sources in the hits aren't actually good hits, but things like a nearly-empty encylopedia entry without even a plot summary (Manga Sanctuary), or a review of another title that just mentions this title in passing (Anime News Network). If you see anything in that search that you think is actually significant coverage from a reliable source, please point it out.
479:
regardless, Dream Focus seems to be treating it as if it is a list of sources considered reliable, while instead it seems to include all sites that haven't specifically been excluded as unreliable. Personally, I think it would be more useful if you just limited it to sites that are known to be reliable (i.e. at
586:
Looks like it has more than just a brief directory mention. A bird encyclopedia might try to list every bird there is, but that doesn't make it less valid. The Anime
Encyclopedia is an encyclopedia, not a simple directly. And I find it unlike it list every single anime ever made, it skipping over
501:
I'd prefer not to limit to just ANIME/RS. (I'm not even sure whether I can do that with CSE.) If that very short list of good sites turns up nothing, then a broader search is called for. Good sites get extra search points from being in the whitelist, and the blacklist gets rid of the worst dreck. If
467:
Calathan, if you have a problem with my CSE please tell me. Before I posted my link here - and before I post CSE links anywhere - I did in fact go through the results and blacklist a couple dozen URLs. (I am aware of
Animetric, but they seem to me to be like ANN's encyclopedia - a jumping off point
478:
What is showing up in that search has changed since I posted my above comment (I don't know if that is because Google changed something or because you did). I'm seeing less torrent sites and porn sites, though that doesn't necessarily mean that the remaining sites are reliable sources. But
635:
How much could you actually say about something like this? There isn't a lot to talk about in this sort of thing, it not some run longing series with detailed character development, but instead just animated pornography. The fact that they choose to mention it at all, shows its notable.
497:
Search results are always changing; rankings for obscure searches can (I think) change just by people searching and clicking on certain hits. Who knows why it changed. (I did another sweep just now and have gotten rid of all the bad hits; for
415:
If you don't believe something should be on that list, then discuss it at the reliable sources page, and have it removed. If consensus supports it being on the list, it must be a notable website, so their reviews count. Plenty of results.
505:
If Dream Focus wants to rely heavily on CSE results, then I'd be glad to give him access, since I assume we generally agree on what goes on the blacklist and the whitelist, and he has enough sense to ask me/the project about grey sites.
717:
Seems like a notable site, with editorial overview, and professional reviewers, well established and all. I don't see any comments about it on the reliable sources page though. A few other
Knowledge articles quote reviews from it.
160:
448:
Have you even looked at what is listed in that search? It is full of torrent sites, forum posts, stores merely selling the title, sites like
Animetric that already on the list of sites that aren't reliable sources
554:
683:
I don't think this quite meets the notability requirements for an article, but it would be a valid search term, so it should probably be redirected to either the game studio or the animation studio.
221:
154:
115:
385:
How does that meet any of the notability guidelines? Especially since both the anime and the game have not received significant coverage by reliable sources. —
329:
120:
88:
83:
92:
75:
367:-the anime series has been licensed outside of Japan, and there is a game series based on the anime (or vice-versa), so meets notability.--
281:
351:
326:
175:
142:
17:
412:
There wouldn't be a point in having a custom search for reliable sources if people didn't find those sources listed reliable.
577:
396:
309:
238:
206:
510:
472:
358:
136:
709:
705:
692:
659:
628:
610:
581:
547:
492:
462:
439:
400:
376:
341:
313:
289:
263:
242:
210:
57:
733:
372:
132:
79:
36:
732:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
285:
182:
273:
616:
715:
701:
368:
71:
63:
520:
We need a new search thing then. Anyway, Google book search shows a result, it having coverage in
168:
148:
688:
624:
573:
502:
you think the hits aren't very good, then try a general Google search for 'Beat Angel
Escalayer'!
488:
480:
458:
450:
392:
305:
277:
259:
234:
202:
195:
for reliable sources turns up nothing. No significant coverage by reliable third-party sources. —
337:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
637:
588:
525:
417:
53:
507:
469:
355:
252:
294:
Neither of those are reliable sources. Animetric is a self-published website that fails
563:
559:
684:
620:
568:
484:
454:
387:
300:
295:
255:
229:
197:
333:
109:
49:
587:
some failed series that no one noticed, and just listing the successful ones.
524:
on Page 52. This series was also released in French as well as
English.
558:
because it attempts to be a comprehensive directory of all anime.
522:
The anime encyclopedia: a guide to
Japanese animation since 1917
726:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
298:
and the ANN Encyclpedia is open edited just like
Knowledge. —
468:
that is not useless enough to be worth blacklisting.) --
719:
105:
101:
97:
167:
222:
list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
736:). No further edits should be made to this page.
552:I know that there has been some debate about
181:
8:
216:
325:Note: This debate has been added to the
220:: This debate has been included in the
7:
24:
714:Dark Diamond gives it a review.
251:There is a review at Mania.com
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
562:are specifically excluded by
753:
729:Please do not modify it.
710:19:04, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
693:16:50, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
660:06:15, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
629:16:49, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
611:16:45, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
582:16:28, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
548:13:26, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
493:00:50, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
475:00:35 25 May 2010 (GMT)
463:13:04, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
440:12:19, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
401:10:39, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
377:04:21, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
342:17:33, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
314:15:45, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
290:05:22, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
264:00:33, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
243:00:02, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
211:23:54, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
58:10:08, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
513:01:46 25 May 2010 (GMT)
361:23:36 19 May 2010 (GMT)
327:WikiProject Pornography
617:The Anime Encyclopedia
555:The Anime Encyclopedia
451:WP:ANIME/RS#Unreliable
566:towards notability. —
615:I looked this up in
72:Beat Angel Escalayer
64:Beat Angel Escalayer
369:Chris (クリス • フィッチュ)
44:The result was
330:list of deletions
245:
225:
744:
731:
702:Peregrine Fisher
656:
653:
650:
647:
644:
641:
607:
604:
601:
598:
595:
592:
544:
541:
538:
535:
532:
529:
436:
433:
430:
427:
424:
421:
344:
226:
186:
185:
171:
123:
113:
95:
34:
752:
751:
747:
746:
745:
743:
742:
741:
740:
734:deletion review
727:
700:and improve. -
654:
651:
648:
645:
642:
639:
605:
602:
599:
596:
593:
590:
542:
539:
536:
533:
530:
527:
434:
431:
428:
425:
422:
419:
324:
128:
119:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
750:
748:
739:
738:
722:
721:
712:
695:
677:
676:
675:
674:
673:
672:
671:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
665:
664:
663:
662:
518:
517:
516:
515:
514:
503:
499:
443:
442:
406:
405:
404:
403:
380:
379:
362:
345:
321:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
267:
266:
246:
189:
188:
125:
121:AfD statistics
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
749:
737:
735:
730:
724:
723:
720:
716:
713:
711:
707:
703:
699:
696:
694:
690:
686:
682:
679:
678:
661:
658:
657:
634:
633:
632:
631:
630:
626:
622:
618:
614:
613:
612:
609:
608:
585:
584:
583:
579:
575:
571:
570:
565:
561:
557:
556:
551:
550:
549:
546:
545:
523:
519:
512:
509:
504:
500:
496:
495:
494:
490:
486:
482:
477:
476:
474:
471:
466:
465:
464:
460:
456:
452:
447:
446:
445:
444:
441:
438:
437:
414:
411:
408:
407:
402:
398:
394:
390:
389:
384:
383:
382:
381:
378:
374:
370:
366:
363:
360:
357:
353:
349:
346:
343:
339:
335:
331:
328:
323:
322:
315:
311:
307:
303:
302:
297:
293:
292:
291:
287:
283:
282:70.29.210.155
279:
275:
271:
270:
269:
268:
265:
261:
257:
253:
250:
247:
244:
240:
236:
232:
231:
223:
219:
215:
214:
213:
212:
208:
204:
200:
199:
194:
184:
180:
177:
174:
170:
166:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
134:
131:
130:Find sources:
126:
122:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
728:
725:
697:
680:
638:
589:
567:
553:
526:
521:
418:
409:
386:
364:
347:
299:
248:
228:
217:
196:
190:
178:
172:
164:
157:
151:
145:
139:
129:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
560:Directories
481:WP:ANIME/RS
155:free images
511:(contribs)
473:(contribs)
359:(contribs)
334:• Gene93k
274:Animetric
685:Calathan
681:Redirect
621:Calathan
485:Calathan
455:Calathan
352:CSE hits
256:Calathan
116:View log
564:WP:NOTE
348:Comment
249:Comment
161:WP refs
149:scholar
89:protect
84:history
296:WP:SPS
272:Also:
193:search
133:Google
93:delete
50:Stifle
655:Focus
606:Focus
569:Farix
543:Focus
508:Gwern
498:now.)
470:Gwern
435:Focus
388:Farix
356:Gwern
301:Farix
230:Farix
198:Farix
176:JSTOR
137:books
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
706:talk
698:Keep
689:talk
625:talk
489:talk
459:talk
410:Keep
373:talk
365:Keep
354:. --
338:talk
286:talk
280:...
260:talk
227:-- —
218:Note
169:FENS
143:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
483:).
278:ANN
183:TWL
118:•
114:– (
708:)
691:)
627:)
580:)
576:|
506:--
491:)
461:)
399:)
395:|
375:)
350::
340:)
332:.
312:)
308:|
288:)
276:;
262:)
254:.
241:)
237:|
224:.
209:)
205:|
191:A
163:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
48:.
704:(
687:(
652:m
649:a
646:e
643:r
640:D
623:(
603:m
600:a
597:e
594:r
591:D
578:c
574:t
572:(
540:m
537:a
534:e
531:r
528:D
487:(
457:(
449:(
432:m
429:a
426:e
423:r
420:D
397:c
393:t
391:(
371:(
336:(
310:c
306:t
304:(
284:(
258:(
239:c
235:t
233:(
207:c
203:t
201:(
187:)
179:·
173:·
165:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
135:(
127:(
124:)
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
