Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Beersheva bus station shooting

1369:

security guard at the bus station as he crawled along the floor. Still alive, he was then surrounded by people who cursed and spat at him, kicked him in the head and tried to hit him with a chair.As paramedics tried to rescue him, the crowd chanted “Death to Arabs”, “Arabs out!” and “Am Israel Hai” (“The people of Israel still live”) and tried to stop them. “It’s terrible,” said a foreign ministry spokesman, Emmanuel Nahshon, one of a number of officials to comment on the killing. “It shows you what a terrible situation we are in.” Zarhum worked at the moshav (a cooperative agricultural community) of Ein HaBesor near the southern Gaza border. His employer described him as a modest and hardworking man who had fled Eritrea to Israel for safety. “All the people gathering around the man attacked him. Nobody was helping him. People just were making sure he doesn’t move. There is no human being who did not kick or beat him. Everyone took part. I couldn’t sleep last night thinking about what happened and I feel sick about myself.”

2005:

you propose is already far too long, My argument is that is the way Knowledge (XXG) is constructed: with articles on specific significant incidents that are then linked from summary articles. this article could be usefully linked from articles on the reception of illegal immigrants in Israel, on the risks of mistaking bystanders for culprits in live-shooting incidents, on lone wolf terrorism inspired by social media, on the integration of Bedouin in Israeli society, and probably from any number of other topics. Delete well-sourced articles on individual, significant incidents, and you reduce the strength, value and integrity of Knowledge (XXG) as a whole. Argue, as you have, for an ethnic standard targeting articles wherein Israeli are the victims for removal, and you have make a very problematic argument indeed.

2567:, when it came back into the news. The article was instantly brought to AFD, and quickly kept. It needs improvement, and would undoubtedly have been a better article, and far easier to create in 2003 than it was over a decade later. That these incidents tend to have ongoing impact is a reason to create the articles when the attacks occur. That article about the 2003 terrorist shooting attack still needs work. But with something like this week's shooting attack in Amman, other editors immediately chimed in with Arabic sources, producing s simple, accurate report that will be a useful part of the project in years to come. As User:My Very Best Wishes says, the rush to delete well-sourced, widely covered incidents like this bus station shooting are damaging to Knowledge (XXG). 2539:, the event is highly notable based on press coverage, however the page is quite possibly one-sided. This should be fixed by including more sources to bring the page in compliance with WP:NPOV. Having fixable POV problems is not a reason for deletion. One can tell about almost any recent event: "let's wait for a couple of months to see if it has a lasting impact, and recreate later". However, doing this is waste of time and has a chilling effect on people who create these pages. Few people will bother to recreate a page later, even if the event will turn out to be having lasting impact. It is easier to delete later if needed. 1569:

indicted, brought to the court or whatever (not in this case, since he is dead). You will again add them to the article and claim "lasting coverage" - as you have done in other similar articles. That is not how it works. I again ask someone to point to lasting significance: have any laws been proposed or changed due to this incident, has the attitude to African migrants changed, etc. And if so, why is that not mentioned in the article? It is not my responsibility to fix other people's stuff. As it stood, the article was (and is still) simply: "Palestinian terror attack in Israel", which is simply a news story.

1314:, he reads to a purpose, which means he downplays or ignores the very extensive comments, anguish etc that marked the aftermath of the incident in Israel, regarding racism, and mob hysteria. One assumes this doesn't interest him because he is focused on the Arab killer. Go through any of the stages of any one article in the series, and what a knowledgeable editor will remark is the information in sources he reads and yet leaves out, I think because it doesn't help the victim narrative, because that information makes things look rather more complex. 967:@kingsindian. Your response is off subject. You were whining that it is a POVFork to create articles about "one side of the conflict", i.e. articles about terror attacks in which the victims are Israelis/Jews (if you meant something else please explain). I responded that it is not the fault of the Israelis/Jews that they are usually the victims of terror attacks instead of the perpetrators of terror attacks and articles about terror attacks should not be deleted because it results in more articles about "one side of the conflict." What does the 1300:

bystander, and the uproar was extensively covered. Here we have a mere whisper of what actually occurred at Beersheva. I've been watching this kind of article creation for a decade. It always comes from people with a national mission, per their editing history in the area. Never see them edit to correct some error re the other side, which is constantly misreported. If you examine the way these articles start up, there is (a) an Israeli victim (b) a Arab terrorist (c) the attack-is-deplored-internationally.

2831:). It's a gray area, to be sure. It's where we have to come to a consensus about sustained coverage. Do the events and coverage so far lead us to believe there will be lasting significance / sustained coverage? I have to lean delete. That said, I notice the word "merge" does not appear anywhere in this long discussion. I'd certainly be open to a possible merge target as well as moving to draftspace to preserve the work and hopefully move it back to the article space pending more coverage. — 1425:(that's the typical NYTs's querying the obvious if there is potential to hurt Israel's image) people kicking the Eritrean man, identified by the Israeli authorities as Haptom Zerhom, 29, and hurling a chair and bench at his head as he lay injured on the ground.The Hebrew newspaper Yediot Aharonot wrote that Mr. Zerhom had been running from danger when an Arab gunman shot and killed an Israeli soldier and Mr. Zerhom was mistaken for a second attacker “just because of the color of his skin.” 1400:

to live in a safe and secure place.. .The dehumanization of African asylum seekers in Israeli public discourse has been on-going for years. It is apparent in the blunt statements made by politicians like MK Miri Regev, Israel’s current minister of culture, who stated, “the Sudanese are like a cancer in our body.” It is backed up by countless practices carried out daily by state agents that make these humans’ lives increasingly difficult.

2282:

stabbing, and car ramming attacks targeting Israelis are nominated for deletion by editors who openly announce their commitment to delete articles about attacks against "one side of the conflict" (i.e., against Israelis) is a matter of record (see above). Knowledge (XXG) is a transparent system. But in this case, Knowledge (XXG) is enabling systemic bias against articles about violent attacks on of Israeli Jews.

1060:

to many NGOs, are in total breach of the legal limits governing a belligent occupier, and the shooting of 2,617 unarmed demonstrators in 30 days (October) is, at least from the perspective of the occupied people, a form of state terror. Both sides have reasons, some sound, for feeling they are victims, but ultimately the story is in the statistics, not in the selective presentation of event articles.

3039:. The article on the killing of Danny Gonen, however, was deleted soon after it was created by a Nom who argued that "within a month or two this event will be almost entirely forgotten." The murder of Danny Gonen has, in fact, been the subject of ongoing coverage, some stemming from the fact that some of those involved in the murder were convicted terrorists released the 1482:. Creating random attack articles and expecting other editors to clean up your shit is not acceptable. And this is routine behaviour. I for one, don't think the article should exist in whatever state. As I mentioned already, the issue of African migrants in Israel is a long one: there is no evidence that this incident had any 2721:: "It may take weeks or months to determine whether or not an event has a lasting effect. This does not, however, mean recent events with unproven lasting effect are automatically non-notable." In addition to the article I cited in response to Rosecalese, note that the incident continues to be in the news cycle this weekend 2306:

incidents is regarded as, precisely, countering systemic bias, not, as I consider your work doing, to exacerbate that by one-sided representation. Your practice would be believable if you tried to make similar articles on known Palestinian victims of numerous extrajudicial executions conducted by Israel, as documented by

2363:, and that was begun some 3 weeks after the event, when it was evident that the incident had notability and continuous wide coverage. You characteristically start these kinds of articles as soon as a news report comes in, completely undeterred by the criteria everyone else says must govern article creation of this type. 1464:

it worked extensively to cover all bases, and provide the details E. M. Gregory has consistently refused to do (why does he say 'security officers shot and wounded' the Eritrean, when one policeman stood there and shot him 6 times?, per many sources) might prove noteworthy. As it stands, it doesn't cut the mustard.

295:

attackers during active shooting attacks; and the proper behavior of civilians and security personnel when a shooter or suspected shooter has been shot but it is uncertain whether he has been neutralized. The international press coverage of these issues (particularly in the Arab press) was enormous. Here

3280:

Relisting (in the meaning of getting more comments) was not required or intended by me. I only intended that it be put back on the list of outstanding AfDs to close since my close was objected to - even though my close was within policy as a non-admin can close AfDs in ways that do not require Admin

2624:

Surely that is odd reasoning? If a perception of some psychological bias determines one's choice, it is rather pointless to say some have a negative motivation to delete, and the other therefore is positively motivated, as a creator of stuff. That goes both ways. The deleters write articles, just not

2300:

That personal attack itself is enough to raise eyebrows. The editors whose comments you object to abstain from writing similar articles re Palestinians killed by Israeli actions - scores of dubious killings, well documented, are available for that. But there is a general agreement not to do this, for

2281:

In fact, Nom, Huldra, and IRISZOOM have repeatedly and forthrightly stated that articles about attacks on Israelis should and will be deleted. That similarly written and sourced articles about similar attacks against other peoples are not relentlessly brought to AFD, whereas articles about shooting,

1828:

No, what I said is totally relevant: this is just another article to portray Israelis as victims with the Palestinians as attackers and there is an article that this attack fits into. Nothing shows this is a notable event itself but the current cycle of violence is, which is why I think it belongs to

1399:

That elected officials have no consensus in condemning this attack is appalling. The fact that public representatives stand behind the killers, justifying their action because of the “need of the hour,” is threatening not only to asylum seekers, but also to any citizen or resident of Israel who wants

258:

This is absolutely standard behaviour by EMG. Whenever an article is AfD'ed, they go around and add more stuff to it, to try to muddy the waters. Why was the article left untouched for the past few weeks? Needless to say, none of the stuff added (I can't see much, though a random "Impact" section has

1490:

on Google for "Israel Beersheva Eritrean" shows almost nothing past October 22ish. The Forward op-ed is on Oct 26, and I couldn't find anything at all after that. Have any laws been changed by this incident? Any change in the long-term rhetoric? Hand wringing by people a few days after the incident,

1309:

was another good example, but I doubt if you will take the trouble to read how the author spun it, until one simply had to step in and show all the information that the editor consistently ignored or left out in order to create the 'we-are-victims-of-Palestinians-who-are-terrorists image'. Same with

1059:

Again, who is speaking of blame? What is arguably culpable here is the persistent use of Knowledge (XXG) to promote a victim framework for one party. These events are clearly violent, several are unambiguously terroristic. By the same token, Israel's methods of extrajudicial assassination, according

1027:

Just to correct you there. Please desist from rhetoric spinning disagreements with yourself as 'blaming Jews for everything' and please note that most of these incidents, both of real terror attacks, and alleged terror attacks (one with a potato peeler, apparently) did not take place in Israel, but

613:

I can't say if the article should be included or not, I think terrorist attacks should have articles but I can't determin if this incident is that significant. Maybe a "List of Terrorist attacks in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict" might resolve this issue. But if this article will stay here, it can

3330:

version. The identity/race/whatever of the "bystander" who was killed is still unmentioned in the lead, even though some people are screaming about how it is so relevant and burning issue that this article must be kept. There is no connection (except a sidebar) present in the article with the wider

3084:

That the killing (of Danny Gonen) is mentioned when another event happen (raid to demolish the home and that Palestinians got killed), as the Israeli policy is now again (so it isn't just because Danny Gonen was killed), doesn't prove something. It is part of the background so of course the killing

1851:

There is no contradiction in highlighting the issue about portaying one side as victims and the other as attackers. As I wrote: "... the downplaying of a very significant part of the shooting (the Eritrean that got beaten and killed) shows even more clearly the focus to show one side as victims" or

1463:

As I said, I haven't and probably won't take a position on whether this should be deleted or not. I would delete the article as it stands, because I read it as the usual attack article, and Kingsindian was correct to bring it up for Afd in the state he found it. On the other hand, the article, were

2004:

this crime has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is (therefore) presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article. It can, of course, also be linked to a list, and linked form relevant pages. My point here is not only that the target article

915:

The last of those three links is a falsehood or misconception on the part of KingsIndian. I had begun to create such an article, possible merely at that point the title or lede sentence, then decided that the coverage did not support an article and withdrew it - all in the course of a few minutes

2429:

The project aims at the neutral representation of relevant items to an encyclopedia, not the creation of articles to push a victim mentality POV. The only pattern here is one where, rather than impartially write articles about notable incidents on both sides of the I/P conflict, you write many on

1430:

That's only a small set of notes on material that Gregory read, but thought best not to utilize, and the consistent omission of complexity to focus on a victim narrative is typical of this genre. Perhaps my real objection is that the refusal of such editors to write comprehensive NPOV versions of

1368:

Haftom Zarhum was shot repeatedly by a security guard then kicked and spat at by a mob after going to the southern Israeli city of Beersheba to pick up his renewed work visa. In events that some Israeli media called a lynching, Zarhum was shot and wounded before being shot several more times by a

3099:

My point is that with that article as with this one, a terror attack has consequences. Killing by terrorists are not routine murder stories that quickly fade. They come back to public attention, repeatedly, and not merely as brief mentions in later articles, but in policy debates, in historical

1299:

The victim framework is re Israeli Jews of course. Is there anything problematical in stating that? There was a huge response to the videos of this incident, showing to most Israelis's shame or embarrassment soldiers and civilians shooting and then beating the living daylights out of an innocent

1232:

some time back: NPOV obliges editors to be neutral, which I think meant, you have to show editing wise that you are looking at both sides of the coin. In articles on conflict, that is, you should show care to ensure impartial representation of both sides. Editors who write these articles don't.

2648:

According to WP:NPOV and common sense, each contributor must make their best effort to create "neutral" content, which means reflecting views by sources from different sides or from different perspectives. When it becomes plainly obvious that someone does not even make an effort to comply with

2583:

The problem is. I noted several POV errors above, and, while My Very Best Wishes sees merit in the sort of issue I raised, you haven't budged to fix it. I did some of the work for you, and you won't even get off your POV arse and insert that relevant material. Ergo, you write these not to give

1568:

Only the first article is indeed dealing with the incident, which is again a simple news matter covering an Israeli Arab lawmaker's statement about the perpetrator. The other two are passing mentions in an opinion piece/news story talking about something else. If in the future, the attacker is

1210:

I didn't argue for the deletion of the article, so your statement is inaccurate. I made a comment, and abstain from voting. As an editor with several dozen attempts to brand me as an anti-Semite over 9 years, I'm used to the innuendo. But the observation is neutral. The editors who write these

294:

I improved the article with significant information form major national and international news media. More can be done about an incident that sparked national and international conversation about racial stereotyping; the difficulty security officials and civilians face in telling victims form

2305:

consider that pushing in victim articles on Israelis is inappropriate on identical grounds. These incidents are of a daily and weekly occurrence, and do not merit article length treatment. This has nothing to do with bias, and indeed refraining from this kind of POV pushing exploiting tragic

1282:

But you talked about "a victim framework for one party". What "side" or "party" did you talk about? Did not you mean Israel? Saying that an article should be deleted/not created because the victims were citizens of Israel would be just as wrong as with regard to citizens of any other country.

1119:

I happen to think that creating a bunch of articles on one side of the conflict when there already exists a main article is an WP:NPOV violation, as I stated already. You are free to disagree. If you continue to create such articles, continue to expect them to land at AfD. I have of course no

2070:: "It may take weeks or months to determine whether or not an event has a lasting effect. This does not, however, mean recent events with unproven lasting effect are automatically non-notable." As I and others have pointed out above, it is usual to start and to keep terror attacks that pass 1978:

What I am doing is opposing the focus to portray one side as victims and the other as attackers, with this article being a recent addition to the collection, and in this case, there is already a perfectly fitting article that can cover this attack and others in the current cycle of violence.

3065:

and it will continue to be both in the news as the charges against the men who set upon the Eritrean illegal migrant mistaken for a terrorist move toward trial, and, perhaps more tellingly, as the public conversation about the proper behavior with regard to identifying possible accomplices,

1660:

This AFD was brought by an editor who has repeatedly declared his intention to attempt to delete articles about attacks targeting Jewish Israelis on the grounds that, unlike similar attacks elsewhere in the world, when Israelis are killed the event is routine. He and another editor have

1267:

I didn't claim articles shouldn't be written on victims with one ethnic/national background. The tetragrammaton forbid. I said people who write these articles have an editing interest not in the subject, but in the ethnic identity of the victim. The distinction is critical yet obvious.

2970:

My assessment was No Consensus so I'll be interested to see how a qualified admin is going to find consensus. Note I've never edited this article or Arab-Jewish conflict but have extensively edited in ISIL and other terrorism topics. A bot has relisted it BTW so that should solve

1852:

in the words of Nishidani: "... which means he downplays or ignores the very extensive comments, anguish etc that marked the aftermath of the incident in Israel, regarding racism, and mob hysteria. One assumes this doesn't interest him because he is focused on the Arab killer". --

2750:. I would assume, because that's the example given, that it's more like "when a storm levels the city of New Orleans, we don't have to wait and see if people are still writing about it in a year, because of course they will." I'm unconvinced by the passing mention in your link. – 707:. Perhaps proponent can revisit at a later date when their prophecy pans out. However typically these type of large scale attacks have international and national ramifications especially under the specific circumstances in which an innocent person was lynched mistakenly. -- 3211:'s closure and subsequent revert of the closure. Perhaps it can be relisted with a past date? Because otherwise it is going to stay open longer for no reason at all. Someone should close this now, there has been enough participation and it has stayed open for a long time. 1669:

is being used to drive away good editors, with the result that articles about violent attacks on Israelis are evaluated differently at AFD than similar attacks elsewhere. The problem can be solved by evaluating this article with the same standards used to evaluate

1701:

DELETE. Another WP:EVENT and WP:NOTNEWS article. There already exists a main article Israeli–Palestinian_conflict_(2015). This article adds nothing that cannot be included under already existing articles. It is clearly POV FORK, and not notable enough for its own

1304:

is an example: the amount of negative detail about the context, and the immediate aftermath Israeli politicians criticizing that bereft community's attempt to use the tragedy for their own settler purposes which has been left out of the article is astonishing.

1227:

to name a few, have not shown any encyclopedic interest in terrorist attacks. They are focused almost exclusively, in this area, on terrorist attacks by Palestinians or Arabs. This is, arguably, not coincidental and my objection is based on a statement made by

1780:, the question at issue in an AFD is whether the topic is notable, If you feel material about the Eritrean who was mistaken for a shooter need augmentation, by all means edit the article. Your argument, however, is irrelevant to this discussion. Please read 1487: 732:

impact. There has been none shown. People are free to create an article if it turns out there is some magical impact to this incident independent of the larger conflict in late 2015 which has killed tens of people on all sides and wounded thousands.

2855:- which states "As Knowledge (XXG) is not a paper source, editors are encouraged to include current and up-to-date information within its coverage, and to develop stand-alone articles on significant current events". This is not a routine news story. 2513:: "It may take weeks or months to determine whether or not an event has a lasting effect. This does not, however, mean recent events with unproven lasting effect are automatically non-notable." Also, this attack is back in today's new cycle, Here: 3100:

analysis, not infrequently in literary references, and, tragically (as with the killing of Danny Gonen), they produce fresh rounds of death. That is why terrorist attacks merit pages. Why it is damaging to Knowledge (XXG) to delete them. Why

2783:

but this isn't covered properly in the article. The black guy dying is the most interesting thing that can't be covered under the general article on the attacks. With Google News, you can adjust the time to only after a certain date, eg after

1330:

At least one Israeli soldier was filmed kicking Zarhum in the head as he lay bleeding on the floor of the terminal. Another man lifted a bench and dropped it on Zarhum's head as others tried to protect him by placing a bar stool over his

1077:. Perhaps this page should be deleted because the event was not notable. However telling it should be deleted because the victims were Jewish, Arabs, or citizens of country X (that's why this page was apparently nominated for deletion 2827:. It looks like the vast majority of coverage comes from a span of just a few days. Recent events aren't automatically non-notable, but that doesn't mean any article about an event gets a free pass for some arbitrary period of time ( 169: 2633:

which motivated medieval builders for generations as they con structed Chartres cathedral, our equivalent is an encyclopedia, as opposed to the pokey flimflam structures of so much flash postmodernity, as ephemeral as news like

3160:, which is improper. Relisting is when there is insufficient participation, or lacking arguments based on policy. A ton of people have commented here, and while some are lightweight, many cite policies for their arguments. As 2805:

may be weakly tangentially related as a shooting death of a civilian by security services (which were in a state of heightened security after a terrorist attack, and were accused of racism for killing a non-white person). --

1995:

You are arguing for the imposition of special rules of (WP:NCRIME) to be applied to crimes committed against Israelis. The standard for notability must be the same for all, irrespective of the ethnicity of the victim.

838:

This is not a POV-fork, but a legitimate sub-page given that main article about 2015 conflict is already very big. The only question is notability of the event, and it appears sufficiently notable to me based on the

682:, I think this page does not qualify for deletion. In particular, this is not a "first-hand news report". This is also not a "routine news reporting on things like announcements, sports, or celebrities" as defined 1943:

IrisZoom, You cannot be serious. A lone wolf enters a civilian bus station, pulls out a pistol and shoots a guard dead. Then takes the guard's gun and shoots random civilians. The only reason this is at AFD and

1431:

this material means other people, like myself, are supposed to step in, and clean up, by adding more circumstantial detail the original editors don't care to edit. That's both lazy, unencyclopedic, and partisan.

1810:

You contradict yourself when you argue that that the article needs more information on the death of the Eritrean mistaken for a shooter, than argue for squeezing this article into an already overlong article.

638:

Expanding article. Nom may not be aware of the extensive national and international attention given to unusual aspects of this attack. I am expanding that section, and welcome editors to join me in doing

2649:

WP:NPOV, it may be a reason for sanctions. Everyone, including E.M.Gregory should remember it. However, merely creating a page does not look like a problem to me, unless the page has been created on an

945:

I checked closing remarks by admins for these deleted pages. According to one of them "No evidence of longterm importance is presented or accepted". I wonder how anyone on the Earth can present any

2785: 1728:. Nishidani's comments on the downplaying of a very significant part of the shooting (the Eritrean that got beaten and killed) shows even more clearly the focus to show one side as victims. -- 2379:

As for your accusation, what I have done is to calmly discuss pattern of and an articulated attitude in the work of certain editors with regard to AFD that is damaging to the project. see:

1884:

I know the Eritrean died of the gunshot wounds and my statement refers to the beating by the mob, which was well-covered. It wasn't only that he got shot dead so what I wrote is accurate. --

1155:

I responded to comment by Nishidani above. Arguing that an article should be deleted because it allegedly promotes "a victim framework for one party" (Jews, Arabs, Serbs, whoever) is wrong.

758:

It may take weeks or months to determine whether or not an event has a lasting effect. This does not, however, mean recent events with unproven lasting effect are automatically non-notable.

3032: 163: 3118:

Oh yes. Anyone familiar with the history of terrorism and long-term conflicts, such as that one, knows that almost all incidents of this nature have long-term consequences. Hence keep.

2351:

Other stuff (Palestinian death notices) doesn't exist because most editors associated with the P side of the I/P conflict refrain from playing that POV card in respect of the rules re

1184:

I used this diff because you nominated this article for deletion and explained your reasons on another talk page. Your reasons are essentially the same as the reasoning by Nishidani.

1527:

and many, many more. Coverage of this incident has been massive and ongoing. As Senator Moynihan used to say, Kingsindian is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.

122: 2216:

No, in fact, not all of them do. But feel free to write articles on any criminal shootings, car rammings, or stabbings that you think can be sourced as strongly as this article is.

443:

Because that is the way Knowledge (XXG) is constructed; with article on specific significant incidents that can then be linked from articles on larger issues. This attacks passes

1724:

article, part of a collection that seeks to portray Israelis as the victims and Palestinians as the attackers, and there is already an article that can cover these recent attacks:

341:

You misunderstand AFD. If an article seems to lack important information, you should add the information or tag the article. If you suspect the topic is not notable, check as per

2473:. "I personally find it interesting that it was in Beersheva" and "Knowledge (XXG) must cover every event in Israel" are not valid AFD rationales. This got the usual 24 hours of 1445:

This is too much for me to handle, however the info and sources/links you provided above (the violence connected to this shooting) should certainly be included in this page, and

244:

Expanding article now. Imagine how great Knowledge (XXG) could be if, instead of spending time bringing well-sourced articles to AFD, we spent that time improving the articles.

686:. As with many recent events, it is difficult to judge how important this event will be seen in a couple of years from now. But it appears sufficiently notable at this point. 532: 398: 2598:

I am sure that an article similar in the sourcing and the scope to that one would never be nominated for deletion in a subject area other than ARBPIA. Once again, my main

95: 90: 1122:

In this context "one side" obviously means Jews, citizens of Israel or Palestinians. Either way, this is not an acceptable argument for deletion, to tell this politely.

99: 2889:

says. You don't think it's applicable here; I think it is. Telling me I "misunderstand" it is not going to persuade me otherwise, especially with a selective quote. —

1671: 3331:

2015 unrest. This is presented as a context-free terrorist attack. The history of African migrants in Israel isn't even mentioned. The reasons are not hard to guess.

1637: 377: 296: 1136:

This is not the place to discuss user conduct. I ask you again to stop flinging accusations here. You can discuss this on my talk page if you want. Or you can go to

2331:: "We do not have an article on y (some Palestinian deaths), so we should not have an article on this (shooting in a civilian bus station)" is Not a valid argument. 555:

Deadly terror attacks with international press coverage merit articles; terror attacks in Israel must be judged by the same standards as attacks in other countries.

82: 512: 312:

The case of African migrants (especially illegal migrants) in Israel is a long-time issue, to claim that this incident is some kind of watershed is incorrect. See

2043:

I am arguing for, and this has been written before by me and others, for following policies and here the case is that nothing has shown the event had any lasting

129: 2914:

Article on terrorism is too detailed for a short listing, part of a much larger conflict akin to creating articles on single battles in a much longer conflict

3066:

identifying whether suspected attackers have been "neutralized," and vengeance beatings of presumed attackers during and after live shooting events continues.

2610:

rather than destroys things, even such as a WP page that provides a reasonable info on a recent event of potentially lasting significance, deserves a credit.

1380:

described it as “a tragic but foreseeable outgrowth of a climate in which some Israeli politicians encourage citizens to take the law into their own hands”.

865:

in a nanosecond. I know we like to blame the Jews for everything but it not their fault they are the victims in the majority of terror attacks in Israel. --

2263:

for others. The only reason why other recent event articles aren't at AfD is because they haven't been nominated yet, really, that's all we know for sure.

1355: 2798: 2793: 1169:

If you are responding to Nishidani, then why are you using a diff from me? Discuss their point if you will, leave any accusations about me out of it.

2048: 1830: 1725: 209: 2430:

Israeli victims, ignoring the potential, were your thesis correct, to do similar articles for the Palestinian victims (God forbid. I would vote

1870:

Accuracy: the autopsy showed that the Eritrean migrant mistaken for a terrorist died of gunshot wounds, "beaten and killed" implies otherwise.

1052:(2)it is not the fault of the Israelis/Jews that they are usually the victims of terror attacks instead of the perpetrators of terror attacks. 320:

called them "cancer". This article, is not about killing of the Eritrean passerby. The identity/nationality of the person killed is not even

184: 3085:

will be mentioned in relation to this article about the raid, not least when two Palestinians got killed and one was critically injured. --

1620: 151: 2625:

this kind of article, and if there is have a psychological subtext for them, there is equally one for the person creating an article, and

1317: 804: 86: 3025: 1478:

Nishidani can of course decide for themselves what needs to be done to the article. But this is one of the main problems with creating

2795: 2584:

comprehensive coverage of a possibly significant event, but for the image spin these incidents supply readers (Arabs are dangerous).

1745: 1525: 17: 3338: 3218: 3175: 2789: 1576: 1498: 1176: 1147: 1109: 937: 907: 826: 740: 465:

How is it notable in and of itself, when it is already covered in the parent article? What is the enduring notability to get beyond

408: 387: 331: 266: 231: 861:

Nonsense. If you know of any articles about Israeli terror attacks that are up for afd please let me know. I will be there yelling

703:. Substantial coverage in reliable sources. AfD proponent's prediction that this will have no long term effect is a just that -- a 803:

I know that there is a tension between covering news and having lasting signficance. However, there already exists a main article

3184:

I relisted because Legacypac (who originally closed it) said it was relisted but it wasn't actually relisted. Purely procedural.

3043:. The Danny Gonen article would be useful, if it still existed. Overly aggressive deletion of this kind damages Knowledge (XXG). 2802: 2140:

No, there are only a limited number of cases like this, where notability is established by wide, deep coverage in reliable media.

1014:(1)I know we like to blame the Jews for everything but it not their fault they are the victims in the majority of terror attacks 978: 872: 789: 714: 660:

I was just going to comment along the same lines as EM Gregory. Beersheva is not usually the site of "normal" terrorist attacks.

345:. If, as you say, you simply misunderstood the impact of this incident on the political conversation, you can withdraw this AFD. 3341: 3314: 3290: 3271: 3245: 3221: 3195: 3178: 3150: 3127: 3113: 3094: 3075: 3052: 3015: 2984: 2961: 2944: 2923: 2898: 2864: 2840: 2815: 2763: 2737: 2706: 2689: 2662: 2643: 2619: 2593: 2576: 2548: 2524: 2501: 2447: 2392: 2372: 2340: 2323: 2291: 2272: 2225: 2211: 2149: 2133: 2083: 2060: 2014: 1988: 1969: 1932: 1893: 1879: 1861: 1842: 1819: 1797: 1769: 1737: 1711: 1695: 1649: 1628: 1601: 1579: 1536: 1501: 1473: 1458: 1440: 1292: 1277: 1260: 1242: 1193: 1179: 1164: 1150: 1131: 1112: 1093: 1069: 1045: 987: 958: 940: 925: 910: 881: 852: 829: 798: 769: 756:

I do not think anyone can make prediction of long lasting effects of almost any recent event. However, according to WP:LASTING,

743: 723: 695: 666: 648: 629: 599: 585: 564: 544: 524: 497: 481: 456: 434: 411: 390: 354: 334: 307: 287: 269: 253: 234: 145: 64: 2759: 2497: 3226:

Well, a normal discussion can be closed any time after the 7 days are up, no matter when/if it's been relisted. You could try

3040: 2702: 2563:, when it is a breaking news story. Much, much harder to go back years later and source an article , as I recently did with 78: 70: 2780: 1408: 141: 52:. Perhaps reexamine this a few months or a year from now in order to be better able to determine its lasting significance. 3123: 2658: 2615: 2544: 1454: 1288: 1256: 1189: 1160: 1127: 1089: 954: 848: 765: 691: 2995: 2725: 1665:

this AFD to the point where I don't blame editors with demands on their time for being reluctant to review it. A sort of

1675: 3360: 2480:

coverage and then one or two other articles within the same week, but at less than a month later, it doesn't look like

1337: 891: 40: 191: 2047:

impact, for example, but is rather one of many attacks during the current cycle of violence. Therefore it belongs to

2779:. Initially neutral. Needs to change coverage to increase issue with vigilantism and the black guy. Netanyahu spoke 1350:

A member of Knesset from the Meretz party called the attack a lynching and demanded the arrest of those responsible.

2564: 1707: 1612:

KEEP. On a relative basis to articles like Jewish Israeli Stone Throwing, this is a much more significant article.

2559:

An excellent point. It is relatively easy to set down the basic facts of an attack like this, or like this week's

1251:

the victims were citizens of Poland, for example. This is over the top and probably something special for ARBPIA.

3146: 2680:- highly notable event. Good sourcing. Also per nonsense Delete reasonings. WP:IDONTLIKEIT does not apply guys.-- 1960:

and his violent attack ought to be judged by the same standards, whether the terrorist targets a German or a Jew.

2952:

This is back at AFD, but it has not been placed back on any of the Articles for Deletion lists it was on before.

1449:

must be significantly expanded. Overall, this is a strong argument in favor of keeping and expanding this page.

1386: 3260: 3119: 2698: 2654: 2611: 2540: 2268: 1624: 1450: 1301: 1284: 1252: 1185: 1156: 1123: 1085: 1081: 950: 844: 761: 687: 313: 3024:

To understand why deletion of this article is destructive to Knowledge (XXG), consider today's headline story

1102:

Please don't fling around random accusations. My reason for nominating is present in my nomination statement.

916:

time. No other editors even saw it and it was certainly not judged, deleted - or even seen, by anyone but me.

221: 3101: 3036: 2878: 2791: 1749: 488:

That article, even if it was well-written, cannot contain all notable material about notable terror attacks.

157: 2356: 2328: 1616: 1311: 2264: 1306: 447:

because it was notable in and of itself. Deadly terrorist attacks are routinely kept at Knowledge (XXG).

1752:

just reinforces my view what this article, the other two and the many before them is all about: creating

661: 3356: 3335: 3215: 3172: 3109: 3071: 3048: 2957: 2940: 2860: 2733: 2572: 2560: 2520: 2388: 2336: 2307: 2287: 2221: 2145: 2079: 2010: 1965: 1957: 1953: 1875: 1815: 1793: 1703: 1691: 1679: 1597: 1573: 1532: 1495: 1173: 1144: 1106: 934: 921: 904: 823: 775: 737: 644: 595: 560: 540: 520: 493: 452: 405: 384: 350: 328: 303: 283: 263: 249: 228: 36: 3227: 1997: 1781: 1753: 1721: 1662: 1589: 808: 664: 1952:

was German and the guard shot in Beersheva was Israeli. You and Nom are applying a double standard. A

3267: 3263: 3142: 2202:

I can't see this being much different from the rest. Events in the Middle East gets much coverage. --

1683: 1518: 983: 877: 794: 719: 3303: 2886: 2882: 2874: 2852: 2828: 2747: 2718: 2510: 2485: 2477: 2474: 2067: 2044: 1483: 1479: 816: 812: 779: 729: 704: 466: 217: 213: 205: 3286: 2980: 2919: 2891: 2833: 2755: 2639: 2589: 2493: 2443: 2368: 2319: 1469: 1436: 1340: 1273: 1238: 1065: 1041: 614:

be expanded with information about the Eritrean incident, since it caused contreversy in Israel. --

177: 3161: 900:, among many others. This has nothing to do with fault of Jews, which is your language, not mine. 342: 3308: 3090: 2811: 2484:. If we're wrong, we can recreate it, but it would be foolish to keep all of these spam articles 2311: 2207: 2129: 2056: 1984: 1889: 1857: 1838: 1765: 1733: 1377: 623: 3323: 3231: 2481: 201: 3238: 3188: 3008: 2360: 1645: 896: 29:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

3355:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

2746:

That part of the guideline doesn't mean that we must keep any article on a non-notable event

2380: 2352: 35:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

3332: 3212: 3169: 3105: 3067: 3044: 2972: 2953: 2936: 2856: 2729: 2722: 2685: 2568: 2516: 2384: 2332: 2283: 2217: 2141: 2075: 2006: 1961: 1928: 1871: 1811: 1789: 1687: 1593: 1570: 1528: 1492: 1224: 1170: 1141: 1103: 931: 917: 901: 820: 734: 640: 591: 556: 536: 516: 489: 448: 402: 381: 346: 325: 324:

in the lead as of this moment, and was barely mentioned in the article when I nominated it.

299: 279: 260: 245: 225: 216:

from there. There is absolutely no evidence that this event has any independent importance.

2071: 2001: 1785: 1777: 1757: 968: 444: 1666: 1521: 1405: 973: 867: 807:, as I noted already, which can easily cover all current events. The creation of separate 784: 709: 675: 574: 470: 423: 1137: 949:

of long-term importance of any recent event. This is all a purely subjective judgement.

3282: 3208: 3063: 2976: 2915: 2824: 2751: 2635: 2602:

objection to deletion in this case is the motivation of people who want it be deleted (

2585: 2489: 2439: 2364: 2315: 1515: 1465: 1432: 1411: 1269: 1234: 1229: 1216: 1061: 1037: 1029: 683: 679: 55: 2726:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-winship/in-israel-searching-for-s_b_8549022.html

1446: 3086: 2807: 2203: 2125: 2052: 1980: 1885: 1853: 1834: 1761: 1729: 1247:

I edited in other difficult areas, but never heard that an article should be deleted

1212: 615: 3235: 3202: 3185: 3157: 3005: 2801:

where Israeli soldiers killed a civilian they thought was an attacker. The article

1641: 1358: 1220: 116: 2434:

for them, as I do customarily for this type of article.) This is not a venue for

3062:

Unsurprisingly, the Beersheva bus station shooting is also still in today's new

2681: 1924: 1389: 728:

I made no prediction, nor am I forced to. The burden is on the article to show

2788:

there are still results. There are other outlets covering the Eritrean issue (

1320: 317: 590:

I edit and start many terror attack articles. Israel ones get dragged to AFD.

1409:

Killing of Eritrean Migrant Shakes Israeli Confidence Amid Surge of Violence

1033: 1310:

E. M. Gregory. Despite scrounging around for every possible source to pass

3141:- This event has received significant coverage and definitely is notable. 1356:

Hunt for Israelis who killed Eritrean man falsely implicated in bus attack

3028: 2359:

etc. The last time someone, not me, wrote such a Palestinian article was

573:

Nobody said it being in Israel was a factor in saying it wasn't notable.

2435: 1949: 1945: 1760:

articles to show one side as victims and the other one as attackers. --

1511: 2629:

to adjust its POV to meet NPOV standards of comprehensiveness. Recall

2885:

is specifically all of what follows that sentence. We both know what

3035:

the home of the family of one of the terrorists responsible for the

843:

coverage. The long-lasting effects are never possible to predict.

3326:

for a close. As to the rest, my nom remains true right up to the

3166:

relisting should not be a substitute for a "no consensus" closure

886:

Multiple ones have already been deleted redirected. They include

316:

story from 2012, with a major politician, (currently a minister)

3349:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.

2932: 2717:

FreeKnowledge, Note that Rosecelese argument is invalid. as per

2998:

to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

2074:

by dint of intense, extensive, international media coverage.

2124:

Then dozens of articles from this period can be created. --

930:

EMG is correct on this point. I have struck the last link.

3104:

should to be recreated. And why this page should be KEEP.

2301:

precisely the policy reasons stated above. Therefore they

259:

been added) gets around the basic objections made above.

1338:

Police to probe ‘lynching’ of Etritrean man in Beersheva

278:(Kingsindian attempted to have me blocked from editing.) 3327: 3281:

action, which "no consensus" defaults to "keep" meets.

2603: 2537: 1078: 887: 321: 112: 108: 104: 2486:

just in case anyone covers the incidents in the future

774:@kingsindian according to your logic every article in 176: 2931:

that perp was a radical Islamist and open admirer of

1318:

Israel mob lynches Eritrean after bus station attack

3004:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 190: 2536:. As follows from discussion with Nishidani above 2873:If that cherry-picked quote actually represented 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 3363:). No further edits should be made to this page. 2653:non-notable subject. This is not the case here. 1672:University of California, Merced stabbing attack 1491:like the Forward op-ed isn't enough by itself. 815:articles on one side of the conflict is simply 2482:lasting impact or coverage will be demonstrated 422:- I don't see why it needs standalone article. 674:. Based on our notability guidelines, such as 533:list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions 399:list of Palestine-related deletion discussions 3156:I have no idea why this page was relisted by 2748:just in case it becomes notable in the future 778:should be deleted. It is impossible to prove 208:article. There already exists a main article 8: 1636:Note: This debate has been included in the 531:Note: This debate has been included in the 511:Note: This debate has been included in the 397:Note: This debate has been included in the 376:Note: This debate has been included in the 1638:list of Events-related deletion discussions 760:This is one of the reasons I voted "keep". 378:list of Israel-related deletion discussions 2877:, we might as well change the shortcut to 1635: 1614: 969:fact about other articles being redirected 530: 513:list of Crime-related deletion discussions 510: 396: 375: 1387:I Survived the Terror Attack in Beersheva 971:have to with the issue that was raised?-- 3165: 1120:intention of AfDing other articles... 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 1421:Graphic video images of the beating 2049:Israeli–Palestinian conflict (2015) 1831:Israeli–Palestinian conflict (2015) 1726:Israeli–Palestinian conflict (2015) 805:Israeli-Palestinian conflict (2015) 210:Israeli–Palestinian_conflict_(2015) 2724:, as well as in the conversation ( 1746:2015 Gush Etzion Junction shooting 1510:I repeated Kingsindian's search. 24: 3207:I guess the confusion comes from 3027:in which Israeli troops entering 1948:is not is that the guard shot by 2803:Death of Jean Charles de Menezes 3234:to get more attention. Cheers, 2631:exegi monumentum aere perennius 3041:Gilad Shalit prisoner exchange 2314:and many other NGOs. Silence. 79:Beersheva bus station shooting 71:Beersheva bus station shooting 1: 3342:14:48, 27 November 2015 (UTC) 3315:21:20, 25 November 2015 (UTC) 3291:03:49, 25 November 2015 (UTC) 3272:02:31, 25 November 2015 (UTC) 3246:07:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 3222:04:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 3196:22:51, 22 November 2015 (UTC) 3179:18:27, 22 November 2015 (UTC) 3151:21:47, 19 November 2015 (UTC) 3128:16:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC) 3114:01:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC) 3095:00:58, 18 November 2015 (UTC) 3076:14:53, 18 November 2015 (UTC) 3053:17:45, 17 November 2015 (UTC) 3016:11:02, 17 November 2015 (UTC) 2985:00:36, 17 November 2015 (UTC) 2962:21:37, 16 November 2015 (UTC) 2945:21:37, 16 November 2015 (UTC) 2924:19:47, 16 November 2015 (UTC) 2899:23:26, 17 November 2015 (UTC) 2865:22:32, 17 November 2015 (UTC) 2841:03:00, 16 November 2015 (UTC) 2816:02:48, 16 November 2015 (UTC) 2764:22:09, 15 November 2015 (UTC) 2738:12:58, 15 November 2015 (UTC) 2707:23:47, 14 November 2015 (UTC) 2690:21:18, 12 November 2015 (UTC) 2663:16:16, 13 November 2015 (UTC) 2644:15:27, 13 November 2015 (UTC) 2620:15:13, 13 November 2015 (UTC) 2594:08:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC) 2577:22:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC) 2549:21:12, 12 November 2015 (UTC) 2525:16:28, 12 November 2015 (UTC) 2502:15:24, 12 November 2015 (UTC) 2448:17:32, 12 November 2015 (UTC) 2393:16:53, 12 November 2015 (UTC) 2373:17:39, 12 November 2015 (UTC) 2341:16:27, 12 November 2015 (UTC) 2324:15:48, 12 November 2015 (UTC) 2292:02:13, 12 November 2015 (UTC) 2273:01:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC) 2226:22:06, 11 November 2015 (UTC) 2212:20:43, 11 November 2015 (UTC) 2150:16:37, 11 November 2015 (UTC) 2134:16:19, 11 November 2015 (UTC) 2084:14:52, 11 November 2015 (UTC) 2061:14:40, 11 November 2015 (UTC) 2015:11:45, 11 November 2015 (UTC) 1989:09:18, 11 November 2015 (UTC) 1970:01:58, 11 November 2015 (UTC) 1933:23:36, 10 November 2015 (UTC) 1894:16:19, 11 November 2015 (UTC) 1880:16:14, 11 November 2015 (UTC) 1862:14:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC) 1843:23:34, 10 November 2015 (UTC) 1820:11:45, 11 November 2015 (UTC) 1798:22:59, 10 November 2015 (UTC) 1770:20:52, 20 November 2015 (UTC) 1738:22:45, 10 November 2015 (UTC) 1712:20:54, 10 November 2015 (UTC) 1696:17:56, 10 November 2015 (UTC) 1650:15:24, 10 November 2015 (UTC) 1602:12:24, 10 November 2015 (UTC) 1376:Condemning Zarhum’s killing, 1028:outside of Israel, in either 65:22:24, 27 November 2015 (UTC) 2606:). In addition, someone who 1776:Iriszoom, you misunderstand 1629:02:51, 8 November 2015 (UTC) 1580:02:08, 8 November 2015 (UTC) 1537:23:50, 7 November 2015 (UTC) 1502:23:46, 6 November 2015 (UTC) 1474:21:41, 6 November 2015 (UTC) 1459:21:19, 6 November 2015 (UTC) 1441:18:00, 6 November 2015 (UTC) 1293:17:12, 6 November 2015 (UTC) 1278:16:45, 6 November 2015 (UTC) 1261:16:38, 6 November 2015 (UTC) 1243:16:29, 6 November 2015 (UTC) 1194:16:25, 6 November 2015 (UTC) 1180:16:19, 6 November 2015 (UTC) 1165:16:01, 6 November 2015 (UTC) 1151:15:56, 6 November 2015 (UTC) 1132:15:48, 6 November 2015 (UTC) 1117:In the diff above you said: 1113:14:45, 6 November 2015 (UTC) 1094:13:05, 6 November 2015 (UTC) 1070:17:40, 5 November 2015 (UTC) 1046:17:32, 5 November 2015 (UTC) 988:16:10, 4 November 2015 (UTC) 959:16:26, 4 November 2015 (UTC) 941:16:21, 4 November 2015 (UTC) 926:15:57, 4 November 2015 (UTC) 911:15:38, 4 November 2015 (UTC) 882:15:26, 4 November 2015 (UTC) 853:16:42, 4 November 2015 (UTC) 830:15:10, 4 November 2015 (UTC) 799:15:05, 4 November 2015 (UTC) 770:14:59, 4 November 2015 (UTC) 744:14:48, 4 November 2015 (UTC) 724:13:58, 4 November 2015 (UTC) 696:13:35, 4 November 2015 (UTC) 667:18:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC) 649:18:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC) 630:15:18, 3 November 2015 (UTC) 600:14:00, 4 November 2015 (UTC) 586:02:44, 4 November 2015 (UTC) 565:15:06, 3 November 2015 (UTC) 545:14:20, 3 November 2015 (UTC) 525:14:20, 3 November 2015 (UTC) 498:13:44, 4 November 2015 (UTC) 482:02:44, 4 November 2015 (UTC) 457:15:06, 3 November 2015 (UTC) 435:13:38, 3 November 2015 (UTC) 412:13:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC) 391:13:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC) 355:16:31, 4 November 2015 (UTC) 335:15:01, 4 November 2015 (UTC) 308:13:53, 4 November 2015 (UTC) 288:13:53, 4 November 2015 (UTC) 270:00:40, 4 November 2015 (UTC) 254:21:02, 3 November 2015 (UTC) 235:13:12, 3 November 2015 (UTC) 212:. This can be considered a 3380: 2851:You seem to misunderstand 2565:2003 Route 60 Hamas ambush 1486:impact by itself. A quick 1036:, particularly in Hebron. 3306:; no significant effect. 2781:against vigilantism (AFP) 1676:Trollhättan school attack 3352:Please do not modify it. 3322:: I have listed this at 3261:User:My very best wishes 1302:Murder of Shalhevet Pass 32:Please do not modify it. 3102:Shooting of Danny Gonen 3037:Shooting of Danny Gonen 3031:to carry out orders to 1750:2015 synagogue stabbing 782:unless time goes by. -- 2881:. The entire point of 1658:Note to closing editor 1427: 1402: 1382: 1371: 1352: 1333: 1307:Death of Yehuda Shoham 1054: 1020: 2561:Amman shooting attack 2308:Amnesty International 1680:Amman shooting attack 1419: 1397: 1374: 1366: 1348: 1328: 1050: 1012: 776:Portal:Current events 2699:FreeKnowledgeCreator 1684:2015 Graz van attack 1080:) is an example of " 3120:My very best wishes 2655:My very best wishes 2612:My very best wishes 2541:My very best wishes 1958:lone wolf terrorist 1954:lone wolf terrorist 1451:My very best wishes 1341:The Times of Israel 1285:My very best wishes 1253:My very best wishes 1186:My very best wishes 1157:My very best wishes 1124:My very best wishes 1086:My very best wishes 951:My very best wishes 845:My very best wishes 762:My very best wishes 688:My very best wishes 2312:Human Rights Watch 1378:Human Rights Watch 3018: 2361:Beitunia killings 1652: 1631: 1619:comment added by 628: 547: 527: 414: 393: 63: 3371: 3354: 3311: 3309: 3243: 3206: 3193: 3143:Inter&anthro 3013: 3003: 3001: 2999: 2896: 2894: 2838: 2836: 2799:another incident 1923:, pr nominator, 1744:The creation of 1720:This is another 1704:Johnmcintyre1959 1423:appeared to show 1392:October 26, 2015 1361:19 October 2015. 1343:19 October 2015. 1225:User:E.M.Gregory 981: 976: 875: 870: 792: 787: 717: 712: 620: 582: 478: 431: 195: 194: 180: 132: 120: 102: 62: 60: 53: 34: 3379: 3378: 3374: 3373: 3372: 3370: 3369: 3368: 3367: 3361:deletion review 3350: 3239: 3200: 3189: 3019: 3009: 2994: 2992: 2892: 2890: 2834: 2832: 2697:per Roscelese. 2265:Rainbow unicorn 1522:Times of Israel 1414:19 October 2015 1406:Isabel Kershner 1336:Ilan Ben Zion, 1323:19 October 2015 1075:Serious comment 979: 974: 873: 868: 790: 785: 715: 710: 575: 471: 424: 137: 128: 93: 77: 74: 56: 54: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3377: 3375: 3366: 3365: 3345: 3344: 3317: 3296: 3295: 3294: 3293: 3275: 3274: 3253: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3248: 3154: 3153: 3135: 3134: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3082: 3081: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3002: 2991: 2990: 2989: 2988: 2987: 2965: 2964: 2947: 2926: 2908: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2893:Rhododendrites 2868: 2867: 2844: 2843: 2835:Rhododendrites 2823:- largely per 2818: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2741: 2740: 2710: 2709: 2692: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2552: 2551: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2505: 2504: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2295: 2294: 2276: 2275: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2017: 1973: 1972: 1936: 1935: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1801: 1800: 1758:WP:NEWSREPORTS 1741: 1740: 1699: 1698: 1667:Heckler's veto 1654: 1653: 1621:100.33.126.154 1609: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1428: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1412:New York Times 1395: 1394: 1393: 1385:Moran Mekamel 1372: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1230:User:Sandstein 1217:User:ShulMaven 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1097: 1096: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1030:East Jerusalem 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 996: 995: 994: 993: 992: 991: 990: 965: 964: 963: 962: 961: 859: 858: 857: 856: 855: 749: 748: 747: 746: 698: 669: 654: 653: 652: 651: 633: 632: 607: 606: 605: 604: 603: 602: 568: 567: 549: 548: 528: 508: 507: 506: 505: 504: 503: 502: 501: 500: 460: 459: 438: 437: 416: 415: 394: 373: 372: 371: 370: 369: 368: 367: 366: 365: 364: 363: 362: 361: 360: 359: 358: 357: 292: 291: 290: 222:WP:PERSISTENCE 198: 197: 134: 73: 68: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3376: 3364: 3362: 3358: 3353: 3347: 3346: 3343: 3340: 3337: 3334: 3329: 3325: 3321: 3318: 3316: 3313: 3312: 3310:Esquivalience 3305: 3301: 3298: 3297: 3292: 3288: 3284: 3279: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3273: 3269: 3265: 3262: 3258: 3255: 3254: 3247: 3244: 3242: 3237: 3233: 3229: 3225: 3224: 3223: 3220: 3217: 3214: 3210: 3204: 3199: 3198: 3197: 3194: 3192: 3187: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3177: 3174: 3171: 3167: 3163: 3159: 3152: 3148: 3144: 3140: 3137: 3136: 3129: 3125: 3121: 3117: 3116: 3115: 3111: 3107: 3103: 3098: 3097: 3096: 3092: 3088: 3083: 3077: 3073: 3069: 3064: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3034: 3030: 3026: 3023: 3017: 3014: 3012: 3007: 3000: 2997: 2986: 2982: 2978: 2974: 2969: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2963: 2959: 2955: 2951: 2948: 2946: 2942: 2938: 2934: 2930: 2927: 2925: 2921: 2917: 2913: 2910: 2909: 2900: 2895: 2888: 2884: 2880: 2876: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2869: 2866: 2862: 2858: 2854: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2842: 2837: 2830: 2826: 2822: 2819: 2817: 2813: 2809: 2804: 2800: 2796: 2794: 2792: 2790: 2787: 2782: 2778: 2775: 2774: 2765: 2761: 2757: 2753: 2749: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2739: 2735: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2720: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2696: 2693: 2691: 2687: 2683: 2679: 2676: 2675: 2664: 2660: 2656: 2652: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2641: 2637: 2632: 2628: 2623: 2622: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2609: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2591: 2587: 2582: 2578: 2574: 2570: 2566: 2562: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2550: 2546: 2542: 2538: 2535: 2532: 2531: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2512: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2491: 2487: 2483: 2479: 2476: 2472: 2469: 2468: 2449: 2445: 2441: 2437: 2433: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2394: 2390: 2386: 2382: 2378: 2374: 2370: 2366: 2362: 2358: 2357:WP:NOTABILITY 2354: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2338: 2334: 2330: 2329:WP:OTHERSTUFF 2327: 2326: 2325: 2321: 2317: 2313: 2309: 2304: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2293: 2289: 2285: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2274: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2227: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2131: 2127: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2085: 2081: 2077: 2073: 2069: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2003: 1999: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1919: 1918: 1895: 1891: 1887: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1859: 1855: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1827: 1821: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1799: 1795: 1791: 1787: 1783: 1779: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1767: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1742: 1739: 1735: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1668: 1664: 1663:WP:BLUDGEONed 1659: 1656: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1613: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1578: 1575: 1572: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1523: 1519: 1516: 1513: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1500: 1497: 1494: 1489: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1429: 1426: 1424: 1418: 1413: 1410: 1407: 1404: 1403: 1401: 1396: 1391: 1388: 1384: 1383: 1381: 1379: 1373: 1370: 1365: 1360: 1357: 1354: 1353: 1351: 1347: 1342: 1339: 1335: 1334: 1332: 1327: 1322: 1319: 1316: 1315: 1313: 1312:WP:NOTABILITY 1308: 1303: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1231: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1213:User:Jethro B 1209: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1178: 1175: 1172: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1149: 1146: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1111: 1108: 1105: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1076: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1058: 1053: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1026: 1025: 1019: 1017: 1011: 1010: 1008: 1005: 989: 986: 985: 982: 977: 970: 966: 960: 956: 952: 948: 944: 943: 942: 939: 936: 933: 929: 928: 927: 923: 919: 914: 913: 912: 909: 906: 903: 899: 898: 893: 889: 885: 884: 883: 880: 879: 876: 871: 864: 860: 854: 850: 846: 842: 837: 836: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 828: 825: 822: 818: 817:WP:POVFORKing 814: 810: 806: 802: 801: 800: 797: 796: 793: 788: 781: 777: 773: 772: 771: 767: 763: 759: 755: 754: 753: 752: 751: 750: 745: 742: 739: 736: 731: 727: 726: 725: 722: 721: 718: 713: 706: 702: 699: 697: 693: 689: 685: 681: 677: 673: 670: 668: 665: 663: 659: 656: 655: 650: 646: 642: 637: 636: 635: 634: 631: 627: 625: 619: 618: 612: 609: 608: 601: 597: 593: 589: 588: 587: 583: 581: 580: 572: 571: 570: 569: 566: 562: 558: 554: 551: 550: 546: 542: 538: 534: 529: 526: 522: 518: 514: 509: 499: 495: 491: 487: 486: 485: 484: 483: 479: 477: 476: 468: 464: 463: 462: 461: 458: 454: 450: 446: 442: 441: 440: 439: 436: 432: 430: 429: 421: 418: 417: 413: 410: 407: 404: 400: 395: 392: 389: 386: 383: 379: 374: 356: 352: 348: 344: 340: 339: 338: 337: 336: 333: 330: 327: 323: 319: 315: 311: 310: 309: 305: 301: 297: 293: 289: 285: 281: 277: 276: 275: 274: 273: 272: 271: 268: 265: 262: 257: 256: 255: 251: 247: 243: 242: 241: 240: 239: 238: 237: 236: 233: 230: 227: 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 193: 189: 186: 183: 179: 175: 171: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 143: 140: 139:Find sources: 135: 131: 127: 124: 118: 114: 110: 106: 101: 97: 92: 88: 84: 80: 76: 75: 72: 69: 67: 66: 61: 59: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 3351: 3348: 3319: 3307: 3299: 3256: 3240: 3190: 3155: 3138: 3021: 3020: 3010: 2993: 2975:'s concern. 2949: 2928: 2911: 2820: 2797:) There was 2776: 2694: 2677: 2650: 2630: 2626: 2607: 2599: 2533: 2470: 2431: 2302: 2260: 1920: 1717: 1700: 1657: 1615:— Preceding 1611: 1610: 1567: 1447:this section 1422: 1420: 1398: 1375: 1367: 1359:The Guardian 1349: 1329: 1248: 1221:User:Amoruso 1118: 1074: 1051: 1015: 1013: 1006: 984:(yada, yada) 972: 946: 895: 878:(yada, yada) 866: 862: 840: 795:(yada, yada) 783: 757: 720:(yada, yada) 708: 700: 671: 657: 621: 616: 610: 578: 577: 552: 474: 473: 427: 426: 419: 199: 187: 181: 173: 166: 160: 154: 148: 138: 125: 57: 50:no consensus 49: 47: 31: 28: 3333:Kingsindian 3213:Kingsindian 3170:Kingsindian 3106:E.M.Gregory 3068:E.M.Gregory 3045:E.M.Gregory 2973:E.M.Gregory 2954:E.M.Gregory 2937:E.M.Gregory 2912:Strong Keep 2857:E.M.Gregory 2821:Weak Delete 2786:20 Oct 2015 2730:E.M.Gregory 2569:E.M.Gregory 2517:E.M.Gregory 2385:E.M.Gregory 2333:E.M.Gregory 2284:E.M.Gregory 2218:E.M.Gregory 2142:E.M.Gregory 2076:E.M.Gregory 2007:E.M.Gregory 2000:and as per 1998:WP:NOTPAPER 1962:E.M.Gregory 1872:E.M.Gregory 1812:E.M.Gregory 1790:E.M.Gregory 1782:WP:MEMORIAL 1754:WP:MEMORIAL 1722:WP:MEMORIAL 1688:E.M.Gregory 1594:E.M.Gregory 1590:WP:BLUDGEON 1571:Kingsindian 1529:E.M.Gregory 1493:Kingsindian 1480:WP:POVFORKs 1390:The Forward 1171:Kingsindian 1142:Kingsindian 1104:Kingsindian 932:Kingsindian 918:E.M.Gregory 902:Kingsindian 821:Kingsindian 809:WP:MEMORIAL 735:Kingsindian 641:E.M.Gregory 592:E.M.Gregory 557:E.M.Gregory 537:E.M.Gregory 517:E.M.Gregory 490:E.M.Gregory 449:E.M.Gregory 403:Kingsindian 382:Kingsindian 347:E.M.Gregory 326:Kingsindian 300:E.M.Gregory 280:E.M.Gregory 261:Kingsindian 246:E.M.Gregory 226:Kingsindian 164:free images 3304:WP:NOTNEWS 3264:Donottroll 2887:WP:NOTNEWS 2883:WP:NOTNEWS 2875:WP:NOTNEWS 2853:WP:NOTNEWS 2829:WP:NOTNEWS 2719:WP:LASTING 2511:WP:LASTING 2068:WP:LASTING 2045:WP:LASTING 1484:WP:lasting 1321:Al Jazeera 1211:articles, 1082:The Plague 1009:. Apropos 813:WP:NOTNEWS 780:WP:LASTING 730:WP:LASTING 705:prediction 624:talk to me 467:WP:NOTNEWS 318:Miri Regev 218:WP:LASTING 214:WP:POVFORK 206:WP:NOTNEWS 58:Sandstein 3357:talk page 3283:Legacypac 3209:Legacypac 3162:WP:RELIST 2977:Legacypac 2916:Redhanker 2879:WP:ISNEWS 2825:Roscelese 2777:Weak Keep 2752:Roscelese 2651:obviously 2636:Nishidani 2604:same diff 2586:Nishidani 2490:Roscelese 2440:Nishidani 2365:Nishidani 2316:Nishidani 1642:• Gene93k 1466:Nishidani 1433:Nishidani 1270:Nishidani 1235:Nishidani 1062:Nishidani 1038:Nishidani 1034:West Bank 1016:in Israel 343:WP:BEFORE 322:mentioned 37:talk page 3359:or in a 3324:WP:ANRFC 3232:WP:ANRFC 3087:IRISZOOM 3033:demolish 3029:Kalandia 2996:Relisted 2808:Callinus 2760:contribs 2627:refusing 2600:personal 2498:contribs 2204:IRISZOOM 2126:IRISZOOM 2053:IRISZOOM 1981:IRISZOOM 1886:IRISZOOM 1854:IRISZOOM 1835:IRISZOOM 1762:IRISZOOM 1730:IRISZOOM 1702:article. 1617:unsigned 947:evidence 617:Bolter21 579:Мандичка 475:Мандичка 428:Мандичка 202:WP:EVENT 200:Another 123:View log 39:or in a 3328:present 3320:Comment 3203:Ansh666 3158:Ansh666 3022:Comment 2950:Comment 2608:creates 2534:Comment 2475:routine 2436:hasbara 2381:WP:PACT 2353:WP:NEWS 1950:Rafik Y 1946:Rafik Y 1686:, etc. 1512:Haaretz 1249:because 1032:or the 1007:Comment 841:current 662:Yossiea 611:Netural 224:apply. 170:WP refs 158:scholar 96:protect 91:history 3300:Delete 3228:WT:AFD 3164:says, 2695:Delete 2682:BabbaQ 2471:Delete 2432:delete 2261:Delete 2072:WP:GNG 2002:WP:GNG 1925:Huldra 1921:Delete 1786:WP:GNG 1778:WP:GNG 1718:Delete 1488:search 980:crewer 874:crewer 791:crewer 716:crewer 445:WP:GNG 420:Delete 142:Google 100:delete 2634:this. 1956:is a 1331:body. 1138:WP:AE 185:JSTOR 146:books 130:Stats 117:views 109:watch 105:links 16:< 3287:talk 3268:talk 3259:per 3257:Keep 3236:ansh 3186:ansh 3147:talk 3139:Keep 3124:talk 3110:talk 3091:talk 3072:talk 3049:talk 3006:ansh 2981:talk 2958:talk 2941:talk 2933:ISIS 2929:Note 2920:talk 2861:talk 2812:talk 2756:talk 2734:talk 2703:talk 2686:talk 2678:Keep 2659:talk 2640:talk 2616:talk 2590:talk 2573:talk 2545:talk 2521:talk 2494:talk 2478:news 2444:talk 2389:talk 2369:talk 2337:talk 2320:talk 2310:and 2303:also 2288:talk 2269:talk 2222:talk 2208:talk 2146:talk 2130:talk 2080:talk 2057:talk 2051:. -- 2011:talk 1985:talk 1966:talk 1929:talk 1890:talk 1876:talk 1858:talk 1839:talk 1833:. -- 1816:talk 1794:talk 1784:and 1766:talk 1748:and 1734:talk 1708:talk 1692:talk 1646:talk 1625:talk 1598:talk 1533:talk 1470:talk 1455:talk 1437:talk 1289:talk 1274:talk 1257:talk 1239:talk 1190:talk 1161:talk 1128:talk 1090:talk 1066:talk 1042:talk 975:brew 955:talk 922:talk 897:this 892:this 888:this 869:brew 863:keep 849:talk 786:brew 766:talk 711:brew 701:Keep 692:talk 684:here 680:here 676:here 672:Keep 658:Keep 645:talk 596:talk 561:talk 553:Keep 541:talk 521:talk 494:talk 453:talk 351:talk 314:this 304:talk 284:talk 250:talk 204:and 178:FENS 152:news 113:logs 87:talk 83:edit 3241:666 3230:or 3191:666 3011:666 2897:\\ 2839:\\ 2488:. – 1520:, 1084:". 678:or 639:so. 584:😜 480:😜 469:? 433:😜 192:TWL 121:– ( 3302:: 3289:) 3270:) 3168:. 3149:) 3126:) 3112:) 3093:) 3074:) 3051:) 2983:) 2960:) 2943:) 2922:) 2863:) 2814:) 2762:) 2758:⋅ 2736:) 2728:). 2705:) 2688:) 2661:) 2642:) 2618:) 2592:) 2575:) 2547:) 2523:) 2500:) 2496:⋅ 2446:) 2391:) 2371:) 2355:, 2339:) 2322:) 2290:) 2271:) 2224:) 2210:) 2148:) 2132:) 2082:) 2059:) 2013:) 1987:) 1979:-- 1968:) 1931:) 1892:) 1878:) 1860:) 1841:) 1818:) 1796:) 1788:. 1768:) 1736:) 1710:) 1694:) 1682:, 1678:, 1674:, 1648:) 1640:. 1627:) 1600:) 1535:) 1524:, 1517:, 1514:, 1472:) 1457:) 1439:) 1291:) 1276:) 1259:) 1241:) 1219:, 1192:) 1163:) 1140:. 1130:) 1092:) 1068:) 1044:) 957:) 924:) 894:, 890:, 851:) 819:. 768:) 694:) 647:) 598:) 563:) 543:) 523:) 496:) 455:) 401:. 380:. 353:) 306:) 286:) 252:) 220:, 172:) 115:| 111:| 107:| 103:| 98:| 94:| 89:| 85:| 3339:♚ 3336:♝ 3285:( 3266:( 3219:♚ 3216:♝ 3205:: 3201:@ 3176:♚ 3173:♝ 3145:( 3122:( 3108:( 3089:( 3070:( 3047:( 2979:( 2956:( 2939:( 2935:. 2918:( 2859:( 2810:( 2754:( 2732:( 2701:( 2684:( 2657:( 2638:( 2614:( 2588:( 2571:( 2543:( 2519:( 2515:. 2492:( 2442:( 2438:. 2387:( 2383:. 2367:( 2335:( 2318:( 2286:( 2267:( 2220:( 2206:( 2144:( 2128:( 2078:( 2055:( 2009:( 1983:( 1964:( 1927:( 1888:( 1874:( 1856:( 1837:( 1814:( 1792:( 1764:( 1756:/ 1732:( 1706:( 1690:( 1644:( 1623:( 1596:( 1592:. 1577:♚ 1574:♝ 1531:( 1499:♚ 1496:♝ 1468:( 1453:( 1435:( 1287:( 1272:( 1255:( 1237:( 1223:, 1215:, 1188:( 1177:♚ 1174:♝ 1159:( 1148:♚ 1145:♝ 1126:( 1110:♚ 1107:♝ 1088:( 1064:( 1040:( 1018:. 953:( 938:♚ 935:♝ 920:( 908:♚ 905:♝ 847:( 827:♚ 824:♝ 811:/ 764:( 741:♚ 738:♝ 690:( 643:( 626:) 622:( 594:( 576:— 559:( 539:( 535:. 519:( 515:. 492:( 472:— 451:( 425:— 409:♚ 406:♝ 388:♚ 385:♝ 349:( 332:♚ 329:♝ 302:( 298:. 282:( 267:♚ 264:♝ 248:( 232:♚ 229:♝ 196:) 188:· 182:· 174:· 167:· 161:· 155:· 149:· 144:( 136:( 133:) 126:· 119:) 81:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Beersheva bus station shooting - Knowledge (XXG)

Index