457:. Any old shareware or freeware utility can be included on a PC Utilities disk -- that's the point, that's what they do. That doesn't in itself constitute notability, particularly since outside of PC Utilities, there is absolutely no mention of this software anywhere. I couldn't dig up any reviews or anything. The existence of articles such as that, if they can be found, would make a cause for notability. As for the advertising claim, I was simply speculated that the page was created for advertising purposes. Although product marketing material is definitely grounds for article deletion, I don't see that here. I do speculate, however, that this Knowledge (XXG) article itself is intended to create notability for the product.
380:. It appears we have a case of a very well formatted article for a topic that is completely non-notable. There are no third-pary references that I could find other than Download.com where anybody can upload their shareware. There doesn't appear to be an active significant community based on a quick visit to the site's forum, even though this isn't necessarily an indicator of notability. I question if this Knowledge (XXG) article is intended as advertising since there is both a free and Pro version of this software, and the website also solicits Paypal donations. --
434:
means that the sources address the subject directly in detail. I don't see that from the PC Utilities entry. Moreover, the material on the DVD related to BPL (except perhaps for the phrasing in that one-sentence coverdisc browser blurb) was provided by its creator, and thus does not qualify as being
400:
disc as it would be totally foolish an action to write full page description on cover disc. Also, why it is totally ignored? Why empty handed claims of non notiblity and that I'm advertising for it? I'm not one of programmers making BPL... Forums are inactive because of bad choice of forum software.
399:
If you don't recognize the PC Utilities entry(dated 2009) then I seriously doubt that you are according to wikipedia policy. Notability is
Notability. It have entry at PC Utilities which is an third party source. And it isn't logical to say that it have only '2 lined' coverage on PC Utilities' cover
77:
176:
260:
Previous article was deleted in 2007 and it is not good to estimate BPL's current status by that. It become notable long ago in 2009. The given links show it at PC Utilities
Magazine. Which is a reliable source.
216:
72:
280:
this looks to me like an article where the creator with a minimal guidance could demonstrate notability and significantly improve the coverage of the current article according to WP criteria.
170:
136:
104:
99:
236:
108:
131:
91:
536:
521:
500:
477:
439:
409:
390:
366:
347:
326:
310:
292:
270:
248:
228:
56:
191:
158:
473:
17:
427:
211:; the only mention I can find of it online is very brief, passing mentions in some fairly obscure forums; no coverage online in
152:
148:
532:
405:
343:
266:
219:, but speedy G4 was declined by an admin, since this is apparently a complete re-write with updates about a 2010 version.
423:
257:
212:
95:
554:
40:
198:
87:
62:
508:. I'm sorry Programmingfanatics but I have to agree with the other delete !voters here. A 2 line entry on a DVD
528:
401:
339:
262:
164:
461:
415:
469:
387:
550:
517:
360:
Learn to create a great program in around 20 minutes with this beginners-friendly BASIC programming tool
288:
36:
306:
244:
224:
184:
352:
Why, yes, Version 1.0 for
Windows was included on the "coverdisc" DVD included with issue #99 of
465:
436:
382:
363:
359:
323:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
549:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
513:
283:
491:
208:
302:
240:
220:
496:
512:
index isn't going to cut it. We need news articles and reviews about this software. --
258:
http://bpl.conforums.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&num=1208778384
335:
53:
354:
125:
509:
338:
See this. Entry to PC utilities is something to be called notable... --
78:
Articles for deletion/Beginners
Programming Language (2nd nomination)
358:
of April 3, 2008, and this is all what they had to say about it: "
543:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
322:. No coverage whatsoever in independent reliable sources. --
217:
WP:Articles for deletion/Beginners
Programming Language
121:
117:
113:
183:
73:
197:
336:http://img240.imageshack.us/img240/6208/bplxw1.png
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
557:). No further edits should be made to this page.
301:What sort of notability did you have in mind?
237:list of Software-related deletion discussions
8:
235:Note: This debate has been included in the
234:
362:". That is not what I call coverage. --
70:
527:Okay... Than fell free to delete... --
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
69:
24:
207:No assertion of notability per
88:Beginners Programming Language
63:Beginners Programming Language
1:
574:
256:It is notable. See this-
546:Please do not modify it.
537:02:22, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
522:02:11, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
57:17:50, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
501:19:42, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
478:16:10, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
440:11:32, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
410:04:11, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
391:01:42, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
367:20:37, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
348:18:57, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
327:15:07, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
311:14:41, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
293:14:39, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
271:06:02, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
249:05:23, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
229:05:23, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
432:"significant coverage"
430:of the subject, where
215:. Previously AFD'd at
68:AfDs for this article:
420:significant coverage
416:notability guideline
414:Notability, per our
529:Programmingfanatics
402:Programmingfanatics
340:Programmingfanatics
263:Programmingfanatics
213:WP:Reliable sources
48:The result was
481:
464:comment added by
251:
565:
548:
480:
458:
435:independent. --
424:reliable sources
385:
291:
286:
202:
201:
187:
139:
129:
111:
34:
573:
572:
568:
567:
566:
564:
563:
562:
561:
555:deletion review
544:
459:
383:
282:
281:
144:
135:
102:
86:
83:
66:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
571:
569:
560:
559:
525:
524:
503:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
442:
394:
393:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
330:
329:
316:
315:
314:
313:
296:
295:
274:
273:
253:
252:
205:
204:
141:
82:
81:
80:
75:
67:
65:
60:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
570:
558:
556:
552:
547:
541:
540:
539:
538:
534:
530:
523:
519:
515:
511:
507:
504:
502:
499:
498:
493:
490:
487:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
456:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
441:
438:
433:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
412:
411:
407:
403:
398:
397:
396:
395:
392:
389:
388:
386:
379:
376:
375:
368:
365:
361:
357:
356:
351:
350:
349:
345:
341:
337:
334:
333:
332:
331:
328:
325:
321:
318:
317:
312:
308:
304:
300:
299:
298:
297:
294:
290:
285:
279:
276:
275:
272:
268:
264:
259:
255:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
233:
232:
231:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
200:
196:
193:
190:
186:
182:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
150:
147:
146:Find sources:
142:
138:
133:
127:
123:
119:
115:
110:
106:
101:
97:
93:
89:
85:
84:
79:
76:
74:
71:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
545:
542:
526:
505:
495:
488:
466:Nintendude64
460:— Preceding
454:
431:
419:
381:
377:
355:PC Utilities
353:
319:
277:
206:
194:
188:
180:
173:
167:
161:
155:
145:
49:
47:
31:
28:
514:Ron Ritzman
428:independent
418:, requires
171:free images
510:Shovelware
384:NINTENDUDE
303:Scopecreep
241:Scopecreep
221:Scopecreep
551:talk page
426:that are
37:talk page
553:or in a
474:contribs
462:unsigned
132:View log
54:ItsZippy
39:or in a
455:Comment
437:Lambiam
364:Lambiam
324:Lambiam
177:WP refs
165:scholar
105:protect
100:history
506:Delete
492:WP:GNG
489:Delete
378:Delete
320:Delete
209:WP:GNG
149:Google
109:delete
50:delete
192:JSTOR
153:books
137:Stats
126:views
118:watch
114:links
16:<
533:talk
518:talk
497:Ruud
470:talk
406:talk
344:talk
307:talk
289:talk
278:Keep
267:talk
245:talk
225:talk
185:FENS
159:news
122:logs
96:talk
92:edit
422:in
199:TWL
134:•
130:– (
535:)
520:)
476:)
472:•
408:)
346:)
309:)
287:;
284:BO
269:)
261:--
247:)
239:.
227:)
179:)
124:|
120:|
116:|
112:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
52:.
531:(
516:(
494:—
468:(
404:(
342:(
305:(
265:(
243:(
223:(
203:)
195:·
189:·
181:·
174:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
151:(
143:(
140:)
128:)
90:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.