568:
cases(??), but about its admissibility that you do not want to recognize by doing your promotion, you are a great French director? No, an actor? No! Just an artistic agent and a blogger so for you gives her the right to be there? In addition, I am for nothing at all for the removal on the wiki IT, FR, DE ??? and what you say is totally wrong, there is no vendetta! You are the one and only person who writes this article. No one else is a contributor.. I did not create to delete the article but to have a notice of eligibility, if it remains so much better for you. I have only one account otherwise if you know how to read I just ask an administrator to change my account name! I only have one and I contribute only with this one. The other users that you denounce against you are not even me, I just reported facts like two other people here in discussion by tapping on Google. For me, you are promoting, bloggers I know and assist artists but are not on WP and have been deleted for lack of notoriety. You are of a great renown in France is the real question? Answer: NO to me. Thank you for your opinion and stop with your false insinuations. Judge in your conscience, thank you! (
534:
were true, the fact that so little news is commentated on national media prove that the person has a real existence. Please be aware that there's a vendetta campaign against this person and
Knowledge (XXG) is not a way to settle accounts. Page as deleted to French wikipedia after admin get enough of fake acounts everywhere and users are trying to to same things here. Plus, Knowledge (XXG) eligility are not often same. Here nothing is promotional (and if it, just add banner, and let's correct that) but neutral. And even if most of sources are social media/websites to prove that content or nominations exists, there are national centred sources Slate, TeleStar, Gala, 20 Minutes). User here is trying to make rumor a legal issue but it's not... There'are clear rules here. So :
703:: Go ahead and continue working on it, you left other puppets of shock? You will set an example as it is easy to create a new account! I am on WP since 2005 in Canada, France, US for more than 3 years(2015) n you, today? Class festival n Nikon short film no eligible!! It's not forbidden to get paid to influence a Knowledge (XXG) article, you just have to declare it! Not with a mention discreet report but visible at the top of the article as in the clipboard!--
617:), what you did here before someone noticed it ;) What everyone can see is : why does some without any contributions in Fr, En and WikiMonde, is suddenly taking care of deleting everything about someone. So please let the community debating, and if it's too promotional, feel free to edit and rewrite, that's the way it works. I voted neutral because I'm to new to vote, and creator of the article. You should do the same, not voting 2 times :)
613:. Just look at the history, there are dozen contributors before and after me. And please we're not here to judge personal thing, and people work, but only is there are sources or not. And here, there are. What happned on other website in not the question here. And the reasons you gave is bad translated but every one can consult it and see it's false (and btw, the history show clearly that you've been blocked for using 4 accounts (
662:
with a conflict of interest is trying to use
Knowledge (XXG) to promote this person. Knowledge (XXG) does not tolerate promotion of any kind. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:15, 26 April 2018 (UTC) CheckUser note: The following accounts are sock puppets: Liloula2200, IamAGecko, Ninobalto222, and MangoZona. See Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/IamAGecko.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:01, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
386:
685:
I worked on draft on IP, but it seems that anybody can create an account and vote so I vote, even it'es clear that the two "deleted vote" are from the same person. There're many primary sources, but also secondary like Slate or 20 Minutes. 1 movie out in theaters (that could be eligible), and a short
533:
Users participing here (Djumbo75 and JohnDoe) were created to delete this article. They did exactly the same things on
Wikimonde and on Knowledge (XXG) IT and DE. There is no legal issue because there point on vue are based on non confirmed sources about a justice decision. And even if the decisions
476:
Wikimonde Plus is not a separate project, please look at many pages, it's just a mirror where people can interact, and this parcular page was on war editing before of this specific user, and admin deleted because of its ware edition, fake accounts not becasue of eligility (it's written in it's log)
666:
Note Given this new information, I would like to highlight (apart from the fact that only the puppets seem to be ok with keeping the article) that 95% of the contribution to this article were made by these sock puppets, given a good information on its unreliability as well as its not notableness.
661:
Comment: Please see
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Benjamin Lemaire. There are a lot of sources here, but few of them appear to be independent and reliable – all the facebook/IMDb/YouTube/google/blog stuff does nothing to establish notability, but does give a strong impression that someone
587:
PS: The real reason for the deletion on the other WPs: "Deleted the page
Benjamin Lemaire (too many problems: promotion problems, deletions of sources, slight eligibility) <= it arranges in its way apparently it is well indicated black on white" questionable eligibility and promotion, etc. The
489:*FALSE: The real reason for the deletion on the other WPs: "Deleted the page Benjamin Lemaire (too many problems: promotion problems, deletions of sources, slight eligibility) <= it arranges in its way apparently it is well indicated black on white" questionable eligibility and promotion, etc.
567:
Bcoz: you are a liar saying that I am a fake nose and I did absolutely nothing about the other WPs just reported what I saw! You are the only contributor of all these articles on all wikipedia... There has been a consensus that has ended with administrators, we are not talking about justice
244:) m . . (184 bytes) (-23,207) . . (Undid revision 838733336 by Javert2113 (talk)slight eligibility, controversial content on legal issues, does not meet the eligibility requirements on WP FR/ Wikiplus... Delete recognized blogger Stop it now!) (undo | thank) (Tags: Replaced, Undo)
334:) m . . (184 bytes) (-23,207) . . (slight eligibility, controversial content on legal issues, does not meet the eligibility requirements on WP FR/ Wikiplus World etc. IP: the same person for self-promotion!!) (undo | thank) (Tag: Replaced)
540:
does not meet the eligibility requirements on WP FR/ Wikiplus World : WikiPlus said they deleted because of war edition only, WP FR deleted after a vote of many fake (and it was before most of sources here, and eligity are not same on all
459:
447:) This person is self-promoting, has changed these names several times to see "nickname" and create his page on all wikipedia of the world, in France he has not met the conditions and has been withdrawn in recent years and on
170:
686:
movie shown and awarded in 2 A class festival that could be eligible (note that it should have 2 short eligible to be eligible to). So it's ok for me, and it's evident here that the people who ask the deletion has COI.
225: . . (23,391 bytes) (+23,207) . . (Please wait a moment, I'll create an AfD thread for you instead. We will then discuss about your arguments. Please wait a moment.) (rollback: 1 edit | undo) (Tag: Undo)
315: m . . (23,391 bytes) (+23,207) . . (Reverting possible vandalism by John doe123456987 to version by 77.136.87.109. Report False Positive? Thanks, ClueBot NG. (3363014) (Bot)) (undo) (Tag: Rollback)
454:
Comment: The link is pointing to
Wikimonde Plus, which appears to be a separate project and not simply a mirror. However, what Djumbo75 said is true for the French Knowledge (XXG) article too:
451:(an administrator deleted it last night for lack of eligibility and problems of all kinds), it seems to me that it should also be deleted here for obvious lack of notability. Best Regards
164:
274:) (talk | contribs) m . . (184 bytes) (-23,207) . . (Undid revision 838732816 by Shellwood (talk)the same person for self-promotion, Fake) (undo | thank) (Tags: Replaced, Undo)
660:
same opinion lack of notability, a single contributor (using 2/4 acc). I would agree with your assessment: lack of notability. Google turns up no reliable sources on him =: -->
123:
395:
498:
609:
Please do not vote twice. And you're not allowed to vote because you just arrived on
Knowledge (XXG) btw. I'm not the only contributors, because the draft was there :
515:
204:
I am converting a speedy deletion tag into an AfD tag to allow discussion about the arguments. This seems to be more productive than starting an edit-war about this.
304:) (talk | contribs) . . (184 bytes) (-23,207) . . (Undid revision 838732672 by ClueBot NG (talk)) (undo | thank) (Tags: Replaced, Undo, reverting anti-vandal bot)
96:
91:
130:
100:
209:
controversial content on legal issues, does not meet the eligibility requirements on WP FR/ Wikiplus World etc. IP: the same person for self-promotion!!
83:
255: m . . (23,391 bytes) (+23,207) . . (Reverted 1 edit by John doe123456987 (talk) to last revision by Shellwood. (TW)) (undo | thank) (Tag: Undo)
618:
285: m . . (23,391 bytes) (+23,207) . . (Reverted edits by John_doe123456987 (talk) (HG) (3.1.22)) (undo | thank) (Tags: Huggle, Rollback)
358:
185:
152:
17:
146:
712:
695:
676:
657:
634:
597:
577:
556:
524:
507:
486:
471:
444:
424:
406:
376:
349:
65:
729:
365:
362:
40:
142:
87:
625:) 13:17, 29 April 2018 (UTC) - Sorry wasn't logged, but as you can see, my IP wasn't use to edit anything else.
192:
79:
71:
622:
630:
552:
482:
321:
291:
261:
231:
725:
691:
36:
158:
708:
704:
672:
668:
653:
649:
329:
299:
269:
239:
589:
569:
519:
502:
436:
432:
178:
593:
573:
467:
440:
420:
402:
345:
626:
548:
478:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
724:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
687:
372:
310:
250:
544:
the same person for self-promotion!! : there are no IP, and no multiple account here...
280:
463:
416:
398:
341:
220:
60:
54:
339:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Benjamin_Charles-Lemaire&action=history
117:
368:
614:
448:
610:
361:. The article was salted there after 2 unsuccessful deletion reviews (
52:. Sock-infested mess, and the article is a blatant advertisement.
720:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
455:
202:
This deletion suggestion has been created by another editor.
338:
113:
109:
105:
396:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles_for_deletion/Benjamin_Lemaire
177:
537:
controversial content on legal issues : no issue here
191:
667:Giorgio69 (talk) 18:23, 14 December 2017 (UTC) --
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
732:). No further edits should be made to this page.
514:Note: This discussion has been included in the
497:Note: This discussion has been included in the
611:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Benjamin_Lemaire
8:
499:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
516:list of France-related deletion discussions
615:http://plus.wikimonde.com/Benjamin_Lemaire
513:
496:
449:http://plus.wikimonde.com/Benjamin_Lemaire
382:Oh, thank you very much for the research.
588:rules are clear on slight eligibility ! (
456:https://fr.wikipedia.org/Benjamin_Lemaire
208:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
383:
357:The AfD on the french wikipedia is
24:
384:
1:
749:
713:15:05, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
696:14:25, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
677:13:56, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
658:13:42, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
635:13:18, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
598:12:38, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
578:12:20, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
557:10:58, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
525:05:19, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
508:05:19, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
487:11:16, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
472:02:44, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
445:00:40, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
425:00:37, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
407:19:31, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
377:17:51, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
350:00:34, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
66:20:31, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
326:(changed account name to
296:(changed account name to
266:(changed account name to
236:(changed account name to
722:Please do not modify it.
80:Benjamin Charles-Lemaire
72:Benjamin Charles-Lemaire
32:Please do not modify it.
318:23:42, 28 April 2018
307:23:42, 28 April 2018
288:23:43, 28 April 2018
277:23:44, 28 April 2018
258:23:45, 28 April 2018
247:23:50, 28 April 2018
228:23:51, 28 April 2018
217:00:31, 29 April 2018
207:Original message was:
527:
510:
394:up here as well:
322:John doe123456987
292:John doe123456987
262:John doe123456987
232:John doe123456987
64:
740:
522:
505:
389:
388:
387:
333:
325:
314:
303:
295:
284:
273:
265:
254:
243:
235:
224:
196:
195:
181:
133:
121:
103:
58:
34:
748:
747:
743:
742:
741:
739:
738:
737:
736:
730:deletion review
520:
503:
385:
327:
319:
308:
297:
289:
278:
267:
259:
248:
237:
229:
218:
138:
129:
94:
78:
75:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
746:
744:
735:
734:
716:
715:
698:
664:
663:
642:
641:
640:
639:
638:
637:
602:
601:
584:
583:
582:
581:
546:
545:
542:
538:
535:
528:
511:
493:
492:
491:
490:
474:
460:view page logs
427:
410:
409:
336:
335:
316:
305:
286:
275:
256:
245:
226:
199:
198:
135:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
745:
733:
731:
727:
723:
718:
717:
714:
710:
706:
702:
701:shock puppets
699:
697:
693:
689:
684:
681:
680:
679:
678:
674:
670:
659:
655:
651:
647:
644:
643:
636:
632:
628:
624:
620:
619:77.136.17.168
616:
612:
608:
607:
606:
605:
604:
603:
599:
595:
591:
586:
585:
579:
575:
571:
566:
563:
562:
561:
560:
559:
558:
554:
550:
543:
539:
536:
532:
529:
526:
523:
517:
512:
509:
506:
500:
495:
494:
488:
484:
480:
475:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
452:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
431:
428:
426:
422:
418:
415:
412:
411:
408:
404:
400:
397:
393:
381:
380:
379:
378:
374:
370:
366:
363:
360:
356:
352:
351:
347:
343:
340:
331:
323:
317:
312:
306:
301:
293:
287:
282:
276:
271:
263:
257:
252:
246:
241:
233:
227:
222:
216:
215:
214:
211:
210:
205:
203:
194:
190:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
140:Find sources:
136:
132:
128:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
62:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
721:
719:
700:
682:
665:
645:
627:Tifftiff1234
564:
549:Tifftiff1234
547:
530:
479:Tifftiff1234
429:
413:
391:
367:). Regards,
354:
353:
337:
212:
206:
201:
200:
188:
182:
174:
167:
161:
155:
149:
139:
126:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
688:Martingally
165:free images
705:Royalhouse
669:Royalhouse
650:Royalhouse
464:~ ToBeFree
433:~ Djumbo75
417:~ ToBeFree
399:~ ToBeFree
342:~ ToBeFree
311:ClueBot NG
251:Javert2113
726:talk page
390:Adding a
330:Djumblo75
300:Djumblo75
281:Shellwood
270:Djumblo75
240:Djumblo75
37:talk page
728:or in a
590:Djumbo75
570:Djumbo75
521:MT Train
504:MT Train
437:Djumbo75
355:Comment:
221:ToBeFree
124:View log
39:or in a
646:Deleted
531:Neutral
414:Neutral
392:comment
213:Edits:
171:WP refs
159:scholar
97:protect
92:history
565:Delete
430:Delete
369:Comte0
143:Google
101:delete
50:delete
186:JSTOR
147:books
131:Stats
118:views
110:watch
106:links
61:Help!
16:<
709:talk
692:talk
683:Keep
673:talk
654:talk
648:: --
631:talk
623:talk
594:talk
574:talk
553:talk
483:talk
468:talk
441:talk
421:talk
403:talk
373:talk
359:here
346:talk
179:FENS
153:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
541:WP)
193:TWL
122:– (
55:Guy
711:)
694:)
675:)
656:)
633:)
596:)
576:)
555:)
518:.
501:.
485:)
470:)
462:)
443:)
423:)
405:)
375:)
364:,
348:)
173:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
707:(
690:(
671:(
652:(
629:(
621:(
600:)
592:(
580:)
572:(
551:(
481:(
466:(
458:(
439:(
435:(
419:(
401:(
371:(
344:(
332::
328:@
324::
320:@
313::
309:@
302::
298:@
294::
290:@
283::
279:@
272::
268:@
264::
260:@
253::
249:@
242::
238:@
234::
230:@
223::
219:@
197:)
189:·
183:·
175:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
145:(
137:(
134:)
127:·
120:)
82:(
63:)
59:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.