465:
565:. Chairman of the zoning board for a city the size of Baltimore is a significant public office. A Google Scholar search turns up several pages of his writings in academic and professional journals. It appears that the articles subject is likely to meet the GNG even though the impetus to write the article is an event that, standing alone, would not demonstrate notability. There's a bit of a rush to judgment going on here.
478:
340:: the "going back several decades" coverage is minor, local, and incidental, I don't see any basis for notability other than the stories of his alleged plagiarism, and these stories (while in high profile non-local sources such as the Chronicle of Higher Education) do not pass the standard of sustained coverage that persists beyond contemporaneous news coverage. —
467:. Judging from the snippets there, and from their headlines and the abstract of one, I think that two of the newspaper articles used as references in the Knowledge article are likely to contain only passing mentions of Mr. Neil, not in-depth coverage. One of the references is titled "Pa, woman, Carroll man admit fracas with officers"; neither the title nor
381:
encyclopedia needs to encounter an army of cluebats. (Nomoskedasticity (talk) 08:08, 30 October 2010 (UTC.)" Taken literally, this is an invitation to violence against people who do not share the writer's perspective. This should rebut any inference that the writer has an open mind on his/her interpretation of the topic of plagiarism.
384:
In another post on the
Chronicle for Higher Education's site a writer using the name nomoskedasticity exhorts someone to "badger some reporters!" for coverage of a plagiarism allegation so that the news coverage could be the source of a Knowledge page. ("UMass Plaigarist makes $ 166k/year" Chronicle,
376:
The initial author violates
Knowledge's POV policy by highlighting one minor series of events in the subject's life without placing it in context with his overall achievements, which are significant. The overall portrayal of the subject is undeservedly negative. He actually is a pretty good guy.
380:
A simple Google search of
Nomoskedasticity's pen name suggests that he/she has a bias, bordering on obsession, with a very strict interpretation of the rules for citing sources. In one posting in a Knowledge discussion, the author says "Anyone arguing that plagiarism isn't a serious issue for an
388:
This makes me question whether nomoskedasticity wasn't the original informant for the
Baltimore Sun articles mentioned in the disputed post. If so, he/she would be the original source of material that was run through a newspaper and subsequently cited in Knowledge. I believe that this stretches
372:
delete: I am a relative newcomer to posting in
Knowledge. Last night I posted un-sourced additions to this entry about a long-time friend to try to create some balance. The additions were removed by the initial author of the article, a writer who uses the pseudonym "nomoskedasticity." I have
468:
481:
of "Hopes of legally selling snowballs melt away before zoning board; 2 who tried to run stands from home are denied" consists of nothing but the headline--one that suggests a likely passing mention of Mr. Neil. The snippet on Google says
175:
271:
385:
March 15, 2013.) This exhortation basically is an attempt to use a newspaper to "launder" original research so that it could be cited in a subsequent
Knowledge listing.
169:
392:
I always like to use my name when posting opinion. Anonymous web posts are inherently unreliable because the reader cannot vet the biases and experiences of the writer.
302:
128:
474:
The guilty pleas were accepted by Judge Donald J. Gilmore after pretrial negotiations between
Benjamin A. Neil, an assistant state's attorney, and Michael S.
485:"We need the patience of Job somedays," says Zoning Board Chairman Benjamin A. Neil. It is here that Rosia Morgan, 69, and Timothy McGinnis, 29, found ...
206:
Does not meet standards for notability. Appears to be notable based on one allegation that was not resolved and several papers that were withdrawn.
135:
101:
96:
402:
105:
88:
570:
190:
17:
157:
582:- Fails SNG as a Politician and as an Academic. BLP-1E for a plagiarism scandal of some sort. Fails GNG beyond that.
566:
319:
288:
258:
151:
607:
358:
357:
non notable person alleged to have been involved in a minor event that has no impact and no lasting coverage. --
211:
40:
345:
574:
557:
536:
517:
496:
457:
437:
410:
366:
349:
325:
294:
262:
241:
215:
70:
406:
147:
92:
63:
603:
513:
254:
197:
36:
488:
which looks like a passing mention. Some articles mention that he ran for the
Baltimore city council. —
84:
76:
452:
398:
207:
341:
183:
445:- BLP1E situation for basically obscure academic; fails to rise to our standards of notability. --
229:
587:
553:
532:
237:
163:
53:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
602:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
509:
505:
489:
446:
433:
425:
421:
545:
337:
314:
283:
250:
225:
583:
549:
528:
233:
122:
429:
548:
close please? As above, this is really a one event BLP that is not notable.
307:
276:
596:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
272:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
373:
attempted to learn the rules today. I am a quick study.
118:
114:
110:
182:
253:with news coverage dating back several decades.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
610:). No further edits should be made to this page.
483:
472:
389:Knowledge's rules against original research.
504:- There may not ever be a clearer example of
303:list of Maryland-related deletion discussions
196:
8:
301:Note: This debate has been included in the
270:Note: This debate has been included in the
300:
269:
428:nature of coverage/events doesn't help.
420:— per David and per nom. I don't think
477:which could be a passing mention. The
7:
464:I searched the Google News archive:
471:mention Mr. Neil. The snippet says
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
527:. The subject is not notable.
1:
627:
424:is within reach, and the
599:Please do not modify it.
395:Mark Adams, Baltimore.
336:. Does not seem to meet
32:Please do not modify it.
575:20:49, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
558:16:24, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
537:07:08, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
518:03:59, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
497:03:41, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
458:01:46, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
438:00:35, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
411:22:40, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
367:20:19, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
362:aka The Red Pen of Doom
350:18:26, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
326:18:18, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
295:18:18, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
263:18:10, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
242:18:06, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
216:18:05, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
71:10:27, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
487:
476:
567:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
401:comment added by
363:
328:
297:
224:- per nom, fails
618:
601:
494:
493:
455:
449:
413:
364:
361:
324:
322:
317:
312:
293:
291:
286:
281:
255:Nomoskedasticity
201:
200:
186:
138:
126:
108:
85:Benjamin A. Neil
77:Benjamin A. Neil
67:
62:
57:
48:The result was
34:
626:
625:
621:
620:
619:
617:
616:
615:
614:
608:deletion review
597:
491:
490:
453:
447:
396:
359:
320:
315:
308:
306:
289:
284:
277:
275:
208:Robert McClenon
143:
134:
99:
83:
80:
65:
60:
55:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
624:
622:
613:
612:
592:
591:
577:
560:
539:
521:
520:
499:
461:
460:
440:
370:
369:
352:
342:David Eppstein
330:
329:
298:
266:
265:
244:
204:
203:
140:
79:
74:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
623:
611:
609:
605:
600:
594:
593:
589:
585:
581:
578:
576:
572:
568:
564:
561:
559:
555:
551:
547:
543:
540:
538:
534:
530:
526:
523:
522:
519:
515:
511:
507:
503:
500:
498:
495:
486:
480:
475:
470:
466:
463:
462:
459:
456:
450:
444:
441:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
419:
416:
415:
414:
412:
408:
404:
403:98.140.197.73
400:
393:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
368:
365:
356:
353:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
332:
331:
327:
323:
318:
313:
311:
304:
299:
296:
292:
287:
282:
280:
273:
268:
267:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
245:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
220:
219:
218:
217:
213:
209:
199:
195:
192:
189:
185:
181:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
149:
146:
145:Find sources:
141:
137:
133:
130:
124:
120:
116:
112:
107:
103:
98:
94:
90:
86:
82:
81:
78:
75:
73:
72:
69:
68:
59:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
598:
595:
579:
562:
541:
524:
501:
484:
473:
469:the abstract
442:
417:
397:— Preceding
394:
391:
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
354:
333:
309:
278:
246:
221:
205:
193:
187:
179:
172:
166:
160:
154:
144:
131:
64:
54:
49:
47:
31:
28:
510:polarscribe
508:than this.
448:Orange Mike
230:WP:ACADEMIC
170:free images
604:talk page
37:talk page
606:or in a
506:WP:BLP1E
479:abstract
426:WP:BLP1E
422:WP:BASIC
399:unsigned
249:, meets
129:View log
39:or in a
584:Carrite
550:uhhlive
546:WP:SNOW
529:Maproom
338:WP:PERP
234:ukexpat
176:WP refs
164:scholar
102:protect
97:history
580:Delete
542:Delete
525:Delete
502:Delete
443:Delete
418:Delete
360:TRPoD
355:delete
334:Delete
251:WP:GNG
226:WP:BIO
222:Delete
148:Google
106:delete
50:delete
492:rybec
430:JFHJr
191:JSTOR
152:books
136:Stats
123:views
115:watch
111:links
56:Scott
16:<
588:talk
571:talk
563:Keep
554:talk
544:and
533:talk
514:talk
454:Talk
407:talk
346:talk
310:czar
279:czar
259:talk
247:Keep
238:talk
212:talk
184:FENS
158:news
119:logs
93:talk
89:edit
66:talk
52:. —
198:TWL
127:– (
573:)
556:)
535:)
516:)
451:|
436:)
409:)
348:)
305:.
274:.
261:)
240:)
232:.
228:,
214:)
178:)
121:|
117:|
113:|
109:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
590:)
586:(
569:(
552:(
531:(
512:(
434:㊟
432:(
405:(
344:(
321:·
316:·
290:·
285:·
257:(
236:(
210:(
202:)
194:·
188:·
180:·
173:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
150:(
142:(
139:)
132:·
125:)
87:(
61:•
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.