219:
Not a direct rebuttal, more a reflection, but if asserting notability simply involves a claim to have sold something to socialites and corporations (specifically, in this instance, a company director and a law firm) then it's a very low hurdle indeed to overcome, and somewhat contrary to the
324:
125:
132:
Seems to probably fail notability, and also not be sourced - seems autobiographical. P.S. afraid I'm a little unsure of the system so am probably doing this wrong! -
92:
87:
96:
79:
244:
I completely agree; I'm thinking more about the last sentence, full of unsourced claims about running for city council, performing at the Met, and so on.
151:
345:
there is no sources whatsoever, and all other links seem to be linking to this article on
Knowledge (XXG). Not a single shred of evidence.--
17:
415:
398:
375:
354:
336:
308:
257:
237:
209:
188:
171:
141:
61:
384:
433:
36:
83:
75:
67:
432:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
332:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
288:
196:
I'm undecided about whether this article actually asserts notability; it does not, however, demonstrate it.
272:
252:
204:
137:
55:
280:
350:
184:
411:
328:
363:
295:. Unfortunately, while what constitutes notability is moderately well defined, what constitutes
371:
246:
198:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
304:
233:
167:
133:
50:
225:
159:
155:
346:
180:
407:
292:
367:
113:
300:
229:
163:
389:
221:
179:, arguably asserts notability, but doesn't show it through any sources.
366:, an Atlanta law firm, does not mention their "famous" art collection.
150:
Your nomination looks good to me. Well spotted! This article is a good
426:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
154:
candidate. Article does not assert notability, and posted by a
120:
109:
105:
101:
362:
no assertion of notability. I notice the article on
299:notability seems to be largely a judgment call...
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
436:). No further edits should be made to this page.
291:) are sufficient of themselves to establish
8:
267:LOL. Thankfully for my own privacy, neither
323:: This debate has been included in the
325:list of Visual arts-related deletions
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
224:approach generally implied per
387:reveals nothing convincing. —
1:
406:No indication of notability.
76:Benjamin Richard Hines, III
68:Benjamin Richard Hines, III
453:
429:Please do not modify it.
416:04:29, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
399:02:22, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
376:18:55, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
355:16:24, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
337:15:18, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
309:14:49, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
258:14:21, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
238:13:39, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
210:13:28, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
189:10:55, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
172:10:09, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
142:07:58, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
62:01:57, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
271:for City Council (per
160:conflict of interest
156:single purpose user
364:King & Spalding
44:The result was
339:
444:
431:
395:
392:
319:
287:at the MET (per
255:
249:
207:
201:
123:
117:
99:
58:
53:
34:
452:
451:
447:
446:
445:
443:
442:
441:
440:
434:deletion review
427:
393:
390:
253:
247:
205:
199:
119:
90:
74:
71:
56:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
450:
448:
439:
438:
421:
419:
418:
401:
378:
357:
340:
329:David Eppstein
316:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
289:WP:ENTERTAINER
261:
260:
213:
212:
191:
174:
158:so probably a
130:
129:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
449:
437:
435:
430:
424:
423:
422:
417:
413:
409:
405:
402:
400:
397:
396:
386:
383:Non-notable;
382:
379:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
358:
356:
352:
348:
344:
341:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
318:
317:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
273:WP:POLITICIAN
270:
266:
263:
262:
259:
256:
251:
250:
243:
242:
241:
240:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
218:
215:
214:
211:
208:
203:
202:
195:
192:
190:
186:
182:
178:
175:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
152:speedy delete
149:
148:Speedy Delete
146:
145:
144:
143:
139:
135:
127:
122:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
60:
59:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
428:
425:
420:
403:
388:
380:
359:
342:
320:
296:
284:
279:a book (per
276:
268:
264:
248:Anturiaethwr
245:
216:
200:Anturiaethwr
197:
193:
176:
147:
131:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
281:WP:CREATIVE
134:Hunting dog
347:EclipseSSD
293:notability
285:performing
222:kid gloves
181:NawlinWiki
408:Edward321
297:asserting
162:as well.
126:View log
368:Johnbod
277:writing
275:), nor
269:running
265:Comment
217:Comment
194:Delete.
93:protect
88:history
404:Delete
385:Google
381:Delete
360:Delete
343:Delete
301:Debate
283:) nor
230:Debate
226:WP:BLP
177:Delete
164:Debate
121:delete
97:delete
57:larity
46:delete
124:) – (
114:views
106:watch
102:links
52:Singu
16:<
412:talk
372:talk
351:talk
333:talk
327:. –
321:Note
305:talk
254:Talk
234:talk
206:Talk
185:talk
168:talk
138:talk
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
391:Wen
414:)
394:li
374:)
353:)
335:)
307:)
236:)
228:.
187:)
170:)
140:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
48:.
410:(
370:(
349:(
331:(
303:(
232:(
183:(
166:(
136:(
128:)
118:(
116:)
78:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.