252:
There are plenty of sources available to expand the article, and I took a few minutes to get started on an expansion. The multiple reliable and verifiable sources about the circle and its reconstruction and elimination should satisfy any reasonable standard of notability.
476:
Each of these solutions implies that, once the circle is paved over, its notability degrades from article-worthy to at most section-worthy. The fact that we already have an article and the sources that are cited in the article show us that this article should be kept.
452:
as I am the other side of the
Atlantic -- This article appears to be about a road junction. The fact that it is no longer a circle does not mean that many years when it was one are NN. However there are alternatives to deletion:
237:
would seem to be the appropriate target for a merge there is no valid reason that it should not have been proposed as a merge target and the far more disruptive rush to AfD avoided, and not treated as an afterthought.
513:
Boring until it's given encyclopedic treatment. Sources seem to support inclusion now clean it up and add some dazzle so the lede explains for the rest of us why a traffic circle can be notable and interesting.
338:
432:. Whether or not it is current, future, or former is irelevant - notbility is not temporary. It certainly seems to be part of an encyclopedic list of such features as noted by
309:
124:
91:
86:
95:
78:
288:
Stifle, so once the object in question ceases to exist, should we delete the article? Can we extend it to people? Once they die, we delete their articles?
436:
above. Such circles were used more extensively and maintained longer in NJ than in other states and are a significant feature of the NJ road system.
374:
165:
Merging to the list article is probably the best way to go. We could probably just put most of the text of the article in the notes column. --
234:
157:
370:
82:
17:
569:
548:
531:
505:
481:
471:
444:
416:
395:
378:
356:
327:
297:
281:
262:
247:
221:
197:
173:
148:
60:
74:
66:
233:
requires a legitimate effort to edit and improve articles, and if notability is still not satisfied to consider a merge. As
587:
230:
36:
586:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
467:
277:
391:
351:
322:
186:
565:
293:
544:
502:
478:
366:
404:
515:
463:
258:
243:
189:. This may be a better target as the history of the circle and this route are closely related. --
144:
494:
462:
Improve description of the present form of the intersection and move to "Berlin
Intersection".
194:
170:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
429:
438:
387:
345:
316:
136:
561:
412:
289:
557:
498:
425:
131:
A critical part of our extensive encyclopedic treatment of NJ traffic circles? How 'bout
540:
211:
51:
48:. No clear consensus to merge, but that may continue to be discussed on the talk page.
132:
493:
Although I'm inclined to vote neutral or delete because the circle no longer exists,
433:
254:
239:
140:
190:
166:
112:
386:- lots of reliable sources found this subject notable enough to write about. --
273:
408:
580:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
229:
Notability is permanent, and this is a notable road feature.
152:*Alternatively, editors may wish to consider the merits of
209:- a traffic circle that has been removed. Merge away...
119:
108:
104:
100:
339:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
590:). No further edits should be made to this page.
310:list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions
8:
337:: This debate has been included in the
308:: This debate has been included in the
369:, its a pretty big article as it is. --
235:List of traffic circles in New Jersey
158:List of traffic circles in New Jersey
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
428:significant coverage, easily passes
24:
539:, sources indicate notability.
231:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion policy
371:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )
75:Berlin Circle (traffic circle)
67:Berlin Circle (traffic circle)
1:
570:01:12, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
549:07:44, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
532:21:55, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
506:19:12, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
482:22:04, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
472:17:37, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
445:12:44, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
61:06:22, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
607:
417:23:38, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
396:13:08, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
379:03:00, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
357:23:27, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
328:23:27, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
298:23:22, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
282:14:40, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
263:23:45, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
248:22:47, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
222:20:53, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
198:23:40, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
174:20:51, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
149:19:30, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
583:Please do not modify it.
501:are definitely present.
32:Please do not modify it.
459:Merge with locality;
154:merge & redirect
456:Merge with highway;
367:New Jersey Route 73
135:-failing, defunct,
44:The result was
523:
450:Comment - No vote
359:
342:
330:
313:
161:
59:
598:
585:
528:
521:
516:
441:
354:
348:
343:
333:
325:
319:
314:
304:
218:
151:
122:
116:
98:
58:
56:
49:
34:
606:
605:
601:
600:
599:
597:
596:
595:
594:
588:deletion review
581:
526:
519:
439:
352:
346:
323:
317:
272:per Gtstricky.
212:
118:
89:
73:
70:
52:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
604:
602:
593:
592:
575:
573:
572:
551:
534:
508:
503:Admiral Norton
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
479:Admiral Norton
460:
457:
447:
419:
401:Redirect/Merge
398:
381:
365:or merge into
360:
331:
301:
300:
285:
284:
267:
266:
265:
224:
203:
202:
201:
200:
177:
176:
139:road feature?
129:
128:
69:
64:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
603:
591:
589:
584:
578:
577:
576:
571:
567:
563:
559:
555:
552:
550:
546:
542:
538:
535:
533:
530:
529:
522:
512:
509:
507:
504:
500:
496:
492:
489:
483:
480:
475:
474:
473:
469:
465:
464:Peterkingiron
461:
458:
455:
454:
451:
448:
446:
443:
442:
435:
434:User:Alansohn
431:
427:
423:
420:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
399:
397:
393:
389:
385:
384:Keep or merge
382:
380:
376:
372:
368:
364:
361:
358:
355:
349:
340:
336:
332:
329:
326:
320:
311:
307:
303:
302:
299:
295:
291:
287:
286:
283:
279:
275:
271:
268:
264:
260:
256:
251:
250:
249:
245:
241:
236:
232:
228:
227:Keep or merge
225:
223:
220:
219:
217:
216:
208:
205:
204:
199:
196:
192:
188:
184:
181:
180:
179:
178:
175:
172:
168:
164:
163:
162:
159:
155:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
126:
121:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
57:
55:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
582:
579:
574:
553:
536:
524:
517:
510:
491:Strong keep.
490:
449:
437:
421:
400:
383:
362:
334:
305:
269:
226:
214:
213:
210:
206:
182:
153:
130:
53:
45:
43:
31:
28:
388:ChrisRuvolo
347:Fabrictramp
318:Fabrictramp
562:Ecoleetage
440:Jim Miller
424:Plenty of
353:talk to me
324:talk to me
137:incidental
54:Sandstein
541:Everyking
405:WP:BEFORE
215:Gtstricky
495:WP:NTEMP
255:Alansohn
240:Alansohn
187:Route 73
141:Eusebeus
125:View log
556:Passes
430:WP:NOTE
191:Polaron
167:Polaron
92:protect
87:history
290:Kushal
274:Stifle
270:Delete
207:delete
120:delete
96:delete
558:WP:RS
499:WP:RS
426:WP:RS
409:Neier
183:Merge
123:) – (
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
566:talk
554:Keep
545:talk
537:Keep
518:Banj
511:Keep
497:and
468:talk
422:Keep
413:talk
403:per
375:talk
363:Keep
335:Note
306:Note
294:talk
278:talk
259:talk
244:talk
195:Talk
171:Talk
145:talk
133:WP:N
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
46:keep
344:--
341:.
315:--
312:.
185:to
156:to
568:)
560:.
547:)
527:oi
470:)
415:)
407:-
394:)
377:)
350:|
321:|
296:)
280:)
261:)
246:)
193:|
169:|
147:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
564:(
543:(
525:b
520:e
466:(
411:(
392:t
390:(
373:(
292:(
276:(
257:(
242:(
160:.
143:(
127:)
117:(
115:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.