124:
states that "A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." This church is referred to in a wide range of local history books and other resources. The article just happens to be a stub, and no editor has yet been
202:
current version. If the editor comes back with something to show that this church is notable, then I will revisit this discussion, but as it now stands, there's no there there. BTW, there are only 21 Google hits if you remove wikipedia and its mirrors.
284:
says notability is not temporary, and there's no mention of time restrictions in
Knowledge policy. The references will be added in due course; the fact that they're not there yet bears no relevance to the subject's notability.
277:
280:
is one such source - I just need to find the book in the library again and add the necessary references. The fact that I have yet to do this does not mean the subject is not notable -
110:
298:
notability. Yes, it is presumed to be notable if it's been written about. However, things still have to be notable for a reason, and you need to state that. For example,
229:
83:
78:
87:
70:
276:
doesn't require a claim to fame, it only requires that "it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."
135:
The article doesn't assert this notability. It just says it is a church. To at least get by the Speedy Delete criteria, the stub has to at least say
173:...don't you feel you're jumping the gun? Yes, I posted that, I speedy-tagged it, but his comment implies he can assert notability. Give the guy a
314:
289:
264:
252:
239:
219:
207:
192:
181:
162:
152:
143:
129:
52:
17:
74:
66:
58:
310:
the man is notable. To get past the basic criteria, the article needs to state why this church deserves mention. --
260:, churches are not above the requirement to establish notability beyond a local interest through reliable sources.
331:
125:
able to expand the content and add the references in question - but, after all, that's what stubs are all about!
36:
302:
has had many, many articles about him...but if the article just says "George W. Bush is a man who is the son of
330:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
49:
204:
189:
215:
per lack of notability. I'm not really a fan of wait till notability is established approach
303:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
311:
299:
249:
178:
159:
140:
261:
149:
286:
126:
104:
281:
273:
236:
121:
216:
324:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
100:
96:
92:
188:
Jumping the gun? The article was created in March.
158:
This nomination was incomplete. I completed it. --
306:", it should be deleted, because it's not claiming
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
334:). No further edits should be made to this page.
117:This convo has been copied from the talk page:
8:
228:: This debate has been included in the
230:list of Christianity-related deletions
7:
177:to get some notability into it. --
24:
67:Bitterne United Reformed Church
59:Bitterne United Reformed Church
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
315:19:45, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
290:12:51, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
265:19:16, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
253:16:37, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
240:16:34, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
53:21:21, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
220:05:17, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
208:20:49, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
193:17:58, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
182:19:29, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
163:19:26, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
153:18:07, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
144:15:09, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
130:08:16, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
294:Again, the article doesn't
351:
248:. He had his chance. --
327:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
304:George H. W. Bush
242:
233:
139:it's notable. --
342:
329:
234:
224:
108:
90:
34:
350:
349:
345:
344:
343:
341:
340:
339:
338:
332:deletion review
325:
237:John Vandenberg
81:
65:
62:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
348:
346:
337:
336:
320:
319:
318:
317:
300:George W. Bush
267:
255:
243:
222:
210:
196:
195:
166:
165:
147:
146:
120:
115:
114:
61:
56:
50:Carlossuarez46
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
347:
335:
333:
328:
322:
321:
316:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
292:
291:
288:
283:
279:
275:
271:
268:
266:
263:
259:
256:
254:
251:
247:
244:
241:
238:
231:
227:
223:
221:
218:
214:
211:
209:
206:
205:Corvus cornix
201:
198:
197:
194:
191:
190:Corvus cornix
187:
186:
185:
184:
183:
180:
176:
172:
164:
161:
157:
156:
155:
154:
151:
145:
142:
138:
134:
133:
132:
131:
128:
123:
118:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
326:
323:
307:
295:
269:
257:
245:
225:
212:
199:
174:
171:Keep for now
170:
168:
167:
148:
136:
119:
116:
45:
43:
31:
28:
312:UsaSatsui
250:UsaSatsui
179:UsaSatsui
160:UsaSatsui
141:UsaSatsui
262:Nuttah68
150:Montchav
111:View log
287:Waggers
127:Waggers
84:protect
79:history
296:assert
258:Delete
246:Delete
213:Delete
200:Delete
175:chance
88:delete
46:Delete
217:Corpx
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
282:WP:N
278:This
274:WP:N
270:Keep
226:Note
122:WP:N
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
308:why
272:.
235:--
232:.
137:why
109:– (
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
48:.
169:*
113:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.