Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Bihartimes.com - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

223:
Whoa, I stand corrected--I don't know why my Google News search produced nothing but strange false positives (for instance, a NYT article with no "Bihartimes.com" in it). I'm changing my vote; some of the hits generated by Phil Bridger's search discuss the site in-depth enough, and there are plenty
181: 120: 87: 82: 17: 91: 224:
of mentions that suggest the site is notable. (The article is still overwhelmingly promotional and needs cutting.) Thanks Phil.
74: 140: 250: 36: 249:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
233: 218: 193: 168: 144: 56: 214: 189: 158:
I don't see how; there's one reference to the article, but that's it. Google News gives nothing at all.
206: 128: 78: 136: 210: 185: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
229: 164: 70: 62: 132: 50: 108: 225: 160: 243:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
127:
Awfully promotional article about a news website. Written by
115: 104: 100: 96: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 253:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 209:to go with the one already in the article. 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 1: 234:16:13, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 219:12:50, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 194:12:50, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 169:02:49, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 145:01:00, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 57:00:04, 21 February 2009 (UTC) 270: 246:Please do not modify it. 180:. Google News does give 32:Please do not modify it. 207:Here's another source 131:. Is it notable? — 44:The result was 261: 248: 118: 112: 94: 53: 34: 269: 268: 264: 263: 262: 260: 259: 258: 257: 251:deletion review 244: 129:user:Bihartimes 114: 85: 69: 66: 51: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 267: 265: 256: 255: 239: 238: 237: 236: 199: 198: 197: 196: 172: 171: 125: 124: 71:Bihartimes.com 65: 63:Bihartimes.com 60: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 266: 254: 252: 247: 241: 240: 235: 231: 227: 222: 221: 220: 216: 212: 208: 204: 201: 200: 195: 191: 187: 183: 179: 176: 175: 174: 173: 170: 166: 162: 159: 157: 153:, see below. 152: 149: 148: 147: 146: 142: 138: 134: 130: 122: 117: 110: 106: 102: 98: 93: 89: 84: 80: 76: 72: 68: 67: 64: 61: 59: 58: 55: 54: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 245: 242: 211:Phil Bridger 202: 186:Phil Bridger 177: 155: 154: 150: 126: 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 182:something 141:contribs 133:RHaworth 121:View log 156:Delete. 88:protect 83:history 52:MBisanz 226:Drmies 161:Drmies 116:delete 92:delete 178:Reply 119:) – ( 109:views 101:watch 97:links 16:< 230:talk 215:talk 203:Keep 190:talk 165:talk 151:Keep 137:Talk 105:logs 79:talk 75:edit 46:keep 232:) 217:) 205:. 192:) 184:. 167:) 143:) 139:| 107:| 103:| 99:| 95:| 90:| 86:| 81:| 77:| 48:. 228:( 213:( 188:( 163:( 135:( 123:) 113:( 111:) 73:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
MBisanz
00:04, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Bihartimes.com
Bihartimes.com
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
user:Bihartimes
RHaworth
Talk
contribs
01:00, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Drmies
talk
02:49, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
something
Phil Bridger
talk
12:50, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Here's another source

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.