186:- As I've noted in the original AfD commentary - along with the fact that I simply don't think this site was noteable outside of its tiny little nitch and for a short period of time. What it boils down to is that within a few years of this site shutting down - no one will be looking for the article. The article is also basically an orphan (only 2 links). --
166:
Correct. But take a look through some of those links on their media page. A number of those links are duplicates (the print copy of the online edition, the radio/tv version of the print edition, etc), and a few are to non-reliable groups ex: "weblog diffusion index". Also 5 of the websites in the
149:
says nothing at all about how active a website must be to be notable. Nor does it say anything about when news articles were written, only that "The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself." which this website has.
73:, all news articles are significantly out of date on the media page. Also the forum on the site themself have had no new posts in the last 5 days (as of this writing) which leads me to believe that the site itself is also dead. Additionally, there has been one previous
102:
the article had a lucky escape last time, surviving mainly upon claims that whilst it was marginal, it was an up and coming site. In fact it seems to be near dead, and never achieved any great notability.
122:
74:
231:
255:: I agree that it may have been something before. For historical reasons, it has notability. Article needs stregthening, for sure. --
17:
264:
247:
219:
195:
176:
159:
137:
112:
93:
57:
155:
279:
36:
278:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
191:
172:
89:
151:
260:
243:
187:
168:
132:
108:
85:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
230:- Notability is not temporary. They may have been a splash in the pan, but looking over the
215:
53:
256:
239:
146:
70:
129:
104:
205:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
235:
211:
49:
63:
167:"Website" section alone goto 404's, or otherwise invalid links. --
272:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
234:
for the term suggests that it meets the requirements of
82:
78:
210:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
282:). No further edits should be made to this page.
123:list of Websites-related deletion discussions
8:
121:: This debate has been included in the
77:and several attempts to prod this page,
7:
48:- default to keep. Nonadmin close.
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
265:02:04, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
248:18:38, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
220:04:25, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
58:14:56, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
196:18:54, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
177:18:54, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
160:18:27, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
138:11:57, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
113:11:19, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
94:07:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
299:
69:Article isn't notable per
275:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
222:
140:
126:
290:
277:
232:Google News hits
209:
207:
152:Mahahahaneapneap
135:
127:
117:
34:
298:
297:
293:
292:
291:
289:
288:
287:
286:
280:deletion review
273:
203:
133:
67:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
296:
294:
285:
284:
268:
267:
250:
224:
223:
208:
200:
199:
198:
180:
179:
163:
162:
141:
115:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
295:
283:
281:
276:
270:
269:
266:
262:
258:
254:
251:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
226:
225:
221:
217:
213:
206:
202:
201:
197:
193:
189:
185:
182:
181:
178:
174:
170:
165:
164:
161:
157:
153:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
131:
124:
120:
116:
114:
110:
106:
101:
98:
97:
96:
95:
91:
87:
84:
80:
76:
72:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
274:
271:
252:
227:
204:
188:ShakataGaNai
183:
169:ShakataGaNai
143:
118:
99:
86:ShakataGaNai
68:
46:No consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
253:Weak Keep
64:BluejackQ
257:Revanche
240:Burzmali
130:the wub
105:Mayalld
212:Xymmax
184:Delete
147:WP:WEB
100:Delete
71:WP:WEB
50:Xymmax
16:<
261:talk
244:talk
236:WP:N
228:Keep
216:talk
192:talk
173:talk
156:talk
144:Keep
134:"?!"
119:Note
109:talk
90:talk
83:here
81:and
79:here
54:talk
238:.
128:--
125:.
75:AfD
263:)
246:)
218:)
194:)
175:)
158:)
111:)
92:)
56:)
259:(
242:(
214:(
190:(
171:(
154:(
107:(
88:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.