Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Bleach (anime) - Knowledge

Source πŸ“

1337:
not seeing a merge rationale and its more fury over the fact that an RFC over its split wasn't made. Though no one seems to be questioning notability or relevancy for the adaptation. The movies are less than 1/200th as long yet something larger than the original page can't stay? Sorta seems off. An all-in-one would completely ruin both pages. I've tested it. Check for yourself if your so inclined. We can discuss the "merge" issue after this AFD closes as "keep, discuss merge", but merging the two would put it back to being splittable under size.
1366:
But we have that. And while the reception is one thing, what about the original arcs? What of the veteran cast and their roles? Why not be specific for articles that are specific? If you honestly believe a 150kb+ article covering the aspects of the anime and the manga and everything else is necessary
270:
limits it to being a "manual of style". I think over 40+ references and many worldwide releases is presumption that the anime adaptation which contains a lot of original material is worthy of its own stand alone page. And I think the contentious nature of the repeated blank and redirect is clear that
1141:
It wouldn't really be a happy outcome because he still acted against consensus to produce a page that several people previously said he should not have. The fact that he has to spend 12000 characters describing the music and soundtracks, even with half of it in a table, really shows how much padding
684:
Harry Potter is a sequence of 7 books and 8 movies and god knows what else. Star Wars is two trilogies of movies and a whole bunch of other stuff. Bleach is a still published manga, 300 anime episodes based on that manga, and a bunch of films that have nothing to do with either. The way Japan treats
549:
should be about the franchise itself, since it has a lot of information not just related to the manga: Anime, Soundtrack CDs, Films, Musicals, Trading card game, Video games, Light novels, Other. And what is listed there about the anime, doesn't show the reception just the anime got, or other valid
1336:
I'm sorry, but can no one discuss the merits of the actual issue instead of piling on this "no consensus to first split"? We have 87 sources and 111 original episodes worth of content not found in the manga and not done by Kubo. Now I'm not sure why Ryulong is removing the cast information, but I'm
1164:
conflicts to end and this was included. Anyways, what's done is done and the community gets to decide. I'll clean up the soundtrack section. I didn't realize it was so unwieldy in that format. Ryulong, keep attacking me and calling my additions "bloating" and I'll bring it to Arb Com immediately. I
918:
Thank you for clarifying that. I'm not sure I agree with that assessment, but I will accept it. I must ask about the specific focus being the topic of the anime and how that proper coverage of either the manga or the anime would result in a very long and complex article. More than half the article
903:
The size guidelines refer to the prose size and not to the size of the article's wikicode, which is not considered to be a good measure of the overall length. The pre-split prose size of the Bleach article was just 27 kB, which is well short of the 50 that would make a split advisable. It could be
615:
a franchise. Look it up in a dictionary. It is a media franchise that extends to books, anime, movies, novels, soundtracks, dramas, video games, toys and more. Not sure why you contest that. Though I'd like to point out that the anime reception should be much smaller and the movies and other deals
475:
The plot section contains two paragraphs about two different original arcs not found in the manga. The duplicate parts should be shortened, just link to the manga plot in its article. Voice cast, Production, Music, Episodes, Release, International releases, and Reception sections are all content
1351:
The issue still somewhat stands that anything you say about the anime is pretty much what you can say about the manga and vice versa. Unless there are sources that commend the animation or that relate solely to the storylines that occur only within the anime (or its dub) then there's no reason to
1102:
If ChrisGualtieri can add new material supported by reliable sources to the new anime article, and by doing so he expands it enough to warrant a split of the main article, it would be a happy outcome for both parties IMO. But neither does this mean that it should be expanded just for the sake of
1001:
I've just pulled more sources that I have access to. Like the "Behind the Scenes" documentary, and some academic works. I have added a good amount of necessary Kubo information and added some casting and analysis of the characters. I disagree with Ryulong's removal of the content covering Kubo's
736:
Because I don't think it works in the situation of manga and anime. A franchise page should be created when the subject has existed for such a long time that discussion of the whole gets in the way of discussion of its disparate parts. This has not, in my opinion, happened for various anime and
630:
Again with this franchise page nonsense. These do not work for anime and manga. And really the only place reception of the movies should be on the articles for the movies themselves, if they existed. Otherwise discussion of the animated movies should be in the same location as discussion of the
888:
What talk page consensus? The only thing that was done was edit warring to remove the page and the article is roughly 40kb as it stands right now. And half the references and a ton of content isn't even included yet! Can we please focus on why the anime is not suitable for its own stand alone
755:
Can you stop calling things "shit" and such just because you do not like it? Your enforcement of your personal views at any cost only results in highly confusing and sparsely written pages that do not even cover the adaptations or original content. You believe that the cast and characters are
297:
Its notability cannot be adequately distinguished from the originating manga. Both are notable as a unit rather than notable separately. This split goes against consensuses formed on the two pages I stated. You cannot keep splitting pages on the basis that "it meets GNG" because all of your
873:
makes it clear that the article's size is not a justification for splitting in this case, as anything below 40 kB would fall under "length alone does not justify division" by following the rule of thumb provided in that page. An article with just 27 kB of readable prose is not long by any
737:
manga. You can discuss the anime adaptation of Bleach alongside the original manga easily. All you have to do is say "this only happened in the anime" for shit like the Bount arc or the Captain Amagai arc and you say the anime is over and discuss the Wanderreich arc as part of the manga.β€”
1415:
along with every other silly article about cartoons and comic books. I don't understand what this junk is doing on WP at all, can someone explain to me why you have to establish notability for university professors or orchestral conductors for instance but childish stuff like this gets
298:
references that you find are simply a western view point that overly inflates the presence of the anime version rather than the manga because for whatever stupid reason the manga is always more popular in Japan and the anime is always more popular in foreign territories. That is why
1433:
isn't a valid reason to delete something. Knowledge is mostly popular culture items, and always has been. These are the types of pages that most people visit, and take time to edit and fuss about. Destroying this sort of article won't make the other articles improve any.
703:
They are treated the same way. Bleach is a manga, Anime, Soundtrack CDs, Films, Musicals, Trading card game, Video games, Light novels, Other stuff, including toys. American comic books get turned into cartoons, movies, games, toys, and whatnot, in the same way. Also,
435:
Plot is identical. Cast and characters are identical. Discussion is identical. As I said above, the only reason there are any references critically discussing the anime is because it is exported faster and is the more popular form in Western
476:
not connected to the manga at all. So most of the article is about the anime not the manga. Reliable sources give significant coverage to the anime on its own, so it passes all notability requirements for a Knowledge article.
756:
useless, but these are needed for the GA. Articles must have a proper level of self contained context for their topic and scattering it to the four winds only makes readers who want to access that information unable to do so.
166: 237:) as the basis for his decision that the article should go forth as he and only he plans and constantly demands that discussions regarding redirecting/merging be done at AFD rather than article talk pages by citing 1206:
I did not spend "thousands of characters" on how many tracks. You have once again removed an entire section that you should not have. It needs to be covered on this article and not "mained" out to somewhere else.
1016:
That information concerns the manga and not the anime. If this was a unified manga/anime article it might be valid to cover it, but since you demand that it's an anime only article it doesn't have a place.β€”
1183:
You spent thousands of characters saying how many tracks were on each of the 4 OST disks and made a massive paragraph out of the character song albums. That's padding. And, all I did was move content to
774:
are the one "scattering it to the four winds" by taking all of the anime information off of the main Bleach page. List articles have always existed so I don't know why you think that's "scattering it".β€”
421:
suggests it and the adaptation is completely different. Perhaps you could state why the article should be merged instead of complaining about discussion pre-split. Stick to the content matter please.
520:
is something that isn't a work of fiction to begin with should not be a valid reason to split an article off that would be so difficult to curate simultaneously, which is basically the only reason
705: 770:
When have I ever said I didn't like it? And there has never been this call for a separate page on the anime version of Bleach until you decided it was the best idea since sliced bread. And
310:
and there is no need to completely separate the topics because they are so heavily intertwined as it is should be the selling point as to why you should have not recreated this page.β€”
1056: 234: 119: 160: 578:
It's not a franchise. It's a manga that has an anime adaptation that has films and video game adaptations. It being a franchise is an invention on Knowledge. Tite Kubo's
904:
possible that, since you plan to add lots of content, it might be better to split the article in the future, but for now we're not really close to that point.--
302:
suggests that pages be about both forms the media takes. It cannot forbid the creation of such pages, but the fact that a bunch of editors already decided that
1071: 279:
including both splitting and detail clauses. Ryulong wants this article to be non-existant and clearly there is more than enough information and references.
454:
Chris I am just saying we should have a consensus in place first, this is contested so what will it hurt to have input from the community on the matter? -
1160:
Repeated blank and redirecting, personal attacks and robbing it of the AFD to push this consensus is silly. Not to mention the mediation matter needed
263:- Rather than respond to his rudeness, this is a simple matter. First of all, MOSAM cannot institute its own notability guidelines as per the RFC. 126: 1462:
I do not believe that your comments are helpful to this or any situation, Smeat75. Also, judging by the nearly two hundred combined sources at
1398:. Its WAY better sourced that most "List of X characters" that are kept around here (which, to be clear I don't actually object to either). 1321: 1399: 1250: 855:
per previous talk page consensus, and as an unnecessary content fork of a topic that can adequately be addressed in a single article.--
92: 87: 1367:- then say so. What I foresee is yet more pruning and cutting of content. At such sizes, it is not simple to navigate or comprehend. 616:
should be on the franchise page, or if it becomes a manga centric page - removed. Either way this has no bearing on the current AFD.
217:
but ChrisGualtieri has just gone ahead and gone against consensus to restore the page based on a single complaint made by Niemti at
96: 582:
has never once as far as I am aware been referred to as a "franchise" up until you saying it is one right now. And the only reason
403:, I saw no consensus for a split off here so we should form one on the respectable talk page not bring things like this to AfD. - 181: 919:
would not be applicable to the other half if combined and if a movie can get its own article, why not a 100+ hour long series?
148: 79: 17: 275:
and having it be held for the mediation which Ryulong dropped out of is not a resolution. This article can stand on N/GNG and
1002:
concept, design and name of the series. Especially while I am in the process of better organizing and filling in the gaps.
660: 528:
and the bit of the guideline that stated "it's not a good idea to have separate articles on the anime and the manga".β€”
1430: 654: 142: 1188:
because it's a better location for all of it than having a giant table on the article describing the same content.β€”
650: 1504: 664: 505: 504:
Does description of the filler arcs really mean the anime and the manga are different though? Voice cast is what
40: 662: 516:
was originally about both the manga and the anime. Just because the article is disambiguated as "manga" because
1372: 1342: 1212: 1174: 1007: 924: 894: 761: 675: 621: 459: 426: 408: 363: 288: 138: 1403: 1254: 1112: 909: 879: 860: 818: 509: 357: 355: 264: 218: 1483: 1457: 1425: 1407: 1376: 1361: 1346: 1325: 1304: 1276: 1258: 1240: 1216: 1201: 1178: 1155: 1116: 1078: 1063: 1029: 1011: 996: 978: 950: 928: 913: 898: 883: 864: 847: 830: 787: 765: 750: 731: 698: 679: 644: 625: 606: 573: 541: 499: 463: 449: 430: 412: 385: 367: 354:
MOSAM does not say that though and it is not official and it cannot comment on notability per the two RFCs.
349: 323: 292: 254: 61: 1301: 843: 188: 1500: 1075: 1060: 280: 57: 36: 708:
uses the word "franchise" twice in the opening paragraph. So why would you not use that terminology?
658: 652: 668: 666: 210: 202: 1368: 1338: 1208: 1170: 1003: 920: 890: 757: 671: 617: 455: 422: 404: 359: 284: 198: 174: 83: 656: 1317: 1108: 905: 875: 856: 154: 821:
and the sixteen season lists. The parent article isn't long enough to justify a split either. β€”
1479: 1421: 1395: 1357: 1270: 1234: 1195: 1149: 1023: 990: 944: 839: 838:
No reason to merge or delete this article. It is plenty enough notable and worthy on its own.
826: 781: 744: 692: 670:
Your extreme views aside; they clearly work for Harry Potter, Star Wars and countless others.
638: 600: 535: 443: 379: 343: 317: 248: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1499:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1435: 956: 709: 551: 477: 267: 53: 1246: 1185: 870: 525: 521: 418: 333: 299: 230: 226: 214: 685:
things is different from how Hollywood does and you should not use the same terminology.β€”
1467: 1463: 1297: 583: 546: 513: 400: 329: 307: 303: 272: 238: 222: 206: 75: 67: 1313: 1475: 1417: 1353: 1264: 1228: 1189: 1143: 1017: 984: 938: 822: 775: 738: 686: 632: 594: 529: 437: 373: 337: 311: 276: 242: 113: 1471: 1165:
see no reason that its themes, production or music should be removed. You
817:
as an unnecessary content fork. The differences are adequately covered by
266:
Secondly, MOSAM doesn't say anything ABOUT this and it should not because
1300:, but only because there was no consensus in the first place to split. 517: 1142:
and bloating he is adding to the article to support its splitting.β€”
1493:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
933:
Since you revealed this Underlying lk, ChrisGualtieri has been
1221:
The paragraph about the 4 soundtrack volumes is massive. And
233:
because he is using an AFD that closed as no consensus (see
706:
Knowledge:Manual of Style/Anime- and manga-related articles
631:
animated television series because of same cast, same etc.β€”
372:
Stop saying it's not official because it gets in your way.β€”
1227:
of all people are mad at me for splitting off an article?β€”
1352:
really differentiate between reception of the two media.β€”
955:
You mean expanding the article with more valid content?
590:
because ChrisGualtieri deleted the section from the page
225:, in in direct violation of the guidelines set forth at 205:
that opposed the creation of this page as separate from
1104: 934: 589: 109: 105: 101: 199:
Talk:Bleach (anime)#Proposed merge with Bleach (manga)
173: 1107:
for example, is clearly a list disguised as prose.--
1057:
list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions
983:
No, I don't think I wrote that at all, Dream Focus.β€”
1394:- I'm failing to see where this doesn't fall under 221:. This article is superfluous to the coverage at 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 1507:). No further edits should be made to this page. 508:is for. Music and episodes are covered on the 187: 8: 1169:this article to fail. And that's bad faith. 1070:Note: This debate has been included in the 1055:Note: This debate has been included in the 235:WP:Articles for deletion/Dragon Ball (anime) 52:. No prejudice towards a merge discussion. 1072:list of Japan-related deletion discussions 1069: 1054: 1470:that notability has been established per 935:bloating the article with more content 7: 586:doesn't show reception of the anime 1263:You know, I had not realized that.β€” 550:information found in this article. 24: 1312:per Narutolovehina5's reasoning. 203:Knowledge talk:MOSAM#Bleach break 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 524:editors came together to form 1: 62:00:30, 11 November 2013 (UTC) 1484:19:19, 5 November 2013 (UTC) 1458:19:18, 5 November 2013 (UTC) 1426:19:05, 5 November 2013 (UTC) 1408:14:23, 5 November 2013 (UTC) 1377:03:56, 5 November 2013 (UTC) 1362:03:52, 5 November 2013 (UTC) 1347:03:45, 5 November 2013 (UTC) 1326:03:13, 5 November 2013 (UTC) 1305:01:02, 4 November 2013 (UTC) 1277:15:21, 4 November 2013 (UTC) 1259:14:42, 4 November 2013 (UTC) 1241:11:57, 4 November 2013 (UTC) 1217:11:43, 4 November 2013 (UTC) 1202:08:06, 4 November 2013 (UTC) 1179:23:49, 3 November 2013 (UTC) 1156:21:42, 3 November 2013 (UTC) 1117:20:55, 3 November 2013 (UTC) 1079:17:50, 3 November 2013 (UTC) 1064:17:50, 3 November 2013 (UTC) 1030:17:00, 3 November 2013 (UTC) 1012:15:00, 3 November 2013 (UTC) 997:07:37, 3 November 2013 (UTC) 979:07:28, 3 November 2013 (UTC) 951:07:23, 3 November 2013 (UTC) 929:03:12, 3 November 2013 (UTC) 914:03:04, 3 November 2013 (UTC) 899:01:06, 3 November 2013 (UTC) 884:00:51, 3 November 2013 (UTC) 865:00:31, 3 November 2013 (UTC) 848:00:16, 3 November 2013 (UTC) 831:21:40, 2 November 2013 (UTC) 788:20:02, 2 November 2013 (UTC) 766:18:39, 2 November 2013 (UTC) 751:18:30, 2 November 2013 (UTC) 732:18:18, 2 November 2013 (UTC) 699:17:53, 2 November 2013 (UTC) 680:17:38, 2 November 2013 (UTC) 645:17:34, 2 November 2013 (UTC) 626:17:30, 2 November 2013 (UTC) 607:17:26, 2 November 2013 (UTC) 574:17:22, 2 November 2013 (UTC) 542:17:15, 2 November 2013 (UTC) 500:17:09, 2 November 2013 (UTC) 464:16:58, 2 November 2013 (UTC) 450:16:56, 2 November 2013 (UTC) 431:16:48, 2 November 2013 (UTC) 413:16:42, 2 November 2013 (UTC) 386:17:28, 2 November 2013 (UTC) 368:17:27, 2 November 2013 (UTC) 350:17:16, 2 November 2013 (UTC) 324:16:39, 2 November 2013 (UTC) 306:was entirely superfluous to 293:16:29, 2 November 2013 (UTC) 255:16:16, 2 November 2013 (UTC) 1524: 328:And you should stop using 283:is not a deletion reason. 506:List of Bleach characters 1496:Please do not modify it. 332:to completely disregard 197:There was a decision at 32:Please do not modify it. 1103:keeping them separate: 819:List of Bleach episodes 510:List of Bleach episodes 219:Talk:Ghost in the Shell 229:, and is bordering on 271:it goes to AFD under 1431:WP:I don't like it 1109:eh bien mon prince 906:eh bien mon prince 876:eh bien mon prince 857:eh bien mon prince 48:The result was 1302:Narutolovehinata5 1081: 1066: 473:Keep, don't merge 1515: 1498: 1454: 1451: 1448: 1445: 1442: 1439: 1273: 1267: 1237: 1231: 1198: 1192: 1152: 1146: 1076:Northamerica1000 1061:Northamerica1000 1026: 1020: 993: 987: 975: 972: 969: 966: 963: 960: 947: 941: 784: 778: 747: 741: 728: 725: 722: 719: 716: 713: 695: 689: 641: 635: 603: 597: 570: 567: 564: 561: 558: 555: 538: 532: 496: 493: 490: 487: 484: 481: 446: 440: 382: 376: 346: 340: 320: 314: 251: 245: 192: 191: 177: 129: 117: 99: 34: 1523: 1522: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1505:deletion review 1494: 1452: 1449: 1446: 1443: 1440: 1437: 1271: 1265: 1235: 1229: 1196: 1190: 1186:Music of Bleach 1150: 1144: 1024: 1018: 991: 985: 973: 970: 967: 964: 961: 958: 945: 939: 782: 776: 745: 739: 726: 723: 720: 717: 714: 711: 693: 687: 639: 633: 601: 595: 568: 565: 562: 559: 556: 553: 536: 530: 494: 491: 488: 485: 482: 479: 444: 438: 380: 374: 344: 338: 318: 312: 249: 243: 134: 125: 90: 74: 71: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1521: 1519: 1510: 1509: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1468:Bleach (anime) 1464:Bleach (manga) 1460: 1410: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1369:ChrisGualtieri 1339:ChrisGualtieri 1329: 1328: 1307: 1298:Bleach (manga) 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1209:ChrisGualtieri 1171:ChrisGualtieri 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1067: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1004:ChrisGualtieri 921:ChrisGualtieri 891:ChrisGualtieri 850: 833: 812: 811: 810: 809: 808: 807: 806: 805: 804: 803: 802: 801: 800: 799: 798: 797: 796: 795: 794: 793: 792: 791: 790: 758:ChrisGualtieri 672:ChrisGualtieri 618:ChrisGualtieri 584:Bleach (manga) 547:Bleach (manga) 514:Bleach (manga) 512:articles. And 470: 469: 468: 467: 466: 456:Knowledgekid87 452: 423:ChrisGualtieri 405:Knowledgekid87 401:Bleach (manga) 394: 393: 392: 391: 390: 389: 388: 360:ChrisGualtieri 326: 308:Bleach (manga) 304:Bleach (anime) 285:ChrisGualtieri 281:WP:IDONTLIKEIT 223:Bleach (manga) 207:Bleach (manga) 201:as well as at 195: 194: 131: 76:Bleach (anime) 70: 68:Bleach (anime) 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1520: 1508: 1506: 1502: 1497: 1491: 1490: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1459: 1456: 1455: 1432: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1414: 1411: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1400:192.251.134.5 1397: 1393: 1390: 1389: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1327: 1323: 1322:contributions 1319: 1315: 1314:Lord Sjones23 1311: 1308: 1306: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1292: 1291: 1278: 1274: 1268: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1251:192.251.134.5 1248: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1238: 1232: 1226: 1225: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1199: 1193: 1187: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1163: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1153: 1147: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1080: 1077: 1073: 1068: 1065: 1062: 1058: 1053: 1052: 1031: 1027: 1021: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1000: 999: 998: 994: 988: 982: 981: 980: 977: 976: 954: 953: 952: 948: 942: 936: 932: 931: 930: 926: 922: 917: 916: 915: 911: 907: 902: 901: 900: 896: 892: 887: 886: 885: 881: 877: 872: 868: 867: 866: 862: 858: 854: 851: 849: 845: 841: 837: 834: 832: 828: 824: 820: 816: 813: 789: 785: 779: 773: 769: 768: 767: 763: 759: 754: 753: 752: 748: 742: 735: 734: 733: 730: 729: 707: 702: 701: 700: 696: 690: 683: 682: 681: 677: 673: 669: 667: 665: 663: 661: 659: 657: 655: 653: 651: 648: 647: 646: 642: 636: 629: 628: 627: 623: 619: 614: 610: 609: 608: 604: 598: 592: 591: 585: 581: 577: 576: 575: 572: 571: 548: 545: 544: 543: 539: 533: 527: 523: 519: 515: 511: 507: 503: 502: 501: 498: 497: 474: 471: 465: 461: 457: 453: 451: 447: 441: 436:consumption.β€” 434: 433: 432: 428: 424: 420: 416: 415: 414: 410: 406: 402: 398: 395: 387: 383: 377: 371: 370: 369: 365: 361: 358: 356: 353: 352: 351: 347: 341: 335: 331: 327: 325: 321: 315: 309: 305: 301: 296: 295: 294: 290: 286: 282: 278: 274: 269: 265: 262: 259: 258: 257: 256: 252: 246: 240: 236: 232: 228: 224: 220: 216: 212: 211:WP:PAGEDECIDE 208: 204: 200: 190: 186: 183: 180: 176: 172: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 140: 137: 136:Find sources: 132: 128: 124: 121: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 1495: 1492: 1436: 1412: 1391: 1309: 1293: 1223: 1222: 1166: 1161: 957: 874:standards.-- 869:By the way, 852: 840:Technical 13 835: 814: 771: 710: 612: 587: 579: 552: 478: 472: 396: 260: 196: 184: 178: 170: 163: 157: 151: 145: 135: 122: 50:no consensus 49: 47: 31: 28: 161:free images 54:Mark Arsten 1396:WP:SPINOFF 649:Franchise. 1501:talk page 1416:articles? 889:article? 268:WP:POLICY 37:talk page 1503:or in a 1249:, then? 1247:WP:POINT 871:WP:SPLIT 526:WP:MOSAM 522:WP:ANIME 419:WP:SPLIT 417:At 28kb 334:WP:MERGE 300:WP:MOSAM 231:WP:POINT 227:WP:MOSAM 215:WP:CFORK 120:View log 39:or in a 1476:Ryulong 1418:Smeat75 1354:Ryulong 1266:Ryulong 1230:Ryulong 1191:Ryulong 1145:Ryulong 1019:Ryulong 986:Ryulong 940:Ryulong 823:Xezbeth 777:Ryulong 740:Ryulong 688:Ryulong 634:Ryulong 611:Bleach 596:Ryulong 531:Ryulong 439:Ryulong 375:Ryulong 339:Ryulong 330:WP:BLAR 313:Ryulong 273:WP:BLAR 244:Ryulong 239:WP:BLAR 167:WPΒ refs 155:scholar 93:protect 88:history 1413:Delete 1245:So... 580:Bleach 518:Bleach 139:Google 97:delete 1453:Focus 1310:Merge 1294:Merge 974:Focus 853:Merge 815:Merge 727:Focus 569:Focus 495:Focus 399:with 397:Merge 277:WP:SS 182:JSTOR 143:books 127:Stats 114:views 106:watch 102:links 16:< 1472:WP:N 1466:and 1422:talk 1404:talk 1392:Keep 1373:talk 1343:talk 1318:talk 1255:talk 1213:talk 1175:talk 1167:want 1113:talk 1105:this 1008:talk 925:talk 910:talk 895:talk 880:talk 861:talk 844:talk 836:Keep 827:talk 762:talk 676:talk 622:talk 460:talk 427:talk 409:talk 364:talk 289:talk 261:Keep 213:and 209:per 175:FENS 149:news 110:logs 84:talk 80:edit 58:talk 1296:to 1224:you 1162:all 772:you 588:is 241:. β€” 189:TWL 118:– ( 1482:) 1480:η‰η«œ 1474:.β€” 1424:) 1406:) 1375:) 1360:) 1358:η‰η«œ 1345:) 1324:) 1320:- 1275:) 1272:η‰η«œ 1257:) 1239:) 1236:η‰η«œ 1215:) 1200:) 1197:η‰η«œ 1177:) 1154:) 1151:η‰η«œ 1115:) 1074:. 1059:. 1028:) 1025:η‰η«œ 1010:) 995:) 992:η‰η«œ 949:) 946:η‰η«œ 937:.β€” 927:) 912:) 897:) 882:) 863:) 846:) 829:) 786:) 783:η‰η«œ 764:) 749:) 746:η‰η«œ 697:) 694:η‰η«œ 678:) 643:) 640:η‰η«œ 624:) 613:is 605:) 602:η‰η«œ 593:.β€” 540:) 537:η‰η«œ 462:) 448:) 445:η‰η«œ 429:) 411:) 384:) 381:η‰η«œ 366:) 348:) 345:η‰η«œ 336:.β€” 322:) 319:η‰η«œ 291:) 253:) 250:η‰η«œ 169:) 112:| 108:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 60:) 1478:( 1450:m 1447:a 1444:e 1441:r 1438:D 1420:( 1402:( 1371:( 1356:( 1341:( 1316:( 1269:( 1253:( 1233:( 1211:( 1194:( 1173:( 1148:( 1111:( 1022:( 1006:( 989:( 971:m 968:a 965:e 962:r 959:D 943:( 923:( 908:( 893:( 878:( 859:( 842:( 825:( 780:( 760:( 743:( 724:m 721:a 718:e 715:r 712:D 691:( 674:( 637:( 620:( 599:( 566:m 563:a 560:e 557:r 554:D 534:( 492:m 489:a 486:e 483:r 480:D 458:( 442:( 425:( 407:( 378:( 362:( 342:( 316:( 287:( 247:( 193:) 185:Β· 179:Β· 171:Β· 164:Β· 158:Β· 152:Β· 146:Β· 141:( 133:( 130:) 123:Β· 116:) 78:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Mark Arsten
talk
00:30, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Bleach (anime)
Bleach (anime)
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WPΒ refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Talk:Bleach (anime)#Proposed merge with Bleach (manga)
Knowledge talk:MOSAM#Bleach break

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑