Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/BlockMaster - Knowledge

Source 📝

201:
on freelancer.com which reads "We need help copywriting a text about our company, BlockMaster, and our products for wikipedia. BlockMaster provides a solution for protecting portable data – a secure USB flash drive and a management console. We need someone who can understand high-tech descriptions
162: 325:
magazine) to outperform its competitors (which have articles in Knowledge) has both the right and the need to be presented here, no metter what the motivation of the main contributor is. User: pozytyv (
251:
and do not establish any historical, technical, or cultural significance. And if somebody got paid for this, it's safe to assume that's the best they could come up with. -
208:. This also appears to have sparse notability, as most of the references are to press releases and I am unable to find significant discussion of this company in multiple 281: 117: 156: 269: 213: 198: 122: 228: 90: 85: 17: 94: 177: 144: 77: 352:
per nom. (Although I would see nothing wrong with someone paying for non-spam articles following Knowledge policy.)
376: 36: 375:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
138: 223: 134: 361: 344: 316: 294: 259: 234: 59: 81: 205: 184: 170: 312: 218: 73: 65: 357: 340: 326: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
291: 256: 321:
I still believe, that the company which product is claimed (by such a reliable source as
150: 248: 55: 308: 194: 353: 336: 247:
just to be sure. The references provided are all to minor trade publications with
209: 111: 287: 252: 202:
and who is very familiar with how wikipedia works. Deadline Fri, June 18th."
50: 303:- Goes completely against Knowledge policies as well as the spirit of it. 212:. This is nominated alongside another article created via this job, 322: 369:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
206:
Knowledge is not a medium for companies to promote themselves
193:
This article is a paid-editing piece developed through a
107: 103: 99: 169: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 379:). No further edits should be made to this page. 282:list of Computing-related deletion discussions 270:list of Business-related deletion discussions 183: 8: 276: 264: 307:people to spam Knowledge is just not on. 214:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/SafeStick 280:: This debate has been included in the 268:: This debate has been included in the 7: 292:killing the human spirit since 2003! 257:killing the human spirit since 2003! 24: 329:) 17:16, 19 June 2010 (Kyiv time) 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 243:per nomination, and probably 396: 362:17:30, 20 June 2010 (UTC) 345:13:16, 20 June 2010 (UTC) 317:20:50, 18 June 2010 (UTC) 295:15:33, 18 June 2010 (UTC) 260:15:33, 18 June 2010 (UTC) 235:15:26, 18 June 2010 (UTC) 60:03:53, 25 June 2010 (UTC) 372:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 195:conflict of interest 44:The result was 297: 285: 273: 387: 374: 286: 231: 226: 221: 210:reliable sources 188: 187: 173: 125: 115: 97: 34: 395: 394: 390: 389: 388: 386: 385: 384: 383: 377:deletion review 370: 288:Smerdis of Tlön 253:Smerdis of Tlön 249:small audiences 229: 224: 219: 130: 121: 88: 72: 69: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 393: 391: 382: 381: 365: 364: 347: 330: 319: 298: 274: 262: 191: 190: 127: 123:AfD statistics 68: 63: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 392: 380: 378: 373: 367: 366: 363: 359: 355: 351: 348: 346: 342: 338: 334: 331: 328: 324: 320: 318: 314: 310: 306: 302: 299: 296: 293: 289: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 263: 261: 258: 254: 250: 246: 242: 239: 238: 237: 236: 233: 232: 227: 222: 215: 211: 207: 203: 200: 196: 186: 182: 179: 176: 172: 168: 164: 161: 158: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 136: 133: 132:Find sources: 128: 124: 119: 113: 109: 105: 101: 96: 92: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 70: 67: 64: 62: 61: 57: 53: 52: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 371: 368: 349: 332: 304: 300: 277: 265: 244: 240: 217: 204: 199:this request 192: 180: 174: 166: 159: 153: 147: 141: 131: 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 157:free images 74:BlockMaster 66:BlockMaster 335:per nom. 309:Nuwewsco 118:View log 354:Tomas e 337:Etrigan 163:WP refs 151:scholar 91:protect 86:history 350:Delete 333:Delete 305:Paying 301:Delete 241:Delete 135:Google 95:delete 46:delete 323:eWeek 230:Space 178:JSTOR 139:books 112:views 104:watch 100:links 48:. -- 16:< 358:talk 341:talk 327:talk 313:talk 278:Note 266:Note 245:salt 225:From 220:Them 197:via 171:FENS 145:news 108:logs 82:talk 78:edit 56:talk 51:Cirt 185:TWL 120:• 116:– ( 360:) 343:) 315:) 290:- 284:. 272:. 255:- 216:. 165:) 110:| 106:| 102:| 98:| 93:| 89:| 84:| 80:| 58:) 356:( 339:( 311:( 189:) 181:· 175:· 167:· 160:· 154:· 148:· 142:· 137:( 129:( 126:) 114:) 76:( 54:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Cirt
talk
03:53, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
BlockMaster
BlockMaster
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
AfD statistics
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
conflict of interest
this request
Knowledge is not a medium for companies to promote themselves

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.