Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Blogcritics (2nd nomination) - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

165:. It has received an independent award from Forbes.com, and this seems to be verifiable. Granted, there is still quite a bit of content in the article that needs to be verified or removed, but the rememdy for this is bold editing, not deletion. 149:. Badly formed nomination - tidying it. Since the previous AfD decision was keep, why was there any need to improve the article? But let us see what the "far more sinister cabal of Knowledge (XXG) editors" think. -- 110: 118: 121:, it is still mostly vanity. I don't see a self-proclamed "sinister cabal of superior bloggers" as notable enough to merit its own article. 17: 137: 83: 78: 241: 225: 217:
due to award and syndication. Article relies a bit too much on primary sources, and has tone issues, but that can be fixed. --
205: 193: 181: 153: 52: 87: 70: 256: 36: 255:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
202: 125: 133: 222: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
129: 74: 234: 214: 162: 238: 176: 171: 166: 218: 150: 49: 104: 190: 66: 58: 161:. I think Blogcritics meets at least one criteria for notability as per 249:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
117:
Article has not really been improved in any fashion since
237:. The rationale for deletion is as clear as mud, too. 100: 96: 92: 189:Award winning popular web site. Clearly notable. 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 259:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 1: 201:as notable and popular blog. 276: 252:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 242:23:45, 4 May 2007 (UTC) 226:07:56, 4 May 2007 (UTC) 206:03:33, 4 May 2007 (UTC) 194:23:25, 3 May 2007 (UTC) 182:17:30, 3 May 2007 (UTC) 154:15:22, 3 May 2007 (UTC) 53:05:47, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 203:Capitalistroadster 142: 128:comment added by 267: 254: 179: 174: 169: 141: 122: 108: 90: 34: 275: 274: 270: 269: 268: 266: 265: 264: 263: 257:deletion review 250: 233:, as it passes 177: 172: 167: 123: 81: 65: 62: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 273: 271: 262: 261: 245: 244: 228: 208: 196: 184: 156: 115: 114: 61: 56: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 272: 260: 258: 253: 247: 246: 243: 240: 236: 232: 229: 227: 224: 220: 216: 212: 209: 207: 204: 200: 197: 195: 192: 188: 185: 183: 180: 175: 170: 164: 160: 157: 155: 152: 148: 145: 144: 143: 139: 135: 131: 127: 120: 112: 106: 102: 98: 94: 89: 85: 80: 76: 72: 68: 64: 63: 60: 57: 55: 54: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 251: 248: 230: 210: 198: 186: 158: 146: 124:— Preceding 119:the last AfD 116: 45: 43: 31: 28: 130:Justinm1978 67:Blogcritics 59:Blogcritics 44:Result was 239:Burntsauce 213:, passes 219:Dhartung 151:RHaworth 138:contribs 126:unsigned 111:View log 147:Neutral 84:protect 79:history 50:Caknuck 235:WP:WEB 215:WP:WEB 191:JulesH 178:Litman 163:WP:WEB 88:delete 105:views 97:watch 93:links 16:< 231:Keep 223:Talk 211:Keep 199:Keep 187:Keep 159:Keep 134:talk 101:logs 75:talk 71:edit 48:. — 46:Keep 168:Jay 109:– ( 221:| 140:) 136:• 103:| 99:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 77:| 73:| 173:† 132:( 113:) 107:) 69:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Caknuck
05:47, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Blogcritics
Blogcritics
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
the last AfD
unsigned
Justinm1978
talk
contribs
RHaworth
15:22, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
WP:WEB
Jay

Litman
17:30, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
JulesH
23:25, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.