Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Bloody Fun Day - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

189:
I saw that the Wired piece was a blog (as indicated at the top) and thus thought it would not be a reliable source. Is that incorrect? Because the dead tree press reference is really a very quick passing mention in an editorial - not even an entire paragraph. Do you think that these two establish
317:
I don't think WP:BLOGS is being pointed out here as an official policy or guideline. At least I am not. But the point that is being put across is that something that is called a "Blog" in an established publication such as Wired is a very different animal than WHPQ's blog on games. --
236:
What Mgm said. Blog in this context is really what would be called a "column" in traditional newspapers excpect it doesn't sound as hip or cool. AS for the VUE article, you should read it again. The entire article is about the game. It isn't a passing mention. --
294:
is not policy, it's just a proposal. As regards the above keep, I am unaware of the reliability of sources being dependent on context. As I say, I'm happy to be corrected, if someone can point me to the relevant policy etc. that supports keeping it.
127: 339: 160:- My initial reaction was "Oh brother, yet another browser flash game." But surprisingly, there is coverage in reliable sources. It's reviewed in 94: 89: 134:
Non-notable flash game; the sources are all blogs or similar; could not establish notability from a reliable source through Googling
17: 355:. Game seems to have received sufficient reception, backed up by reliable sources which allowed it to pass the Good article review. 98: 81: 379: 36: 378:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
57: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
229: 364: 346: 327: 312: 282: 246: 231: 207: 177: 151: 63: 85: 50: 343: 278: 225: 291: 221: 360: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
213: 161: 273:
reliable sources. So, I'd say this has sufficient sourcing to pass the notability test.
224:. Blogs can be reliable if they're related to publications with a solid track record. - 323: 305: 242: 200: 173: 144: 77: 69: 274: 356: 220:
for more information on why it's a reliable source. You may also be interested in
115: 165: 267: 217: 319: 298: 238: 193: 169: 137: 263: 290:
If policy arguments can be made, I'd happily withdraw - however,
372:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
262:- I think in the context of an online flash game, websites like 122: 111: 107: 103: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 382:). No further edits should be made to this page. 340:list of video game related deletion discussions 8: 338:: This debate has been included in the 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 164:, and actually was also reviewed in 24: 1: 212:Yes, that's a mistake. See 399: 178:15:30, 30 April 2009 (UTC) 152:23:57, 29 April 2009 (UTC) 375:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 365:17:08, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 347:17:30, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 328:11:57, 2 May 2009 (UTC) 313:03:30, 2 May 2009 (UTC) 283:06:42, 1 May 2009 (UTC) 247:10:10, 1 May 2009 (UTC) 232:10:07, 1 May 2009 (UTC) 208:05:07, 1 May 2009 (UTC) 64:22:24, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 349: 311: 206: 150: 390: 377: 334: 310: 308: 302: 296: 214:Wired (magazine) 205: 203: 197: 191: 149: 147: 141: 135: 125: 119: 101: 60: 53: 44:The result was 34: 398: 397: 393: 392: 391: 389: 388: 387: 386: 380:deletion review 373: 306: 300: 297: 201: 195: 192: 166:dead tree press 145: 139: 136: 121: 92: 76: 73: 58: 51: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 396: 394: 385: 384: 368: 367: 350: 332: 331: 330: 285: 256: 255: 254: 253: 252: 251: 250: 249: 181: 180: 132: 131: 78:Bloody Fun Day 72: 70:Bloody Fun Day 67: 52:American Eagle 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 395: 383: 381: 376: 370: 369: 366: 362: 358: 354: 351: 348: 345: 341: 337: 333: 329: 325: 321: 316: 315: 314: 309: 304: 303: 293: 289: 286: 284: 280: 276: 272: 269: 265: 261: 258: 257: 248: 244: 240: 235: 234: 233: 230: 227: 223: 219: 215: 211: 210: 209: 204: 199: 198: 188: 185: 184: 183: 182: 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 159: 156: 155: 154: 153: 148: 143: 142: 129: 124: 117: 113: 109: 105: 100: 96: 91: 87: 83: 79: 75: 74: 71: 68: 66: 65: 61: 55: 54: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 374: 371: 352: 335: 299: 287: 270: 259: 194: 190:notability? 186: 157: 138: 133: 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 268:Jayisgames 218:Wired News 344:MuZemike 292:WP:BLOGS 275:Robofish 222:WP:BLOGS 128:View log 357:Salavat 288:Comment 187:Comment 95:protect 90:history 48:(NAC). 264:Kotaku 123:delete 99:delete 301:Chzz 196:Chzz 168:. -- 162:Wired 140:Chzz 126:) – ( 116:views 108:watch 104:links 16:< 361:talk 353:Keep 336:Note 324:talk 320:Whpq 279:talk 266:and 260:Keep 243:talk 239:Whpq 216:and 174:talk 170:Whpq 158:Keep 112:logs 86:talk 82:edit 59:talk 46:Keep 271:are 226:Mgm 363:) 342:. 326:) 307:► 281:) 245:) 202:► 176:) 146:► 114:| 110:| 106:| 102:| 97:| 93:| 88:| 84:| 62:) 359:( 322:( 277:( 241:( 228:| 172:( 130:) 120:( 118:) 80:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
American Eagle
talk
22:24, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Bloody Fun Day
Bloody Fun Day
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
 Chzz 
 ► 
23:57, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Wired
dead tree press
Whpq
talk
15:30, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 Chzz 
 ► 
05:07, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Wired (magazine)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.