Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Bryan Jepson - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

324:. Searching on Google for "Bryan Jepson" gives just 271 hits, searching without "" gives 512 Ghits, so I don't know where the figure 8000 mentioned by Snocrates above comes from. As mentioned by Sideshow Bob Roberts, the 4 hits on Google Scholar are not very impressive. Even less impressive is the fact Jepson appears not to have been cited (even the only paper that I could localize in 474:- I haven't looked at this particular article yet, but the autism and anti-vaccine activists have colonized Knowledge (XXG) to a significant extent, meaning that there is a lot of coverage in Knowledge (XXG) on these topics. It's my sense that some of the article contributors may be a bit over-broad in their sense of what is notable on this issue. -- 379:, as far as I can see it is unfiltered. The results page says there are 1090 results, which condense to 271 (with the usual disclaimer of "In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 271 already displayed"). I get exactly the same result using your search above. No clue what is going on here.... -- 517:
An emergency medicine MD, whose contributions WRT to WP:PROF basically amount to one book (per Crusio, above). The book's grounds for notability are dubious, authorship of a single book doesn't imho confer notability. The theories he's supporting (rather than originating, as I understand it) seem
332:, has been cited only 17 times). In short, from Google Scholar and WoS it is clear that this person is not notable as an academic at all. From what I see in Google and above, I don't think that he's notable according to 181: 303: 246:. This person is of no stature, but has simply been inserted in a bid to mislead parents into thinking there is credible opinion to attack vaccines and make money for autism quacks. 113: 150:. But I don't know a lot about autism research, so my vote for deletion can only be one of "weak delete" in light of the google hits, which I haven't completely sifted through. 518:
to pass WP:FRINGE by a wide margin, but I don't see him inheriting encyclopedic notability from writing this book. Since the book is largely a synopsis of work out of the
276: 185: 227:
If he's an "authority", where's the recognition from his peers? If he's "definitely notable", how come he's been so thoroughly ignored by the national media?
224:
and it's not about autism. Four results on Google scholar is, frankly, pathetic. (I return way more hits than that and I'm certainly not notable.)
253: 376: 214:: The first link indicates that he spoke at a conference. The second link indicates that he wrote a book. Neither of these makes him 147: 125: 457:; no notability, as shown above. The Google Scholar information is rather pathetic for a modern scholar writing in the Western world-- 547:
No notable scientific work on autism or anything else. one popular oriented book, with uncritical stories in two local news sources.
17: 430:
Yes, I am, I'll try again from home later.... Later: Nope, exact same results at home. Is the whole of France being filtered?? --
86: 81: 121: 405:
Hm, very strange. Are you searching from a worksite or anywhere that might filter any internet content without your knowledge?
90: 232: 133: 189: 73: 600: 36: 519: 228: 129: 599:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
257: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
504: 249: 578: 582: 558: 539: 508: 483: 466: 439: 409: 388: 362: 345: 316: 289: 261: 236: 204: 172: 154: 146:. Although person has almost 8000 google hits, he doesn't seem to fit well under any of the criteria of 137: 55: 77: 222: 162:: There is one article in a local newspaper covering an appearance, but I don't see enough to fulfill 462: 535: 494: 333: 69: 61: 479: 52: 571: 523: 498: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
163: 527: 435: 384: 341: 458: 313: 286: 531: 522:(as I understand it) a merge to that page may be more appropriate than a keep. He's no 406: 359: 351: 325: 151: 215: 554: 475: 168: 107: 355: 431: 380: 337: 197: 310: 283: 358:
gives me 39,400 hits. Perhaps you're using a filtered search of some kind.
549: 350:
I don't know how you search on google. I use quotes and get 7,730 by
193: 593:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
103: 99: 95: 221:
I could only find one peer-reviewed paper by Jepson
120:Orphaned article about non-notable individual, per 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 304:list of Academics and educators-related deletions 603:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 192:indicate that he is a reputed authority on 302:: This debate has been included in the 275:: This debate has been included in the 493:: Highly notable nutritional doctor. 148:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (academics) 126:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (academics) 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 122:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (people) 277:list of Medicine-related deletions 24: 354:. Searching without quotes using 328:, the above mentioned paper in 1: 56:08:58, 10 December 2007 (UTC) 583:23:13, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 559:22:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 540:20:12, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 509:20:00, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 484:19:58, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 467:18:29, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 440:21:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 410:21:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 389:21:37, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 363:21:10, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 346:18:21, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 317:17:56, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 290:17:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 262:15:35, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 237:17:04, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 205:06:35, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 190:these Google scholar results 173:04:21, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 155:03:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 138:03:35, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 620: 375:This is weird. This is my 566:, not notable per google 520:Autism Research Institute 596:Please do not modify it. 196:. Definitely notable -- 32:Please do not modify it. 229:Sideshow Bob Roberts 130:Sideshow Bob Roberts 530:for that matter. 524:Simon Baron-Cohen 511: 307: 280: 264: 252:comment added by 611: 598: 575: 528:Andrew Wakefield 502: 315: 298: 288: 271: 247: 202: 111: 93: 48: 34: 619: 618: 614: 613: 612: 610: 609: 608: 607: 601:deletion review 594: 573: 526:, nor is he an 309: 282: 198: 84: 68: 65: 46: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 617: 615: 606: 605: 588: 586: 585: 561: 542: 512: 487: 486: 469: 451: 450: 449: 448: 447: 446: 445: 444: 443: 442: 419: 418: 417: 416: 415: 414: 413: 412: 396: 395: 394: 393: 392: 391: 368: 367: 366: 365: 326:Web of Science 319: 296: 293: 292: 269: 266: 265: 254:86.138.124.221 240: 239: 225: 219: 208: 207: 175: 157: 118: 117: 64: 59: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 616: 604: 602: 597: 591: 590: 589: 584: 580: 576: 569: 565: 562: 560: 556: 552: 551: 546: 543: 541: 537: 533: 529: 525: 521: 516: 513: 510: 507:was added at 506: 500: 496: 492: 489: 488: 485: 481: 477: 473: 470: 468: 464: 460: 456: 453: 452: 441: 437: 433: 429: 428: 427: 426: 425: 424: 423: 422: 421: 420: 411: 408: 404: 403: 402: 401: 400: 399: 398: 397: 390: 386: 382: 378: 374: 373: 372: 371: 370: 369: 364: 361: 357: 353: 349: 348: 347: 343: 339: 335: 331: 327: 323: 320: 318: 314: 312: 305: 301: 297: 295: 294: 291: 287: 285: 278: 274: 270: 268: 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 245: 242: 241: 238: 234: 230: 226: 223: 220: 217: 213: 210: 209: 206: 203: 201: 195: 191: 187: 183: 179: 176: 174: 171: 170: 165: 161: 158: 156: 153: 149: 145: 142: 141: 140: 139: 135: 131: 127: 123: 115: 109: 105: 101: 97: 92: 88: 83: 79: 75: 71: 67: 66: 63: 60: 58: 57: 54: 53:Mailer Diablo 50: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 595: 592: 587: 567: 563: 548: 544: 514: 490: 471: 454: 336:, either. -- 329: 321: 299: 272: 243: 211: 199: 177: 167: 159: 143: 119: 70:Bryan Jepson 62:Bryan Jepson 45: 43: 31: 28: 515:weak delete 503:—Preceding 356:this search 352:this search 248:—Preceding 144:Weak delete 459:Prosfilaes 330:Pediatrics 532:Pete.Hurd 407:Snocrates 360:Snocrates 334:WP:FRINGE 152:Snocrates 476:Lquilter 250:unsigned 169:MastCell 114:View log 574:Georgia 568:scholar 505:comment 472:Comment 216:notable 212:Comment 164:WP:PROF 87:protect 82:history 564:Delete 545:Delete 455:Delete 432:Crusio 381:Crusio 377:search 338:Crusio 322:Delete 244:delete 200:¿Amar៛ 194:autism 160:Delete 91:delete 572:Sandy 311:A. B. 284:A. B. 108:views 100:watch 96:links 49:elete 16:< 579:Talk 555:talk 536:talk 499:talk 495:john 491:Keep 480:talk 463:talk 436:talk 385:talk 342:talk 300:Note 273:Note 258:talk 233:talk 188:and 186:this 182:This 178:Keep 134:talk 124:and 104:logs 78:talk 74:edit 51:. - 570:. 550:DGG 501:) 308:-- 306:. 281:-- 279:. 184:, 112:– ( 581:) 557:) 538:) 482:) 465:) 438:) 387:) 344:) 260:) 235:) 180:: 166:. 136:) 128:. 106:| 102:| 98:| 94:| 89:| 85:| 80:| 76:| 577:( 553:( 534:( 497:( 478:( 461:( 434:( 383:( 340:( 256:( 231:( 218:. 132:( 116:) 110:) 72:( 47:d

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Mailer Diablo
08:58, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Bryan Jepson
Bryan Jepson
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Knowledge (XXG):Notability (people)
Knowledge (XXG):Notability (academics)
Sideshow Bob Roberts
talk
03:35, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Knowledge (XXG):Notability (academics)
Snocrates
03:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
WP:PROF
MastCell
04:21, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
This
this
these Google scholar results

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.