166:
119:
214:
160:
433:
395:
be able to claim that they'd passed GNG if coverage of the campaign itself were all it took. Accordingly, coverage of the campaign itself is deemed to fall under
235:
as non-notable. I haven't been able to find sufficient independent sources about this person to suggest that they meet our notability guidelines.
126:
17:
92:
87:
96:
79:
181:
148:
329:
554:
40:
262:
407:
beyond the ordinary level of coverage that all candidates can always be expected to garner (e.g. what happened to
333:
508:
487:
362:
324:
for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the
240:
142:
197:
Not notable as a political candidate, only other relevance is 3 obscure clinical guidelines research papers.
535:
516:
495:
473:
445:
420:
370:
352:
305:
267:
244:
224:
221:
206:
138:
61:
550:
257:
83:
36:
411:
in 2010.) But with just one source here, nothing even remotely like that has been demonstrated so far.
408:
346:
be created and retained on that basis, even if the person had not been notable prior to the campaign.
202:
188:
57:
483:
396:
253:
466:
236:
174:
75:
67:
486:. Is there a relevant 2015 Canadian election campaign article that might be a valid redirect? --
350:
358:
531:
441:
416:
301:
218:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
549:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
457:
315:
273:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
504:
339:
154:
198:
53:
460:
as an unelected politician. The article can be recreated if he is elected to
Parliament.
461:
338:" I take that to mean that if coverage during the campaign was sufficient to pass the
325:
347:
527:
437:
412:
311:
297:
272:
Unelected candidates for office do not get articles just for being candidates, per
113:
319:
276:— if you cannot make and properly source a credible claim that he would
280:
have been eligible for a
Knowledge (XXG) article for some other reason
296:, without prejudice against recreation on October 19 if he wins.
543:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
399:, except in the exceedingly rare circumstance that the coverage
361:- if all the coverage were related to the campaign .... --
320:
3. Just being an elected local official, or an unelected
482:
he wins the election he would certainly deserve notice,
109:
105:
101:
288:
notable enough for a
Knowledge (XXG) article until he
173:
187:
284:becoming a candidate for office, then he does not
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
557:). No further edits should be made to this page.
387:garner local coverage in their local media — so
215:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
8:
432:Note: This debate has been included in the
213:Note: This debate has been included in the
434:list of Canada-related deletion discussions
431:
212:
458:our notability guideline for politicians
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
505:Calgary_Heritage#Election results
336:of the subject of the article".
517:23:00, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
496:02:44, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
474:23:39, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
446:23:37, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
421:22:53, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
371:22:38, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
353:22:35, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
306:23:36, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
268:22:18, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
245:19:12, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
225:00:12, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
207:00:06, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
1:
328:of "significant coverage in
326:primary notability criterion
536:17:18, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
62:20:03, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
574:
310:That isn't quite correct,
478:from the sources i found
546:Please do not modify it.
526:- Unelected politician.
32:Please do not modify it.
512:aka The Red Pen of Doom
491:aka The Red Pen of Doom
366:aka The Red Pen of Doom
375:In addition to BLP1E,
409:Christine O'Donnell
252:as appears to fail
318:actually says is "
513:
492:
448:
391:candidates would
367:
227:
565:
548:
514:
511:
493:
490:
471:
469:Let's discuss it
368:
365:
337:
330:reliable sources
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
573:
572:
568:
567:
566:
564:
563:
562:
561:
555:deletion review
544:
509:
488:
467:
403:into something
363:
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
571:
569:
560:
559:
539:
538:
521:
520:
519:
476:
450:
449:
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
379:candidates in
373:
292:the election.
270:
247:
237:Cordless Larry
229:
228:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
570:
558:
556:
552:
547:
541:
540:
537:
533:
529:
525:
522:
518:
515:
506:
502:
499:
498:
497:
494:
485:
481:
477:
475:
472:
470:
465:
464:
459:
455:
452:
451:
447:
443:
439:
435:
430:
429:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
372:
369:
360:
356:
355:
354:
351:
349:
345:
342:, an article
341:
335:
331:
327:
323:
317:
313:
309:
308:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
269:
266:
265:
261:
260:
255:
251:
248:
246:
242:
238:
234:
231:
230:
226:
223:
220:
216:
211:
210:
209:
208:
204:
200:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:Brendan Miles
73:
72:
69:
68:Brendan Miles
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
545:
542:
523:
500:
479:
468:
462:
453:
404:
401:nationalizes
400:
392:
388:
384:
380:
376:
343:
321:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
263:
258:
249:
232:
219:Everymorning
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
49:
47:
31:
28:
484:however....
334:independent
161:free images
397:WP:ROUTINE
383:elections
254:WP:NPERSON
199:FUNgus guy
54:Courcelles
551:talk page
332:that are
322:candidate
37:talk page
553:or in a
501:redirect
359:WP:BLP1E
264:computer
120:View log
39:or in a
528:Carrite
438:Bearcat
413:Bearcat
316:WP:NPOL
314:. What
312:Bearcat
298:Bearcat
278:already
274:WP:NPOL
259:Rubbish
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
524:Delete
510:TRPoD
489:TRPoD
463:Cullen
456:Fails
454:Delete
393:always
385:always
364:TRPoD
357:Well,
340:WP:GNG
294:Delete
286:become
282:before
250:Delete
233:Delete
222:(talk)
139:Google
97:delete
50:delete
344:could
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
532:talk
442:talk
417:talk
302:talk
290:wins
256:. --
241:talk
203:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
507:--
503:to
405:far
389:all
381:all
377:all
348:DES
189:TWL
118:– (
52:.
534:)
480:if
444:)
436:.
419:)
304:)
243:)
217:.
205:)
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
530:(
440:(
415:(
300:(
239:(
201:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.