141:- Very much a marginal case for inclusion. The article claims that he's written a book; if the book in question was published by a major company and/or had a wide circulation, then he's notable. If no sources can be found to demonstrate this, however, then I can't see that the rest of his career constitutes notable activity.
240:
all results come up as wikipedia or mirrors, or another individual with same name. Book not listed on Amazon dot com. Book not assigned an ISBN. Involvement with
Basketball Canada was not significant enough to be on the Basketball Canada website (via site search), shouldn't be here either.
222:. I think that the individual achievements add up to notability, particularly helping to get millions of dollars in compensation for hepatitis C victims from the Canadian federal government. --
187:
is the large
Canadian government development agency that my friend works for, and his IDRC is something to do with real estate and has merged to form CoreSat Global or something. --
121:
201:
309:
272:, influenced a government decision. If we included him just for that, we'd have to include the whole board. Unless something else can be added, I'd
268:
It reads more like a vanity article than a hoax. I don't really see anything there. The closest thing is that he was on the board of a group which,
183:- I can't find any sign of "Mojito". The International Development Research Council rang major bells for me, but it appears that the IDR
94:
89:
98:
153:- On the lower edge of wiki notability standards. low g hits. I removed most recent prod only because it had been contested before
17:
81:
321:
255:
Lots of notability is asserted, but no sources are provided. In fact, I can't find any sources at all. Thus, there is a major
241:
Involvement with
Hepatitis is good, but only if backed by multiple non-trivial sources, which the article does not provide.
342:
36:
341:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
142:
325:
298:
280:
263:
245:
226:
211:
191:
173:
161:
145:
132:
63:
85:
77:
69:
317:
259:
problem. The article may even be a hoax, since creating it was the original creator's only edit. --
242:
170:
57:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
277:
313:
158:
129:
256:
291:
223:
208:
295:
50:
115:
260:
188:
335:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
154:
111:
107:
103:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
345:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
200:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
202:list of Canada-related deletions
1:
326:06:18, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
299:00:23, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
281:23:43, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
264:23:22, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
246:22:52, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
227:22:12, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
212:22:12, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
192:22:07, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
174:22:06, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
162:17:19, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
159:-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider)
146:16:56, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
133:15:08, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
64:15:08, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
362:
236:. A7. Does not pass the
338:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
312:comment was added by
143:Walton monarchist89
238:search engine test
329:
214:
205:
128:lacks notability
353:
340:
307:
206:
196:
119:
101:
60:
53:
34:
361:
360:
356:
355:
354:
352:
351:
350:
349:
343:deletion review
336:
308:—The preceding
306:- non-notable.
169:, non-notable.
92:
78:Brian L. French
76:
73:
70:Brian L. French
62:
58:
51:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
359:
357:
348:
347:
331:
330:
301:
285:
284:
283:
249:
248:
230:
229:
216:
215:
194:
177:
176:
164:
148:
126:
125:
72:
67:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
358:
346:
344:
339:
333:
332:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
305:
302:
300:
297:
293:
289:
286:
282:
279:
276:this one. --
275:
271:
267:
266:
265:
262:
258:
257:verifiability
254:
251:
250:
247:
244:
239:
235:
232:
231:
228:
225:
221:
218:
217:
213:
210:
203:
199:
195:
193:
190:
186:
182:
179:
178:
175:
172:
168:
165:
163:
160:
156:
152:
149:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:
135:
134:
131:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
61:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
337:
334:
303:
287:
273:
269:
252:
243:Jerry lavoie
237:
233:
219:
197:
184:
180:
171:Deltabeignet
166:
150:
138:
127:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
151:Weak Delete
139:Weak Delete
278:JGGardiner
314:Turgidson
288:Weak Keep
220:Weak Keep
130:Mayumashu
322:contribs
310:unsigned
292:Eastmain
270:arguably
224:Eastmain
209:Eastmain
122:View log
59:(o rly?)
296:Mista-X
274:delete.
253:Delete.
95:protect
90:history
52:Majorly
304:Delete
261:N Shar
234:Delete
185:Centre
181:Delete
167:Delete
99:delete
46:delete
116:views
108:watch
104:links
16:<
318:talk
290:per
198:Note
189:Slp1
155:here
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
207:--
204:.
157:.
120:– (
324:)
320:•
294:--
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
48:.
328:.
316:(
124:)
118:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.