Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Brian R. Banks - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

542:
book, but possibly not about him points to a symposium he spoke at, not a third-party source presumably is a link to another book of his but it's unclear, in any case, not RS is to liner notes that he wrote, not RS. So we've really got nothing about him. The book itself is cited all of 12 times in G-Scholar, held in about 250 libraries in Worldcat. Not an entirely bad showing, but nothing that would save this article.
471:. I see no real coverage of him, especially in those academic reviews. Four reviews of one book do not create "significant critical attention". Continued discussion in reliable sources of the ideas presented and citation may. (GoogleScholar shows a whopping twelve citations to the book.) He has not had that kind of impact and has not 367:). Yes, there's CREATIVE 4c: ""The person's work (c) has won significant critical attention". Are several reviews in academic press sufficient? Perhaps. It's very borderline. I'd rather suggest this is rewritten into an article about a book, which could have a section about its otherwise unnotable author. -- 541:
There are sources, but they are clearly inadequate to provide verifiability for the content of the article. For example, cite fails to verify the biographical information the precedes it. is a reference to his book, which should not be a reference but in a bibliography section is a review of his
163: 116: 304:
and that only suggests instead that the book is notable but perhaps not him (??). I would've also said keep only if the article was actually going to be improved though.
239:
There are sources on the page (pretty clear form the visible footnote numbers). Creator apparently did not know how to create refs. Page needs someone ot fix the notes.
157: 277: 257: 586:
for now. If the book is notable then write an article about it and redirect this there; authors do not inherit notability from their notable books.
123: 363:. One of his books got several academic reviews. This probably means that the book is notable, but I don't see why this would extend to him ( 337:
Knapp, Bettina L.. 1993. Review of The Image of Huysmans. The French Review 66 (3). American Association of Teachers of French: 510–10.
89: 84: 17: 93: 76: 178: 524:-- My impression was of very limited notability. However this is not my field of expertise, so I am not formally voting. 145: 497: 415: 388: 194:
Limited notability, an internet search mainly pulls up web pages run by the author himself, or pages selling his books.
617: 40: 285: 451: 139: 310: 529: 598: 578: 551: 533: 514: 488: 455: 436: 406: 379: 354: 315: 289: 269: 248: 230: 200: 135: 58: 281: 613: 350: 265: 244: 226: 36: 476: 185: 594: 447: 218: 564: 364: 305: 171: 80: 468: 214: 209:
Lousy, promo of an article. A total mess. However, a quick search on JSTOR shows that his book
525: 53: 213:
was widely reviewed, albeit waaay back before Al Gore invented the internet. He easily passes
402: 373: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
612:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
325:
Antosh, R. B.. (1992). . Nineteenth-century French Studies, 21(1/2), 239–240. Retrieved from
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
547: 484: 346: 261: 240: 222: 151: 560: 587: 446:
I would say this meets CREATIVE 4c as mentioned above with the multiple academic reviews.
196: 427: 72: 64: 300:
and draft and userfy instead as my searches simply found nothing better than that one
568: 508: 398: 369: 110: 543: 480: 559:- Not seeing enough independent coverage of the author to show that he passes 567:
either. LaMona's and Bejnar's analyses, in particular, are pretty spot on.
326: 301: 331:
Cevasco, G. A.. (1992). . The Modern Language Review, 87(3), 756–757.
338: 332: 221:, you probaly want to withdraw this AFD and just tag the article. 606:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
500:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
418:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
391:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
106: 102: 98: 170: 506:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 424:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 397:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 184: 361:Weak delete/merge/rewrite into the book's article 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 620:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 278:list of England-related deletion discussions 276:Note: This debate has been included in the 258:list of Authors-related deletion discussions 256:Note: This debate has been included in the 275: 255: 370:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 345:There are more reviews of this book. 327:http://www.jstor.org/stable/23533410 473:won significant critical attention 339:http://www.jstor.org/stable/397460 24: 333:http://doi.org/10.2307/3733003 1: 552:20:37, 28 December 2015 (UTC) 534:15:12, 27 December 2015 (UTC) 515:00:47, 27 December 2015 (UTC) 489:07:19, 26 December 2015 (UTC) 456:15:18, 18 December 2015 (UTC) 437:12:23, 18 December 2015 (UTC) 407:01:19, 10 December 2015 (UTC) 563:, and doesn't qualify under 380:07:33, 8 December 2015 (UTC) 355:11:45, 6 December 2015 (UTC) 316:08:15, 6 December 2015 (UTC) 290:21:51, 5 December 2015 (UTC) 270:19:33, 4 December 2015 (UTC) 249:20:23, 3 December 2015 (UTC) 231:19:57, 3 December 2015 (UTC) 201:19:26, 3 December 2015 (UTC) 599:19:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC) 579:12:24, 4 January 2016 (UTC) 365:notability is not inherited 59:20:21, 4 January 2016 (UTC) 637: 609:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 467:is notable under #1 of 475:and thus fails 4c of 465:The Image of Huysmans 211:The Image of Huysmans 219:User talk:Smileguy91 48:The result was 517: 439: 435: 409: 292: 282:Shawn in Montreal 272: 57: 628: 611: 592: 575: 572: 511: 505: 503: 501: 434: 432: 425: 423: 421: 419: 396: 394: 392: 376: 313: 308: 189: 188: 174: 126: 114: 96: 56: 34: 636: 635: 631: 630: 629: 627: 626: 625: 624: 618:deletion review 607: 590: 573: 570: 518: 509: 496: 494: 448:RickinBaltimore 440: 428: 426: 414: 412: 410: 387: 385: 378: 374: 311: 306: 131: 122: 87: 71: 68: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 634: 632: 623: 622: 602: 601: 581: 554: 536: 504: 493: 492: 491: 458: 422: 411: 395: 384: 383: 382: 368: 343: 342: 335: 329: 323: 318: 307:SwisterTwister 298:Delete for now 294: 293: 273: 253: 252: 251: 234: 233: 192: 191: 128: 73:Brian R. Banks 67: 65:Brian R. Banks 62: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 633: 621: 619: 615: 610: 604: 603: 600: 596: 589: 585: 582: 580: 577: 576: 566: 562: 558: 555: 553: 549: 545: 540: 537: 535: 531: 527: 526:Peterkingiron 523: 520: 519: 516: 513: 512: 502: 499: 490: 486: 482: 478: 474: 470: 466: 462: 459: 457: 453: 449: 445: 442: 441: 438: 433: 431: 420: 417: 408: 404: 400: 393: 390: 381: 377: 371: 366: 362: 359: 358: 357: 356: 352: 348: 340: 336: 334: 330: 328: 324: 322: 319: 317: 314: 309: 303: 299: 296: 295: 291: 287: 283: 279: 274: 271: 267: 263: 259: 254: 250: 246: 242: 238: 237: 236: 235: 232: 228: 224: 220: 216: 212: 208: 205: 204: 203: 202: 199: 198: 187: 183: 180: 177: 173: 169: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 141: 137: 134: 133:Find sources: 129: 125: 121: 118: 112: 108: 104: 100: 95: 91: 86: 82: 78: 74: 70: 69: 66: 63: 61: 60: 55: 54:Seraphimblade 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 608: 605: 583: 569: 556: 538: 521: 507: 495: 472: 464: 460: 443: 429: 413: 386: 360: 344: 320: 297: 210: 206: 195: 193: 181: 175: 167: 160: 154: 148: 142: 132: 119: 49: 47: 31: 28: 477:WP:CREATIVE 347:E.M.Gregory 262:E.M.Gregory 241:E.M.Gregory 223:E.M.Gregory 158:free images 588:Ivanvector 565:WP:NAUTHOR 430:Sandstein 375:reply here 302:JSTOR link 197:smileguy91 614:talk page 469:WP:NBOOKS 463:His book 215:WP:AUTHOR 37:talk page 616:or in a 498:Relisted 416:Relisted 389:Relisted 117:View log 39:or in a 522:Comment 510:MBisanz 399:Natg 19 321:Sources 164:WP refs 152:scholar 90:protect 85:history 584:Delete 561:WP:GNG 557:Delete 544:LaMona 539:Delete 481:Bejnar 461:Delete 136:Google 94:delete 50:delete 179:JSTOR 140:books 124:Stats 111:views 103:watch 99:links 16:< 595:talk 574:5969 571:Onel 548:talk 530:talk 485:talk 479:. -- 452:talk 444:Keep 403:talk 351:talk 312:talk 286:talk 266:talk 245:talk 227:talk 207:KEEP 172:FENS 146:news 107:logs 81:talk 77:edit 217:. 186:TWL 115:– ( 597:) 591:🍁 550:) 532:) 487:) 454:) 405:) 353:) 288:) 280:. 268:) 247:) 229:) 166:) 109:| 105:| 101:| 97:| 92:| 88:| 83:| 79:| 52:. 593:( 546:( 528:( 483:( 450:( 401:( 372:| 349:( 341:. 284:( 264:( 260:. 243:( 225:( 190:) 182:· 176:· 168:· 161:· 155:· 149:· 143:· 138:( 130:( 127:) 120:· 113:) 75:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Seraphimblade
20:21, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Brian R. Banks
Brian R. Banks
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
smileguy91
19:26, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
WP:AUTHOR

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.