545:. Or keep at least some of them. The Shropshire, Staffordshire and Warwickshire Leagues are all feeder leagues to ECB Premier Leagues, which are the highest level of amateur club cricket in England, and possibly others are too. I wouldn't support having articles on the individual clubs that make up these leagues, but the leagues themselves are, IMO, worth retaining as an integral part of the pyramid structure of English cricket. I think User:Jhall1's point about notability for other WikiProjects is also a consideration, and I'm swayed also by the fact that another sport with a similar pyramid structure, soccer, has lots of articles on leagues that appear much more geographically constrained than these are, and are further down that sport's structure.
508:
I thought it was convenient to collect them together, but feel free to express different opinions on each one if you wish. I don't regard age as necessarily conveying notability, because vast numbers of sports clubs and competitions were founded in
England towards the end of the nineteenth century,
489:
The problem with group nominations is that these are all different things. The
Priestley Cup isn't a league for instance. It's a one hundred year old cup competition for teams in the Bradford League. How many sports competitions are a hundred years old without becoming notable? There'd be a lot
493:
for instance for last years final. I'd say these leagues and competitions have a much greater lineage than most of the US college sports which get covered in
Knowledge and considering that soccer gets covered way down the ladder of acceptability I don't understand why these quite senior leagues
530:- none seems notable from a cricket viewpoint, with the possible exception of the Priestley Cup. One caveat: I see that North Somerset Cricket League has been adopted by the Somerset WP, and it is conceivable that the league might be notable from their perspective. JH (
83:
78:
87:
70:
370:
365:
374:
357:
278:
273:
74:
445:
I am nominating several amateur cricket leagues in
England for deletion. None of the articles make any claim to notability, or cite any independent sources, and thus they fail
282:
116:
324:
319:
265:
328:
140:
135:
144:
66:
58:
574:- I'm undecided on the others, but the cup competition definitely seems to have gained notability through the years. I do lean towards Keep to the leagues as well.
416:
411:
311:
564:
477:
420:
127:
232:
227:
403:
361:
236:
219:
583:
554:
535:
518:
503:
466:
52:
353:
269:
315:
131:
261:
186:
181:
407:
190:
491:
17:
450:
307:
223:
173:
123:
399:
598:
215:
36:
597:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
514:
462:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
499:
579:
510:
458:
49:
177:
495:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
550:
531:
454:
575:
490:
of press coverage over that course in time, here's an article from the
Yorkshire Post
446:
169:
453:, and none of them is even at the top level of English amateur cricket according to
437:
391:
345:
299:
253:
207:
161:
104:
546:
591:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
433:
429:
425:
387:
383:
379:
341:
337:
333:
295:
291:
287:
249:
245:
241:
203:
199:
195:
157:
153:
149:
111:
100:
96:
92:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
67:Bristol & District Cricket Association League
59:Bristol & District Cricket Association League
601:). No further edits should be made to this page.
509:and I don't think that makes them all notable.
8:
565:list of England-related deletion discussions
478:list of Cricket-related deletion discussions
559:
472:
563:: This debate has been included in the
476:: This debate has been included in the
354:Staffordshire Club Cricket Championship
449:. They are each confined to a single
48:to delete, which defaults to keep. --
7:
24:
262:Shropshire Premier Cricket League
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
308:South Yorkshire Cricket League
1:
584:22:28, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
555:21:12, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
536:19:45, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
519:13:29, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
504:12:20, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
467:10:34, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
124:North Somerset Cricket League
572:Keep Priestley Cup for sure
400:Warwickshire Cricket League
618:
216:Shropshire Cricket League
53:21:04, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
594:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
494:should get the chop.
568:
481:
609:
596:
441:
423:
395:
377:
349:
331:
303:
285:
257:
239:
211:
193:
165:
147:
114:
108:
90:
34:
617:
616:
612:
611:
610:
608:
607:
606:
605:
599:deletion review
592:
414:
398:
368:
352:
322:
306:
276:
260:
230:
214:
184:
168:
138:
122:
110:
81:
65:
62:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
615:
613:
604:
603:
587:
586:
569:
557:
539:
538:
524:
523:
522:
521:
511:Stephen Turner
483:
482:
459:Stephen Turner
451:English county
443:
442:
396:
350:
304:
258:
212:
166:
120:
61:
56:
50:Moonriddengirl
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
614:
602:
600:
595:
589:
588:
585:
581:
577:
573:
570:
566:
562:
558:
556:
552:
548:
544:
541:
540:
537:
533:
529:
526:
525:
520:
516:
512:
507:
506:
505:
501:
497:
492:
488:
485:
484:
479:
475:
471:
470:
469:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
439:
435:
431:
427:
422:
418:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
376:
372:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
330:
326:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
284:
280:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
238:
234:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
192:
188:
183:
179:
175:
171:
170:Priestley Cup
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
146:
142:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
118:
113:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
593:
590:
571:
560:
542:
527:
496:Nick mallory
486:
473:
444:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
576:matt91486
532:talk page
455:this list
117:View log
487:Comment
417:protect
412:history
371:protect
366:history
325:protect
320:history
279:protect
274:history
233:protect
228:history
187:protect
182:history
141:protect
136:history
84:protect
79:history
547:Johnlp
528:Delete
447:WP:ORG
421:delete
375:delete
329:delete
283:delete
237:delete
191:delete
145:delete
112:delete
88:delete
438:views
430:watch
426:links
392:views
384:watch
380:links
346:views
338:watch
334:links
300:views
292:watch
288:links
254:views
246:watch
242:links
208:views
200:watch
196:links
162:views
154:watch
150:links
115:) – (
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
580:talk
561:Note
551:talk
543:Keep
515:Talk
500:talk
474:Note
463:Talk
434:logs
408:talk
404:edit
388:logs
362:talk
358:edit
342:logs
316:talk
312:edit
296:logs
270:talk
266:edit
250:logs
224:talk
220:edit
204:logs
178:talk
174:edit
158:logs
132:talk
128:edit
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
582:)
567:.
553:)
534:)
517:)
502:)
480:.
465:)
457:.
436:|
432:|
428:|
424:|
419:|
415:|
410:|
406:|
390:|
386:|
382:|
378:|
373:|
369:|
364:|
360:|
344:|
340:|
336:|
332:|
327:|
323:|
318:|
314:|
298:|
294:|
290:|
286:|
281:|
277:|
272:|
268:|
252:|
248:|
244:|
240:|
235:|
231:|
226:|
222:|
206:|
202:|
198:|
194:|
189:|
185:|
180:|
176:|
160:|
156:|
152:|
148:|
143:|
139:|
134:|
130:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
578:(
549:(
513:(
498:(
461:(
440:)
402:(
394:)
356:(
348:)
310:(
302:)
264:(
256:)
218:(
210:)
172:(
164:)
126:(
119:)
109:(
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.