311:"significant roles in multiple notable... televisions shows": While she plays the same character in both series, both have international broadcasters, including BBC station CBBC. The Next Step is in its fourth season, with 125 episodes. Often children's series get 65 episodes, the "magic number" for syndication, so any series with more can be considered very commercially-viable.
539:
I grant that the original reference for her 2017 nomination was problematic, and not even just because it's a community weekly newspaper and not a major market daily — it's also an article that merely happens to glancingly namecheck
Brittany Raymond's existence in a "other local actors who also got
388:
Sorry, just realizing that your comment refers to the whole argument. Yes, those don't appear in the article, yet. But that's something that could have been requested using {{Notability|date=January 2017}}. Yes, there's lots of spam on
Knowledge, but editors should act on the assumption of innocent
457:
This is the first I've heard of the frequency of a media outlet coming into play. Where would I read more about this determinant? Brampton used to have a paid daily (The
Conservator), but it was largely supplemented with wire stories. While the Guardian has shrunk since then, the number of local
317:"has made... prolific... contributions to a field of entertainment": to have appeared in 131 episodes of scripted TV series in the first four years of your career is a substantial rate. I'm just discovering, through the news link at the top of this nomination, that she has performed live
581:
I find myself generally writing tldr notes at Afds justifying my !votes. But what
Bearcat writes is absolutely perfect. I couldn't have written better (or less). Keep it is, with advise for improvements to the article.
163:
342:
241:
314:"large fan base": 348k followers on Instagram, the best barometer of fan base for youth celebrities. The global following is large enough that she has a biography on the Spanish Knowledge.
458:
stories in both were roughly the same, just more spread out amongst the dailies. Given the state of local media as a whole in North
America, a dailies-only policy is worrisome. --
116:
157:
261:
304:. Yes, she's only been nominated once for a Canadian Screen Award, the top screen acting prize in Canada, so that general criteria isn't reached. But in Entertainers:
281:
123:
89:
84:
338:
93:
552:
Brittany
Raymond. I've replaced that source with a more appropriate one, and added a couple of other sources as well — it still needs
76:
497:
if the notability claim amounts to "notable because she's been in stuff", in which case we do require multiple stuffs — but it is
178:
17:
501:
relevant if the notability claim is "notable because she's been nominated for a top-level award in her field", in which case
145:
489:
nominations for an entertainment award before being nominated for an entertainment award counts as a claim of notability —
322:
289:
269:
249:
522:
514:
139:
609:
40:
318:
590:
573:
467:
452:
398:
383:
369:
354:
293:
273:
253:
232:
215:
58:
135:
285:
265:
245:
560:
article status, so it should still be flagged for referencing improvement, but the base notability claim
605:
365:
333:
228:
211:
185:
80:
54:
36:
171:
583:
569:
505:
nomination is enough so long as it's properly sourced. And, for that matter, even if a person
463:
448:
394:
379:
350:
151:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
604:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
361:
224:
207:
199:
72:
64:
195:
513:
have multiple nominations: for some reason
Zanimum just mentioned her nomination at the
374:
The (old) weekly combined stat, 345,000 copies, is in the article, in the infobox. --
493:
nomination is enough if properly sourced. The word "multiple" only becomes relevant to
494:
404:
203:
206:. No awards or multiple nominations. A few biographies in small local newspapers.
565:
459:
444:
390:
375:
346:
110:
509:
require "multiple" nominations to qualify as notable because nominations, she
403:
If the claim of notability is "notable because media coverage exists ergo
545:
337:
has a circulation of 116k or 129k, depending on the day of the week,
415:
of the community's size, for that claim to actually be satisfied —
525:
in 2015 as well. So even if notability because award nominations
598:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
521:
the fact that she was nominated in the same category at the
481:
and flag for reference improvement. For the record, it is
242:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
419:
could be used as supplementary sourcing for stray facts
556:
sources before it can get a quality class promotion to
106:
102:
98:
170:
427:been satisfied by stronger sourcing, but it cannot
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
612:). No further edits should be made to this page.
262:list of Television-related deletion discussions
339:according to 2015 audited circulation figures
184:
8:
389:until proven guilty, not the opposite. --
282:list of Ontario-related deletion discussions
280:Note: This debate has been included in the
260:Note: This debate has been included in the
240:Note: This debate has been included in the
279:
259:
239:
431:the GNG in and of itself as an article's
439:a valid notability claim here, but the
548:, not an article that's even remotely
540:nominations" coda to an article whose
485:necessary for an entertainer to have
7:
443:article has nothing to do with it.
411:newspapers, not community weeklies
343:9th largest municipality in Canada
24:
331:As per "small local newspapers",
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
360:This is not in the article.
591:19:19, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
574:18:13, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
468:12:46, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
453:18:13, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
399:23:18, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
384:23:13, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
370:21:26, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
355:06:21, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
294:00:09, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
274:00:09, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
254:00:09, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
233:19:08, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
216:23:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
59:08:36, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
629:
564:now properly covered off.
523:3rd Canadian Screen Awards
515:5th Canadian Screen Awards
435:source. That said, there
341:. Brampton itself is the
601:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
222:Withdrawn by nominator
537:multiple nominations.
417:The Brampton Guardian
334:The Brampton Guardian
533:nominations, she
441:Brampton Guardian
407:", then it takes
296:
286:Shawn in Montreal
276:
266:Shawn in Montreal
256:
246:Shawn in Montreal
620:
603:
588:
189:
188:
174:
126:
114:
96:
73:Brittany Raymond
65:Brittany Raymond
57:
34:
628:
627:
623:
622:
621:
619:
618:
617:
616:
610:deletion review
599:
584:
517:in 2017, while
131:
122:
87:
71:
68:
53:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
626:
624:
615:
614:
594:
593:
576:
538:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
401:
386:
329:
328:
327:
326:
319:in New Zealand
315:
312:
306:
305:
298:
297:
277:
257:
236:
235:
192:
191:
128:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
625:
613:
611:
607:
602:
596:
595:
592:
589:
587:
580:
577:
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
555:
551:
547:
543:
536:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
512:
508:
504:
500:
496:
492:
488:
484:
480:
477:
476:
469:
465:
461:
456:
455:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
400:
396:
392:
387:
385:
381:
377:
373:
372:
371:
367:
363:
359:
358:
357:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
335:
324:
320:
316:
313:
310:
309:
308:
307:
303:
300:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
278:
275:
271:
267:
263:
258:
255:
251:
247:
243:
238:
237:
234:
230:
226:
223:
220:
219:
218:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
187:
183:
180:
177:
173:
169:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
137:
134:
133:Find sources:
129:
125:
121:
118:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
66:
63:
61:
60:
56:
55:North America
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
600:
597:
585:
578:
561:
557:
553:
549:
541:
534:
530:
526:
518:
510:
506:
502:
498:
490:
486:
482:
478:
440:
436:
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
332:
330:
301:
221:
193:
181:
175:
167:
160:
154:
148:
142:
132:
119:
49:
47:
31:
28:
544:subject is
362:Magnolia677
323:in Scotland
225:Magnolia677
208:Magnolia677
158:free images
50:speedy keep
413:regardless
606:talk page
200:WP:ANYBIO
37:talk page
608:or in a
546:Simu Liu
531:multiple
529:require
487:multiple
423:GNG had
196:WP:BASIC
117:View log
39:or in a
586:Lourdes
566:Bearcat
542:primary
519:missing
460:Zanimum
445:Bearcat
425:already
391:Zanimum
376:Zanimum
347:Zanimum
345:. --
164:WP refs
152:scholar
90:protect
85:history
495:WP:ENT
405:WP:GNG
204:WP:ENT
202:, and
194:Fails
136:Google
94:delete
550:about
429:bring
421:after
409:daily
179:JSTOR
140:books
124:Stats
111:views
103:watch
99:links
16:<
579:Keep
570:talk
558:good
554:more
511:does
479:Keep
464:talk
449:talk
433:only
395:talk
380:talk
366:talk
351:talk
321:and
302:Keep
290:talk
270:talk
250:talk
229:talk
212:talk
172:FENS
146:news
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
535:has
527:did
507:did
503:one
499:not
491:one
483:not
186:TWL
115:– (
52:.
572:)
562:is
466:)
451:)
437:is
397:)
382:)
368:)
353:)
292:)
284:.
272:)
264:.
252:)
244:.
231:)
214:)
198:,
166:)
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
568:(
462:(
447:(
393:(
378:(
364:(
349:(
325:.
288:(
268:(
248:(
227:(
210:(
190:)
182:·
176:·
168:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
143:·
138:(
130:(
127:)
120:·
113:)
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.