Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Brooklyn Matters - Knowledge

Source 📝

287:- the first reference seems to be a passing reference to the movie. I can't read the ALM article as I don't want to spend $ 15, however searching for the title of the film shows an excerpt that would indicate that it is only a passing mention. The third reference is an actual review of the movie. -- 335:! Please, and what would that be today? So we should just throw away information? After the sites provided above demonstrate that, the film has received secondary and third source reviews? I am sorry, 121: 167:- based on one solid reliable source, I think it would be appropriate to give it a bit more time to see if other sources can be dug up to establish notability. -- 88: 83: 148:- no reliable sources to indicate that this documentary is notable. No indication of awards or other types of critical recognition. -- 92: 75: 17: 48:, leaning strongly towards keep with the new sources found at the end of this discussion. Please add sources to the article. 261:. I believe that is enough 3rd party – independent – creditable and reliable sources to establish notability. Thanks 420: 128:
Non-notable film. Can't find an entry for it on IMDB, it doesn't have any references and has no incoming links.
36: 419:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
248: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
405: 355: 315: 296: 277: 232: 211: 176: 157: 137: 57: 255: 79: 384: 332: 387: 342: 264: 241: 223: 380: 348: 311: 270: 245: 198: 53: 394: 259: 133: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
71: 63: 401: 252: 376: 390: 292: 172: 153: 307: 204: 192: 49: 372: 129: 109: 186:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
397: 288: 168: 149: 306:
Reviewing sources above, this does not meet our notability standard.
386:, as the documentary seems to have raised high emotions in Brooklyn 413:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
116: 105: 101: 97: 378:
The article was, not too unsurprisingly, reviewed in
191:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 423:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 371:It was also spoken about extensively at the 222:Fails all notability guidelines for films. 258:posted an extensive article as shown here 244:reviewed the Documentary as shown here 7: 24: 251:credits the film as shown here 46:No consensus defaulting to Keep 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 406:21:12, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 356:01:49, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 316:23:39, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 297:03:18, 24 February 2008 (UTC) 278:23:48, 22 February 2008 (UTC) 233:23:18, 22 February 2008 (UTC) 212:22:58, 22 February 2008 (UTC) 177:03:18, 24 February 2008 (UTC) 158:15:22, 17 February 2008 (UTC) 138:20:15, 15 February 2008 (UTC) 440: 58:13:42, 1 March 2008 (UTC) 416:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 240:– I am sorry, but the 256:People's Weekly World 333:Notability Standards 375:'s NYPC Radio Show. 242:New York Daily News 381:The Brooklyn Paper 354: 276: 230: 214: 208: 431: 418: 353: 351: 340: 275: 273: 262: 228: 226: 225:Ten Pound Hammer 209: 206: 201: 195: 190: 188: 119: 113: 95: 72:Brooklyn Matters 64:Brooklyn Matters 34: 439: 438: 434: 433: 432: 430: 429: 428: 427: 421:deletion review 414: 393:also treats it 349: 341: 271: 263: 224: 205: 199: 193: 184: 115: 86: 70: 67: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 437: 435: 426: 425: 409: 408: 396:. You judge.-- 391:Gotham Gazette 365: 364: 363: 362: 361: 360: 359: 358: 319: 318: 300: 299: 281: 280: 235: 229:and his otters 216: 215: 189: 181: 180: 179: 161: 160: 126: 125: 66: 61: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 436: 424: 422: 417: 411: 410: 407: 403: 399: 395: 392: 388: 385: 383: 382: 377: 374: 370: 367: 366: 357: 352: 346: 345: 338: 334: 330: 327: 326: 325: 324: 323: 322: 321: 320: 317: 313: 309: 305: 302: 301: 298: 294: 290: 286: 283: 282: 279: 274: 268: 267: 260: 257: 253: 250: 246: 243: 239: 236: 234: 227: 221: 218: 217: 213: 210: 202: 196: 187: 183: 182: 178: 174: 170: 166: 163: 162: 159: 155: 151: 147: 146: 142: 141: 140: 139: 135: 131: 123: 118: 111: 107: 103: 99: 94: 90: 85: 81: 77: 73: 69: 68: 65: 62: 60: 59: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 415: 412: 379: 373:Brian Lehrer 368: 343: 336: 328: 303: 284: 265: 249:ALM Research 237: 219: 185: 164: 144: 143: 127: 45: 43: 31: 28: 337:I disagree 207:Disclaimer 165:Weak Keep 344:Shoessss 308:Eusebeus 266:Shoessss 122:View log 50:Davewild 369:Comment 329:Comment 285:Comment 247:. The 130:Lugnuts 89:protect 84:history 389:. The 331:– Our 304:Delete 220:Delete 194:Keeper 145:Delete 117:delete 93:delete 398:Aldux 350:Chat 272:Chat 120:) – ( 110:views 102:watch 98:links 16:< 402:talk 339:. 312:talk 293:talk 289:Whpq 254:and 238:Keep 173:talk 169:Whpq 154:talk 150:Whpq 134:talk 106:logs 80:talk 76:edit 54:talk 231:• 203:| 197:| 404:) 347:| 314:) 295:) 269:| 200:76 175:) 156:) 136:) 108:| 104:| 100:| 96:| 91:| 87:| 82:| 78:| 56:) 400:( 310:( 291:( 171:( 152:( 132:( 124:) 114:( 112:) 74:( 52:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Davewild
talk
13:42, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Brooklyn Matters
Brooklyn Matters
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
Lugnuts
talk
20:15, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Whpq
talk
15:22, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Whpq
talk
03:18, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Keeper
76
Disclaimer

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.