504:: The default criterion is something about citable sources that document significant and more than local coverage. But, there are catagories that have inherent notabiliy. I think licensed local radio stations and there may be some for athletes too. An encyclopedia is supposed to make the obscure accessible to the ignorant masses without being advertising. I'd look for inherent notability in various catagoies or athlete. Driving a tractor in a sporting event should qualify for "athlete" status especially if the regulating body has any national significance ( like NFL or MLB etc FWIW). LOL.
477:
251:
first people in the world to create of of these monsters. I included the team's website so that if nothing else, it can be verified that this truck does exist in a real sport. I suppose if there isn't a chance to make this page worthy of
Knowledge (XXG) delete users, then there ain't no reason to be workin' on it then, huh? Oh, and cheers.--
250:
Maybe it's just me, but I don't see how a multi-million dollar Mack Semi is a piece of farm equipment, but nonetheless, this is a professional sport and this specific team has been competing since 1984, and the owner, who I am not merely looking up on the internet, but am related to, was one of the
366:
It's a valid objection. Shouldn't the same rules apply to "tractor pulls" that apply to other motor sports? Or, for that matter, other competitions that are big enough to play sports arenas? I agree with you that most of the sports articles on here are "other crap", but until the threshold is
228:
are popular arena entertainment. Although I've never been to one of these events, I've known many a person who paid to watch the competition and see their favorite trucks and drivers. It's no less of a professional sport than drag racing or automobile racing. The website
381:
You are right, the same rules should apply to all sports. This sport does not get the reliable source coverage that other sports receive. The lack of coverage in reliable sources means a lack of coverage in wikipedia as
154:
232:
confirms the article's claim that the "Buckeye
Bulldog" is at the top of its super-semi competition. To me, this easily passes the low threshhold of notability that Knowledge (XXG) confers upon sports.
115:
148:
185:
NN tractor. Do we have a notability requirement for farm equipment? there had been a prod from another editor on the article, denied by the creator.--
230:
275:
I agree entirely with that. Speaking of farm equipment, I've heard that people enjoy watching horses run around an oval. Can you imagine?
225:
88:
83:
92:
17:
520:
and of course the tractor itself should be inherently notable for "Winning" in such a competition as any other Gold medal winner.
75:
169:
136:
542:
485:
451:
due to the apparent lack of multiple independent reliable sources about the subject and conflict of interest concerns.
340:
36:
444:
448:
48:. There is no clear consensus here over whether this merits an article or not based on the notability guidelines.
525:
509:
325:
256:
130:
541:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
529:
513:
496:
460:
432:
394:
376:
357:
329:
308:
284:
260:
242:
216:
194:
126:
57:
473:
321:
302:
It may be a professional sport and it may be good at it, but I dont see anything that makes this notable.
252:
176:
521:
505:
79:
372:
367:
raised on sports, its more of a matter of equal application of the rules, not of othercrapexists.
280:
238:
162:
452:
412:
190:
53:
456:
354:
317:
208:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
142:
204:
71:
63:
423:
368:
303:
276:
234:
383:
186:
49:
349:
109:
490:
388:
481:
469:
207:, doesn't assert notability for the tractor. Then take a ride on my
415:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
535:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
105:
101:
97:
161:
316:
What makes the article in question not notable while
224:
Perhaps it's because I live in redneck country, but
420:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
175:
545:). No further edits should be made to this page.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
386:can not be established without coverage.
488:. I think there is enough to keep it.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
343:. We are discussing the merits of
24:
445:Template:Infobox Buckeye Bulldog
339:: Your argument is invalid, per
449:Template:Infobox Buckeyebulldog
215:, his otters and a clue-bat •
1:
530:12:26, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
514:12:25, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
497:12:20, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
461:11:42, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
433:08:09, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
395:12:27, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
377:19:08, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
358:19:00, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
330:06:31, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
309:06:16, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
285:17:15, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
261:05:09, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
243:16:14, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
217:19:58, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
195:15:56, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
58:09:55, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
320:one is? Notice Sec. 3.6 --
562:
538:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
482:won class in this event
356:
341:WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS
44:The result was
486:2009 points champ
435:
431:
348:
209:Big Green Tractor
553:
540:
493:
430:
428:
421:
419:
417:
391:
352:
306:
214:
213:Ten Pound Hammer
180:
179:
165:
113:
95:
34:
561:
560:
556:
555:
554:
552:
551:
550:
549:
543:deletion review
536:
522:Nerdseeksblonde
506:Nerdseeksblonde
491:
478:mention in this
424:
422:
410:
389:
350:
322:Benjamin.bachna
304:
253:Benjamin.bachna
226:"tractor pulls"
212:
122:
86:
72:Buckeye Bulldog
70:
67:
64:Buckeye Bulldog
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
559:
557:
548:
547:
532:
517:
516:
499:
463:
437:
436:
418:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
397:
333:
332:
311:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
289:
288:
287:
264:
263:
245:
219:
183:
182:
119:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
558:
546:
544:
539:
533:
531:
527:
523:
519:
518:
515:
511:
507:
503:
500:
498:
495:
494:
487:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
464:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
442:
439:
438:
434:
429:
427:
416:
414:
409:
408:
396:
393:
392:
385:
380:
379:
378:
374:
370:
365:
364:
363:
362:
361:
360:
359:
355:
353:
346:
342:
338:
335:
334:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
312:
310:
307:
301:
298:
297:
286:
282:
278:
274:
273:
272:
271:
270:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
262:
258:
254:
249:
246:
244:
240:
236:
231:
227:
223:
220:
218:
210:
206:
202:
201:Speedy delete
199:
198:
197:
196:
192:
188:
178:
174:
171:
168:
164:
160:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
135:
132:
128:
125:
124:Find sources:
120:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
537:
534:
501:
492:~~ GB fan ~~
489:
465:
440:
425:
411:
390:~~ GB fan ~~
387:
344:
336:
313:
299:
247:
221:
200:
184:
172:
166:
158:
151:
145:
139:
133:
123:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
468:- there is
443:along with
149:free images
426:Sandstein
384:notability
347:article.
369:Mandsford
277:Mandsford
235:Mandsford
413:Relisted
248:Response
187:Syrthiss
116:View log
50:Davewild
502:Comment
453:Adambro
351:Cocytus
337:Comment
155:WP refs
143:scholar
89:protect
84:history
484:, and
441:Delete
300:Delete
205:WP:IAR
127:Google
93:delete
170:JSTOR
131:books
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
526:talk
510:talk
474:this
470:this
466:Keep
457:talk
447:and
373:talk
345:this
326:talk
318:this
314:Keep
281:talk
257:talk
239:talk
222:Keep
203:per
191:talk
163:FENS
137:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
177:TWL
114:– (
528:)
512:)
480:,
476:,
472:,
459:)
375:)
328:)
283:)
259:)
241:)
211:.
193:)
157:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
524:(
508:(
455:(
371:(
324:(
305:Q
279:(
255:(
237:(
189:(
181:)
173:·
167:·
159:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
134:·
129:(
121:(
118:)
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.